Not sure if a logo has been decided on, but here is a concept. I can provide the vector file if desired.  It looks nice but similar XRP and Vietnamese Vinaphone logos. Hope you have other idea! Similar yes, but in the pool of logos worldwide you will always find a similar logo. Eventually changing the black inner dots could help differentiate a little bit further. |
|
|
|
Not sure if a logo has been decided on, but here is a concept. I can provide the vector file if desired. Nice! Looks good to me. |
|
|
|
|
F2 hat heute bekanntgegeben das man nicht Forken werde. Daher wohl der Anstieg.
|
|
|
|
But let's flip your stupid assertion on its head. Isn't it a problem that one angry chinese miner and one high powered enthusiast on the autism specter can bring Bitcoin to its knees? Why is that? Why is Bitcoin so weak?
A lot of bitcoin haters joined forces to make it look weak. Those are different groups with different agendas. They would hate to see segwit, LN and side chains implemented. Every fucking altcoin can be implemented as a bitcoin side chain without any risk to consumers! But that is the last thing banks would like to see. So they pump the alts they've chosen to distract average Joe from further converting his savings into bitcoins. The alt is not dangerous for banks. They can kill it anytime just by dumping it. 99% of altcoin investors are just desperado gamblers that don't really care about smart contracts or whatever. Do you really think the BU crowd, the banks, Roger Ver and some Chinese dark forces all sat around a table together and conspired to bring Bitcoin down? I know this is the internet age and anyone can believe anything - but the problem is simple. Bitcoin is at war with itself, unable to change to deliver a solution to a real problem and lacking leadership, and direction. It has issues and no solution is apparent. There is no conspiracy of dumpers, just people who worry and sell coins because of this uncertainty. It is rational behaviour to sell when the price is not looking realistic. That is all. I am a Bitcoin fan. Agreed, although I wouldn't say that we need leadership but rather a more clear mechanism of decision making. 1 BTC = 1 VOTE |
|
|
|
users with that wetrust.io avi should be forbidden
Signature and Avatar-campaigns and you know instantly 99% of posts are just crap. |
|
|
|
But let's flip your stupid assertion on its head. Isn't it a problem that one angry chinese miner and one high powered enthusiast on the autism specter can bring Bitcoin to its knees? Why is that? Why is Bitcoin so weak?
A lot of bitcoin haters joined forces to make it look weak. Those are different groups with different agendas. They would hate to see segwit, LN and side chains implemented. Every fucking altcoin can be implemented as a bitcoin side chain without any risk to consumers! But that is the last thing banks would like to see. So they pump the alts they've chosen to distract average Joe from further converting his savings into bitcoins. The alt is not dangerous for banks. They can kill it anytime just by dumping it. 99% of altcoin investors are just desperado gamblers that don't really care about smart contracts or whatever. So Roger Ver is a Bitcoin hater now? Roger Ver is an emotional psychopath or act like that because he is a puppet directed by shadow actors. He hates everything that doesn't go his way. He doesn't care about Bitcoin or BUcoin success. His only obsession is to see Core team defeated. Everything and everybody that can get Core humiliated will get Roger's support! LOL, what a shithead you are. And no i am not in any camp in this silly civilwar. Edit: Who are those "shadow actors"? The Illuminati? The Rothschilds? |
|
|
|
I think this is it.
unfortunately you are the perfect contraindicator  |
|
|
|
BTW mempool is near zero at the moment.
alts are sucking that dry too!! WE"RE DOOOOOOOOOOOOMED! alts are eating bitcoin for breakfast |
|
|
|
|
BTW mempool is near zero at the moment.
|
|
|
|
So... Bitcoin dies again... Amirite ?!
No it lives. Just in xx different versions, all worth a fraction of todays valuation. So technically its still alive, only from a price point of view... |
|
|
|
This is fucking terrible. I wonder how much further this can go.
it is terrible, fucking terrible No it's just the first real challenge that the experiment Bitcoin faces. Now it will show how good that concept works under scrutiny. Even if we wouldn't have those 1MB-limit issues there would be another issue along the road with the potential to split the community or the community from the miners. If Bitcoin isn't able to handle that it's a fail. As simple as that. |
|
|
|
Eine Hashrate von oberhalb 60% für BU halte ich für sehr unwahrscheinlich. Müsste ich eine Wahrscheinlichkeit festlegen dafür das BU in 2017 eine Hashrate oberhalb von 90% erreicht (von 99% gar nicht zu reden) würde ich sagen unter 1%. Das bedeutet für mich: Wir bleiben höchstwahrscheinlich bei 1MB ohne SW. Edit: Interessant wie unterschiedlich doch Erwartungen sein können. Und EXTREM spannend wie sich alles entwickeln wird.  |
|
|
|
Ich schätze, es geht so weiter,
dass die Miner Unlimited benutzen, die User die wollen, auch, während ein Großteil der anderen User weiter Core...
Das bedeutet du rechnest mit einer HF? Edit: Oder besser gesagt: Außerdem bin ich guter Dinge, dass es noch im Lauf dieses Jahres vorwärts geht.
= HF? Ja, klar. Rational betrachtet, welche Möglichkeiten hat das Ökosystem? (1) Weiter so, 1 MB Digitales Gold. Denke nicht, dass sich das durchsetzt. Dafür wird zu schnell klar werden, dass das auf Business-Ebene in die Hose geht. (2) SegWit: Ja, wäre ein Weg, aber es gibt einen mächtigen, unersetzlichen Akteur im Ökosystem, der es blockieren kann und das auch macht (nicht Jihan, sondern die Miner als ganzes) (3) Hardfork: Wird von niemandem blockiert. Die Core Devs können dagegen argumentieren, es aber nicht blockieren Wenn (1) nicht mehr hinnehmbar und (2) nicht möglich ist, wird es auf (3) rauslaufen. Ok, was denkst du ist notwendig an Hashrate um sicher Forken zu können? Peter R schreibt ja von 2/3 bis zu 3/4 der Hashrate. |
|
|
|
To get 2/3 or 3/4 of the hashrate isn't THAT easy. At least i think so.
A large mining pool might tip the scales to 51% now. That would be a powerful signal. 95%? Forget it. Ever. Just don't know how that one gets resolved. 51% is not enough to HF securely and you are aware of that 2/3 and 3/4 ≠ 95%?  |
|
|
|
Ich schätze, es geht so weiter,
dass die Miner Unlimited benutzen, die User die wollen, auch, während ein Großteil der anderen User weiter Core...
Das bedeutet du rechnest mit einer HF? Edit: Oder besser gesagt: Außerdem bin ich guter Dinge, dass es noch im Lauf dieses Jahres vorwärts geht.
= HF? |
|
|
|
|
To get 2/3 or 3/4 of the hashrate isn't THAT easy. At least i think so.
|
|
|
|
is it really mining? I thought we had another word for the process  Someone came up with Elastic Processing Unit (EPU) for the miner, so presumably the act of mining would be Elastic Processing. We could call it Knieveling eventually  Doing a Knievel. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
