Hello to our already very big community. We previously announced November first week but we are getting listed on Escodex tomorrow Oct 25. The rest will follow this week. Happy Trading! https://www.escodex.com/ Thanks SUQA Foundation Really? ... A decentralized exchange that doesn't have the facilities as one of the other stable exchanges have? AND says that my account is already taken? So no account creation as well? Great work guys - seriously have grave doubts as to what you consider a 'good supported' exchange is now. #crysx yeah.. escodex even worse than graviex) STEX or CB - best start ex.. all other simple = scam\low volume\useless escodex and cb use the same backend (and, apparently, same interface as well) |
|
|
|
|
More than 10 gpus not working is a known bug, actually it's a missing feature because, in order to have getblocktemplate support, we were forced to fork from an older ccminer codebase.
|
|
|
|
|
The planned usage of the funds is documented and we try to be as transparent as possible about how they are spent.
|
|
|
|
Is the dev team considering a fork to CN8?
It is already on the develop branch ;-) I.e. coming soon. |
|
|
|
I see that the opensource miner is improving. Cut and paste kernels from my suprminer x17 fork. I should get the reward, since I did the work right.  To get the best speed you need to replace all of the 17 kernels, and not only a few. The ccminer you forked can only do 16MHASH of x17 on the 1080ti. My opensource suprminer fork can do 23MHASH on the same clocks. +44% faster. Why don't you create a pull request in my github and add x22i there. Then I will add it. https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminerwork: https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/commits/masterTo really improve the miner you need to work on swifftx, which is currently taking half the compute time if not more. Every improvement is an improvement, but you can't compare x17 to X22i: much more than some percent to some algo is needed. |
|
|
|
I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).
XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years. The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume. I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected. Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday. |
|
|
|
are you guys planning to implement anonymity such az zk-snark?
not for the time being. we are not a privacy-focused coin. for this reason we don't have masternodes or other advanced anonymity features. |
|
|
|
|
I just pushed a further improvement to some rpc wallet calls, as requested by novaexchange for listing.
Only affects "standardamounts" enabled configurations.
|
|
|
|
Hello, mates)
I can't comply the wallet on ubuntu 16.04 according github resources((( Could someone help with step-by-step guides?
Thanks in advance)
What error are you getting? On discord, support is more conveniently delivered. |
|
|
|
Will Lethean hardfork to MoneroV8?
We are planning it right now ;-) (Change of pow algorithm) |
|
|
|
Blah blah
Too many words, sorry. What if, instead of writing all this stuff, you use your time better, by committing the fixes you already have? |
|
|
|
|
by your own words, the fix you are requesting is not for "the majority", and if it was a one liner, and I could test it, I would have done it already.
but what about the majority? do you know there is no amd miner yet, for example? don't you think that, from the community perspective, that should be given priority?
releasing a perfect coin is impossible, pleasing everyone is impossible, we are doing our best and we are sorry if you feel left out.
constructive complains help.
good code commits help even more ;-)
|
|
|
|
You are nitpicking my words. The ccminer compiles on Linux, but not on all distribution and versions, just like any other ccminer fork.
The git repo doesn't have the correct attributes because it has been initialised by a windows developer, using my code.
The limitation on GPU number hasn't been introduced by the changes needed to run X22i. The reason why the miner was forked from an older ccminer is because of the need to have support for getblocktemplate, to have a fair launch even without pools.
Hope that answers all of your questions.
Yes - one question is answered ... But I didn't ask ANY others, AND the reasoning you provided still doesn't fix anything Pallas. It just explains WHY. It is this so called 'nitpicking' that you refer to that eliminates the confusion created when you speak generally of such things. It is something almost ALL developers seem to do in this Crypto space, and it causes more issue than resolve. Had there been specifics (those reasons) given from the beginning, confusion would not settle in and we would not be having this discussion. Better yet, had these issues been addressed BEFORE the release, the same would result. Either way, the issues remain and so the state of which the miner sits is still the same, getblocktemplate or not. It is a few simple issues that could be easily resolved BEFORE the publication of the code, setting this project apart from all the others, instead of melding in with ALL the others that do the same thing. BTW - I did NOT state that the GPU limitation was 'introduced' by the x22i Algo, I merely stated that there was NO CARE taken to allow larger miners a resolve to this GPU limitation issue of the miner. Something that could have been resolved also BEFORE the release of the miner, and something that is simply consequential of the lack of CARE taken once again, based on 'your' code or otherwise. So thank you for answering my one question about the GPU limitation, and thank you for explaining why the issues in the git exist. It still doesn't help those that require a simpler way of compiling, nor does it help people who are new to this space (which unfortunately is the majority these days), to begin their journey into the mining/Crypto arena. This is NOT an attack as you seem to have taken it, but specifics on what the ISSUES are in this project, at least from my/our side. Something this project NEEDS to consider when trying to show professionalism within the realms of the project, and all it has. Much respect mate! #crysx I don't think my posts shown anything about attacks; and I can explain everything, but you write so much :-) We did not want to delay relase of the coin, nor make the miner unstable or buggy when first released, hence why we choose not to use the most recent ccminer and add getblocktemplate support to it. This meant no >9 gpu support, but I think a good launch and fair mining is more important. The miner will be enhanced and improved. You are stating an absence of care for huge farms, I'm saying an absence of care would have been releasing a coin without gpu miner, and have all the private miners floating around, which happens on a lot of coins. We launched a fair coin, that was the goal. Now let the improvements come. Feel free to make pull requests for any enhancement to the miner you might have. We are a community project after all. Thanks for your support :-) |
|
|
|
|
You are nitpicking my words. The ccminer compiles on Linux, but not on all distribution and versions, just like any other ccminer fork.
The git repo doesn't have the correct attributes because it has been initialised by a windows developer, using my code.
The limitation on GPU number hasn't been introduced by the changes needed to run X22i. The reason why the miner was forked from an older ccminer is because of the need to have support for getblocktemplate, to have a fair launch even without pools.
Hope that answers all of your questions.
|
|
|
|
Anyone can sync wallet?
cant sync for 2 days now?
Hi. Today I have nlineno 560 000 SUQA, using the official wallet. The next time you receive a transaction, all the coins disappeared from the local wallet. Just disappeared all records of transactions in http://suqaexplorer.com/search ahhh! All transaction records in the local wallet have disappeared. In the debug file.log records about received blocks remain, but there are no records in the blockchain. Judging by the topics on the forum my problem is not unique. How can I recover the missing coins? Not sure what happened. What does "nlineno" means? More details needed. |
|
|
|
what about any news for AMD miner?
there is a bounty, and we are contacting amd miner devs :-) |
|
|
|
I'm working on a faster keccak miner. Have managed 1700MHASH on the 1080ti. Should be able to do 2500 on the 2080ti. (FPGA speeds)
A single FPGA card does 17 Gh/s. Same power consumption. what about the cost? fpga is 4x the cost of a 2080 ti if i'm not mistaken, but consumption is equal costs 4x and is more than 4x faster, same power usage. yes but with no possibility to mine zero day coin because the reprogramming thign is slower than adding a new algo on ccminer i believe indeed. but zero-day mining is something that will probably be less and less possible in the future, as people realise that taking bitcoin and just changing the pow algo (by shuffling the x17 chain), adds no value. |
|
|
|
and this shit team has tampered the x22i-ccminer source code,you can not build it on Linux.Of course the windows build has a hidden fee.10%+?%,a coin of Hodlcoin fork of new vicious scam team.
the miner has been developed on linux and can compile fine. it has all the usual limitations of the base ccminer code, for example the dependancy on older openssl library, but it's nothing to do with x22i. the windows build is the same code you can find on github, and has no hidden fee. there is a 10% developer reward, which is widely advertised and transparent, including the usage those coins will have. |
|
|
|
Just curious. Is there a bootstrap file to sync the wallet?
It's not needed, there are just a little more than 7000 blocks in the chain. When it grows enough, we will start making blockchain snapshots for the people to download. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
