This coin is something different and is backed by a brilliant mind, coins like these deserve to have much higher value.
Value is never "deserved"... it must be earned. Don't use the word "deserved"... only freeloaders with entitlements claim that they "deserve" something... Instead... let's help DRK earn it's place... |
|
|
|
The best setup is to have 2 machines:
Machine A: Holds 1000DRK, runs as masternode. Use configuration option -masternodeaddr=machineB
Machine B: Holds 0DRK, runs as masternode.
There's no target.
How does the network know about Machine A? IP of Machine A has to also be communicated to the whole network? Or only IP of machine B? I would only consider a machine secure if the network somehow does not even know it exists. |
|
|
|
The best setup is to have 2 machines:
Machine A: Holds 1000DRK, runs as masternode. Use configuration option -masternodeaddr=machineB
Machine B: Holds 0DRK, runs as masternode.
There's no target.
This logically means I would need two static IPs, right? |
|
|
|
The best setup is to have 2 machines:
Machine A: Holds 1000DRK, runs as masternode. Use configuration option -masternodeaddr=machineB
Machine B: Holds 0DRK, runs as masternode.
There's no target.
Interesting. I already like what darkcoin will do for the evolution of more secure methods of money transmission. Excellent work, sir! |
|
|
|
Dumb people take pictures of their CC and publish them online https://twitter.com/NeedADebitCardHopefully dumb people won't be able to setup a masternode, but if they do they will lose their coins like they lose their real $$$ ... If you follow these basic instructions even if someone hacks into your server they won't get your coins, "stupid proof". I don't think there is such a thing as "stupid proof"... mistakes are made, and servers have to be constantly patched and updated to have complete security (which in turn might introduce new loopholes as heartbleed has shown)... But I tend to agree with you. I am all FOR stupid people losing their money. So that more capable people can enter the market and take over. That's what I love about the free market. And if that is how Darkcoin is supposed to work, so be it.  |
|
|
|
If you know what you are doing it's not that dangerous. Block all ports besides Dark and ssh, limit ssh to one IP, encrypt your wallet.
Damn, I know what I am talking about,... that's why I would never underestimate it and take it lightly. Securing a server is the hardest thing to do these days. Especially if it is CLEARLY deducible for every hacker what your server does and how much value it holds! That's like asking to be raped. |
|
|
|
A master node could never lose the Dark from others due to the way signing is implemented.
The devs are going to make an Amazon EC2 server image to help noobs set up master nodes securely.
Ok, losing others money is impossible, ... But what about your wallet? A thief will know that when he manages to hack your masternode wallet, he will ALWAYS get atleast 1000 DRK out of it. |
|
|
|
Interesting thing this darkcoin. I bought some a week ago, and am very happy I did.  Thinking about setting up a masternode... but then again... I would NEVER DREAM OF putting a wallet on a server. That just invites hackers to steal my DRK. How do you guys guarantee the masternode holders are not just some noobs who have no idea about how to secure a server??? This is seriously dangerous... I wonder when we'll hear about the first masternode losing all it's dark. (and possibly even some DRK of other people?) Or am I missing something? Other then that, I very much like DRK! And will continue to buy a few every day... :-) Yes, you are missing something. The 1000DRK is just a collateral to ensure it is very expensive to attack the network. The coins have nothing to do with the Masternode roll of being randomly selected to mix a Darksend transaction. The masternodes play a role in the anonymity and they get pay for that service, the collateral coins are very unlikely to be stolen. But wait a minute. My wallet has to be on a publicly accessible server with static ip. Visible to all. My wallet must be on the same machine. No wallet, no working masternode. Am I right? So a hacker gets a free list of juicy static ips with each having a wallet of 1000 DRK, and we should just sleep tightly? |
|
|
|
Interesting thing this darkcoin. I bought some a week ago, and am very happy I did. Thinking about setting up a masternode... but then again... I would NEVER DREAM OF putting a wallet on a server. That just invites hackers to steal my DRK. How do you guys guarantee the masternode holders are not just some noobs who have no idea about how to secure a server??? This is seriously dangerous... I wonder when we'll hear about the first masternode losing all its DRK. (and possibly even some DRK of other people?) Or am I missing something? Other then that, I very much like DRK! And will continue to buy a few every day... :-) |
|
|
|
I have stopped using eligius two weeks ago.
I still have a few mBTC in the payout queue...
how do I request a manual payout?
It should tell you on the stats page of your address when the shares will be payed. I don't think there is a way to cut the queue short by requesting a manual payout. Well that's the thing... for many days it has been saying the same thing on my stats page: "you will be eligible for a payout of your balance in a manual payout no sooner than a few seconds from now."Those must be very long seconds... maybe planet venus seconds or something...  |
|
|
|
|
I have stopped using eligius two weeks ago.
I still have a few mBTC in the payout queue...
how do I request a manual payout?
|
|
|
|
Although I cant make any promises yet, I am, in fact, right now working on a stand-alone wallet.dat editor allowing you to view, edit, import/export and manage your private keys.
I will make an announcement here on the forums once a first testing alpha becomes ready!
Been a long time... Any news? Is there a wallet editor available somewhere? |
|
|
|
|
pool up again after maybe 1.5 hours.
Shares where accepted in the meantime.
So everything is fine!
Good job, admin!
|
|
|
|
|
multipool is down.
What's happening?
|
|
|
|
Hopefully that .13 BTC helps their case. I lost my respect for him when we found out it wasn't backed like he said it was
lol, yeah 100k Mazacoins aren't what they used to be... |
|
|
|
Last twitter was: BTC Oyate @BTC_Oyate Apr 2 OUTRAGE as state of SD uses deceased Daughter to bring a false child support case against mazacoin founder This guy really has a handle on positive PR. Yeah, that was a little strange, I hope he doesn't continue to wash "his laundry" in the public, because WTF has this got to do with mazacoin? Or does he want to build trust by being completely open? There is something like "too much openness"... |
|
|
|
Hi xray, did you read the TOS you agreed to? They write clearly that you can't get refund till the order is 61 days late. They even interpretate their TOS in a way that you have to wait 71 days before you can get refund (we discussed this some time ago).
We all invested in a very young company and in their TOS they pointed out how late they might be, so we knew the risks.
Please don't spam. You won't get refunded because of spamming. I'm waiting too for my order, but it doesn't changes anything if we freak out about that.
regards
comp006
Legally speaking, it appears as if bitmine really should have written how late they will be, not how late they might be. Is there any customer of bitmine who has not had his device delivered with 50% CPP or at the last moment before refund? I recieved my two coindesks exactly at 50% CPP... That's why I say, the TOS should read like: "we 100% will be late and deliver you 50% CPP ... we will NOT do everything in our power to avoid triggering the CPP. No, now that you have agreed to our TOS, we will abuse the system AGAINST YOU. To the fullest amount possible."That is the truth, and I say that as a customer who is quite happy with the coindesk. The product works (although turbomode not), but I still feel punked, because I wouldn't have made an order late november if I knew that EVERYONE would get their devices 5+ months later !!! Bitmine was never capable to deliver the devices in time, that's why I feel punked. They proposed the CPP as some kind of security, but they let this security trigger for everyone of us. And that IS ABUSE, no matter how you put it.I don't know the legal definition of this, but if you have a security, and have it trigger in 100% of the cases, then if one can prove that you have done this deliberately then I think this breaks some kind of law... But I am just saying, I am not a lawyer, but it is very fishy what happened here. |
|
|
|
|
were can I download a dogecoind daemon for windows?
I see it only has the qt ?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
