Is it by any chance a mistake from your end since 0.5 and 5 are close enough. If you put 5 before the [.], it will be 5. Hence, it's possible that you made a mistake; just sharing the factos. I can't see any other reason why/how would they force you to bet higher.

I can see 2 negative feedbacks on your profile for cheating bounty campaign referenced here- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5383361.msg59113670#msg59113670
Are you not guilty according to this reference? If you haven't cheat, respond there and/or reach out to both member through DM who have sent you the negative feedback. There's no other way to get out of the feedback since they have used reference with enough proof.

In which wallet, you were asked to add the metamask? Can you please share more details?

If you have used this site to download etc., you are on the official site. There's no issue with that but I guess you are either giving credential to 3rd parties by following their command or your device which you are using to access the wallet is affected with malware which passes information.

He doesn't seem to be interested as mentioned in the OP that he isn't talking about tournaments. I was also planning on joining the tourney but sadly the time slot isn't in my favor. Hence; I had to leave it.
Nevertheless, I would recommend SwC as I have played numerous times there & it's exactly the one you are looking for.

My god! I didn’t even know that Microstrategy is the #1 bitcoin holder. Saylor is really trying hard to hold as much BTC as possible. Is it only a compare of corporate holding or this include any individual as well? Who is the most BTC holder? Satoshi is supposed to be having 1 million but that's not a true fact with solid proof. So, who else?

Elon Musk is shit. I wondered why he was motivated to implement DOGE. Trying hard to manipulate as he did back in the days.

C'mon, Madrid has more than enough good team to qualify against PSG. I have to agree that PSG is quite good team; they are now a balanced one and determined to win the UCL but that doesn’t mean Real Madrid have no chance. Real Madrid deserves to win as well and I believe they will qualify.

Returned from this- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5383474.0

Anyone can put feedback on trustpilot and the same goes with play store & a lot of other platforms. The scammer uses this as an advantage. They buy fake reviews from different sources. We have seen it here as well. But most of the times, buyer/seller both get away from getting tagged while both parties help to scam a big amount of people. Why don't we tag them? Isn't it necessary to tag all of them so that they don't participate in these shady activities? Back in the days, I tagged someone if I can remember correctly & Vod was the only one who used to fight against these shady activities.
But why many DT don't tag? Can you please share your opinion why don't you?

You are a Full Member in bitcointalk forum but acted like a noob THB. That's very sad; you know any feedback site can be faked. You must not trust them blindly. You are lucky that the total sum isn't big.
I'm wondering where did you find the website at the first place? Or is it quite familiar? I'm not really familiar with such lending sites; hence now idea if they are familiar or not.

I would be pissed off if any of the casino sites support isn't fast enough & assisting accordingly. You are talking about the feedback on the forum and off the forum? If they have a bad practice in the forum by anyhow, would anyone from the forum give them a fuck? I doubt anyone would join. If we are talking about new sites, I barely deposit on them. Most of the times, I just check it out and leave.

Even if Neymar is there, I guess we will see a huge fight from Real Madrid and TBH, I'm hopeful that Madrid will make it at the end. Madrid is having a nice season in La Liga. Vini is playing great. Their front line isn’t that bad either & the mid is one of the best. It will not be easy for PSG regardless of who is playing.

I was looking for some information on a website and found a google ads about NAV coin. I tried to learn more about this and found that it couldn’t make an ATH in the bull which seems quite weird. Most of the shitcoins ecen did their ATH. Later on, after spending some time behind privacy coins, I came to know that most of the privacy coins couldn’t perform as expected or at least not even as closer to the ATH or what other altcoin aka shitcoin did.
What's wrong with Privacy coin? Why couldn’t they make a difference? Any idea?

It's quite strange though. Amazon should have considered it long ago since volatility isn’t an issue anymore these days due to the different payment processor.
Well, Wallmart will probably consider it very soon as they are planning to join the metaverse eco system. It is also possible that they will launch their own crypto & will allow/force to use that in their eco system.

Welcome here. You were in the gambling industry for quite long time but you discovered bitcointalk just now. That's quite unusual. Most of the casinos accepting cryptocurrency starts their journey here. Anyway, I will have a look around as I can see esports gambling are there. Will leave feedback later.

Russia is a very important nation toward the adoption of Bitcoin; most probably the most active local board in bitcointalk if I'm correct.
They have surplus electricity and it's an advantage without any doubt but their CB isn't after that. On the other hand, their Finance ministry is opposing the decision and they are suggesting going through regulation instead of banning it. That's good. Both Putin & Finance ministry are backing up crypto. I guess there's nothing wrong going to happen in the fate of bitcoin in Russia.

Are you an affiliate network? Correct me if I got you wrong. I have browsed the site and found some of the pricing models. I guess I'm yet to find out what exactly you are offering here.

You are offering a service I guess; you must post it in Service announcement instead of gambling section.

Both are totally two different things you are talking about. Football is a sport for entertainment while gambling is something else. These both doesn't depend on one to another. You can gamble with other sports if you don't gamble with football. Football will still be there if gamble isn?t. Therefore, I guess your point has no sense/point.

Earning here is an advantage for all of us who are utilizing the signature space. We are here to learn more about cryptocurrency/bitcoin and it was really interesting to learn whatever I was looking for. But later on, I was able to use the signature space & started earning.
If you learn, try to learn here in the forum, remember, earning will come easily; you even don't have to think about that.

It's very much easy to take profit in a bull market & it's easier to provide a signal in such a market. But when it comes to the bearish season, it's not easy nor a lot of people can make a profit. Only the most experienced guy can do that. I was following a few Twitter handle lately; they are inactive for the last 2 days LOL. They used to share their signal and when trade hit the signal, they were likely to post & take the credit. As you said, they are not anymore there to say a word or two LOL.

I don't disagree that we don't need a price tracking page on bitcointalk. Did you miss my post? It doesn't make enough sense. There is a lot of alternative to it; even in bitcointalk I guess. It's a matter of writing some codes only after all.
This is not the thread to discuss the second part of your quoted post; we both are going off-topic, otherwise, we could discuss.

That's easy to say but quite hard to follow unless you are a true Bitcoin Enthusiast. Have you ever sold your BTC? Then, you yourself aren't following the 1 BTC = 1 BTC rule. I used to think this way back in the day but when I was tempted to sell; eventually I did, I was no more a supporter of 1 BTC = 1 BTC. If you are used to selling BTC, you would rather not compare in that way. As for OP, I guess it doesn't make sense to have one.