|
Great to see that they are back but that's not a good approach at all. Privacy seeking user now have to contact with the admin to get their fund back. And there are other people too who have lost their fund while they aren't available here.
|
|
|
|
Everybody Now talking about this its all over the internet.
There is got be something why its started.
I just Hope Putin and nazarov will push Bitcoin to 300k+.
So I can sell with at least 100k+ im here for the money as Everybody else.
Everyone talking? May be because I don't care who satoshi is the reason I didn’t get this before anywhere else. And it’s a group of people trying to manipulate something. May be the chainlink? If you believe that they might be involved with BTC, go with chainlink. Once this get proved that they are linked with BTC, chainlink will be pumped significantly. |
|
|
|
with only less than 4 shots on goal (at least that's what I count so far, I may be wrong)
Arsenal has a total of 9 shots until now and had only one shot on target. Leeds are dominating match but yet to have a score. Still 4 minutes to go and anything can happen. I have picked Arsenal to win but this isn’t going to happen. |
|
|
|
|
Just have read all the details pointed out in the article but whenever I read Nazarov who mistakenly said he was involved with crypto for almost 10 years, it sounds a like to blatant lie to me.
Either way, although I don't know how much true the proofs are, I guess many things can be a coincidence and thus, this never makes this guy satoshi.
|
|
|
|
I don't think $7,000 was the trigger to disappear. It's not a big amount, especially compared to what has been spent. Perhaps there is a bigger fish that lost money in we don't know about (not everybody bitcoiner uses Bitcointalk) but $7k doesn't look 'good enough'
It doesn’t seem like an exit scam but it’s possible that they had scammed more users within this time which we are not aware of as not everyone comes here and complain on such scams. And few days ago, there was another complain which was a fault of the user who lost some BTC (assuming more than one at least as they received 3 BTC)- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5235190.msg55291465#msg55291465 |
|
|
|
I expect both teams to score and I think that is best bet here.
I placed bet on both team to score and Liverpool to win the match but you are right that it will not be easy to beat Leicester as Liverpool will be missing their goal machine Salah. Nevertheless, it’s Anfield and Liverpool will no way miss the chance I guess. |
|
|
|
|
It's potential loss. Since you haven't switched to BTC back then, you must not consider this anymore.
Fiat and BTC both are different. Fiat is stable while BTC is volatile. So, either compare your profit with fiat, or with BTC only. For example, I have LTC purchased @0.005 BTC, I'm still in loss as I consider the BTC value when it comes to alt investment regardless of fiat value.
|
|
|
|
I don't know if artsidim contacted their support or write them email, but I can see that MyCryptoMixer profile they use was not online in forum for last six days.
That's the only hope for OP. Hopefully they will come bacj and resolve the issue. Let's hope this will be resolved soon, and if not I will support the Flag.
Why dude? Waiting for their words to be confirm mean you are giving them more time. Imagine, this is an exit scam but without hearing from them LoyceV didn't create this flag, what would happen? More people would be scammed. Supported the flag. |
|
|
|
Maybe around 6-10 parlay, I think that would be fun as it's not easy to hit that, or even lower to make the competition quite achievable.
Do they allow 6 betslip in parley? I think no. BetBTC allows 5 per betslip as far as I'm concerned. It's not that hard to win a parley with such low number of matches/events. If I'm correct, I have won twice out of 5/6 in BETBTC. Anyway, increasing the number of matches in parley would be great I guess. |
|
|
|
|
1. Aston Villa vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC - 1
2. Tottenham Hotspur FC vs. Manchester City FC - 1
3. Leeds United vs. Arsenal FC- 2
4. Liverpool FC vs. Leicester City FC - 1
5. Villarreal CF vs. Real Madrid - 1
6. Atletico Madrid vs. FC Barcelona - 2
7. Cadiz CF vs. Real Sociedad - 2
8. Deportivo Alaves vs. Valencia CF - 2
9. Schalke 04 vs. VfL Wolfsburg - 2
10. TSG Hoffenheim vs. VfB Stuttgart - 2
11. Eintracht Frankfurt vs. RB Leipzig - 2
12. Hellas Verona vs. Sassuolo Calcio - 2
13. Sampdoria Genoa vs. Bologna FC - 1
14. SSC Napoli vs. AC Milan - 1
15. AS Monaco FC vs. Paris Saint-Germain FC - 2
Betnomi username- Raptarex
|
|
|
|
|
Liverpool 2-0 Leicester
raptarx
|
|
|
|
|
For what purpose you are using coinbase? If you are looking for using it for trading purpose, I think KYC is needed while for wallet purpose, none of such KYC is required. However, if coinbase finds any suspected transaction with your account, they may require identify verification.
|
|
|
|
A friend has also recommended Localbitcoins, where does that fit into the Exchange scene? I understand Localbitcoins act as an intermediary between a seller and a buyer, so does that qualify as an exchange or is that more peer2peer? Does anyone have any thoughts on whether Localbitcoins should be avoided or not?
It’s a P2P trading platform. You can try it as well if you are looking for purchasing BTC or other crypto through your local payment method which different international exchanges don't support. Otherwise, it’s better to use an exchange. |
|
|
|
|
The article doesn’t contain enough to prove the claim is right. The survey was conducted to a limited group of people who may have same interest but that doesn’t necessarily mean all of the same group people would be interested.
|
|
|
|
|
What are the verify requirements? Any kind of KYC? Also, as I can see this reward will be given on different events which require one user to win a lot of hands which doesn’t seem free at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
