|
^^^^^^
A.K.A., come live in the most expensive city in the U.S., while we pay you peanuts and rape your talents.
|
|
|
|
The bastards spiked his crank with glucose or some such evil concoction. His body just couldn't take it.
Or just Occam's Razor, that he knowingly took some questionable shit or overdosed and ended up in a hospital. But of course we'll never fully know the truth. He'll spin this as sabotage/assassination attempt to further his mystique. "Never let a good crisis go to waste." |
|
|
|
You know, as a business, you can accept zero confirmation transactions from both BTC and BCash.
For BTC = just wait 10 seconds. Even a cup of coffee can wait 10 seconds. It's zero confirmation, but you can almost safely accept the transaction if there are no double spend attempts after 10 seconds.
For BCash = just wait about 10 seconds also. Maybe 20 if you want to make sure. After a confirmation, send it to an exchange and market sell.
For anything else that costs more than a cup of coffee, I'm sure you can wait 10 minutes for a block; and if the transaction hasn't confirmed yet, it should in a few.
Or use Dash Instant Send in which case you don't have to wait around for confirmations or limit yourself to trusting only small cup of coffee sized amounts. Infofront. This conversation keeps coming up, you should let my comment stand. Or are you trying to keep it a secret that Dash has already solved this problem?Or ya know, all you guys could stop with this line of pointless conjecture and quit pretending that Lightning Network doesn't exist for Bitcoin? Also, the coffee analogy really sucks. Nobody is buying coffees with their bitcoin. In fact, people are hardly spending their bitcoin at all. Merchant spending usage probably accounts for less than 0.001% of all daily trade volume if that even. If I missed that guestimate by another decimal or two I wouldn't even be shocked. |
|
|
|
What I hear in my environment is that people find BTC compromised by the irrational pump and subsequent dump. So they consider it unreliable as investment.
It's important that Average Joes only invest in that one reliable investment that goes up in a nice, safe, angled straight line. You know the one I'm talking about, right? Right? Yeah... that one... ummm... I'm sure it'll come to me... eventually... We will hang around the actual flat or Barted curve till something external happens. I do not expect that before late September... .
Same. |
|
|
|
What is going to happen when the real FUD begins?
There is never any real FUD, silly bear. It's all fake made up bullshit. |
|
|
|
Nobody has been claiming that doublespends are impossible. The argument is that the potential for doublespends is a manageable cost of doing business.
Unbelievable. Such insane BCash confirmation bias. If Bitcoin had this blatant flaw right now, you'd be screaming. The whole community would be having a cow over it. Especially because 0 confirmation is not and has never been "Satoshi's original vision" which the BCashtards like you want to so desperately drone on about. For example, if a coffee shop (coffee is our canonical example, right?) can sell 1000 more coffees by accepting unconfirmed transactions, at the cost of one successful doublespend transaction, accepting such is still a profitable exercise.
That's fucking bullshit and again, your insane fallacy. There won't be "one successful doublespend", there will be hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands. It pretty much torpedoes BCash ever being adopted as a mainstream merchant currency. You really. Need. To. Fucking. Stop. "Better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt." |
|
|
|
jbreher the BCash lover wants to go on and on about how Bitcoin fungibility is somehow "compromised" with SegWit. But on this BCash compromise (ie. complete failure)? Dead silence. Crickets. Complete failure? Not at all. For those transactions worth waiting for, you can wait for block inclusion. It is an option that BTC does not give you. Nice fkn spin there jbreher. You think you're the teflon man, but you aren't. Just a bullshitter. I suppose by your reasoning then I can say that in Bitcoin for those that don't want to use SW, the legacy wallet addresses still work just fine. It is an option that BCH does not give you. |
|
|
|
You know when sock puppet troll accounts are posting 4-5 times in a row, we've hit the bottom of the market.  |
|
|
|
I've been taking C60 daily for two months now. Feel fkn amazing.
Did you have a specific complaint before you began taking C60? No not really, just like experimenting on myself like a human guinea pig. I'm fairly healthy and active as it is. I was exaggerating a little - I feel good. Not as much muscle soreness after workouts. More energy and alertness during the day. |
|
|
|
|
I've been taking C60 daily for two months now. Feel fkn amazing.
|
|
|
|
OP, please go get your eyes checked. That's not Tom Lee, this is :  |
|
|
|
Corn and other drugs Consider cereal grains for a moment. Why grains like corn rapidly and extensively replaced traditional foods even though they were less nutritious and required more labour has been widely regarded as a puzzle; cultivation of cereal grains continued even when the abundance of more easily processed foodstuffs—such as meat and fruit—rendered it unnecessary. Well, foods like wheat and corn release exorphins when digested. It's been speculated daily opioid self-administration could have increased people’s tolerance of crowded sedentary conditions, of regular work, of subjugation by rulers. If so, corn might have ultimately helped the development of civilization. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809873/Fast forward... by extension they also likely figured out that corn syrup could be cheaply mass produced and when shoved into nearly every food product on the market, thus could spur over consumption of their over-priced garbage. Leading to the obesity and diabetes epidemic that we have today. Crowd tolerance and subjugation effects would be a bonus as well. Is WALL-E the future? |
|
|
|
jbreher the BCash lover wants to go on and on about how Bitcoin fungibility is somehow "compromised" with SegWit. But on this BCash compromise (ie. complete failure)? Dead silence. Crickets. |
|
|
|
Another reason why we need bitcoin!
Rats chew up ₹12,000,000 (USD 17,614) in cash at an ATM in Assam India
No worries, they'll just print moar. |
|
|
|
I have continually stated that I am merely pointing out that a reduction in fungibility is endemic to the design of Segwit. I said nothing about a current attack.
Just. Fucking. Stop.
Bullshit. That may be what you have repeated many times, but you've also implied and insinuated that this so-called "flaw" makes BCash the better crypto by comparison. That's been your true underlying agenda, troll. 1. Bitcoin buyers/users know exactly what SW is, it's implications, and still buy and use it. 2. We don't need you to come here, condescend and repeat what we already know about SW. 3. BCash, by inference, is not better because it doesn't have SW. It's a centralized, compromised, piece of shit altcoin controlled by a bunch of Narcissistic asshats. And that is all it will ever be. So you Just. Fucking. Stop. |
|
|
|
A: Was I talking to you?
B: Why are you trying to be a dick?
You were talking to all of us who read this thread. I am not being a dick. Just being intellectually honest. You tried insulting me by calling my unexceptional, without knowing a thing about me. And tried peacocking and telling everyone what a great swinger you are with the all ladies. Mmmkay... how about intellectually, honestly, fucking off? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
