If you have a handgun or rifle or whatever and even if you did not buy it for killing someone, you can never know what you gonna do in a case that you are get in to histerics or when you have a nervous breakdown. Having gun may push you to shoot someone when there is legal solitions instead.
If you don't have a handgun or a rifle you still have access to knives, hammers and other blunt&sharp objects. Its been better to have a gun control in every country so that some people stop for there non sense doing like they are going to be strong person because they have a gun. Some people are thinking that they very strong person because they holding a gun so some are afraid to them. So much better that have gun control to avoid killing without knowing
There's a negative correlation between murder and guns per capita in the US. Which means less guns per capita = more murders More guns per capita = less murders.  |
|
|
|
Its why you insist on keeping the discussion general by oversimplifying everything to "socialism vs capitalism". By avoiding talking about actual policies, you're able to perpetuate the strawman that people are supporting failed policies of the past. When our policies are actually laid out for you, you always say "no thats capitalism" which is evidence that you know no one is pushing for the policies you're referring to when you talk about socialism.
Everything that doesn't involve the state is capitalism. It's because your policies involve coercion, which capitalists aren't very fond of. We believe in individual liberties. |
|
|
|
Jesam li ja to dobro razumio? Ti si tek jučer počeo igrati, odnosno tek jučer si napravio momčad i imaš ID 6007? Pa nije igra onda baš popularna. Ako znamo da se neaktivne momčadi ne brišu, a ID-evi vjerojatno idu redom to bi značilo da su u nekih šest mjeseci skupili 6000 igrača. Vjerojatno i manje jer je dosta ljudi imalo više timova. Ne znam, nekako sam mislio da ima puno više igrača. Dobro si razumio :/ myth striker izašao. 500 000 coinsa, lol
Čak okej ideja, baš me zanima koliko neka top ekipa ima nagruvanih coinsa. Cibalia  Poslao sam ti plavi starter pack, momčad je sranje ali s njom možeš osvajati sve osim zadnja 3-4 turnira. Pošto si tek krenuo, ovo će te ubrzati za mjesec-dva  Hvala, s ovim mogu igrati i N America cup  |
|
|
|
od danas ne koristim više ono best overall, moral, blabla...
Ja sam danas to upalio, Igram 2 puta za redom s likom koji ima 60 mil. navijača i skroz ljubičastu momčad, baš me zanima hoće li mi zamijeniti neke igrače u momčadi. Ovo mi je prilika uzeti nešto fanova, nadam se da im taj sustav radi kako spada. Evo počeo sam i ja igrati jučer pa ako tko želi udjeliti igrača tu sam Kako ti se zove momčad? Da pogledam što ti eventualno mogu poslati. Cibalia https://footbattle.io/team/6007 |
|
|
|
2/3 = 66.67%
But they won't get the 2/3.
Also, it would be correct to say "every ELECTED president" since Ford wasn't elected.
I need to stop posting when I'm hangover. |
|
|
|
But if you take more time to read about the subject which even more people won't do, you'll ask yourself who's the only president that they didn't try to impeach?
It's fucking Nixon.
Uh, speaking of fake news, where did you hear that? The Judiciary Committee voted on October 30, to begin consideration of possible impeachment of President Nixon by a 21–17 party-line vote, with all the committee's Democrats voting yes and all Republicans voting no,[42] and took up the matter in earnest that December, upon completing the Ford confirmation hearings. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_process_against_Richard_Nixon#Preparation_for_impeachment_proceedingsThe chairman of the Judiciary Committee was Peter Rodino, who was a Democrat, obviously. EDIT: Yeah, I fucked up. It was Ford, not Nixon. Anyways. First, the House of Representatives’ members (Article I, Section 2) can introduce an impeachment resolution - or the entire House can vote to open an investigation into the possible reasons for impeachment. Second, a special committee or, more commonly, the Judiciary Committee will then investigate. After the investigation is done, the committee can vote on sending the impeachment articles to the full House. Third, the Judiciary Committee and the House can approve or disapprove of the impeachment. Both the investigating committee and afterwards the House of Representatives vote with a simple majority on whether or not to impeach the president. Fourth, if a president is impeached, then they become subject to trial in the Senate (Article I, Section 3). When the Senate has to decide whether or not an official is guilty of the charges, a two-thirds majority is needed.So, basically you need 75% support in order to impeach a president. It's pretty obvious they won't get 75% support in the Senate. So what's the point? It's a propaganda tool. I still find it pretty misleading to be labeled as mostly false.  |
|
|
|
We really do not care.
Krugman is so bad economist and I wonder why he has become so popular. It is okay that he stated this in public but there is no point in having this news on the front page.
It might have something to do with winning the nobel prize. |
|
|
|
It was tension between Iran and USA. Neither USA bear any damage nor Iran ( other then that so called general). The only victim of this so called tension were poor passengers of Ukraine flight. Flights to Iran must be banned as they cant handle there air space efficiently.
What Iran did was terrible. Apparently, the victims on these tensions are always innocent people. 140 people lost their lives for nothing. And now that people was against the US, will turn now their back to Iran. I highly doubt the Ukranians were against the US. Russia invaded Crimea so they most probably naturally consider Americans to be their allies. |
|
|
|
Front page of Mediate, cernovich.com, zerohedge, breitbart, theblaze, daiilycaller and dedicated thread on bitcointalk...must be a slow news week.
You're just confirming that MSM bias exists. Besides that, what difference does it make who reports on it? The only source you need is the tweet itself. |
|
|
|
|
The most Orwellian thing I've seen recently are these Fact-checkers even Facebook uses to warn the users about "false" information.
So, you see a statement on facebook saying 'Democrats tried to impeach every Republican president since Eisenhower' and a notification pops up saying this is false. I'm extremely suspicious on how unbiased these are and what sorts of information they're used for.
For example, if you take the time to click the article and read through it without just taking it as false, it will say Democrats tried to impeach 5 out of 6 Republican presidents.
They know most people won't click&read.
|
|
|
|
|
How does a rider on a white horse with a bow but no arrows correlate to the islamic prophet?
How does the red horse correlate to the Arab spring?
|
|
|
|
The Australian fires are manmade. And @OP do you have any stats for the cooling argument? Those climate change activists who are busy with their demonstrations would have done better by plantings trees imagine one million protesters all planting trees and reducing their carbon emissions. That would go a long way in helping than protesting without doing anything and waiting for the governments to do something. How are trees going to help anything? I never understood people who think planting trees is going to help the planet somehow with anything. We already have enough O2 and we already have forests. |
|
|
|
|
I don't see why Iran would allow the investigation to happen since it's most probably them who did it with Russian missiles.
Ukranians have every right to ask for the it to happen, it is their plane that was shot down!
But it's most certainly shot by Iranians.
Who else would shoot it down? o.o
|
|
|
|
Were the Nazis socialists? No, not in any meaningful way, and certainly not after 1934. Hitler allied himself with leaders of German conservative and nationalist movements, and in January 1933 German President Paul von Hindenburg appointed him chancellor. Hitler’s Third Reich had been born, and it was entirely fascist in character
Facism is an extremely statist ideology as well. Giving the goverment or supreme leader more authority over the individual and his free will is the complete opposite of capitalism. Facism and socialism are very close ideologies. The major difference is that the enemy in socialism is found in class instead of race. |
|
|
|
Its a strawman. no one is "pushing for" the ideas and policies that haven't worked in the past.
Your nickname "coins4commies" determined that was a lie. |
|
|
|
Evo počeo sam i ja igrati jučer pa ako tko želi udjeliti igrača tu sam 0xa2a6e178fa7ed0b82b328e1c27a5d402c24e6505 Moram reći da sam se dobro načitao u ovih 30 stranica threada Stao sam na 20, pa prebacio na 34,35,36 Trenutno kad gledam čini mi se da bi mi bilo pametnije da sam namjerno gubio na početku kako bih mogao i dalje igrati Beginner cup za klubove ispod 1000 fanova u kojima se dobiva po 70 coinsa, nego sam prešao to i sada igram za 5 coina Oceania i Caribbean cup. Jer ovo ovako se stvarno čini nedostižno da ću vam se ikada približiti ako ne ubacim eth u igru. Trenutno sam složio 3 squada koja mogu igrati tako da cijelo vrijeme pimplam neke coine ali to je sve ekstremno loše. Treba odigrati 35 utakmica za jednak broj coina kao taj Beginner cup. |
|
|
|
 God Emperor Trump on facebook is a good source of memes. |
|
|
|
Why is the left pushing the idea of socialism/comunism so much even tho it showed that it doesn't work many times in the past?
Socialism makes sure not to give power in hands of private players and large players who contribute to GDP of the nation. While any government wont want that , socialism also makes sure to keep price under control , handle inflation and related unemployment. It also protects the people of the country by safegaurding land and labor laws. Everything you said is incorrect. The dictator is a large player, especially the ruling class. Socialist countries tend to have enormous amounts of inflation, look at Venezuela for example My country was a part of socialist ex Yugoslavia which also issued million Dinar bills and had 2000% inflation rates. They only hide the unemployment by hiring people in non-existing positions that aren't actually needed. They expropriate land from the people. |
|
|
|
Typical bunch of "argumentation"... maybe the OP does need to follow his own alleged advice & google definitions of both first...
I do not think it has to follow any Google definition because it implies that the Nazis were not socialists they did these things to remove prejudice from society The Nazis used to say against those who were anti-social. Literally nothing you just said makes any sense whatsoever. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
