|
in my signature i sell 24" PCIE-PCIE cables and 6" Y-splitters. perhaps one or both of these would help with the S7?
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah that's way more than $50 to ship to the states. Probably closer to $80-100 if I had to make a guess
|
|
|
|
For all the S3 Miners and one SP10, I'll offer you 0.5 BTC and I'll pay for shipping costs.
what about just the SP10? For both sp10's I'll offer.. 0.375 BTC hmm thats a bit lower than i'd like. for both SP10 units, 0.5BTC (plus shipping) and you'd have a deal though. where is it shipping to? edit: S3 buyer fell through - so I could accept the 0.5BTC offer for 6xS3 and 1xSP10 if you pay shipping. |
|
|
|
no the spondoolies thread actually spans hundred of pages and thousands of posts about their hardware.
This IS a hardware thread and it IS about a hardware manufacturer, whether people use it responsibly - including you continuing what you consider OT - is on the poster not the thread. This thread has to exist as a non-moderated version of the main thread because discussion about the company was being deleted. That's how this works, and its rather strange to now claim that discussion about a company isn't relavent to the company's thread as it was with BFL, Bitmain, Bitfury, Canaan Creative, Bitmain etc etc. well i dont consider it hardware. Its a downhill shit-valanche thats gaining momentum before someone moves it to the correct sub-forum. |
|
|
|
This is just another dogie spam, bullying, conspiracy posts and insults another forum members thread.
He opened it after that, if it became clear that after Spondoolies bankruptcy he can not return anything which has already been paid.
Can anyone to explain why this topic is still in Hardware thread?
+1. This belongs in the feedback/trust/scam subforum(s) since its nothing to do with hardware at all at this point, particularly with the rediculous 3-way trolling Then neither does the other Spondoolies-Tech thread. This is the sister, non moderated version and they are tied together. no the spondoolies thread actually spans hundred of pages and thousands of posts about their hardware. this thread is a 4-page shitstorm of accusations and trolling that you simply titled to lok like it is a sister thread. move it to scam accusations |
|
|
|
For all the S3 Miners and one SP10, I'll offer you 0.5 BTC and I'll pay for shipping costs.
what about just the SP10? |
|
|
|
Bitmain has begun selling used units from Inner Mongolia. S9 should arrive soon after the used units are sold out..
While I am not questioning the accuracy of this, how did you come to find this out? It's entirely consistent with other bits of information and the very recent hashrate "acceleration". just various tidbits of info floating around. Bitfury, BW, and Bitmain all have new chips very nearly ready. Bitfury and Bitmain were both impacted by the TMSC 14A earthquake damage (which meant a 30-60 day setback as bitcoin ASICs are relatively small clients/priority) That means chips should be about due to start or come from production around now. S7 prices are quickly approaching the manufacturing cost, which is likely $250/unit considering parts (assuming ~$1/ASIC chip) and staff pay. the hashrate movement seen over the last day or two is mostly varience. its not like a 200MWatt datacenter just flips a switch and puts over 100PH online instantly. |
|
|
|
This is just another dogie spam, bullying, conspiracy posts and insults another forum members thread.
He opened it after that, if it became clear that after Spondoolies bankruptcy he can not return anything which has already been paid.
Can anyone to explain why this topic is still in Hardware thread?
+1. This belongs in the feedback/trust/scam subforum(s) since its nothing to do with hardware at all at this point, particularly with the rediculous 3-way trolling |
|
|
|
Guy, any inside infos about whos "behind" current hashrate bump?    I have a bet with someone it will be over 2 EHs on July 1st. thats pretty ballsy - with recent TMSC delays of 1-2 months it looks like chips may just be getting into the right hands now, or during the next few weeks. How quickly that becomes fabricated hardware and plugged in is the big question. personally i think August 1st is a more realistic 2EH target (assuming you take a larger moving average, and not day-to-day spike) |
|
|
|
Guy, any inside infos about whos "behind" current hashrate bump? lady luck, also known as "statistical variance" |
|
|
|
I dont know why they didnt just come up with a 3-board design using undervolted chips for less heat and better efficiency. I bet a 135-chip design could manage 4.2TH/1kW, which would be pretty compelling. Including the PSU seems silly in most places where PSUs are readily available in stores. Unless its <$80 for that PSU it not really worth the hassle and shipping costs compared to the local NCIX/tigerdirect. but i love the top bracket. Id buy just that for my S7 as it looks like a great way to minimize cord clutter from the PSU |
|
|
|
|
I have both styles of the labyrinth (silver balls and ceramic balls), if you want to make an offer (hint: if Max is still selling them, tats the cheaper option)
|
|
|
|
 Bitslandia: much rage and devastation  But in Etheria, great joy and jubilation DANCE PARTY!!  You're thinking of Etheropia:  |
|
|
|
Why do we need to see an invoice from anyones solicitor? This is private information. We need to see the invoice to see if dogie was lying or not when he stated that the lawyer was paid "up front"! Apparently he can't back up his statement. Maybe there are other statements that he usually pulls out of his ass, but we don't know. We do know that he refuses to show any tangible proof so that makes it a lie in my eyes. By the same judgement he can say that he is being owned $1000 or $1M! What lies are you referring to, or are you just here for the pictures and shillfest?
Are you really reading all the posts here? We have 2 lies until now: 1) The posted receipt from dogie was first for "court fee and security of funds" which was later edited to "court fee..."; 2) dogie stated that the lawyer was paid "up front", but refuses to prove it. While dogie could clear up this issue very fast he refuses to do so. Just like Craig Wright refuses to really sign a message with the genesis block's address while stating that he is really Satoshi... I used to respect you on here, but this is just going deep south crazytown. Dogie doesnt need to prove shit to you, or spondoolies. He just has to prove it in court (which bitcointalk clearly is not). The fact he removed 3 words from a post is you grasping at straws to somehow discredit him when theres a huge amount of proof that spondoolies owes him and others money for referrals/commissions. (again, spondoolies-tech must have been drunk when they throught 5,10,15% commission tiers were a smart idea, because that probably was the entire profit margin (or more) on producing the SP3x/SP20 product line) I mean, who the fuck cares if dogie pays his lawyer up front? What do you have to gain by him proving it, and what does he have to gain by proving it? If anyting, it just provides spondoolies more ammunition to fight his claim in court, and witholding sensitive information is a smart move. We do know that he refuses to show any tangible proof so that makes it a lie in my eyes. By the same judgement he can say that he is being owned $1000 or $1M! Are you kidding? hes not trying to sell you something, he has no need to prove shit to you. Unlike SP-Tech, who maintained for months that an SP50 was in the works, and used that lie to bolster the BTCS share price by nearly 30% before they sold off and declared bankruptcy (royally screwing over BTCS and shareholders in the process). |
|
|
|
I know this is a really old thread to revive but i just seen a link to it on another post and had to post what a beautiful piece of history this coin has, 1 rumoured to sell for $1,000,000.
Is there anymore of these if someone wanted, unfortunately not me.
I don't think many would mind seeing this again anyway.
It really is a beautiful piece of bitcoin history. You could say that about this thread itself. It's face value, when loaded, would be 5 million, not counting the gold, the rarity, the type of coin, and collectors value. Wow! Just it's face value worth $5 million, in what currency? At today's rates it's face value would be about $440,000 USD by my calculations. Collectors and rarity value would add a bit, then the gold itself would add more but i can't see anyone paying $5mil for one. yea, he missed a zero |
|
|
|
Very nice coins! But curious how are you justifying 15BTC for the lot? Seems very pricey considering the current market rates....
I was totally thinking the same thing, thank you. I was going on the last sale that happened in October. I am accepting offers though. amazing MS69 set, but i think you'll realistically get 1.5BTC+2BTC+3.5BTC+4BTC = 11BTC, |
|
|
|
you cant be bothered to use images that are not copyrighted? Your company ran off with $2.25M and your best logic is putting up images that are covered in watermarks and labelled "for preview purposes"? using those images in te forum is theft from the copyright holder. good job making spondoolies look like (even more of) the bad guy here |
|
|
|
They have also stated they will end the POW phase in a year or so as well. It will be interesting to see how they fork goes when they do. What's the critera for Eth to jump algorithms? Is there an automated conversion of Eth1 to Eth2 in the protocol? Is there a "central authority" handling that jump and those conversions?
a few months ago they were saying PoW ends sometime in summer or fall, ten tey pushed it to winter/2017, and now it sounds like summer 2017? |
|
|
|
Well, the other 15% of miners now control the network if every merchant/user/service/exchange/etc did not agree with the hard fork the miners had, and the difficulty will adjust downward on that side of the fork to compensate for the real network mining losing a substantial amount of hash power. The original 85% of miners that voted on and adopted this miner-voted hard fork would basically be mining nothing since merchants and users aren't accepting their chain.
I did not know that one merchant or user or service or exchange could forestall a hard fork approved of by all remaining parties. Quite the concentration of power. Universal veto. miners provide security for economic incentive, and it is in their best interest to make a profit on "work" (hashrate). They have TOTAL control over hardforking the blockchain by the very definition that only a miner can create blocks. Merchants, users, exchanges, services that do not mine blocks ave zero ability to create blocks and must follow the rules set by miners in order to have a transaction confirmed or marked valid. obviously, merchants/users may not agree with a fork implemented by miners and may stay on the unforked ruleset, with transations mined by those miners. If they decide to send the same coins on both sides of the fork, that would also be fairly easy to do. But if a majority of hasrate in on the new chain, the older chain becomes vulnerable to hashrate attacks and using it for transacting becomes unsafe or unpredictable. In this situation, fees become important. If all the transactions (and thus fees) are on the minority blockchain, miners would have economic incentive to return to that ruleset. |
|
|
|
How much is shipping to New York. It's really close but I cant come myself..
feel free to use the canadapost.ca calculator, from M6K2Z1. AFAIK its around $20/1kg or ~$50/5kg so keep that in mind. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
