|
I read you need at least 20 XRP to activate an account.
So 1 Ripple giveaway makes no sense: you should at least give 21 XRP.
Probably 21 Ripple is too much; you better switch to a coin that mekes sense.
|
|
|
|
ATM I harvest with 15k XEM and got average 1 Block per Week with average 15 XEM fees each. I don't do transactions either. I wouldn't not wonder if the price of XEM compare to Fiat and BTC will rise massively within the next 5 years. That's why, the harvesting is a nice side gift from the system.
That's one of the best features of NEM, delegated harvesting. Collecting fees with your PC off. Don't think mining BTC with a comparable amount would get you anything like NEM ... just wasted electricity  greentea, You know similar coins with similar concept of harvesting/staking ? Every POS coin (NXT, Waves...) has ability to delegate staking to a pool but this brings to centralization and you must trust the pool to return you the profits. NEM is better: you delegate to your own personal pool and you have complete control even if your pool runs on someone else's node. |
|
|
|
3,65% annual interest?
Yes, something like that. |
|
|
|
|
Aren't you devs concerned about ETH scalability issues?
ChronoBank project aims at real world mass adoption, it may kill ETH if it succeeds.
Any plan to switch chain before the shit hits the fan?
|
|
|
|
Just for info: right now - what amount of income can I expect from own supernode?
I can place a server near M9 - main internet exchange traffic hub in Moscow, Russia.
About 300 - 320 XEM per day |
|
|
|
1. I got an error message after registering using your referral link: "invalid referal" should I enter the whole URL or something else?
2. Are you launching social media bounty program soon?
This is a huge project with a lot of potential!
ICO is over |
|
|
|
Scusate la mia ignoranza ma io nel mio portafoglio mi trovo sta roba:
Waves Community 3PPKF2pH4KMYgsDixjrhnWrPycVHr1Ye37V false 1
MobileGo 3PBZsbSX2CCxjUHwmqcLLRhdcdbKa2Tim6a false 88.04102744
WavesGo 3P2HNUd5VUPLMQkJmctTPEeeHumiPN2GkTb false 1.89064325
Miner Reward 3PR8T2UCseRnFR4KdbLHcaK9BxrCoXNYw9m false 0.52
Cosa è sta roba?
MobileGo e WavesGo cosa ne faccio?
I WavesGo potresti venderli ma temo che ci ricaveresti meno della fee di DEX MobileGo è un falso di cui se vuoi puoi sbarazzarti qui: https://wavesdrop.com/?faucet=thedump |
|
|
|
(from Bart's question) "The proposer can set a date for voting. NEM users vote with their importance either in favor or against the idea. If a quorum of at least 3% of the importance of the NEM blockchain is met and the vote passes with a 65% majority, then the vote is considered accepted by the community. Otherwise it fails. If the community gives the thumbs up, to submit the project details as aforementioned to the core committee. _If the community accepts the vote, then the core team will vote. _ _If 80% of the core team is in favor, the proposal is accepted. _ If the vote fails, the core team can either reject the proposal outright or propose a modified idea to the community, in which case the community would vote as in step 2. This continues until the proposal is either accepted or rejected. If a proposal is rejected, it may be proposed again after a waiting period of 2 weeks." Those IF's should be presented clearly - prefer some programming language coz otherwise there is coming out such conclusion that If 80% of the core team is in favor, the proposal is accepted ? Did I get it right? FOR i = 1 to Infinity Step 14 IF the community accepts the vote, THEN The core team will vote. _ IF 80% of the core team is in favor, THEN the proposal is accepted. ELSE modified proposal OR END ENDIFELSE modified proposal OR ENDENDIFNEXThopefully That kind of procedure I am expecting, but is it also in the original spec ? Yes, there's an old google document somewhere in forum.nem.io with the rules. |
|
|
|
...
Comme par hazard, le responsable marketing de NEM nous a fais le plaisir de nous contacter aujourd'hui, j'espere pouvoir m'entretenir avec eux dans pas longtemps, c'est déja un excellent pas en avant car NVO veut travailler avec touts les projets Altcoin. On utilise counterparty, on stock sur maidsafe, on veut utiliser toutes les blockchains.
...
This guy is NVO dev. I don't know why he wrote in french language. Come on, i´m learning Japanese, i can´t learn french at the same time And what does "NVO" mean ? Sorry for my ignorance. I can hardly understand it but Google Translate is your friend. What's NVO? Hint: follow the link to the quoted message. |
|
|
|
...
Comme par hazard, le responsable marketing de NEM nous a fais le plaisir de nous contacter aujourd'hui, j'espere pouvoir m'entretenir avec eux dans pas longtemps, c'est déja un excellent pas en avant car NVO veut travailler avec touts les projets Altcoin. On utilise counterparty, on stock sur maidsafe, on veut utiliser toutes les blockchains.
...
This guy is NVO dev. I don't know why he wrote in french language. |
|
|
|
|
quite unfair: THEY were hacked so YOUR coins are gone
|
|
|
|
I'm now wandering how can you cope with race conditions and double spend attempts in cross chain trades.
Suppose I sell my asset X through NVO, buyer sends me asset Y and in the meantime I transfer my asset X somewhere else through a native wallet.
There's a chance I get asset Y for free.
Thanks for your support, this have been addressed, and here is the content : The answer to 0-conf attack vector is in the reddit thread. Effectively when you validate a transaction without confirmations (0-conf), there is a risk for Double spending, or replace by fee, speed attack ... but this can only happen in the case of a normal address, in the reddit thread he didn't considered the specifications of a 2-OF-2. In the case of the validator, the trades will be handled using multisig 2-OF-2, which means that when you will trade using the validator, you will have a shared 2-OF-2 address with the validator, this will prevent this type of attacks as the validator's won't allow such transactions or manipulations. Once the Validator allows a transaction and process it, you won't be able to issue an attack as you will need the agreement of the Validator. Unless you corrupt the validator, which means breaking SafeNetwork, regroupoing the framents and then decrypting them, all of this, just to get at the validator and try to corrupt a single address. These steps are actually not feasable, maybe in 10 or 20 years using quantum computers or using a lazer computer with graphen components. Even if you do it, you won't be able to corrupt more then a single address, the one you will share with the validator because the addresses will change randomly. Really intresting. Does this system need multisig support in all the coins? may be I'm wrong but I think Waves doesn't have multisig yet. Another question: ever tought adding NEM to the supported coins? NEM has multisig support, has assets, but no asset exchange yet. |
|
|
|
Does anyone have any idea when catapult is out?
This summer  Ok thanks. Uh, summer is 4 months long here lol. Can you tell me which month or months? Nobody knows |
|
|
|
Hello, thank you for the question. In fact, NVO will allow assets trading, for now, you are seeing it from a centralized point of view.
The model of NVO is A sends to B, so if you have a Waves Asset, and wants to sell it for BTC, and found someone who wants your Assets and offers BTC, both will exchange asset for crypto.
It is as simple as that. The ratio is decided by the traders.
Very nice! I'm now wandering how can you cope with race conditions and double spend attempts in cross chain trades. Suppose I sell my asset X through NVO, buyer sends me asset Y and in the meantime I transfer my asset X somewhere else through a native wallet. There's a chance I get asset Y for free. |
|
|
|
I must be missing something important... Atraura :  nem foundation  loooots of xemz  What's your point? I don't see it. And what's with this name you marked? Can you explain it a bit more concisely, please? I cannot comprehend why member of nem foundation is requesting from community fund. Anyone? Because he needs them in order to complete his project? |
|
|
|
|
I'm dumb, need some clarifications.
The wallet will enable me to buy Waves assets paying in NVO tokens.
Am I allowed to buy Waves assets using another coin?
I guess the seller wants Waves for his assets.
The software automatically converts my coin in Waves?
If so how is the exchange ratio decided?
|
|
|
|
Why would Catapult help Nem price all that much as others have claimed. Isn't it just a C++ version of the current Nem? Just to make it faster? There isn't any new feature is there?
Catapult is a complete refactoring of the code to add new features and improve existing ones. Switching to c++ only because our developers prefer it. |
|
|
|
I would like to draw attention of the management behind the Waves dx platform towards assets creation feature. There should be some strict rules for anyone who wish to create an asset because after all it is all about the reputation of Waves. People already begin to question because of the abuse of this service by some people. I hope I expressed well what the concern is about.
They are working on unique asset names. I'm curious to know what will happen to all existing fake and duplicate tokens. Will they just disappear from everyone's wallet? |
|
|
|
He is a council member of the NEM Foundation, not the president of it. |
|
|
|
At the very least the core developers of NEM/XEM should publicly weigh in on this project before a vote is taken:
1. Will it benefit and support the NEM platform in the future?
2. Is the cost of this project reasonable as presented.
3. Will the value of XEM increase for shareholders with its' implementation?
Most of us can only speculate on the value and cost of this project and need the honest assessment of the NEM developers to form an opinion.
NEM team hasn't a cristal ball to know the future for sure. Anyway the president of NEM Foundation (rockethead ) already expressed his thoughts about this project. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
