The only "improvement" of Worldcoin is 60 seconds blocks...
15 actually..  So for you changing the retarget time is more "constituting doing something" than making transaction commentable? Interesting So, one moment your backing some coin that is clearly no different to any other alt thats been released, and the next your trying to bag some other coin like you know what your talking about, when clearly you know nothing about it (or you wouldnt be asking me). Crypto clearly isnt your forte jacky boy. Why dont you take up baseball or a craft like sewing? 1. I don't back this coin: I think comments for transactions is a bad idea
Isn't it enough clear? 2. I never asked you anything 3. That doesn't answer my question Do you think changing the retarget time is more "constituting doing something" than making transaction commentable? Thank you for answering instead of trying to upsetting me |
|
|
|
The only "improvement" of Worldcoin is 60 seconds blocks...
15 actually.. So for you changing the retarget time is more "constituting doing something" than making transaction commentable? Interesting |
|
|
|
Personally, I think all altcoins need to find their own forums. This is Bitcointalk, not altcointalk or cryptocurrencytalk etc., it's just Bitcointalk. Some altcoins do have their own forums but most stick around here and advertise to newbies who have no idea what's up or down in the Bitcoin world, the owners pump and dump and then ditch the coin to whoever's left; after all, the 40th Litecoin clone with slightly altered parameters is probably not being created for the good of man, nor does it even hope to compete with Bitcoin, but merely exists for the creator who prays he'll get rich off it if he advertises enough. To put it bluntly, they're get-rich-quick schemes, and aren't created to service anyone in any way, and I believe they should be treated for what they are. If an altcoin has an incredible amount of merit for being so very innovative, becoming the possible Bitcoin killer (so to speak), then it will naturally make news and find its way over here, instead of being shoved down newbie throats and then disappearing after a couple of weeks.
This, a thousand times. Moreover, they are not even Bitcoin clones per se, but rather Litecoin clones. So they should go on litecointalk or whatever. Really, at least scrypt-coins should be forbidden |
|
|
|
I think comments for transactions is a bad idea but as gnode just said, at least the dev did something!
Yea, I guess if including a transaction comment constitutes doing something The only "improvement" of Worldcoin is 60 seconds blocks (actually it's not only an improvement, it makes it "the coin of the future" ) Florincoin have 40 seconds blocks Thoughts? |
|
|
|
I'm surprised this coin only got 5 pages of comments in a day, when at least the dev tried something new. Especially given some of the craziness around some of the other clonecoins.
Same here I think comments for transactions is a bad idea but as gnode just said, at least the dev did something! Maybe people just want pump&dumps |
|
|
|
|
Great!
I'm looking forward to see the result
|
|
|
|
He is attacking not only PowerCoin but the whole crypto community
Absolutely not. He proved that a shit coin can't be sold higher than a shit price. Otherwise someone will fuck with it. So he didn't attack Bitcoin. So he didn't attack "the whole crypto community". |
|
|
|
|
XKkzgKMBMi2xoRGUyq7NnAGyatYu3NWmgT
|
|
|
|
1. Have a problem 2. Go to technical support subforum 3. Don't read stickies 4. Make a new thread 5. ??  ? 6. Profit |
|
|
|
* satoshi misses the forum |
|
|
|
Do you know by chance anyone that is currently developing for FastCoin?
You Don't try to fool anyone... Your first post was 3 days ago, it was a new thread directly in the altcoin subforum to explain what is Fastcoin and how to use it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=237703.msg2514699#msg2514699Since then, all your posts (72) mention Fastcoin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=130812;sa=showPostsOh and did I mention the fact that only 1 hour after your first post here you were giving away Fastcoin? Who the fuck would have enough altcoins to give them away only 1 hour after having heard of them? And finally, you are the only one who give a shit about this coin. Even the dev is nowhere to be found for several weeks. Interesting enough your account was created after the last time he logged in. Edit: Also, this post just now in the altcoin subforum: We are currently looking for developers that are interested to develop a pocket Wallet for mobile phones, iPhone and Android based. We would like to work with the FastCoin Protocol, please post below with your FastCoin wallet address and list of credentials and previous work.
|
|
|
|
|
You can see the results immediately, and it won't be deleted if the Fastcoin developper find the results bad for his business
|
|
|
|
Go boobs go
Indeed We are still waiting for some |
|
|
|
Bienvenue à tous! Je suis nouveau sur le BitCoin et ce genre de truc, quelqu'un peu m'expliquer un peu ce que c'est?
Merci
C'est une monnaie décentralisée basée sur la cryptographie asymétrique. La création monétaire est fixée une bonne fois pour toutes et est inchangeable: 50BTC, divisés par 2 tous les 4 ans, par bloc, et un bloc toutes les 10 minutes en moyenne. Ca fait une masse monétaire qui ressemble à ça:  Voilà la description courte, demande si tu veux plus de précisions. Tu peux aussi regarder la page wikipedia de bitcoin, ou le wiki bitcoin.it. Je vois dans tes posts que tu t'intéresses aux "altcoins" (c'est peut-être ce que tu voulais dire par "ce genre de trucs"). Ils sont tous des copies de Bitcoin avec de légères variations. Soit la durée moyenne entre deux blocs, soit la quantité totale d'argent crée, soit la récompense, soit l'algorithme de création de blocs. C'est ce changement d'algorithme qui est la différence principale de Litecoin: il a permis aux cartes graphiques de continuer à créer des blocs (et donc gagner de l'argent) lors de l'arrivée FPGA/ASIC beaucoup plus efficaces sur Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
Ça sera effectivement parti mais ce qui fait foi dans Bitcoin c'est la blockchain.
Soit ta transaction y est et dans ce cas elle est gravée dans le marbre (enfin presque, voir forks)
Soit elle y est pas et aucun mineur ne veut l'inclure dans les blocs. Dans ce cas tu peux faire oublier à ton client qu'elle existe (en changeant de wallet) et tes sous "reviennent". (Enfin pas vraiment puisqu'ils sont jamais partis)
Et je sais pas pour la syntaxe j'utilise jamais ces options. Ça doit être sur le wiki
|
|
|
|
|
Moi je te conseille de tenter de la faire cette transaction, ça permet de te familiariser avec bitcoin. Surtout que justement ce n'est que quelques centimes.
Il y a un flag pour empêcher bitcoin-qt de t'empêcher de l'envoyer en cas de frais trop faibles. (setmintxfee?)
Trouve-la et teste. Et renseigne-toi, tente.
Fais juste attention à ne pas valider quoi que ce soit si les frais ne te conviennent pas.
Sois conscient qu'il est possible qu'une transaction de ce style puisse mettre plusieurs jours à être acceptée. Voire ne jamais l'être.
Au pire il est possible d'annuler ces transactions. Pour cela fais dès maintenant une sauvegarde de ton wallet.dat actuel.
|
|
|
|
How about using ECC point multiplication and AES:
1. Get recipient's public key R (R = r*G, r is private key)
2. For each message, generate unique keypair S,s: S = s*G.
3. Create a shared secret: K = R*s
4. Compute 256-bit encryption key out of that shared secret: key = SHA256(SHA256(K))
5. Encrypt the message with that key and send the message together with unique pubkey S.
6. Recipient gets the message and computes key using his private key r and S: key = SHA256(SHA256(r*S))
7. Recipient's key turns out to be the same because r*S = R*s = r*s*G.
I like this scheme more because it allows to efficiently encrypt messages of arbitrary sizes.
It's OK but: 1) There is no need of doubling SHA256 to obtain the symmetric key. SHA256^2 is a bitcoinish thing that does not improve the security of SHA256. In fact, there is no need of SHA256. Take "Kx" as symmetric key and it's ok. 2) It is better to use "S" as the shared secret and send "K" to the recipient. She can get the secret "S" as S = r^(-1) * K. This way, you can send the same encrypted message to many recipients: just create the K1, K2, K3, etc, pubkeys for de recipient's keys R1, R2, R3, etc 2. Indeed! 1. Wouldn't you lose one bit of entropy? (As only half of x values between 0 and n-1 leads to a pair of points) Using Kx+(Ky&1) should make it a bit better right? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
