Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 02:26:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 [149] 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 »
2961  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes on: January 29, 2015, 02:43:37 AM
I think we need to be careful about posting addresses in this thread...

This link should work instead...: )

I thought about that too an hour ago, but then again, I posted my donation adress all the time (hundreds of times) in my posts in the darkcoin thread.

If two persons share each others adresses it can't be considered a coin giveaway.

But yes, better be careful.

Mr. Spread has been banned by a legitimate post where there is NO MENTION AT ALL to a giveway and he has NEVER asked anyone to post addresses. But people posting the addresses in the thread he created had him banned. So, better safe than sorry. No addresses here!
2962  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: New stratum/getwork proxy with Web-based GUI and pools management on: January 29, 2015, 12:29:03 AM
                                                          ------->Pool A
                                                          |         (Active)
                                                          |
                                                          |
 Single Betarig ------------> proxy stratum---------> Pool B                                            
    (Big renter)                                      |           (Active)                          
                                                          |    
                                                          |                                        
                                                           --------> Pool C
                                                                        (Active)


possible? what would be the config?

yes - but not 'split' hashing for each pool ... just failover as far as i can see ...

so it will jump from one pool to another to another and then back again once the initial pools come back online ...

its how i run mine farm when i want to rent my hashes out ...

please correct me if im wrong here ...

#crysx

I think you can set-up some kind of load balance mining 5 minutes on each pool round robin style. But i never tried...
2963  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes on: January 28, 2015, 11:24:19 PM
If this coin now has pools, does that mean it can be mined with ASIC?

Btw The pool that exists is a test pool. If you mine this coin on a pool, your coins will be stolen by other miners since the private key will be exposed. This coin does not make pools impossible it just makes pools not profitable because other pool members will steal your coins. That's the reason there are no pools, not any kind of banning or such.

Well, everytime the truth is said, trolls come here and try to burry it with large useless posts, so here it goes again...
2964  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes on: January 28, 2015, 09:48:01 PM
The spreadcoin.net main page should address issues publicly, concerning the legitimacy of its platform that may be confusing to investors.

investors are aware that big red letters mean someone is a troll and is making a fuss. Also, investors read the white paper, not trolls in an online forum.
2965  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes on: January 28, 2015, 07:35:11 PM
If this coin now has pools, does that mean it can be mined with ASIC?

Btw The pool that exists is a test pool. If you mine this coin on a pool, your coins will be stolen by other miners since the private key will be exposed. This coin does not make pools impossible it just makes pools not profitable because other pool members will steal your coins. That's the reason there are no pools, not any kind of banning or such.
2966  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes on: January 28, 2015, 07:15:33 PM
If this coin now has pools, does that mean it can be mined with ASIC?

There is no relation between ASIC and pools. ASIC that mine X11 are not publicly available yet, and they would not work with spreadcoin "out of the box". So expect a few years before ASIC are available for this coin.
2967  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes on: January 28, 2015, 06:38:03 PM
Oh, bitman008 is back with some more FUD. Remember to report his posts.

Idiot - price of SPR keeps going up, I'm glad to be holding it. Instead of spreading FUD, he should have just bought in.  Grin
He's trying to buy in but his greed is getting the best of him and instead of considering it a steal at 42k a coin he tries to spread FUD trying to make people believe his stupid rants and broken english as if he knows what he is speaking of lol Hey Bitman008 I have you on ignore and I suggest the rest of the community do the same and also report him to the moderator as I have already done yesterday Smiley Cheers

He's gotta have a lot of time on his hands to sit around all day and spread bad lies lol

He's probably being paid for that. Believe it or not, there are people who pay "professional" FUDers and spammers on these forums... I guess they overpaid him, since the dump is already over and he's still there...

I would believe it - maybe they're paying him to try and suppress the price a little bit, so they can get more before it rises.

<conspiracy theory mode on>
OTH, If i had someone making REAL criticisms to my coin that i didn't want to address and wanted people to simply ignore them, i'd hire someone to spam the thread with big red letters childish rants so that any criticisms, valid or not, would be dismissed as FUD.
<conspiracy theory mode off>

So maybe it's me and Wolf0 spaming the thread with big red letters so you wont believe we produced a "crippled" miner to sell the "real" one later, heh?

That would be a neat trick, since I haven't produced ANY public miner for SPR...

Please don't dismiss my FUD with mere TRUTH! Who cares for truth anyway if there are big red letters?
2968  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes on: January 28, 2015, 06:26:35 PM
Oh, bitman008 is back with some more FUD. Remember to report his posts.

Idiot - price of SPR keeps going up, I'm glad to be holding it. Instead of spreading FUD, he should have just bought in.  Grin
He's trying to buy in but his greed is getting the best of him and instead of considering it a steal at 42k a coin he tries to spread FUD trying to make people believe his stupid rants and broken english as if he knows what he is speaking of lol Hey Bitman008 I have you on ignore and I suggest the rest of the community do the same and also report him to the moderator as I have already done yesterday Smiley Cheers

He's gotta have a lot of time on his hands to sit around all day and spread bad lies lol

He's probably being paid for that. Believe it or not, there are people who pay "professional" FUDers and spammers on these forums... I guess they overpaid him, since the dump is already over and he's still there...

I would believe it - maybe they're paying him to try and suppress the price a little bit, so they can get more before it rises.

<conspiracy theory mode on>
OTH, If i had someone making REAL criticisms to my coin that i didn't want to address and wanted people to simply ignore them, i'd hire someone to spam the thread with big red letters childish rants so that any criticisms, valid or not, would be dismissed as FUD.
<conspiracy theory mode off>

So maybe it's me and Wolf0 spaming the thread with big red letters so you wont believe we produced a "crippled" miner to sell the "real" one later, heh?
2969  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) | Testing New Masternodes on: January 28, 2015, 06:19:31 PM
Oh, bitman008 is back with some more FUD. Remember to report his posts.

Idiot - price of SPR keeps going up, I'm glad to be holding it. Instead of spreading FUD, he should have just bought in.  Grin
He's trying to buy in but his greed is getting the best of him and instead of considering it a steal at 42k a coin he tries to spread FUD trying to make people believe his stupid rants and broken english as if he knows what he is speaking of lol Hey Bitman008 I have you on ignore and I suggest the rest of the community do the same and also report him to the moderator as I have already done yesterday Smiley Cheers

He's gotta have a lot of time on his hands to sit around all day and spread bad lies lol

He's probably being paid for that. Believe it or not, there are people who pay "professional" FUDers and spammers on these forums... I guess they overpaid him, since the dump is already over and he's still there...
2970  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 27, 2015, 06:50:59 PM

can someone send me test spr coins to this address: miEoLGY4WLTccbTN8PDWmnL4LzRv2SG1Av please?

I am mining in a slow VPS, and the diff is already too high Sad



thanks to whoever sent. I received 3 "donations". That's more than enough, i guess


So, little help here: how do i run a masternode?
You need to go to the masternodes page and start it by clicking the checkbox.
This thread is where everything is happening: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=938222.new#new

How do i do that from the command line?
2971  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 27, 2015, 06:26:01 PM

can someone send me test spr coins to this address: miEoLGY4WLTccbTN8PDWmnL4LzRv2SG1Av please?

I am mining in a slow VPS, and the diff is already too high Sad



thanks to whoever sent. I received 3 "donations". That's more than enough, i guess


So, little help here: how do i run a masternode?
2972  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 27, 2015, 06:22:01 PM

can someone send me test spr coins to this address: miEoLGY4WLTccbTN8PDWmnL4LzRv2SG1Av please?

I am mining in a slow VPS, and the diff is already too high Sad



thanks to whoever sent. I received 3 "donations". That's more than enough, i guess
2973  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 27, 2015, 06:10:47 PM

can someone send me test spr coins to this address: miEoLGY4WLTccbTN8PDWmnL4LzRv2SG1Av please?

I am mining in a slow VPS, and the diff is already too high Sad

2974  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 27, 2015, 05:10:20 PM
Oh, another bought account coming to FUD it up so they can get cheap coins.

not bought, that's a newbie... they don't even care to buy accounts anymore (spent all their money dumping SPR yesterday)
2975  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 27, 2015, 01:48:15 AM
Guys,

I'm a long term DRK investor and supporter, I have a single masternode and have been in DRK since it was around it's ATH. I've traded reasonably over that time to build up my holdings (an achievement in and of itself considering I bought in at around 0.02!) but it's not much more than the single masternode. That's okay though, and I'm grateful I've been able to do as much as I do, I've really enjoyed being involved and I love interacting with some very good people.

Now, I've taken a position here in SPR too (unfortunately before all this madness happened over the past few days so I most likely could have had four times as much Spread....that's crypto for you) and am looking forward to setting up a Spread masternode on my existing VPS. I think Mr Spread's take on how things could be done better is very interesting and I'm looking forward to seeing Spread make a positive impact.

And there are clearly many good people here too with lots of commitment, good ideas and positive sentiment. But unfortunately this thread is turning into a farce. I've just spent an hour or so catching up on the past 15 pages and it's been pretty mind numbing to say the least. We've had never ending posts by Hippie and that other idiot that constantly types in big red letters and can't put a space after a comma,to save himself. And now showjackoff has raised his ugly head in here. Good grief! Can we just move on and stop interacting so much with these people? The amount of tit-for-tat back and forth posting is terrible. I'd say 95% of the past 15 pages of posts have just been a constant FUD, then FUD rebuttal, then FUD rebuttal come-back, then FUD rebuttal come-back plus ask for details of proof, explanation, etc. It's appalling that so many are taking the bait and adding to the cacophony and continuation of shit-head noise.

I'm interested in what Spread's going to do to get adopted and how it will make inroads into areas that crypto may not currently touching i.e. what is Spread for and why is it important?

Can we talk about these concepts and just leave these idiots alone? I've responded once to Hippie and then bumped that response but I doubt it's had any effect. That's about as much as I'm willing to do because he's clearly committed to putting shit on everyone. We just shouldn't interact any further. The same with red,"can't,use,commas",text fool. And don't get started with ebolajackoff, it's just not worth it; he's had a history of extreme FUD and aggression in the DRK thread over many months and he's an untrustworthy individual.

RenegadeMan - the easiest thing to do is just ignore the individuals that you want to.  All of their posts disappear but their placeholders are there if they ever say anything of use.

Yes. Thanks pokeytex, I'm well aware of the ignore button but if everyone else is still responding and interacting, one is exposed to it all still through people quoting. It's often very hard to not respond to people whose only intent is harm; one wants to defend and often lash back at the lies and ridicule, but it's exactly the same as all forms of bullying; the perpetrators get-off on being interacted with and seeing people get annoyed/upset. What I'm putting forward is the need for us all to maintain some level of dignity and not get caught up in the abuse and obnoxious behaviour these individuals are so committed to. Once they're getting ignored by everyone, they'll go off to find somewhere else they can peddle their nastiness (it's the nature of the mindset they've chosen to adopt....it feeds off people being "hooked" and responding). Lets just not interact with them beyond perhaps an initial rebuttal to clarify facts. It's the never ending back and forth come-backs that are just filling the thread up with rubbish which will just turn-off many many people.

Maybe there should be something like a warning in the OP (or maybe in the title) to dismiss the FUD, so that people that reads the thread do not get caught in the FUD. Something like: FUD and diffamation campaign in progress, please ignore comments by the following users, issues are addressed in posts <link> and <link>.

My fear of just ignoring the trolls is that people that reads the thread will get the wrong impression that their false issues were not addressed, and fall for it.
2976  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 26, 2015, 10:43:09 PM
Gitian builds take sooo loooong time and if something went wrong you need to restart them from the beginning. Anyone needs Linux builds for testing masternodes or Windows is enough? Source will be available so you will be able to build them yourself.

source is fine with me. I always build from source anyway.
2977  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 26, 2015, 09:57:43 PM
Holy shit, did HippieTech REALLY just think that was a virus warning?  HOLY FUCK!  HAHAHAHAHAHAH.  I took screenshots in case he edits that out.

Oh god...
I am just observing and saw that post also. I had a good laugh. What is even more epic is that he is the fud source. Panic dumpers have to be Sad

No again.. I posted those screenies so as to warn people about the potential security risk(s) when using that block explorer. Those pages completely hijacked my browser and wouldn't allow access to any of the open tabs.

Search for Mr. Spread's 80k addy with both explorers then get back to me if you notice anything odd about the reported balances.

Whatever you do, DO NOT use the "block", "tx id", and/or the "address" search fields unless you're willing to deal with what I experienced.
What I don't understand Hippie is why do you care if Mr. Spread has 80k of SpreadCoin? There are coins out there that are 100% premined or coins out there that have a premine of 10% which is way more than 80k of Spread and people still invest in them!! So Mr. Spread has 80k worth of Spread big deal!! He created this coin so I would assume that the developer would have some holdings of their own coin or what would be the point of making a coin if the developer couldn't profit off their creation? What I don't understand is why all of a sudden out of nowhere you show up FUDDING this coin to all hell trying to get people to sell their coins? Could you answer that for me please and thank you Smiley Cheers

Do you realize that statements justifying this unethical behaviour may one day land you accessory to fraud charges ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(crime)

Lets be clear about a few things about me, okie ?

I do not :
1- share my experiences and/or observations with the intent of creating FUD. (Tough shit if the truth hurts.)
2- create/ use alternate accounts.
3- put myself in a position where there may be a conflict of interest.
LMAO accessory to fraud charges haha HOW??? Because I simply stated that BIG DEAL if the developer of the coin holds 80k of HIS coin that HE CREATED? Also I never said that you used alternate accounts did I? I simply asked what your problem was and why all of a sudden did you start FUDDING in this thread? I then stated that there are plenty of coins out there that are either 100% premined or the developers of the coin hold a huge percent of the coin off the hop and people still invest in them.  I don't get where you are trying to say that I will get charged with fraud charges lol I don't see how I could get charged with fraud charges? Because I simply put my faith on a coin that I think is a decent investment that makes me an accessory to fraud? I think you need to figure your shit out buddy and maybe take your meds before you start trying to convince people that something is a scam or a shit coin Smiley But I would love to know how my statements would make me an accessory to fraud charges if you don't mind explaining that to me because I'm sure that the wonderful people of this thread haven't had enough comedy for today Wink

Don't worry, he is just FUDing you into believing you might have committed fraud. But then,

I do not :
1- share my experiences and/or observations with the intent of creating FUD. (Tough shit if the truth hurts.)

leaves me confused... is he creating FUD about the fraud charges and just plain lied to us, or is he telling the truth and thus lying to you about the fraud thing? OMG. Now i'm lost in so many FUD and lies Wink
2978  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 26, 2015, 09:26:36 PM
(...)
I do not :
1- share my experiences and/or observations with the intent of creating FUD. (Tough shit if the truth hurts.)
(...)

I severely disagree with this statement. Do you have any evidence whatsoever that supports it?
2979  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 26, 2015, 09:21:55 PM
Long live $100 Spreadcoin!  Grin
I'd laugh my ass off right now if some Whale came by seen this and was like "FUCK THIS" and dumped like 20 BTC into SpreadCoin and the price SKYROCKETED and all the panic sellers would just shit themselves thinking "Why the FUCK did I sell those coins for so cheap?" LOL That would be totally classic if that was to happen lol

We shouldn't be relying on whales necessarily.  Mr Spread's coding is what would be 'classic' if he rocks it and provides what many here think he is capable of.
Oh without a doubt that would be the cherry on top of this sundae for sure Smiley I just was stating that it would be funny if some Whale did do that though just because of all the people who panic sold this coin because of this FUD that begun right before the testing for the masternodes start (which I also found quite convenient) lol But yes when Mr. Spread pulls through which I'm pretty confident that he will pull through then the price will speak for itself and those panic sellers will still be kicking themselves but I just wanted a good laugh right now lol

Do you really think there were any panic sells? I think all the volume moved today was in the hands of the fuders and they just lost their money on it. I mean, who would fall for big red letters anyway?
2980  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 26, 2015, 07:18:21 PM
What I don't get:

What is so bad about pool(s) ? Smiley

well, there are 2 main things:

1- centralization of hashpower in the hands of few pool owners (sometimes a single pool has 51% of the hash power, which allows them to perform 51% attacks on the network)
2- multipools dumping the coins as soon as they are mined, making the price of the coin go down.

There are also good things about pools, like enabling more predictability in the income from mining and allowing small miners to mine when hashrates are too big. So it's actually a "choice" this coin has made to avoid pools, and it has been a successful one.


1. Well miners decide where to mine, if they see the pool gets too large/big, they can just move away. Fair pool ops would also close registrations and put a message on the pool for the miners to spread.

2. A multipool is also helping coins getting the price up.. Imagine coins that are not mineable anymore, a multipool mines other currencies and buys "that" coin with the coins it mined and pays out in "that" currency.. There is nothing bad about it - I - or any other pool op, could set up a normal multipool for SPR in a few minutes.


Some seem to forget that there are lot of "private" pools in SPR.. I saw a distribution chart somehwere in this thread, I think it was in the OP, well, if that doesn't look like there are a few private pools i don't know what it looks like Smiley

Everything that is somekind of "worthy" will be mined by people with lots of hashing power.. So always the people with the biggest hash get the most coin.. It doesnt matter if there are private or public pools Smiley



Well, clearly there are already a lot of coins for those who do agree with you. SPR is the coin for those who DO NOT. I still prefer not to rely on the conscience of pool owners and miners and have a little bit o mathematics give me a little help. As i said, there is value in pools and there is also problems. Choosing to allow or avoid pools in a coin is mostly a choice.

And, based in your last sentence, i don't think you got it correctly : we are not communists here, we really don't care that some people make more money than others, we are talking about securing the blockchain, not about distributing wealth.
Pages: « 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 [149] 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!