Compiled and uploaded.   Enjoy.

100% support this format to be 100% a scam.


Just look at the initial link in a incogneto window:  check the background image:  Cryptual

I need not say more.

just about anything on IB is crooked and not trustable on their site... and anything worthwhile; carries a hefty minimum risk every day...  you are scamming yourself.

some time ago, you could easily spot the traps because bots were trading in sub-minimum allowed amounts...

The constant forks/re-consolidations/denomination changes, and other such nonsense.... I just don't get how people fall for it.  Its soo obvious....  

The thing I never understood is: their ETC free .01/day.... where did it come from?   It originally was enabled somewhere just after the recent big ETC blunder.  I acquired quite a bit before the section went offline; and it sits in my coinbase account now....

I have some very interesting unanswered support tickets as well;  such as asking why they keep a sidechain of VSX/XVS (VSync) up when clearly every other exchange is on a completely different chain....   Or why they refuse to update certain wallets by deleting the blockchain and rebuilding it as is needed in their case....  their attempt at fixing it is just turning the wallet back on for a few days so the status changes slightly....

I never liked having to send a micro TX for fear of not receiving my actual full TX....

They deserve what has happened;  I just wished I had been warned before the sig ban instead of thinking my account was hacked due to a changed sig....


*edit*
imagine this "IB strategy":
Take mass funds (most IB require .1-1BTC worth of investment)
Dump mass funds dropping price after enough of a bankroll is gathered.
Watch price drop and buyback at lower rate.

Everyone screwed who used IB.


This is probably whats happening.

I was on their sig campaign, but i was one of the actual good posters and never changed my habbits when I joined the program...
but...


They did not care about the forum campaign rules as I figured out as time went on;   they only topped off the payment wallet once or twice a year last year...   and my guess is the spammers were in bounty and other sub-forums I didnt visit, because I never really saw many yobit ads in the altcoin or hardware sections.  They never had any active campaign managers, and they have extremely poor tech support.   Their concept of trying to get a wallet online is re-launching the wallet and hoping their blockchain doesnt need rebuilt, or they will just offline the wallet again....  Theres a huge list of issues I have had with yobit personally, and to be fair;  I have tried to help out many many people on this forum whom have been scammed with something in relation to yobit; weather it was them falling for a telegram scam, having a hacked browser extension, visiting a fake yobit site, depositing incorrect funds to incorrect wallets.... the list goes on as well.....


I will admit;  the only thing that kept me on their sig campaign was the fact they paid .0003BTC flat per post to legendary.    Nobody came close to paying that.    On the days/weeks where things were busy for me on this forum (like when I was updating my batches a year or two ago, or when XMR is going through upgrades)  I could easily get an extra $40-150 in crypto just by doing what i was gonna do anyways.  During the height of 15K+ BTC...  I was legitimately making a ridiculous amount of coin.... and it paid 80% of my living expenses since I have been on disability and sick for several years.

Rock and a hard place... y'know?

*saying with sarcasm*  Why is he even still allowed to post?

I see similar activity with "Veil" ads/banners often these days...

but the posts are soo close to the edge;  I don't report em....  Don't wanna tarnish my 100% accuracy on post reporting if ya dig.

yeah, I should be able to have it done by the end of my weekend.

I agree with this;   having a scaled impact value vs.  a simple yes/no;  needs to be considered IMHO.  I have seen people with negative trust;  just because they were duped into advertising for a scam unknowingly.....

In the same regard; my Yobit banner could potentially have harmed me if yobit truly went south for the winter and started ripping everyone off blatantly (which i personally am surprised they haven't yet); because for me;  the sig was just a way to put a little coin in my pocket for doing the same thing I have always done;  help in the areas I can help in;  when I am physically/mentally able to do so.....  Never once did I advocate anyone use them or go out of my way to shill for them;  I would only suggest people go in and hit up the free coins when there was something worth nabbing (like the free .01 ETC every 24 hours), or when I was gung-ho on a [still in progress] "coin" that I believe the project has merit (as a DEX)....
Shit; I already have a negative distrust from some asshat on the old system for my yobit banner;  with literally no real reasoning for it other than I would rebut or continue the discussion with logical processes and analysis in my process of trying to help them through the issue they were having.    I think it might even be the guy whom sent an ETH smartcontract token set to his ETH wallet on yobit;  which they have never supported..... he was quite butthurt at my honest curt replies.


 Yeah;  but here's the rub;  If you dont have evidence of a scam;  it's a blind accusation from you in the eyes of everyone else with an objective mind.....  so that's a double edged sword of a concept to try and modify that way.  Even if the people who trust you see it;  they have nothing on it past your say so;  that doesn't fly in the online world unless you are truly respected by even the people who havent conversed with you.   Very few people reach that status in any regard. (at the same time, I am baffled why people put so much stock into actors' opinions these days)

I think this is why one option is for heavy scam potential;  vs. an actual accusation of a scam that happened....

Innocent until proven guilty must still hold; or everything falls apart quickly...

After reading this, and the other SM/QS/TEC/Lauda threads for good entertainment and some drama;

you sir; are definitely blocked from hereon out.

Such disgusting vocabulary and sentence structure.... I just can't anymore...  

Ill have to make due with the quotes of your illogical and emotional mutterings as i'm forced to see them while scrolling through threads.



To all the affected parties who have been discussing this:  I feel your pain;  from both sides of the spectrum.

I hope you guys can find a way to sort this out and be more productive towards/with each other soon.


My only random comment:  People with power don't always know they are abusing it; but many do.  Please try and curb the idiocracy be amicable....   I have had good dealings with most of you in the past... and hate seeing people needlessly flogging dead horses.

FYI: one one-above-all-god-complex-dude:  I can't see your reply.

*edit* LOL.... taking bets on if his reply below was directed at me xD

you must not understand the link tesla has had with in the crypto space; along with how companies like his effect the crypto world.   All good.  I don't fault others for thinking with a set of blinders on; I will point it out though.  There are a myriad of societal issues that directly impact the crypto space if you take the blinders off and at least attempt look at the whole picture.... I am willing to bet you didn't even read the articles, so you have no clue what the actual content and message of the articles were.


Its not that their links weren't showing up for purely crypto searches;  they were almost literally smeared off the board....   and I personally have serious doubts you read the article originally linked at this point.

true.... but still regardless of that minor detail... the google search numbers speak louder than anything;  they have been getting very good at censoring people for the wrong reasons:  I.E. look at youtube.

Just read the article: https://www.ccn.com/ccn-is-shutting-down-after-googles-june-2019-core-update

Interesting.


I have a suspicion that a big part of their content being filtered is the larger number of right-leaning posts/articles that have peen posted in the past few months;  just check their article title history.


What are your thoughts on the matter?  Did you browse their articles regularly along with the other news sites?

pm responded to, thanks phil!

Bumping the thread;  still have this unit, quality hardware (90% purchased from forum members originally)


Remember, reasonable offer gets it.

Also something to note:

If you check your account from a cellphone; the location can be wildly different than your actual location;  for instance, I am in California, but when on my cellphone, the IP will show as Texas, or Washington... sometimes on the east coast....

you can set up any flavor of linux you prefer;  I use Ubuntu 16.04 on my rigs/servers.

Stability may hint at an underlying issue with the machine (power supply ripple, failing capacitors, bad memory, etc)  FYI.

If you wish to set up a miner that runs off a USB boot drive, if your server has enough ram; you could always use a ramdisk for the OS.... but that's asking a LOT of ram, so I suggest using a SSD.

my connection is always funneled through the same private IP... so its easy for me to see if something is fishy.   And what would you know;  only one IP on the list  

Before I ever do any large transfers, I typically will try sending one or 5 coins first.... eliminate any chance of major issue.... but lets see whats going on;  at least there's a change now.


I sort-of think being on CB could be a good thing as well;   even though the final bubble network will be basically the same type of service built in.

Yobit's wallet shows 358,284 blocks and "delayed" status (a bit less than my wallet is showing);  maybe their wallet is still rebuilding the blockchain?  I can see a withdraw pane, but no access to deposit.   This is the first time I have ever seen "delayed" on their wallet status.


Let's try and diagnose this:
What is the blockheight in your wallet? (help->debug console)
How many nodes are connected to your wallet when its online?
When is the last time you synced your blockchain?

I may have to install the wallet on one of my servers and open a port to the public;  right now my wallet is behind some rather intense firewalls.



FYI:  Im still on the right chain, and matching the explorer blockheight:

At this point:
I'm willing to bet some serious cash that YoBit let the wallet go offline in order to accomplish two tasks:

1:  Selloff all mined coins the exchange has received from staking with their whale wallet.
2:  Attempt a hostile chain takeover and continue from the last block that they signed after all other wallets gave up on the project.


I am 100% certain #1 is true and has happened (explaining how you got your bag, or possibly Mick sold some of his that were stuck on the exchange).
#2 is purely speculation; but I think something along those lines could be a possibility, but its doubted at this point.   YoBit has a history of letting wallets go offline/off chain, and continuing them off chain.  They have several wallets ( to name two of them: NKA and VSync [XVS/VSX] ) that are and have been off chain, forever.   Thousands of complaints on these, from people whom did not test a Tx on a small coin/network before diving into the pool.

yeah, I could tell by the pool stratum, etc....

The whole idea of the pool using less than network diff shares, is so it can calculate your hashrate and averages to give you mining statistics;  if the share was at network diff, you would know nothing about the mining statistics till it reported a block.


Just gotta let it keep on goin, and see how long it takes.

you can also check for web mining calculators to see how much time [estimated] it would take your your hashrate to find a block at current diff....

it looks like your miners are hashing and reporting shares.


Look at your mining pool to see if you have been the finder of any blocks or what your credits are for.

for instance in the first photo, you see info for
A: accepted shares (total)
R: rejected shares (total)
HW: Hardware errors (total)
WU: Workunits processed

your shares accepted are going to be at the stratum issued difficulty or higher;  a block could be substantially greater than that.

I suggest looking into how the different pool systems work to get a feel for what you are doing when mining to a pool (PPS, PPNS, PPLNS, etc) and what shares are for; because they apply weather you are finding the block or not.

I am willing to bet you are working off a stratum assigned difficulty, and not the actual block/network difficulty for your submitted shares which is why you have submitted shares.  Doing research above like I mentioned, and it will make this clear.