So, I made that graph using LaTeX and the PSTricks package.  It's pretty damn ugly, dogie's graphs are enormously more useful.  But anyway, LaTeX and PSTricks (psmatrix, psnode) if you were curious.

Just for correctness sake (although it's probably obvious), it should say make between 1 and 13 posts in a given activity period.  That's because <1 means you miss that period.  And >=14 means you get the 14 points, not "potential" which is what the OP asked about.

Cheers!

Send me a PM if you want to get a high-level account so that you can get a reasonable rakeback on your bets.

Lol.  Indeed, I just noticed it right now.  Well, so now I'm legendary.  Congrats to me, I guess.

Re: quickseller, it seems he's run out of steam in his attack on me.  I'm happy to say that I think my days of QS abuse are over (fingers crossed).  Hopefully the same is true for the large number of other folks he needlessly smeared as he was trying to build a reputation out of neg-rep first, think-never.

BTW, I have a level 8 account for sale, it also has 3 out of the 8 tasks done for level 9.  Also, has access to Tao (rare!).   Rakeback on this account is at "62% of the maximum", which I think is 3%, so you get a little over 1.5% of your bets back in DT.

Serious inquiries just send me a PM.

I just don't play much anymore (it's been months since I really hung out there for any time) and I figure that if someone wants a high level account without having to spend a lot to work their way up the ranks, they should just let me know.

Cheers!

You should do "/message Di ..." in game.  He'll straighten it out for you if your issue is legit.  I've had an issue or two in the several years I played there but they were always corrected once I let Di know.  Btw, what was the transaction id, it does seem a little weird that it has the wrong balance.

Congrats, Mich.  I 'm actually hoping that I hit it as close to the last moment as possible.  Just seems like  a fun bit of notoriety if I could hit later than the 1008 by defaced.

Fun, thanks for the chart, sho.  Looks like mprep was pretty close to the max when he hit.

So if the guarantee is at 1052, I'd be curious to hear who has the current record for latest legendary.  Seems OP here hit it somewhere around 1008 (exactly?).

I'm in the 900s and I'm still hero, I'd like to see if I can last longer than 1008 before I rank up.

Let's get ol' quicktemper up into that tie for second.  He sure as hell annoyed me for about 8 months.  I can't really think of anything comparable.  So QS takes the cake for me.

While this is clearly a tangent to the main point of the discussion, I feel compelled to point out that the land that the USA did distribute was taken by blood from the people who already lived there.

Isn't a P2PKH just a normal address?  the hash of a pubkey?

Actually, I think that as long as you can sign a message at some potential future moment of needing an account recovery from theymos, then an unedited post is actually all that's required.  The quotation is nice because it ensures that it can't be easily removed by someone who compromises the account.

So, if navaman's gripe is with mods on JD, seems like he posted in the wrong thread.

I think the problem is not "creative thinking" or not.  Seals always had tons of players back when they actually had working clients.  It's now been a year, and still no clients.  This is the problem.  You can make all the "fish fries" you want to, as long as people can't login or play, it doesn't matter how many gimmicks.

Can someone give me the two sentences version of who's Chuck why does navaman say he's censored?

Also, navaman, I can help you to run the clam client, it's not that hard.  Just ask questions here or in PM or in JD chat if you're stuck.  What went wrong?

Folks are telling the OP that he could use blockchain.info to do the work he needs to do (sign a message).  This is true, but such advice should come with a strong warning: once you give your private key to blockchain.info you're relying on them to keep it safe---ie, you've got multiple points of failure: yourself, bc.i, network transport.  Anyway, this may be fine, but if you were going to use that address to store any significant amount, I, personally, would opt for a local solution where you don't have to send your key over a network to a third party.

Right, but your mileage will obviously vary.  How long it takes will depend on your hardware, your connection speeds, etc.  And there's the tip about starting with a db dump...

Sure, it's an easy irony to point out.  People aren't usually so careful on internet forums so that's really the explanation.  I have an ad in my signature, yet I agree with the OP that sig-ad spam is a problem.  I'd like to think that I'm not contributing to that problem because I don't post just to get paid and I report problematic posts when I see them.  In any case, the world is a rich and varied place, and many of us agree that sig-ad spam is terrible, yet we like to get paid for our own posts.  I think that strictly speaking, this means that I disagree with the OP because I don't want signatures removed as in delete, disable, gone.  Yet, I do agree about the problem and I want to see things get better, not worse.

I think that's all you have to do, actually.