Minimum withdrawl isn't really applicable to how Elgius works, though there is a minimum (.04 BTC appx.) to get put into the payout que that kinda might sorta count as a minimum withdrawl limitation.
It's user-adjustable. |
|
|
|
Luke-Jr, any ideas on the comms errors I've reported above? My U3 seems to be running fine in all other aspects, but it seems the comms errors cause it to drop off the pool I have it pointed to (or the pool boots it off, not sure). Thank you.
Nope, never seen comm errors here. Although the U3 does like to randomly die :/ |
|
|
|
I downloaded the Win32.zip version of your file and scanned it with my antivirus software and it said it has 2 high risk threats. Are these real threats or just my antivirus acting up?
Check that they match my signature, but AVs have indeed been known to flag BFGMiner as a false positive. |
|
|
|
|
You're welcome. -Eligius miners
|
|
|
|
are this software can running well at os linux android?
It is running well for Windows, OS X and linux but not for android. You can't mine using an android phone. However, you can connect miner(s) to android phone and mine using it but it won't be effective. Eh, most Android devices should be better than a Raspberry Pi at least. |
|
|
|
Why is this website allegedly giving my email to spammers?
Not sure what you mean, can you give more details? I got this email spam: From: seba.burger@gmail.comSubject: Distribute your coin from Android game Hi, Sébastien from Paris here ! And i'm building several Android apps wich distributes giveaway of cryptocurrencies, to help devs to promote their brand. If it may interest you, take a look on this thread where I give a little more details : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1064953.0 or directly on the wesbite where I have install the system on it : w -SPAMLINK-ww.aapcoin.com (it's on test mode only) If you're still interested and would like to be intregrated on Aapcoin or have the same website for your currency only, you can reply to this email and i'll be able to give you more details about it ! Regards, Sébastien Burger PS : I have got your email from http://coinmarketcap.com/, if it's a misstake and you're not a cryptocurrency developper, sorry for this message. |
|
|
|
|
Why is this website allegedly giving my email to spammers?
|
|
|
|
|
Do you plan to send a unit to developers so we can properly support it?
|
|
|
|
Hello!
Maybe a stupid question, but I did not find an answer from forum or any other sources.
I am quite new in mining and I like to know is bfgminer mining like a small pool when mining solo? So if I have for ex 4 miners, does bfgminer use those to mine like a one miner with hashrate of their all or is it mining all 4 miners individually?
There is no difference. |
|
|
|
What's the best CPPSRB pool out there for Bitmain sha miners?
Are you associated with Eligius? I've only ever used Eligius and itzod (now closed); surprised this thread's OP is lacking on info about what pools use CPPSRB - maybe Polmine is another option (but I have not used them). wizkid057 runs Eligius for the past few years, but I remain affiliated to some extent (mainly as an advisor). |
|
|
|
|
Just a note CPPSRB works better than PPLNS for pretty much any usage pattern.
|
|
|
|
hey guys, I know this is an older thread but I just have finally got off my but and started getting into the mining again. I just picked up a Pi, a Bitfury M-card (v3.0) and a bunch of H-cards v2.2, I was just wondering if anyone would have any info on how to get bfgminer to detect the cards? or if I should go to another mining software.
please the info on these kinds of cards is rare as but there are so many of these cards floating around on ebay and all over the forum. cheers
Josh
I'm not sure you can mix cards of different versions like that. IF it works, it would be using ./configure --enable-bfsb and then at runtime bfgminer -S bfsb:auto |
|
|
|
Thanks, I'll give that one a shot and report back. A separate question, even though the U3 reports DEAD, it still seems to be hashing, the number to the right of the slash updates like the unit is working; albeit not at 60GH, but right now if I can get it to run stable at all I'll be happy.  That's how averages work.. |
|
|
|
So EU is light years ahead of you. Go figure... Yeah, and the EU is half the size of the USA... EDIT: You can get cable practically everywhere and fibre in towns as small as 1500 people. How about outside those towns? For example, where there's one hour per hectometre. I thought I'd point out, the EU is not half the size of the US. The EU outnumbers the USA by nearly 200 million. EU Population: ~503 Million est. USA Populaiton: ~318.9 Million est. I was referring to land mass, not population. Your information means the EU is 4 times as dense as the US, so easier to build up infrastructure for... |
|
|
|
Is there a way to relabel Lucko from "Hero Member" to "Clueless Idiot"? <.< This is by design from the beginning. If you don't like the way bitcoin is designed, you should use something else. There is no way to change it. There is no way to force anyone running a full node to mine or relay any specific transaction.
No you need to change it to do that... If you don't it will not reject valid transaction. You need to add so-called antispam to it and say this in a valid translation but it is not valid for me. And when a big pools and nodes start doing this and that is blocking big wallets providers it is a big problem if they don't tell you what new rules are... this is practically unannounced a fork... No, this is what Bitcoin has always done by design and also by default since 0.3.19 released by Satoshi. Policy is not a network fork in any sense. |
|
|
|
So EU is light years ahead of you. Go figure... Yeah, and the EU is half the size of the USA... EDIT: You can get cable practically everywhere and fibre in towns as small as 1500 people. How about outside those towns? For example, where there's one hour per hectometre. |
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I must be too tired or something... I can't see how this is possible.
Analysing a core dump, I can see it's not getting into vecPriority, but getrawtransaction is succeeding so it must be in the mempool or confirmed... and it obviously isn't confirmed. Yet I don't see how it's possible for it to be in the mempool and not be making it into vecPriority without the "invalid input" logging, which isn't in the log file either.
Stumped. :/
|
|
|
|
This one is clearly above 0.0001 BTC/KB, so Luke, where exactly is the problem?
Not sure why this time, but Eligius's node still didn't receive it. Just this one or all of the unconfirmed (like 10 of them)? I see ccc86e9316fcd17f1cf1223c5f1dd64633e70a150a71a1c6a53b0fe0d6f39991 and 04515f9e358dbff637ee3c6c31471d2b2a8be91ddb75b4fa4872b4c5568f796e on the node, but not being mined. 04515... was being mined an hour ago, though. I wonder what's going on with that. It's still shown as being unconfirmed: http://btc.blockr.io/tx/info/04515f9e358dbff637ee3c6c31471d2b2a8be91ddb75b4fa4872b4c5568f796eWhere did you see it being mined? In a template. We didn't find a block during that time, so it's not on the blockchain. |
|
|
|
This one is clearly above 0.0001 BTC/KB, so Luke, where exactly is the problem?
Not sure why this time, but Eligius's node still didn't receive it. Just this one or all of the unconfirmed (like 10 of them)? I see ccc86e9316fcd17f1cf1223c5f1dd64633e70a150a71a1c6a53b0fe0d6f39991 and 04515f9e358dbff637ee3c6c31471d2b2a8be91ddb75b4fa4872b4c5568f796e on the node, but not being mined. 04515... was being mined an hour ago, though. I wonder what's going on with that. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
