Sorry zazarb, not looking to sell this to you as I'm spreading out who I sell to for now

Selling for BitStamp rate, only to highly trusted members, and you're going first. PM me.

BayAreaCoins has a total depth 2 DefaultTrust score of (0).

He is trusted by SaltySpitoon (depth 1), but negated by dooglus (depth 1).

This isn't commenting on anything about BAC & dooglus being pissed at each other, and I'd ask you don't comment on that here. I'm more curious on if this is actually intended. Do you need 2 negations on depth 1 to cancel out being trusted by a single depth 1 user?

The Kialara arrived!

Not a bad box.



Moment of truth...



Amazing. Sorry, the Kialara is tilted (and seems like it doesn't fit - it does!) as I'm holding the box at a tilt in this photo.



The back:



Amazing coin. Thanks, LuckyBit.

Sorry if you don't like the photos by the way, they were quick iPhone 4 photos and I haven't cleaned any smudges or dirt off the coin.

Seriously?

Like, I'm not taking shots at you yourself here. But it doesn't matter who the person hosting the code/server would be here, whether you, Stunna, theymos, or whoever - I really think that's a stupid thing to do. You buy MoneyPot and the first thing you do is hand off the responsibilities and everything to do with the security to an app?

"Ah, this seems good! Looks like they know what they're doing for sure!"


"Oh."

First...what? You're giving away the security side of your operations to an app?

Before I get it when Dean sees this, please don't give me the "over-reaction, he's saying we're the shittiest-site-in-Bitcoin" job, like you've done before. No, you're pretty decent (you have fucked up before, but that's more minor now). But that's not really my point, though.

You've got a bit of a conflict of interest here and it seems like you're just tilting away your security to another firm because they entered a business partnership with you, as if you're the government giving contracts to the lowest bidder. Why the hell are you giving away your security?

Do it yourself. If you can't secure your own new service, why are you buying it!?

Thanks to Coinichiwa in their support of ShitDice. They have decided to auto-correct all referral links to a link to our website in order to support us. We salute you, our fellow dank Bitcoin memers.

If you aren't trusted, don't bother. I only trade with very trusted users and rarely go first. Please don't waste my time, it just isn't going to work very well.

Please refer to the post I made as well:

You left a response, he expressed his opinion, you expressed yours, really that should be it as neither of you are on DefaultTrust. Both of you did what is perfectly allowed so while you may be a tiny bit salty that should be just about it.

Wow, looks like the level for people whining about "trust abuse" (which is actually completely how the trust system is intended to be used) isn't even at getting a negative rep from DefaultTrust now, but getting a single negative untrusted rep.

People are completely in their rights to leave whatever trust they like. Whether they'll be on DefaultTrust or not is another story.

Oh clam up man, don't be a wanna-be. The discussion is perfectly fine and hilariousandco a) isn't even derailing the thread and b) knows what he's doing.


They should give the information if a scammer/fraudster was using their services, they'd have to via a subpoena anyway.

Please consider escrowing the funds at least partially. It isn't good enough to just say that because people will be paid directly into their accounts there's no need for an escrow (??). I offer my services as a partial escrow if you want them but there are plenty of extremely trusted escrows on the forum.

That seems like a pretty fair analysis, and I'd generally agree with you there. But still, I'm not going to add the question to the OP as I don't think it belongs in a thread such as this which isn't supposed to poke against specific companies or services.

This was your first and only mistake. Don't write auto-mute scripts. You open yourself up to a lot of issues especially with side cases, as well as false detections. If the chat really isn't moderated well enough to catch these (which I sincerely doubt as the staff team seems to have grown significantly since I left), then tell Stunna & MICRO and more mods will be brought on.

I don't really want to give an answer to this as it would be very easy to create bias in this question. It's a bit of a leading question, too, and I don't want to show preference to any one signature campaign in a thread designed to be a general FAQ.

For all intents and purposes, the Legendary rank is just a bit of a joke. If you just want it because you think you'll get more in campaigns, I don't think you're here for the right reasons.

If you're that valuable, anyway, you can just negotiate a price.

Are you taking a fee on every deposit or something? Depositing 1 BTC gives you 0.998 BTC in your balance. Annoying for your friends of oshi! promotion-thing too as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umDr0mPuyQc

How could you do this to me I didn't deserve this, I'm not an edgy teen who capitalises letters randomly!


Thanks man

Awesome, that Kialara looks amazing!

Congrats to all who won Thanks a lot to the LB staff ^_^

I'm sure they all think man-made satellites and the ISS are fake too, don't worry. The level of conspiracy theories in this thread is absolutely insane.