....the legit users you burn won't.
....the legit users you burn won't.
....the legit users you burn won't.
....the legit users you burn won't.
Sounds about right, don't it lad? I wonder what AUTOBAN is. Bpip is confusing me. @Vod what does "profile has been autobanned" mean? Autobanned from bpip? Autobanned from sending you PM? German word for highway   |
|
|
|
Just now noticed The Pharmacist tagged by OP iluvbitcoins as well he/she is also in DT list. Personally I don't think this is enough reason to tag. There is no reference to identify why he got tag. Is this counter tag ?
OP attempted to blackmail us into removing their ratings. We got tagged for not giving in. Any attempts at making their ratings appear under a real pretense is therefore void (actually makes them a even less trustworthy).  Do you have no self awareness? Or do you just not care about your transparent hypocrisy? You're delusional; there's no hypocrisy. This case is clear, the mind is guilty. |
|
|
|
Interesting you accuse me of a logical fallacy while in the same breath using a false choice fallacy, as if not shotgunning negatives left and right is equivalent to letting go "thousands of abusers, cheaters, and attempted scammers". Oh, I see now I am the PERPETRATOR here, and after anal retentively searching my ratings that is all you could come up with I'm sure. The Stazi would have loved you.
Yes, you and anyone who wants to let the shady individuals run wild are essentially perpetrators. In certain scenarios, allowing certain actions to be committed can make you worse than the one who actually commits the action. There are plenty of non-forum scenarios where this is objectively correct; now apply accordingly. ..and after anal retentively searching my ratings that is all you could come up with I'm sure. The Stazi would have loved you.
The only thing I can clearly see is that you like slapping the word Nazi on the opposing side. Now where have I seen this before? Hmm.  |
|
|
|
Just now noticed The Pharmacist tagged by OP iluvbitcoins as well he/she is also in DT list. Personally I don't think this is enough reason to tag. There is no reference to identify why he got tag. Is this counter tag ?
OP attempted to blackmail us into removing their ratings. We got tagged for not giving in. Any attempts at making their ratings appear under a real pretense is therefore void (actually makes them a even less trustworthy). |
|
|
|
Yeah what do I know I have only been here since before it existed and watched it degrade every step of the way from pretty much every angle. The only real way to demonstrate trust is by having an exchange where the ability to steal is there, but does not happen. Otherwise what you are describing is a system of belief, not a system of trust. By the way, speaking of trust, you think you might find that missing BCH any time soon?
So your argument is: appeal to authority && ad hominem filled with lies? Nice rebuttal. It's lovely how you are trying to let go thousands of abusers, cheaters and attempted scammers because it suits your biased narrative. Not similar to OP at all. 
You're the exact type that would let semi-fraudulent people appear trustworthy here due to their pajeet trades (Oh right, it's not like we've already had examples of people buying stuff from DT members that leave positive ratings for minuscule amounts).
It's worth placing this here again.  |
|
|
|
I don't usually look for people who have lots of trading experience, but for people who can leave what I believe to be accurate ratings. I have done very little actual trading here in the grand scheme of things, and was put on DT initially by BadBear probably for my ratings on scammers which he must have thought were accurate enough. At the time of that I'd probably only engaged in one or two actual trades here other than earnings from signature campaigns etc. This is kind of at the essence of the problem, the people the rating system effects the most, traders, are pushed to the side and lots of political games are played to the point it becomes less useful for those that need and use it the most. IMO there needs to be a requirement of some kind of material loss that can be documented to leave valid ratings. Either this or some other form of feedback that is purely for anything OTHER THAN trade. It's not a trade system, it's a system-of-trust. Stop spewing nonsense. |
|
|
|
Abusing merit via alts deserve an immediate RedTag, but let's remember about accounts being tagged for "begging for merit" which falls also under acceptable category deserving RedTrust but also a something stupid (less than selling merits) that destroy reputations of many users.
Sounds about right. We're replacing spam posts with merit begging posts; indeed a very helpful policy. Liberalism strikes again. |
|
|
|
My analysts and the underlying facts speak for themselves.
There are no facts (presented by you), and you (nor your accompanying scam buddies) are certainly not qualified to perform any objective analysis. The only fact is as follows: No funds have been lost, and more funds have been returned than was required. |
|
|
|
The above says two things, 1st it explicitly says that the bitcoin would be held in 3AiGej11G8jUXvEBPvQKPLiHXC7ruUCp1Z, and 2nd, it implied that each of the three above escrows would be the sole custodian of one of the three private keys that can spend funds in the above address, requiring two of those keys.
No, it doesn't say that; this is what happens when a butthurt, pathetic scammer is interpreting the situation. That was that investment address; it has nothing to do with where funds were going to be kept. The above is a breach of contract.
There is no contract that implies any such restriction, nor was there any breach of any kind of imaginary contract. -snip-
There are no missing funds. When will you stop being upset that I trampled over your shady account-farming business? It's time to forfeit the lies. |
|
|
|
I have not taken any escrows for over a year now and do not plan to take any in the future. The thread should state that I am no longer active etc...
Yeah, soon. I have no clue what he is implying with the "covering for Lauda" statement.
It might be beneficial to actually ignore the butthurt troll. Now go fetch me my stuff.  Moreover, I don't believe that Blazed needs to "cover" Lauda to stay in an escrow team. Their reputation supercedes themselves.
It's just a formal thing; whether one or more of us leaves it wouldn't really matter. |
|
|
|
I tried to help m'y local Friend to get some money je sais un Bad situation that corpice mybe just coppied m'y auth cuz hé post another link
Okay, that's it. marlboroza remove your rating. I was wrong, and so were you. OP is clearly innocent. Gotta love the hilarious (&& pathetic) leftist victim card. wie heißt die mutter von niki lauda?
Shush, back to the Bahn. |
|
|
|
Are there any threads where Lauda explains the purpose of these recent changes to their forum account? Link please.
This is the best explanation I've seen so far: Didn't you say you changed the email?
I did change it. What about it? Them's fightin' words!  Which is more than sufficient; if people can't follow PGP chains than that is their own problem. More changes are coming. |
|
|
|
I could see this just being an honest mistake.
I completely agree with you. This really IS honest mistake. TECSHARE clearly has no clue what he is talking about here, thus his input on the matter can be safely ignored. OP is a good case-example of someone on the other end of the scale, opposite of "honest mistake". As long as they benefiting the community by tagging scammers and abusers, why you complain? We don't have the official police anyway (and usually the official body will abuse you more).
You actually need (certain) strong incentives unless you want inactive, semi-useless DT members (which most nowadays are). However, some people are more than satisfied with investing countless, thankless hours just for the common good (you can easily figure out who some of these are; hint: read title). Truly bad people, those which are rotten to their core (as is the case of OP) would rather have nobody benefit from anything (and let a countless number of people get hurt along the way) if they can't be on the benefiting end of the scale.
German word for highway I guess you confuse this with Autobahn  Yes, OP got confused and lost somewhere on the Autobahn.  |
|
|
|
If a DT member tags you for something stupid involving merit (ie. probably anything less than selling merit), then they're not going to be a DT member for much longer. In this case, many DT members should not be in DT for much longer. I can't remember how many profiles had been tagged because of merit issues (not selling). I think DT members have to review some of their judgements. That's absolutely untrue. Abusing merit via alts falls under the acceptable category. If the system disallowed punishments for users that a clearly abusing it via alt accounts, then the system would be a joke and shouldn't exist in the first place. |
|
|
|
The bounty campaign has been updated. There are several changes:- The whole bounty allocation has been rewamped according to the desires of the Vena team.
- The payment terms have been decided and added to the thread.
- Two new campaigns have been added: Lucky Draw and Translation Campaign.
- The English-only requirement for Blog/Article/Youtube campaigns has been lifted with a caveat.
- The avatar for the signature campaign has been added and you can finally earn the bonus stakes for wearing it.
- The bounty campaign has been extended by another 4 weeks.
For any questions:
As always, please read the rules before participating or asking any questions as they cover pretty much everything. ~Kitty |
|
|
|
Mind explaining AngelSky?
Nothing needs explaining; the account is compromised and doesn't even have a sufficient number of negative ratings. |
|
|
|
Which is a thread that contains no truth whatsoever. In any case, he needs to post proof of deal, transactions etc... I get many fake offers almost every day to buy many goods for cheap and everyone can accuse me of fooling them because I did not pay them.
Again, you have to be out of your damn mind to consider this legitimate given the amount involved. |
|
|
|
Funny how this goes from me asking the user to make a group with the other party as seen here: https://i.imgur.com/ijanbnq.png, to asking me to send him "his money" without any involvement from me side whatsoever as seen here: https://i.imgur.com/8ZOdl8E.png. Of course later down the road I was threatened to give "the money" (which was never sent nor was any address given to begin with), or else they would run down my reputation. Classic pajeets.
Note: Screenshots can be trivially tailored (thus neither mine nor anyone else's are definite proof), message forwards can not. for 165usd
Sounds like a case of legitimate escrow exit scam. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
