I think both Satoshi and Nakamoto are common names in Japan. But you may find more hits under "Sato", a short version. I spent time in 08-09 in Japan and learned a bit about the language. I may be wrong, but let me take a stab at this name.

聡 中本
The first name "聡" means something like wisdom. Like the word Sophia in Greek. The surname "中本" is made from two characters. The first one is ment to show a line going inside of a mouth. It is used to imply "inside of". The second character is a tree that has it's roots emphasized. It implies roots or the origin of something. It is also in the word for Japan (日本). See it at the end? Here it is combined with the character for the sun. So Japan means "the origin of the Sun", or the land of the rising sun.
So Satoshi Nakamoto could be interpreted to mean "Wisdom from within the roots" or maybe "wisdom originating from within". Its difficult because, unlike alphabetical languages, one must glean the meaning from what is implied rather than spelled out.

Amen brother. That is the key difference. If I can't control it, then I don't want anyone to control it.

Ya know I always wished I was good at code breaking. It is interesting, but I'm also not good at math or other related things. It is also interesting to me that math and code breaking is best done by young people. In math you are washed up at 30. Almost all great discoveries in math are made by people in their 20's or younger.

THEY? This is something you made up this morning, lol.

now if you want a real code breaking challenge you may be interested in this:
https://www.cia.gov/kids-page/games/break-the-code

Codes and breaking them is real spycraft, but it ain't easy. And since it tends to be a natural ability more than a learned skill agencies are always on the lookout for young talent.

I don't know who you are talking to, but the reason anyone hates a group is because they are broken people who do not have the capacity to let go of hate. They are typically cry babies who want someone to pity them rather than point out that their failings are due to their own actions. Wa wa wa, look how shitty my life is and it's all because the _______'s did this to me. Rather than get off their ass and do something they are inclined to wine about what other people are doing. At least that has been what I have seen.

Top secret operations do not use cute little anagrams. I's not a contest that drops hints.

I was kidding a bit. But that is the start of creating an alt coin. Most alts are not adopted by very many people. However, it is a great way to learn about blockchain technology and how all these crypto-coins work.

You may want to look at Satoshi's white paper also. You may have already, but if not you can find a link in my sig just below this post where it says "the gospel according to Satoshi".

I see no debate. Apple pay is a slightly different implementation of credit cards. There is nothing new about it. Bitcoin is a fundamentally different technology and an order of magnitude faster, cheaper, and more secure.     

I think we need to weave "time travelers" into the narrative. That's another funny internet phenomena. Maybe we can't find Satoshi because he has not been born yet!!!!!! Or he was a mathematically gifted daimyo in feudal Japan!!!

Ah there is an actual argument. Are bitcoins like beanie babies in terms of their financial performance?
You correctly point out the flaw in "investing" in beanie babies. Since they are issued by a central authority the supply could be infinite. There are also problems with fungibility, but unknown supply is enough to preclude them from use as a currency of any kind. This was the same problem that led to the Tulip mania in Europe.
This problem is solved by Satoshi because the supply is known to all and is unchangeable. There will never be 21 million coins. Almost, but not quite. The rate of production is also known and comes to about 3600 per day at our current block reward. With bitcoin there is no "company" to manipulate anything. The loss of value of bitcoin is to be expected in a highly speculative market. Speculators guess, some too high. Then it falls back to Earth. Again and again and again.

I think that's a good list OP. I might add a "black swan" sort of risk. That is to say that an unknown flaw or exploit in the protocol could emerge. Or some other, as yet unconsidered, event. Perhaps a dramatic change in the free and open use of the internet? It's not risk free. 

Sexy underwear? No, fishing lures...? No, bending space-time? Or maybe, no it's gota be the space-time thing. 

Hey thank you for that clarification. 

You mean what else can you say? 

I would hate to have you as my lawyer.

"Your honor, I would like to enter into evidence this picture of a guy I found on the internet. Some say he is a criminal."

"And what does this have to do with your parking ticket Mr. slowerloris?"

"baghold, ponzi!, turtles!!!"

"Mr. slowerloris, are you ok?"

"beartrap, grapi, heaijedlinu!!!!"

"Mr. slowerloris "

It's funny right. 
One guy arguing with everyone and trying to look like he is part of a group of like minded accounts. Wana see something hilarious ask him to place his money where his mouth is and bet. then it's all crickets and excuses. 

Ah, so are the sellers using the site technically the taxable entities? That makes sense, but I would worry about what happens when they refuse to pay. Would I as a business be required to report their sales? I don't know? But I know Craigslist has spent a lot of time in court because many early users were advertising prostitution services.
I hope someone can find a way through this. I think it is a good business if you can get there.

Ah, that makes sense.

You have a great point in there man! If I had sold all my possessions in 2010 and put it all in bitcoin then I would be very rich right now and some would think me a financial whiz kid. In reality I would be a lucky fool.

I wonder about motives also. Some have claimed to be paid to spread FUD, but I'm not so sure. Anyone who is making a serious and expensive attempt to move sentiment by spreading FUD would quickly see that it is not cost effective. So I don't think they would continue to pay trolls.

Our troll who cerates these accounts daily often posts with a lot of anger. That could point to anger over a foolish loss. Perhaps that is a motivation? Or maybe its just a drama queen? The energy in some peoples life has to come from others, because they themselves do very little worth being excited over.  Or something else?
Whatever it is these threads clearly do not show any actual belief that bitcoin is in trouble. They know bitcoin is crushing it. If they were sincere and responded to counter-arguments, I would be inclined to listen.

It's no surprise to me that the price has gone up.