I have read the medium of this project that they have developed this so called "prototype" which I didn't understand well. Can someone explain me more about the project development so I can understand well what is "prototype" means. I hope this will be address.
Prototype simply means first sample model. It's basically the early stage of the ICO where the team will release the prototype of the project in order for them to gain audience, popularity, and also investors that are willing to invest on the project. Even with a prototype you can make mistakes. It's important that the quality is already good so people are convinced of the team. You may have a good point, but what is good by having an available prototype is that people can actually experience the usage of the platform and in this way, I think they can surely make some suggestions abut some improvement of the platform. As long as it is not totally disappointing or just extremely limitedly working, showing a prototype can be the right step for sure. |
|
|
|
The project have a lot of potential, I wonder why people are selling GBX under ICO price, really don't know.
There are many reasons why they might do it. Some just lose confidence in the project and some need the money for unknown reasons of course. |
|
|
|
Bitguild has a great vision and goal indeed to unite online gamers and crypto currency investors. Hoping for more projects like this in the future.
All the young gamers from the past have the ability to invest now so I think creating games that suit the taste of people who play games in 90s will surely attract more support to this project. Yeah, you are right there mate. Pretty sure, I will be also interested in investing in one of their launched game and also the game will be attractive if the member or player can earn profit just by playing it online. What do you mean that you are interested in investing in a game? Is it also possible to invest in particular games? |
|
|
|
ICO ends few days ago, what about bounty? When you will update spreadsheets please?  - For this i guess you should refer their bounty thread and also they might give some good updates regarding the stakes. Also each project needs a lot of time for counting the stakes and also sending the tokens so be patient and you will recieve your tokens. There are many ways to contact them like their telegram groups which we can actually DM the CM. In that way, things can be clarified within just a short period of time. We know that the ICO has already been ended few weeks ago and what we can do for now is to keep up to date with their announcement. Has there so far been any AMA with the team or one of the developers or only written communication thus far? |
|
|
|
Finally got my Globitex tokens. It is a pity that the bear market lowered the price three times lower than the ICO. I hope that the price will be higher at the Golobitex stock exchange itself. Nobody knows when the bidding is about to begin?
Not the end of the world. You could have used the opportunity to cost average down your portfolio and individual tokens. If it goes up it can also go very quickly. |
|
|
|
I have read the medium of this project that they have developed this so called "prototype" which I didn't understand well. Can someone explain me more about the project development so I can understand well what is "prototype" means. I hope this will be address.
Prototype simply means first sample model. It's basically the early stage of the ICO where the team will release the prototype of the project in order for them to gain audience, popularity, and also investors that are willing to invest on the project. Even with a prototype you can make mistakes. It's important that the quality is already good so people are convinced of the team. |
|
|
|
RCN goes live April, Hopefully the beta exchange by Ripio will follow closely. great time coming
I added some Ripio tokens to my position as I researched project well and expect it will bring true value after launch this year. I like that it is in communication with other projects building their products on Ethereum network, like Request. Future looks bright and this bear market is good opportunity to get some tokens with great discount (could drop even more). It will produce important synergies among the projects that collaborate and can bring additional value for the users of all combined networks together. |
|
|
|
It is possible for me but i am thinking if it will reach that 3k satoshi for sure in the future it will reach $1 with also the high value in dollars. I am not holding xvg anymore maybe i will catch some again after that said news. Anything is possible in xvg what more now that it has an active teams.
USD 1 won't going to happen, never ever after that deal. Some can turn it as they want, just impossible now. The only 1+ USD chance would have been Paypal, Amazon, Ebay, something in that tier and category. Just having adds now on every pornsite doesn't make it USD 1 automaticly for sure. I'am allready beginning to realize that this will cause mega problems with ASACP, which someone should not underestiminate in its power. If minors is granted access to pornsites through verge than the Verge team has allready 1 foot in jail .... While I definitely agree with the legalities you mentioned here and your previous post, 3rd party integration with age verification systems will be key. This still does not hamper Verge rise (no pun intended) on porn sites or for whatever reason. The burden of proof/verification falls on the merchant/service etc etc, not Verge, as it should be. I also know there will be some resistance from those opposed to porn and other forms of entertainment, but again - with Verge being a key asset traded it still makes XVG, well an asset - regardless of what it's used for. Agreed as well. However, as soon as you have again age verification, you have lost the privacy factor. Age Verification just excludes privacy, easy as that. While i agree that it falls into the merchant service the outcome could be either Mindgeek drops Verge when threatend by the authorities and or Verge has to face some legal responsibility as well. I would not exclude the later having in mind that many authorities just search for a piece to attack crypto. This is very very very hot and dangerous play. Seriously ASCAP has huge influence when it comes to protecting childs and minors, no fun there. Lets see if the other so called partner is mindgeek and verge is just its client paying for advertising or if its something else. Age verification alone doesn't destroy privacy. If you prove via a zeroknowledge proof that you are old enough it would be fine. |
|
|
|
The authors of the project Omnitude ICO promise to make the field of Internet trading transparent, profitable and safe. This system will play the role of a bridge for integration between existing systems and the technology of blockrooms without the need to replace them.  Your summary applies to 1000 other projects as well. What is it that makes this one unique? |
|
|
|
Many personal data can be underestimated. Especially if this content can be used for any purpose. And the service for control, was it would not be bad.
And why do people post their reports here? Bounty branch does not work?
Some projects have a combined thread which is really annoying because you can't have a normal conversation with others who are interested in it. |
|
|
|
I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't. The one thing I really don't like and don't understand in ICObench is rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. So they review projects and making grades for each project, but some of this experts are obviously don't know what these projects are about. Yeah, this rating system is ridiculous, some great projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings As for my opinion, every "expert" should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the numbers. I do agree with you guys, there should be a kind of explanation or the way to discuss ay least, but both of those experts haven't answered on LinkedIn. But don't you worry, ICObench rating is one of preliminary ratings and having 5.0 is much more suspicious than say 3.8 or 4.3 as it's a result of some work done. The final mark comes from the market anyway ) They have also been bad with their ratings at times when high quality of the project was very obvious. In that case they probably did an independent rating. Question remains whether they take money from some projects or not but I doubt that we will ever find out. We won't unless someone enrolled an independent expert tells the world Having a whistleblower would be great. An enrolled expert might not have the info we are looking for though. Payments could still be made in the background without some of the experts even knowing. |
|
|
|
I am not asking for too much, I rather think you might be aiming for too much. I think a more modest approach to build the whole system step by step without announcing everything in advance might be the wiser process.
It doesn't make sense, because it is better if all things announced clearly, transparently at the start. It doesn't make sense if Ultima team keep their promises and finish all stuffs they stated at the beginning. Time will give us answer, so please give the project, Ultima team more time to see their products, their efforts, their dedication to the project and Ultima community. I prefer projects that underpromise and overdeliver over those who overpromise and underdeliver Of course you should communicate the vision, but it should all be within realistic reach. Underpromising needs to be done carefully though unless you are fine with not drawing too much attention to your project for a while. |
|
|
|
Hello everyone, tourism has recently been very popular, and Tavitt gives you the opportunity to earn on vacation) Very cool!
True, but on the market comes more and more tourist projects on the basis of the blockchain. It is not yet clear how they will use it. Tourism has been popular recently? Lol so when was tourism not so popular? Could you educate us on that topic a little bit? |
|
|
|
the project is interesting and very promising. please tell me, in which country are you officially registered? and in which countries will your platform be launched?
Hi, than you for your interested. Our headquarter is based in Hong Kong. Are you a registered company and if yes can you please post the details here along with all information about the team? thanks for the answer, but I would also like details about the legal issue of this all. I think we have a right to know this Is it possible to meet up with you in Hong Kong soon? I will be in Asia and I may also spend a few days in Hong Kong. What do you think? |
|
|
|
Hi, Guys so, I have almost finished my e-commerce platform with BTCZ Payments, (everyone will be able to open their own shop with BTCZ payments for free) I have also finished 90% of our crypto trading course that'll be available on that platform in 2-3 days max. 50% of BTCZ raised by selling this course will be donated to BTCZ DEV Found every week  so my question is... If You would buy that course how You would like to be available? send as a file by e-mail? available to download through website or maybe You would like Your own account on my platform where this course will be available for You all the time and where I could easily update it with new lessons? Just let me know If you are so good at this, can you make an exchange where all altcoins are traded against BTCZ? You can start with the top 50 altcoins listed and everyone can trade them against BTCZ like BNB and USDT. Would you launch such an exchange? You can expect almost every trading pair to have very low liquidity but you still have all the maintenance cost and staff and trouble. Not worth it I think. If you think about it from a big picture standpoint, that is what Vitalik did. Ethereum is basically a decentralized exchange to create, buy and sell ICOs. I think the benefits are huge. That is what BNB is for Binance. Both projects Ethereum and Binance cannot be compared to BitcoinZ. I think it is a far-fetched dream to believe that this can reach those levels. |
|
|
|
The price of DeepOnion is very stable towards the last airdrop. Once those final 350.000 coins have been distributed the only way is up!
Looking forward to this historical Friday!
I agree with you mate. Deeponion will move upward after this. It may take some more time to move upward. But we are here for the long term Well it depends on how the altcoin market recovers. If it goes up there I am quite confident that DeepOnion also goes up. with all the new features coming up i think it will go up but i hope that people dump so i can buy cheap i am torned T_T" Dilemmas  use a mixed strategy then, sell a small percentage and then buy some more, if price is going down after airdrop (and i do not see any real reason, the "market" already discounted that..) you are going to profit, if not.. well, you will be happy because your other onions will be valued more You should still have a good balance in your portfolio. Being only in one coin can put you in a difficult situation. |
|
|
|
I thought there was only 1 stage for the ICO (5th Mar. - 4th Apr.), but Devs have changed their ICO rules right after the end of original ICO, without any notification, and are planning to do more ICO sales from 10th May.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
why will the dev team want to lunch another ico? is it that the first ico was not successful? and also can not just change the terms of first initial ico without making proper announcement in this regards, trust and transparency is very important factor for both project developers and invest, bridging that trust will automatically bring misunderstanding and mistrust in the project, really cant understand why they have to go back on their words  As long as they put everyone into the position that they were in before the investment I think it is ok. |
|
|
|
What will be the value of the Flux token? Will it be used as an internal currency in the system?
You will be able to use this token on FLUX platform to buy games, support developers by crowdfunding their ideas and later receive commission from the game, participate in paid matchmaking and win more FLUX tokens using your skills, choose the best skins from the community and buy them, buy virtual goods and support your favourite streamers with FLUX token. If you receive commission from the game is that the type of passive income stream that the SEC might call a characteristic of a security? |
|
|
|
I didn't know that and it is also impossible to verify whether they are independent or not. We all know how the three big ratings agencies did their job right before the financial crisis They claimed to be independent, but obviously they weren't. The one thing I really don't like and don't understand in ICObench is rating. There are several of so-called "experts" who have no idea about the tech behind blockchain and ICO. So they review projects and making grades for each project, but some of this experts are obviously don't know what these projects are about. Yeah, this rating system is ridiculous, some great projects has 3.5-3.8 rankings As for my opinion, every "expert" should be forced to describe his grades and leave a comment, so people can research and follow opinions not just the numbers. I do agree with you guys, there should be a kind of explanation or the way to discuss ay least, but both of those experts haven't answered on LinkedIn. But don't you worry, ICObench rating is one of preliminary ratings and having 5.0 is much more suspicious than say 3.8 or 4.3 as it's a result of some work done. The final mark comes from the market anyway ) They have also been bad with their ratings at times when high quality of the project was very obvious. In that case they probably did an independent rating. Question remains whether they take money from some projects or not but I doubt that we will ever find out. |
|
|
|
I thought there was only 1 stage for the ICO (5th Mar. - 4th Apr.), but Devs have changed their ICO rules right after the end of original ICO, without any notification, and are planning to do more ICO sales from 10th May.
They have also changed their Whitepaper, and rewritten the period of ICO. The way of doing things are so UNFAIR.
I feel so scammed by Vestarin Devs. People who have not invested yet, just STAY AWAY from this project.
EDIT: now they say that they won't do another ICO. They just messed up, and lost trust from initial investors.
Tell me whether the ICO has ended or will there be still the next stages? And how much was collected in total? As far as I know the first stage ICO is over. Until now there has been no clarification about the continuation of the 2nd stage ICO. If the initial investor is disappointed with the decision, how is the future of Vestarin next? I hope I keep getting paid from here. This is a very sad situation. But I can understand the developers. Lack of money is bad for the development of the project. Tough for all developers right now as the hype is going down a lot. Will first round investors get their money back or is it certain that a second ICO round will follow? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
