Nope.
Bitcoin is having a boost simply because it is a profitable investment more than being a currency. Well it is useful indeed; low transaction fees, faster with anonymity and such but the problem is its market price volatility. I doubt that in countries wherein it is widely accepted, people will use Bitcoin perhaps, to pay their clothes or food. They'd more prefer using fiat still on daily transactions. Let us accept it. At the present most of the people view this industry as a way of earning profit or in form of investment.

But going back with the topic, it's been years indeed. Its market value have gone too far and thid technology is now being recognized on countries around the globe. But I doubt this is the peak already. Bright future ahead once the market price slowly stabilize as more people or businesses acknowledge this industry.

There are other ways to know whether a project is a fraud or not such as background checking on people or team behind that project. Check if they had good ones before if possible. But that is indeed true; no matter how we secure not being scammed, if it would then things would happen. But if you're that anxious, then avoid investing to projects then. Engage with other crypto activities which would generate profit. For sure other project investors are aware of the risk of being fooled by new projects but they are taking the risk still. If you cannot do the same thing, then try trading or investing to released coins in the market; profit may not be as what you're used to but everything can be learned.

Well, for sure people will have impressions such as whales withdrawing their assets but as we can see on the market price, it didn't fill red marks which should have tickle a bit. Meaning, the amount was just transfered probably on their wallet. If we won't use our comprehension, this might cause FUD towards small investors therefore we should not emphasize such thing to avoid misconceptions and panic.Whale things I guess?  They are simply comfortable with this industry for being in years. Coinbase on the other hand is a trusted exchanger. But maybe he just made sure of things given that what happened recently, rarely occur. So he probably eliminated the risk of losing money due to negligence. As long as he won't sell it, the amount will continue 'living'. He might be planning to rest that amount for months or even year until the market recover.

Fiat is not losing value, the market goods are just having increase with the market price as a consequence of inflation which is a reflection of world market and rach countries' economy. Ofcourse it won't go to zero unless hyperinflation occur to a particular country such as with Zimbabwe. The market value of their currency did not deop to zero that would be impossible, its market value is just low. Also, given how volatile the msrket prices of crypto, it won't be sustainable for the economy to use it as a main coin 'coz there will be no consistency with daily transactions simply because the value of crypto changes from time to time.

All in all, there is always a tendency for the price of Bitcoin to be as low as it can especially if demand will dictate it to do so. Whether it would go up or not, the demand would be the bottomline as it determines the market price of crypto.

I'm not a muslim but I think there are no direct reason for our muslim brothers and sisters to ban or prohibit usage of this technology unless if it would be linked to gambling because you are somehow betting to something everytime you are investing in a token. But it is not really gambling if the idea of gambling is taking advantage of your opponent (well it depends on the game because sometimes it is the house which is your opponent) or simply you are not taking anything from your opponent(the idea of gambling in its broadest sense). It will only be between investor and the market which gave me the idea that they won't be prohibited from using it. But if I'm wrong please correct me.

Introducing this technology and field of investment takes time especially for young individuals. A parent may use a more practical scenarios which won't ruin their childhood such as allowing them to sell candies to their friends or at school if they would want to. This may infuse to their thought an idea of capitalism and investment which won't be as harmful as with bigger assets. Just the idea would be enough on their early years. Wait for that idea to manifest afterwards but pushing them to do so may just interrupt their development. Allow things to happrn atleast close to what is 'natural'. Being an adult we should guide the young ones for the betterment without actually destroying happiness; that's important.

A good observer I guess, knows what he is observing. Everyone could observe but not everyone could understand or simbly be organized observing. Perhaps on a experiment; you cannot observe every aspect, you need to focus onky on the things you needed to find explanation of.Being a good speculator on the other hand, speculates with basis and not by mere assumptions. So I guess a good observer could become a good speculator simply because if he knows what he is trying to observe, he can create an especulation which has a tendency to be close , if not exactly, to the assumptions. Unlike with people who just throws random speculations because that's his/her "feeling" of something. Speculation itself is subjective but if you want to atleast fill it with substance, then you better be objective on some aspects to make an educated guess.

What's the need for a fight if government has the power whether to allow the usage of this technology or not? Bitcoin is  being used as an option for mode of payment to some countries while in ither countries, I guess it is not prohibited but rather not supported. A manner of "use it if you want to but we're not in accountable for the risk". Regulation on the other hand remains the same. They could do it if they would want to as long as they would be able to track every transaction which I think would be only possible through third party wallets.They are only into taxes. Also, there's no cooperation needed. They just need to find a way how will they control in and outs of cryptocurrencies from wallet to another. They've already tried third party apps but users in this industry are just not making use of it because of high fees. And they just cannot do anything about it at the present.

Bitcoin for a higher chance of earning profit when bullish trend occur and altcoin on the other hand for a higher rate of increase as well as profit but is more risky as an investment. I do prefer going with altcoin investment simply because it would require me less amount to invest, even if it is more risky, but allows me to diversify my capital in different assets than to just let my investment sleep with bitcoin.No competition indeed. It is just a matter of an investor having his own preferences of where to engage his/her money with. No matter what you choose, there will always be an involved risk because all cryptocurrencies has volatile market value. Well in comparison, Bitcoin and alts might be different with utility aspects wherein Bitcoin is for daily transactions and alts are solely for projects (mostly) although some are also for transactions.

This is all because of the impression created by people towards this industry. Many non-crypto users view cryptocurrencies as an easy way to get rich but in reality it is not because of market volatility and inconsistencies. Some are even quitting their job just because they've earned a decent amount for the first time not knowing that it won't always be that way. Some are also selling their houses and other assets just to be able to invest in cryptos then complain eventually of their losses. The thing here is that no one pushes us to do something as an investor so technically there's no other individual to blame but ourselves. The best thing to do is to be knowledgeable of what we are engaging ourselves with.

Also, verification would only matter if you are planning to hold a token for years. Wherein most of the people in Binance are not even storing their assets in it for a long period of time 'coz most of the people in that exchanger are also traders. Holding tokens in the first place should be done on wallets so I guess there's no need for verification especially if you are not planning to keep your assets in a 'box'. All of these are because of what happened right? People are asking for adjustments from exchanges because their assets might be lost. This technology is decentralized so what's with this 'ID'. People should just practice self-discipline. If assets were lost then check for transaction history.

On my end, I think it would stabilize at $16k price point based on its behavior at this moment but ofcourse no assurance. I am just hoping it won't fall that much because a domino effect could be triggered especially after an issue. New ones might think this industry really is a'fraud' and that might cause bigger problem by pulling down the demand.
Lowest indeed but I doubt that it would be the best point to enter. If you have financial resources then it will really be but if you are a small time investor then that would be crucial. Some people migh lose interest 'coz issues come after one another. What I'm trying to point out is the difficulty of climbing up if price will be too low. therefore if you'd enter at its bottom, there is a tendency for your money or investment to be dead for a year or more than that depending on market behavior. My perfect timing for entering investment in crypto is the time a clear price direction can be seen.

Exchanges dropping? It ended already. The only problem now are people being scared of what happened. The market quite stabilized already from the incident. Even before the issue of FYX, the market already was dumped by factors such as economic crisis and such. LUNA case is another story I think because the team behind the project itself were the ones at fault, in comparison with factors which affected the market downfall. But at the end of the day, we just cannot predict what will happen in this market, generally. There'd be a day wherein issue will arise same thing with bullish runs wherein news arise which hypes up investors towards the market.

It is quite hard to prevent people from stressing out due to what happened recently involving FTX. Being neutral means understanding that such thing is unexpected and expected to happen at the same time. Same thing is evident with rugpulls related problems; the idea itself. What we are seeing are people generalizing such that same thing could happen with other exchangers, but in reality it doesn't occur often. There are other big exchangers which are still performing well for this industry. Being worried won't make you comfortable of what you are doing in this industry and may just eventually affect your profit. You just have to be cautious with your actions such as not storing wealth with exchangers. Assets are meant to be put in wallets.

Market will rise indeed but I doubt it would be this year. The market and outside exonomy are both struggling which makes it sketchy for a high market value on cryptos before this year end. Enduring market downfall at this moment would be the main thing for investors to be able to survive this bear trend. We may expect a bright future for this technology but its nature of volatility won't make the upward movement consistent. Also, something to point out is easy profit. This is a misconception we should be removing from our minds as well as with non-crypto users. Nothing's easy in this industry. If you are an investor you need to endure sudden changes with market prices. If you are a trader you have to study graphs of price directions and if you are into campaigns, you have to work hard to be paid. Nothing's easy.

Then where will the token be used for? posting? If it is for twitter then its utility will be limited to the platform itself. And for it to be stable, users should be okay with it. As far as I know, most of the users of twitter are into posting stuffs than watching videos (if I'm not mistaken). So think of this: if that token will be used for twitter usage, will it be sustainable. But this is just measuring tendencies and possibilities for the token since Op have mentioned about stability with the token's market value. If we would base or compare to stable coins such as USDT there is a continuous usage of it in transactions. This would be a possible alt, and being stable is somewhat impossible.

Quite impossible with what we are seeing at this moment. The market is struggling at $16-17k. Given that we are more than a month remaining, things would be hard especially for a complete recovery with the market. But I don't want to conclude. This market behavior is just hard to predict. But if there will be news which could boost the interest and demand of investors towards this industry on the last month of this year, then things would be possible. But in my opinion, this year will end not in favor for us or for this industry in general. But let us hope as well that if it really won't, atleast there would be an increase on the early months of 2023. But as I've said, no assurance will be made. For now holding and being patient is the only thing we could do.

There are also participants of projects; both campaigns and air drops. They are also a part of this industry as well as gamblers (which are also included because they are using cryptocurrencies on their transactions). But in terms of investment strategies you could also add scalping wherein a trader/investor would jump on a particular price (regardless if it is bear or bullish run) as long as there is a potential market price movement. Pointing here that we may have different market strategies but having the same goal which is to earn profit. Unfortunately, the idea of profit is being too emphasized towards non-crypto users which makes them unrealistic of how money is being 'created' in this industry.

Well, we just cannot really stop the inflation rate; an economy can just slow it down or reduce it. The problem arise because minimum wage cannot cope up with daily expenses which yields to poverty. Who's at fault? Government and families. I'd say governments because they are the ones making regulations to cope up with the situation. Families on the other hand could also be at fault if they won't manage the family itself;family planning and daily expenses wherein adjustments should be made.
Major problem is family related factors. Same with my country wherein people are complaining about shortage of financial resources but they are the ones who made a big family to feed. It has something to do as well on sense of responsibility.

Like something that they would acquire in the future? that would be wise but be sure to transfer you assets to your child once they already have awareness and once they are ready for it because there would be a tendency that they would ignore it, if they still don't.
Those are good threads, I have read it as well before. Well for sure people in this industry are having the same thought of passing this technology across generation due to its potential. Some are even having plans of "ladderized" plan for younger ones. 'coz if you would share it in an instant and at the wrong age they might not pay attention to it so efforts could not go to aaste.