Good god, don't make me ask you about your childhood. Why does this gif infuriate you so much, and what will happen to you once I show the next gif I am preparing? /jk
|
|
|
Provocation ? She is working out and promoting fitness Exactly, what's not to love? More to come soon...
|
|
|
hm? So what is your definition of a darkcoin girl?
A smart girl who can be appreciated because of his skills and who don't need to use make up and cosmetics, who don't try to manipulate the man. where did you see make up and cosmetics? I only saw CURVES, CURVY CURVES all the way!!! Also, I believe you meant to say "her skills", not "his skills"...
|
|
|
No slut here pls. hm, she's hot as f***? So what is your definition of a darkcoin girl?
|
|
|
Even a Darkoshi?
I believe it is called a "duff", in honour of eduffield. Yes, even a duff is welcomed.
|
|
|
Darkcoin rises! I could create gifs like that all day! Feel free to! If you like my memes, please donate DRK: XtAdMy5nSxArut6rKKLQXxm84rpJNipXibEvery satoshi helps... I need to save for my masternode...
|
|
|
Darkcoin rises! I could create gifs like that all day!
|
|
|
can't seem to reach the website anymore.... down?
|
|
|
This was just released. You posted that in the darkcoin thread too? Are you trying to harm zetacoin with this action? A**hole!
|
|
|
Congratulations to all darkcoin supporters and devs.Also congratulations to all the trolls, who - with their constant futile trolling - showed the whole world how important this coin is. Thanks everybody.
|
|
|
Lol I put like $15 into MZC back in the day...is now worth approximately 1.7 cents. Don't think I've ever seen a coin fall as bad as MZC did. Live and learn...
Did you not see Aurora coin ? Aurora was not this bad.. This grew in the shadow of Aurora and this was just another pump and dump coin. Too bad, I was dumb enough to loose half my stack in this useless coin. Not blaming the coin, blaming myself and the couple of days I had to stay away from my computer. Basic trading 101: You don't invest in something during its IPO... you wait for it to find a floor, and THEN you invest. Now is the best time to invest in mazacoin. Not during the hyped "IPO" (if we were to compare mazacoin to a stock)
|
|
|
I know this is probably cliche in most of the communities right now, but just remember, 1 MZC = 1 MZC, this currency was designed to be the currency of a nation and people looking solely to the exchange rate with bitcoin are looking at it wrong, the same as people who only look at Bitcoin as it relates to FIAT. These are currencies that are meant to stand alone. Now linking MZC to staple purchases, Flour, Sugar, Milk, etc, will be beneficial for the nations that choose to adopt MZC.
Yep, that is the way we must look at cryptocurrencies in general. Namely as complementary currencies. So that people have a backup currency in place should something go wrong with the USDollar (hyperinflation?)... You can't put a complementary currency in place AFTER the hyperinflation happens... it needs to be in place NOW.
|
|
|
So merge-mining feature will not be part of this fork, did I see that right?
|
|
|
based on yesterday trading volume it would only take 15 years to repay the missing amounts.
kinda makes you question their whole approach... it's like buying government bonds or something...
|
|
|
Oh and one last thing: exchanges do *not* create rallies. They are trading platforms. It is the traders (like you and me) that create rallies.
How would you know? The internal workings of an exchange are completely opaque to us outsiders. I hope that in the future we will get some kind of more transparent decentralized way of exchanging currencies. At the moment we have to assume that anything an exchange reports (volume, pricelevel, reserves(?)) is unreliable. PS: I am happy that you can use such rallies to offset previous losses you made, but I for one would have liked the price of devcoin to stay low for a little longer so I could be able to accumulate more millions. That's probably why the possible fakeness of this rally annoys me so much. lol
|
|
|
All websites that are online to date have vulnerabilities, so your statement that Vircurex should be taken offline makes no sense, we would just be losing a good exchange for no good reason.
I'd rather have a constant churning of faulty exchanges going under, and new better exchanges replacing them, so that real innovation can happen. So that the customers win. This is a business that does not allow for any mistake. I am sorry to tell you. Apparently you have an axe to grind with Vircurex, well so be it. I can't change a closed mind. I will stop replying to this thread.
I needed to offset the surprisingly very pro-vircurex sentiment here with a little reality checking. Now back to devcoin. I'd rather see devcoin create some real growth coming from real innovation, instead of relying on some odd rallies created by obscure exchanges.
|
|
|
From your description, I get the impression that you do *not* understand their payback plan. They pay back from their source of income - the fees on the exchange. If they stop the exchange, they will never be able to pay back.
They can get a bankloan or work another job, and pay us all back. Putting the weight on their own shoulders, not ours! Why do you make it look like the only way for them to act is to keep on doing the same thing they proved to be incompetent with???Where do you get that they act irresponsibly? Please prove your statement or shut up with spouting nonsense.
The way I heard from many traders who got caught off guard and got their accounts frozen, their communication was far from perfect and early enough. Many people had no time or possibility to react to what was coming. So why should we call that responsible? Most people were completely at the mercy of vircurex.
|
|
|
I don't mean a place to keep your savings, I mean a place to pile your buy side depth if you are trying to uphold the value of a coin by ensuring it always has depth.
Of course I would prefer to have them all on my own exchange, but if I must have them on someone else's then I prefer Vircurex because their payment system means I can afford to have offers in place that I don't expect anyone to ever actually take me up on. I can afford to have them there "just in case" and in order to have offers at every possible number of satoshis of price because the bitcoins earn while they sit there providing depth.
Also obvious of course is to try to only use "profit coins", as soon as possible, that is, get your initial capital back to your own wallet as soon as possible, plus some profits too, so that the only coins you have on any third prty site are "pure profit" coins the site already earned you.
I left my coins on Vircurex knowing the freeze was coming because I figured it would be nastily ironic to evacuate them to some scam exchange and have them stolen. What I left was leftover profit after taking take-home profit, and I figured if they do get stolen its maybe better to let Vircurex, who made/earned them for me in the first place, steal them than ship them off to some other thief. Almost all other exhanges were obviously scammers, their entire exchanges existed purely for the purpose of perpetuating endless numbers of scam of the day scamcoin scams, they were all about proliferating as many scams per day as possible, jumping on as many new scams as possible, anyone whose entire business is based on profiting from scams it seems stupid to imagine is not planning to scam you so I avoid them.
The thing I like least about Vircurex actually is they seemed to get so desperate they started to jump on scams too, I think for example if supporting DOGE was at all justifiable the same facts that justify accepting DOGE ought to have caused them to drop the scrypt coins that had even less hashing power than DOGE, since the main thing DOGE did for the world was prove how patheticaly weak even litecoin's hashpower was, making it clear that even litecoin, and certainly all the scrappy scrypt coins with even less hashpower than litecoin, are ridiculously insecure.
I wish they would add GRouPcoin though, since it has quite a bit of hashpower and would help make Vircurex the place to go for dealing in merged mined coins.
-MarkM-
I hear you. And I used to like vircurex for having only a few selected coins, and not 200 like so many others. I think the best way in the future would be to have a pure devcoin only exchange. Where DVC/BTC is traded and nothing else. Someone has to make that happen.
|
|
|
I think you are mistaken or I am misunderstanding what you say. Vircurex cannot "lure" with rallies since they have nothing to do with who is or is not offering or buying coins - they only provide the trading platform. The other thing that seems that you do not understand how an exchange works: it cannot take someone's money and give it to another. In fact, every exchange should have at least as much coins as there are orders and balances on the exchange, in other words it must be fully solvent, you cannot remove money from one person and still be a balanced exchange. That was exactly the problem when someone stole from Vircurex - people heard it and started withdrawing money (run at the bank) and it became obvious that Vircurex was no longer solvent after the breach. The way that Vircurex is paying back is that the owner is using his *profits* (the fees that you pay to trade and withdraw) to pay back every month. I find that very courageous and I want to honour the owner for paying back from his own income. I hope that this clears up your misconceptions.
Yes, ofcourse I understand their payback plan. But it's very curious that you call that courageous. Isn't it basic decency to pay back what you owe? How is this courageous? What I meant to say is, that they should STOP making business as an exchange until they have solved all problems and payed everyone back. Only THEN they can try a relaunch or comeback (complete with rebranding I suggest). That would be the really courageous thing to do. Not making a sinking ship look like new, that is a little bit manipulative if you ask me. Or is that what you meant with "courageous" ? To keep on using an unsave ship, risking the money of new traders? Where is the responsibility in this? To continue acting irresponsible shouldn't be considered "courageous"... it should be considered dangerous.
|
|
|
I have been forced to use Cryptsy for a lot of my trading and that has worked well too, but occasionally they have extreme delays.
How exactly did they *force you* to use Cryptsy? I don't get it. I used about half a dozen exchanges by now, and never did I feel coerced to use the one or the other... For me it's just a perfect free market. Bad players should be punished, lose their customers and give up their market share. Good players on the other hand should get more traffic and volume, that's only fair. Let the people decide, there is really no force and coercion in the crypto exchange business as far as I can see. "Trust has to be earned" comes to mind.... also "Buyers beware"... And my "Buyers beware" alarm goes off very loud when I hear vircurex and "good place to keep your bitcoins" in the same sentence.
|
|
|
|