I’m pertaining to the side bet offered on the table games such as baccarat and blackjack that gives you a chance to win a certain multiplier by just meeting the certain requirements. I often avoid this kind of bet because it’s very rare to win on this and I’m only burning money that was supposed to be added to my profit whenever my main bet won while my sides always loss.
But recently I become lucky on side bet since I win x100 multiple time and x50 with 1$ profit. I realize that sometimes this side bet is the one that can give us the bigger profit once we get lucky compared when betting in fix amount while the result is just breakeven. Most side bets only have a small chance of winning and cannot be applied to traditional Blackjack strategy, which means they give the dealer and the house a much greater advantage than in the standard game. So, in my opinion they should only be seen as a way to increase fun, because when you consider the risks you will see that they are not a viable method of increasing your earnings over a long period of time. Any side bets you may want to place should be carefully considered and you should assess your chances of winning to the best of your ability. But as I just said, it is undeniable that side bets are much more exciting and faster, and they are great for those who play Blackjack and don't like limiting themselves to one bet at a time and having to wait for the end of the round to find out if they have won. . Furthermore....if successful, side bets substantially increase your winnings from much smaller bets than you would receive in the standard game, but be careful not to deceive yourself and end up losing more than you should. |
|
|
|
People are starting to speculate about De Bruyne future because until now the negotiation about contract extension between him and Manchester City is still not reach an agreement so some of Saudi Arabia teams want to utilized this situations with attempts to bought him this summer and at least 4 teams who showing their interest to De Bruyne such as Al Nassr, Al Ahli, Al Ittihad and Al Hilal but reported De Bruyne has open the opportunity to stayed at Manchester City and in the near future he hope will gets new contract even so with Guardiola because Guardiola know De Bruyne is important player and he doesn't want De Bruyne to leave but the situations might be change that if negotiations for a new contract are deadlocked then not impossible for Manchester City to sell him this summer From what I've read, Manchester City is willing to sell Kevin De Bruyne who may be living his last months as a player in this team. Kevin De Bruyne, in fact, has been heavily harassed in recent weeks and not even Pep Guardiola knows if he can count on the player, but he still hopes that everything will be resolved as soon as possible. As you said, one of the main interested parties in the athlete is Al Nassr, who, as we all know.... want to transform their team into a selection with the best in the world. Values.... aware of the Arab club's interest in their athlete, the Manchester City board decided to set a price for their player of no less than €100 million! Do you think this value is "acceptable"? What is the possibility of Al Nassr paying this without trying to negotiate a discount? |
|
|
|
Achei essa noticia curiosa, se olharmos no google trends dá pra perceber o nível de popularidade que o Bitcoin tem na Nigéria, parece que a população encontrou uma maneira poderosa de se proteger da inflação e agora o governo culpa o BTC pela alta inflação na moeda local e quer proibir que as pessoas tenham acesso a essa ferramenta de proteção. Olha eu comentando sobre economia, algo que não entendo "bulufas nenhuma". Mas enfim... apenas minha ideia de que por mais que o Bitcoin não seja o causador dessa inflação, acredito que ele certamente contribuiu para o "problema" quando a população decidiu referir ele à uma moeda que o governo poderia controlar. Em todo caso, qual seria a possibilidade de problemas ou soluções se o governo da Nigeria fosse trocar de vez para o Bitcoin já que por todo canto estão utilizando ele ao invéz de proibi-lo? Claro que eu estou ciente de que o governo não quer "abrir mão" do seu controle e da riqueza que ainda possuem nas mãos de poucos, mas deixando de lado essa parte corrupta... não seria melhor para o país? Se não, porque!? |
|
|
|
Estou pra ver o dia em que forem anuncia o primeira longa-metragem produzido por uma inteligência artificial  Só espero três coisas: 1. Estar vivo para presenciar isso; 2. Poder pagar em Bitcoin para ver, e; 3. Se algo feito para que humanos consigam compreender. Sobre os dois primeiros eu acredito que nã oserá um grande problema, talvéz até seja de graça. Porém o último é algo que eu tenho minhas dúvidas... não estou falando sobre a qualidade do material após produzido, mas sim do fato de que: Todo filme envolve emoções humanas, algo que a IA certamente não tem pois já discutimos aqui que ela não é de fato "inteligente" mas apenas um modelo de aprendizagem baseado em repetição sobre os erros e acertos. Então... será que ela saberia produzir algo que envolva sentimentos humanos compreensiveis e que tenham algum sentido para nós? |
|
|
|
I haven't replied to him and I am not answering his call as I feel I would be doing injustice if I say yes. I am confused and do not know what to do, what do you guys suggest? Asking money from loan sharks is dangerous! If you really are his friend, lend your money so he can pay the loan shark and sleep easy saying he can pay you back within a year! I'm kidding, don't do that. In fact, this is not an easy situation to deal with and trying to use gambling to solve this problem is a big mistake. The best way is to look for a reasonable "agreement" to pay the debt and get this money in a dignified way, if possible even selling assets such as cars. But it's not enough to just get rid of debt, you need to be more responsible in the game to avoid getting into debt again. |
|
|
|
I just noticed here in our city, that two brothers own different gambling platforms people have different impressions of each one of them, the first one owns a lottery outlet and he is getting respect from people from all walks of life, people look upon him as a giver of luck because many people hit consolations from his Lotto outlet
The other one is the owner of Cockpit Arena and many people despise him because many of their husbands and fathers lose a lot of money and go home empty-handed
I wonder why these two brothers receive different impressions when both are running a gambling platform, honestly, I prefer my friends and relatives to bet on the lotto but I advise them to be careful when playing in a cockpit, because in a cockpit arena, you can wipe out all your money and you end up empty-handed because the games are continuous you have no control and you are tempted to continue playing or lose everything whereas in Lotto you can allocate your bets.
Do you have the same situation like this in your country where gambling operators are not getting the same treatment?
No, because in my country gambling is prohibited, so all we have are official lotteries and some small unregulated bets that are generally not widely known to the public. But, the perception of these two people is highly linked to the amount of money that people put into each game.. take a look: In the lottery it is not common for people to put in a lot of money, generally they bet lower amounts but with a regularity/frequency and this hardly causes them to lose all their money. On the other hand, the second brother promotes a bet that deals with great emotions in a practically "online" way, that is... depending on how the duels occur, a small bet can turn into an "all-in" when the adrenaline rushes. is high and this will certainly result in disappointment for many people at the end of the day. But I ask you: Which of the brothers makes more money? I don't think he's the owner of the lottery, right!?  |
|
|
|
To be on a safer side, don't expect much from the system, rather expects less so you'll not be surprised when your budgets doesn't go as plan. It's no new thing to experience losses, however we become stronger to deal with problems when we're independent. Regrets happen on daily basis in the space. We're often lucky and when it hits harder, we lay down and cry out, that's for those of us that don't have the balance control of our emotions, but some of us stand strong enough to take in anything in the system. Gamblers are always ready to embraced any results generated on their end.
I always say that in games of chance we have to have the following perspective: Worry about not losing more money than we can, if we don't win anything then it's okay, and the fact that you get rich with a big asset is a gift, or be it... we must dream of this possibility but it can never be our goal. With this in mind, we would never need to worry about gambling, about spending money on something that could ruin our lives, and who knows, when we least expect it, we could be surprised by something really good. However, if we always play risking losing more money than we should and with the aim of achieving something that is "unlikely", then we will always play in a depressed way and the chance of dying of heartbreak is great. |
|
|
|
Legal que os e-mails mostram como o nosso fórum foi criado, ainda quando era hospedado no bitcoin.org (e algumas alternativas que testaram antes). Também tem o satoshi falando sobre o tamanho dos blocos e a chance disso virar um problema.. bem legal o material, deve ter bastante coisa ali. Será que o @theymos vai apresentar as PMs do Satoshi aqui no fórum nesse julgamento?  poderiam ser boas provas contra o CSW. Então, não só o @theymos, mas deve ter tanta gente com informação "sigilosa" e valiosa para jogar contra o Craig... provavelmente só estão esperando: 1. Uma oportunidade de ver esse can@lha enfrentando um Juiz que não lida para o tanto de dinheiro e "poder" que Craig tem (já tá ocorrendo); 2. Aguardando Craig falar mais uma baboseira que pode ser desmentida por algo que ainda desconhecemos. Mentira tem perna curta, quanto mais ele insistir nisso maior será o estrago que ele terá de reparar. |
|
|
|
Acho que eu já disse em outro comentário. Eu tenho três cursos superiores. Dois em áreas de estudos parecidas e um numa área oposta as outras. Como falei no comentário anterior, nunca tive vocação para o magistério (ser professor), então, eu preferi em vez de fazer mestrado e doutorado, fazer mais dois cursos superiores. Aqui no Brasil, acredito que em Portugal também tenha, existe algo chamado de aproveitamento de estudos. Então, você pode aproveitar determinadas matérias de um curso que você já fez em um novo curso. Assim fica mais rápido você terminar. Eu levei por volta de 10 anos para terminar esses 3 cursos. Tinha um amigo meu que dizia que eu era maluco em fazer tantas faculdades. Ele falava que o individuo tinha que escolher um ramo profissional e fazer todos os cursos possíveis nesse ramo. No meu caso foi diferente. Meu caro amigo, uma dúvida! Essas três formações que você tem foram feitas com qual propósito: Conseguir uma formação mais abrangente/complet ou apenas um desejo de estudar mesmo? No caso da primeira opção isso realmente te ajudou? Um antigo amigo de escola meu (época do ensino médio/colegial) fez duas faculdades ao mesmo tempo, durante o dia EAD (remoto) e a noite presencial, hoje é concursado pelo estado e me disse uma vez que as duas faculdades foram fundamental para ele conseguir alcançar o que tem hoje. Enfim, eu sou da velha ideia de fazer uma faculdade e ir se especializando, mas hoje na área de TI minha especialização já ficou em uma tecnologia "deixada de lado"... uma particularidade dessa área. |
|
|
|
Mega threads kept open for long time, in this gambling discussion and the main gambling section I do see a thread that from the first to ten pages all the discussion answers has been given but that thread continues moving whereas all the questions been asked in the thread majority has answered it, why mega thread in gambling section, when you calm down and read some of the trading style or method you can see that some points made us is not longer in line with the aim of the thread. Moderators rarely close threads unless someone asks for it, so it's the OP's responsibility to manage it. However, there is another problem: The number of repeated topics! Even if a topic is closed, as soon as it disappears from the first page (TOP 20) someone opens a new topic with the same subject. In other words... perhaps it would have been better to have left the first topic open? Some topics like Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions Newthey remain open forever, and this is correct because it is a topic where the discussion never ends. On the other hand, for example, I tend to create topics about the main Brazilian championship every year... as one championship ends I close it and open the next one. |
|
|
|
Have you ever tried something like this situation before?
So what is your thoughts on this, 50/50 good for you or nah?
Will you insist to have an ego battle if you are on the same situation?
If your answer is yes then Why?
And if no then why not?
What are the things you would do to resolve the issue?
How do you think you can handle this kind of situation? Certainly the best thing to do is to split the money, but I will give you both answers: It's better to divide: When half of 1.9 million is more than enough for you to pay all your debts, make a good investment that provides you with passive income and even buy something you've always needed like a house or car. It's not worth creating more problems in your life because of a fight like that. It is better to fight to get all the money: When you are really in debt and half of that amount is not enough. This can happen to those who, for example, have a company that went through a difficult sales year and accumulated a lot of debt with suppliers, employees and banking institutions. |
|
|
|
Perhaps you have seen other videos as well and maybe share it here. Here in Brazil there is a series in documentary format called "Compulsion". It addresses different cases of compulsion with food, sex, alcohol, cocaine, crack, sports, electronic games and shopping. In each episode, compulsive people tell their story since their first contact with addiction. In the fifth episode, there is the story of a compulsive Bingo player for 20 years and also a man who played for 12 years and lost a lot of money too, in addition to making his personal life a nightmare. Both have a happy ending, and share how they managed to overcome addiction. |
|
|
|
Nos últimos dias, uma polêmica tomou as redes: a entrevista do SAMY DANA + PABLO SPYER no Flow podcast Para nossos colegas portugues, Samy Dama é um economista brasileiro bem famoso que ja falou várias coisas absurdas sobre Bitcoin Pablo Spyer é sócio da XP, a maior empresa de investimentos do Brasil. E o Flow é um dos maiores podcast do Brasil. E nessa entrevista eles falaram várias coisas sobre Bitcoin (e o Pablo está fazendo um filme ''sobre Bitcoin''). Entre as coisas absurdas: - Bitcoin não tem liquidez - As Bitcoins subiram e foram divididas e divididas e divididas e divididas -Abrir conta NAS BITCOINs é muito dificil -Pra usar BTC precisa de um PHD em computação.... Entrevista inteira: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MECRVA3Zans&t=3278sMeu video de react pq nao aguentei:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dzvJ2Dw-Jc&t=100s Obrigado pelo resumo, poupou meu tempo para não assistir à essa entrevista. Ok, confesso que abri só pra ver qual era a do chapéu  Fico pensando... atualmente qualquer pessoa 100% leiga quanto a criptos consegue forma uma boa base de conhecimentos com ótimos conteúdos que encontra facilmente na internet. Então, como é que pessoas "importantes" como esses dois tem a cara de pau de falar tanta baboseira? MDS, só pode ser de propósito para levar desinformação às pessoas, não é possível. Típica ação que muitas mídias televisivas pregam a seus telespectadores. |
|
|
|
A Arkham liberou nessa semana informações sobre as carteiras da MicroStrategy. Diz ela que a MSTR não faz autocustódia e depende de terceiros como Fidelity e Coinbase.  Então, que uma empresa dessas terceiriza a posse de seus Bitcoins, isso eu já presumia... porém acreditava que fosse em alguma empresa especializada de investimentos ou algo do ramo. Falar de Coinbase, por exemplo, parece assustar, porém eu acredito que eles tenham um contrato bem "diferenciado" do restante dos clientes para essa posse. Em todo caso,não dá pra deixar de se preocupar que qualquer "merd@" que ocorra com a Coinbase, por exemplo, vai refletir nos bitcoins da MicroStrategy e nenhum contrato poderá salvá-los |
|
|
|
Arsenal would go into the transfer market for a striker this summer, there are rumors that they might try to sign Ivan Toney from Brentford. Thomas Frank has already said it would be nearly impossible to keep Toney at the team after the end of the seadom, though Arsenal might have to pay a huge amount of money if they are to get Toney. I think it was still January when I read that Arsenal were looking to invest heavily in that transfer window, at the time they were targeting Victor Osimhen from Napoli, Benjamin Sesko from RB Leipzig, Ivan Toney from Brentford, and Evan Ferguson from Brighton... none of these contracts were completed. Now, two months later they are again in a desperate search for a good striker... certainly prices have gone up and options have dwindled. Just so you're aware, Chelsea is also interested in Ivan Toney, so if Arsenal still want him in their team, they'll have to fight for it. |
|
|
|
Ferrari got a good pace today, both in fast lap and race simualtion.
All the cars looks great with all the compouds, it should be a closer races this years behind RBR. So... since Ferrari presented its new SF-24, they are guaranteeing that they will maintain their power in the classifications, but that alone is not enough... it is also necessary to win races. I say this because since the adoption of the new aerodynamic regulations in 2022, Ferrari has always shone in the Saturday classifications, but the problem is that the various pole positions have not been converted into consistent victories. I even researched here to confirm what I was already following in the races and in fact the numbers say that in 2022 they won twelve pole positions and only four victories, in 2023 the SF-23 won seven pole positions but only won one race with Carlos Sainz in Singapore. Anyway, expectations regarding Ferrari's performance are high, I also hope that this time it actually surprises us positively, so now we can only wait for the SF-24 to take to the track and show its true performance during the official races. |
|
|
|
I had a friend who use to play the gambling only when he consumed drugs,Sometimes he use yo win the money.But most of the time he loss the funds,when we have a chat on the weekend we shared our experiences.The reason of the loss in the drug consumption is the gambler will play the game without any hesitation to take risk.The gambling is the risky game,the gamblers who take huge risk some times make the huge multiple of betting dollars.But the risk doesn’t make him win,because the meaning of the risk is the possibility of losing and winning.Every month we meet each other,the odds between us is gambling.
My friend also added when he had huge winning in the night games without drugs,he had an habit of playing the gambling at the earning morning after wake up.It doesn’t mean an addiction,it was his dedication towards the game.But the sad part is he will loss sometimes if he wake up in the few hours sleep.When he had shared this I had advice him not to do the gambling in both in drugs or early morning games.Because we should not play the game at the early morning,because we are beginning the day.If the game give the loss in the early morning,the entire day will goes in a negative vibe.The new gamblers should take it as the lesson to avoid loss in gambling. Each type of drug has a different action on the person's body, you didn't mention what he takes but almost all of them interfere with the central nervous system and can affect several neurotransmitters that play an important role in regulating mood. When the drug affects certain neurotransmitters, the person can suffer from symptoms of anxiety, such as muscle tension, sweating, rapid heartbeat and even shortness of breath, which can greatly interfere with strategic decision-making during betting. Certainly, playing under the influence of drugs does not bring any benefit, it is preferable that people make a random bet that will certainly have the same result but without the risk of becoming dependent on drugs, in addition to gambling. |
|
|
|
Does this really make sense, sometimes I have to reason twice and come to think about something very important which we don't always pay heed to because we always believe that when spending about $1 to $4 is something we can afford to lose right but, it may surprised you if you Sum all this little dollars into investment and savings you (we) would probably make a good investment and savings at the process reducing our gambling rates and lost.
Let us discussed to if this can save someone from gambling addiction.
I follow the following methodology regarding the money I have: Accounts - Investment - Leisure In other words... water, electricity, house bills, bank loans, studies, medicines, etc. must be a priority and therefore need to be paid off before anything else. Then, with what is left over, you will save what you think is relevant for a future dream or a financial security reserve... this should be done every month. Then, you spend the rest of the money on entertainment, whether on gambling or in restaurants, cinema, bars, etc... Credit cards must be used consciously, and never for gambling. |
|
|
|
Ainda não está aberta ao público, aquela coisa de limitar o acesso para analisar os riscos e corrigir falhas. Com o tanto de "jailbreak" que rolou lá no começo do ChatGPT, fico meio preocupado com o que pode ser feito com essa ferramenta. Imagina se for possível gerar vídeos fakes com coisas sérias com cunho sexual, violencia corporal, assasinato, etc...  Então, eu acredito que o "motor de interpretação" já esteja bem protegido de falhas desse tipo, então agora o que eles precisam fazer é apenas a saída em um novo formato... texto já temos, imagens estão "quase perfeitas" e o novo obstáculo agora é os videos. Enfim não sei se fui claro, mas a chances de eles fazerem um video de violência corporal é tão improvável quanto já é hoje vermos o ChatGP montando um diálogo sobre isso. Obviamente que falhas ainda existem, e aí o que podemos concluir de fato é o alcance dos estragos. Pois ler uma frase de "eu matei fulano" é muito diferente de vermos um video com essa ação. |
|
|
|
A pergunta que eu faço, bloquearam como? Era carteiras em Binance ou outras exchanges?
Outra pergunta, que acho que seja mais interessante e útil: Existe alguma forma útil de verificar se temos algum BTC vindo de um endereço especifico? Então, se o dinheiro entrar em alguma exchange que recebeu essa ordem judicial, cabe à eles fazer o bloqueio dos fundos... agora imagina a treta que isso não vai dar com um usuário ignorante ou inocente  Sobre rastrear... a blockchain do Bitcoin é aberta, atualmente existem várias ferramentas capazes de detectar se os fundos recebidos passaram por determinado endereço. Mas pergunta que ainda fica é.... quantos "nós/saltos" eles irão considerar para bloquear ou não os fundos? E ainda: Se de um valor de R$ 1.000,00 depositado na excange apenas R$ 100,00 tiverem sido proveniente do endereço da vítima à uns 3 nós/saltos atrás, eles irão bloquear os R$ 1000,00 ou apenas os R$ 100,00 !? Isso é o que acontece quando se coloca essas decisões nas mãos de juristas ainda leigos no assunto, tenho pena do setor jurídico dessas exchanges que precisam lidar com essas buchas. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
