Avem un concurs mai aparte:

[FREE RAFFLE + CAVEAT] 🔶 7 of 8 limited edition BCB prints 🔶 Whats the catch?
Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5412649

Organizator: aoluain

Se poate castiga:
Ei, aici nu sunt sigur ca am inteles bine..
In prima faza se castiga un "negativ" pentru colorat. Acela trebuie colorat si trimis inapoi prin posta. Pe baza acestora se vor tipari niste postere in serie limitata.
Daca am inteles corect, castigatorii vor primi apoi un poster tiparit.


Poate participa oricine.
Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar (care nu a fost deja rezervat) de la 01 la 21
Transportul este gratuit, dar castigatorii trebuie sa coloreze "negativul" si sa il trimita inapoi prin posta pe cheltuiala lor.

Concurs incheiat.

All transactions containing an address are under that address in a blockchain explorer, it's not an advanced option.
But maybe you indeed want something (much) more complicated (which you either didn't express well, either I misunderstood). And then you may want to take a look at this topic (and related pages) : Bitcoin in SQL

Keep in mind that, at least in EU, having no-KYC cards require the card total top-up, for the entire card lifetime, is somewhere around 250 EUR. So the minimum 300$ sounds fishy (and greedy).
Of course, there can be done tricks like issuing the cards on others' names, but that is also risky, possibly illegal, and clearly overly expensive.

EU has pretty much done this - and there are discussions for doing this even better - but UK is not in EU, heh...

But I would be very careful with UK new PM. She seems to tell/promise a lot of nice things and I'm afraid she won't be able to fulfill all of that because, you know, public funds is usually a limited resource.
However, the first few "promises" getting implemented may "be lucky". Fingers crossed.

It doesn't matter much. Just look at his trust feedback (and flag).. and move on. You will probably be wasting your time for nothing if you do otherwise.

All in all, I do like it. It's my fav block explorer and putting it onto tor is a good step forward.
However, who is handling the hosting / has access to the data (logs?) in there? (is it only you?)


It works for me...

Sent you a PM. I hope it's not too bad


One culprit may be ref links and the expectation some may be earning a few pennies off it.

I think that $20k is doable in most western countries. The problem is that most of those affording $20k don't trust bitcoin so they invest so much in that.
Somehow we forget that we're still a small community; and we also forget that this is only the beginning, bitcoin is still young.

I knew about your scripts. But this time it's not only about phrases, it's also (or more) about where these posts are also located.
Do those scripts also handle this? Because if so I will start looking for phrases when this kind of topics pop up.

The only information I've found is about "custom integration"


I guess that best would be e-mail them (support@coinatmradar.com) and ask.
And if the answers you get are not what you'd like (i.e. if it's a paid service), you can look for the (few) competitors, maybe you get lucky.

That Amulet is spamming mindlessly everything, from bitcoin discussion to meta and local boards.
I keep reporting them but I wish a mod would add some keywords into a script and just remove automatically those posts, especially if they're not in altcoin discussion/announements areas.

I don't know how you plan your setup, but it may worth keeping in mind that ASICs are very noisy devices.
So if you plan to do this at "home" scale, and actually at home, ASIC may be a problematic choice.

On the altcoins mining part I cannot advise, that you may want to ask in altcoin mining sub.

You're right. This also helped to keep very low value altcoins on trade, where bitcoin 8 digits after decimal point wouldn't have suffice.

Also I've checked now how many trade pairs USDT has on Binance and I was surprised - they're more than BUSD or BNB, probably more than BTC too - then it struck me: binance.com has no USD and the replacement was (and is!) USDT.

So yes, we have now a much better answer to OP question.

Because while 1 pool operator can randomly become evil, the chance for more than one do that decreases by a huge degree?
Because maybe FUD was working better back then than now?
I don't know. But ask yourself: did that pool get evil and has done 51% attacks (and why not)?

That would be wishful thinking.

Maybe somebody has the numbers about how much USDT is transferred in and out of Binance on a daily basis, but I have a feeling the numbers may be bigger than for fiat. And then delisting USDT would be an awfully bad business.



The second one is USDC, not USDT 
But wasn't market cap an useless parameter to measure?

And they are so stupid and malicious they will team up to destroy bitcoin - which now brings them nice money - instead of stay clean and keep earning... right?
It's funny to read that you tell others they're wrong, when you are the one decoupled from reality.

While I could have been wording that better (only the ending part of the strategy was bad / missing), if you start with insulting people that will never prove your point.


If you make a strategy for winning when your car is that slow, unless you have Ayrton Senna at the wheel it means that you've smoked the wrong pot (and please don't come with bedtime stories about how good driver is Lewis).
Compared to the golden days they were pretty much expecting the unexpected and were one step in front of RBR, now they've adapted poorly. Leaving Hamilton with medium tyres when pretty much everybody had softs simply cannot end good. On soft tyres people get much faster (was it 1 second less per lap?) and they know all that. Indeed, the only good window for that may have been when the pack went through the paddock and maybe changing tyres for both pilots then would have been bad for Russell for short term, at least.
But if they would have been doing that, both cars could have been ending before Ferrari - which is the team they are battling now, not RBR.


With their winning mentality (lol to that), they've screwed it up. Just look at Hamilton swearing at near the end of the race.
They've lost valuable points. They're only lucky that Ferrari wants to win the title for the team that sabotages itself best over the history of F1.


OK, that does make sense for long term.. and would have if safety cars (virtual or not) wouldn't have been spoiling their plans. And in F1 they pretty much have to expect the unexpected and take advantage of everything they can. Well, they didn't. In the last laps they could have had a chance for holding positions only with softs, period.


While keeping the team together is a nice thought, while he is fighting for his team, this, instead of getting people more focused into doing their job perfectly, has the opposite effect: the team seems to be sloppier and sloppier with every week passing by. The strategy seems to be missing (I mean, not long ago they asked the pilot how he wants the strategy?!), the tyre changes go randomly bad, .. it's clearly easy to comment from outside, but something does look wrong there.

My address is also OK.

He is right: it's more hype than substance. But no, that direction is not a dead technology, there is some (small amount of) "substance" there after all.
Yes, they're far from making it consumer grade. Yes, since it's extremely prone to errors, and also it needs to stay at very low temperatures and protected from any kind of vibrations, it's almost like we want to build something meant to not work on Earth. But this only means that they have more work to do.
Also if the funding will (ever) get depleted, this idea will probably get halted, not buried. And maybe a fresh idea can change everything.

So, exactly like with "bitcoin is dead", I would not be so eager to announce the death of QC. I could be too easily get proven I'm wrong.

P14 (!)


Mercedes strategy was pretty bad. But while Russell was smart enough to get advantage of the pit lane situation, Hamilton wasn't.


I simply don't understand what is Ferrari doing. They are constantly sabotaging themselves. Completely unprofessional.


Yeah. I said I'll bet on him and I (sadly) didn't because was travelling again in the weekend. I've missed all the practice, qualifying and race too. I've just seen today a rerun of the race.
The race was interesting, especially the last 1/3 of it.

---

Does anybody know the backgrounds of the incident when Vettel ignored blue flags and didn't let Hamilton pass? Any official excuse, or was it meant as a "farewell salute"?