The best thing is to play normally without minding the jackpot because if you only play for the jackpot, you will likely lose most of the times but remember to play manually and always look on the numbers that shows on your screen so that you won't miss it if ever you hit the jackpot numbers.

They shouldn't change it because it will be unfair for those who spend millions already trying to hit that jackpot and besides it wasn't easy to hit it anyway. They should not worry because they can earn more than that jackpot amount. It was somehow a nice lure or promotion that primedice got. No wonder why primedice has no promotion because their jackpot prize is too huge already.

The main problem with staking is that, you are getting something that has inflation, but others do have it too, so you have to calculate how much it is. For example, bitcoin does have inflation, newbitcoins are mined constantly, hundreds of them everyday, tens of millions of dollars worth of bitcoin printed every single day.

But that is eaten up in the market because of how high our volume is, and it is not that important, and the inflation is very little there. Whatever you are staking, if it is decent and not a lot and can't be really hurting its financials, then it is fine, but if it is printing too much then we are going to end up with a high inflation for that token and it could cause a problem.

I am definitely agreeing with this for sure. I have been in crypto only because I hate fiat, everyone keeps talking about how crypto could become better and how if we could just adjust crypto the more like fiat, and so forth, regulations, legal tender, laws, many other things but for me none of that matters.

I was in love with bitcoin the moment I saw it, a truly decentralized digital money that can't be controlled by the government, the "price" could be controlled, but the coin itself can't be touched. That's all I care about and that's all I want to know. There is no CBDC, no fiat, no other thing that would make me want to use over crypto.

I had the same thing but in gambling, I lost a lot of money because I chased my losses there. I rarely do lose money in investment because I am long term, but in trading I do not just "lose" money, I usually just put a stop loss so my losses are low, and I just keep the rest when they go back, or do DCA if I trust the project too much which means I rarely do lose when trading.

Not that it hasn't happened before, when I first started I was horrible at trading, but I considered those losses as learning curve and I considered it my lesson cost, and now I am doing better and that is how people should approach their trading losses as well.

There is a good level between reading and doing. If you start trading without ever reading you will become a bad trader for a long time before you could get any good, if you keep on reading for years and then start trading you will not start being amazing on the first trade neither. That means that you need to both read and trade based on how quickly you can learn things.

The period you should be reading and learning without ever trading depends on what kind of person you are, if you are a great financial mind you will learn quickly, if you are not it will take some time, I still read for example . But in the end, you need to start trading only after you read enough.

The real scary thing is, if this war is not stopped one way or another and Russia doesn't back off, then who could say that other big nations won't stop attacking other nations? Like what stops china from taking Taiwan? What stops from Russia to attack another nation? What stops Africans starting to attack each other for land?

I mean basically this war will change how wars are fought in this era of the humanity. So far we have seen nations like the USA attack Iraq or Afghanistan and so forth but those are proxy wars where they just attack those lands but attack those who support those lands and they just leave, they do not take land. We are in 2022 and Russia is fighting for lands, that will change a lot of things.

I do agree that if you are going with leverage route, then you should be insanely well educated in trading and be a veteran. If you are a newbie then you will lose a ton of money. Most newbies end up going all in or a high amount for their leverage trades and they end up losing a few in a row and suddenly they are so down that only a big hail Mary will save them and they do that and lose that too and be gone. That should be the last thing you do, just put like 1% of your money into one trade in leverage because since it has high return, if it is good trade then you will earn enough, if it is bad trade then you will lose only 1% of your account.

If you are trading with emotions and think that you could do better than others based on your gut feelings then you will lose a lot. You are right that people make the same mistakes because we repeat ourselves, and that should be something to be careful about.

If we could realize the fact that market doesn't care about us, and the market doesn't go up and down based on whatever we do, then we will realize how cold and ruthless it could become. If you use that to your advantage and leave all of your emotions aside and start making a profit based on what you see and how market moves instead of what you "feel" it will do, you will start earning a lot.

What's being cool with scamming people? do you find it cool when some new project steals your money? They can promise cool stuffs like big returns or a feature that you didn't see before but that's only just a promise. Old projects are still cool because they don't scam us but they only give you better returns as long as you keep on investing and keep on holding for a longer time.

More older projects might not be cool to some because they are already old and don't offer a new feature, it's okay if that's what they think, they are free to pick newer projects. I think there are still new projects out there are legit. They just need to do a proper research.

His son was as already a teenager, usually with that age they already know what they are doing and the parent don't have a control anymore if what content their kids are accessing but what is that game again your trying to say? my guess is that a summer time saga? because this game is an adult game and it was trending before.

A teenager can now work and there are online jobs available. They can earn money and they can use that money to buy in game items. No need to ask for their parent's money but if their parents are loving, they can give money to their kids. There is no problem on here but you are just paranoid and making it a big issue.

Investors are already investing just before a massive inflation came, we should not worry about them but worry on those regular individuals that did not know how to invest because they are the ones that can get affected the most by inflations but there is no need to force them, just to talk to them calmly about this issue.

If they will agree and invest then that's good for them but if not then that's already their problem. They choose to live in a much harder way but they are already used to this. Cryptos price goes down but this is not caused by the inflation, crypto is rather the inflation saviour. The decline in the crypto price are normal.

So what they are all saying is true, that the tutorials are superb. It's good for those who want to learn the blackjack in a straightforward way because sometimes we can't understand what is being shown in the tutorials.

This can save them lots of time but is there any way that a person can help, like a donation address or something since the tutorials are free right? That way, the creator of those tutorials are going to be more motivated to help more people that want to learn blackjack. Up to you if you believe on lucky charms but it can be true that blackjack and any other gambling games still need some luck in order to win consistently or effectively.

I know I will be hated for this but 100% definitely CBDC. If I am going to trust my money in basically fiat form, then I would rather do that with government and not some company. Many people here trust USDT but I do not trust them, who is tether? Who is bitfinex? Why would I trust them? They are literally nobody that we trusted tens of billions of dollars, it is around 100 billion or so nowadays isn't it? Makes no sense to me at all.

I believe that if you do this with governments then it should be better, one way or another they will pay you, maybe it won't be as easy, or maybe it will hurt the economy but they will find a way to pay you. Companies could be just closed and say they are hacked or bankrupted or whatever and be gone.

Maybe it is just me, but wagering AGAINST Barcelona right now with a martingale rule could be actually quite worthy. They have been winning in la liga for too many games in a row right now and I have a feeling that eventually they will lose.

It means that even if it is not the next game, they may lose just one and if you do martingale until they lose, you may get something good in return. Obviously the downside is that they may never lose another game until the season is over, which would be awesome for Barcelona but I just feel like that is unlikely to see. I won't do it, I just do not have the courage enough to do this, but I wonder what would happen if someone tried it.

Yes of course it is here for a reason and that is to secure the value of our unstable cryptos but I don't really think there is a strong connection between usd and usdt in terms of power. They can make usd more powerful but in the crypto world, usdt is not the strongest but there are more cryptos that are stinger than usdt and what is the connection of military for having a strong currency?

I think to have a strong currency, a country must have a strong economy first. The dollar didn't get weaker but in fact usd is still the world's reserve currency. If there is a currency that got weaker lately then that would only be the Russian ruble, we already know why.

Between the fact that the price would go up anyway even if you buy right now (okay maybe not from 30 bucks to 60k, but still go up maybe 10x in the next 10 years how knows) and the amount you can collect if you do it consistently, there is still a chance for people to make enough money.

I am not saying that you could get rich from a free faucet, the aim for a free faucet is not to make you rich, but if you do this like for even 12 times a day for the next 10 years, you could literally buy a very good car, maybe even a brand new tesla with this money, or maybe you won't, who knows? This is just a guess of course, I could be very wrong as well, but I really hope I am not .

People could buy at the all time high level, maybe OP did or maybe he didn't but that is not the point, there could be SOME people out there who did that, I wouldn't know who but there could be one. This means that we need to help people figure out a solution if they did that, maybe not to help for OP only, but for anyone who is out there and don't know what to do.

In that situation we need to figure out a way that you should be able to fix this by buying a lower level. If you bought at 69k, then buy some more at 30k-35k levels and suddenly you could drop that to 45k and then when the price goes up to 48k, you would be in profit by that time without having to wait for it to go to 70k.

Right now, we are in half time as Barcelona is playing look like they are doing this for full three points because with this win they will be strongly stayed at second spot level on points with one match in hand Levante is in relegation zone even they are trying their best for avoiding this, but time is running out, and they already lost their train for survival with there the worst performance.

Still it's not easy for Barcelona because they have very crucial matches against Frankfurt, and they want their best players available for this match without any serious injury news or other problem.
 
Mostly in these situations we have some poor results in league matches from teams like we already have in Germany but with current players and form Barcelona is very hard team for me, they are going to win this match for their full three points.

And why not? Is there a rule that everyone must agree before someone can make a review of a gambling site? But, I think it's safe to ask permission first to the gambling site owner. That is also to give respect to them and yes, it is better if they make a review based on their actual experience of playing on that gambling site, not that they will write whatever think of but even if they did it, there will still be a disagreement that will happen because not all of us can get the same experience when playing on the same site.

In my case, I agree on what he puts on the top 10 list. I knew most of those casinos and I knew that they are good.

SOL doesn't actually have a high TPS, they promise a high one but whenever it gets real high, it gets problems. Thats how you know a network is safe or not, whenever there is a clogged network, it becomes a problem and we see people finding loopholes in the network so that they could hack something or someone. That is why I do not think that it matters, we should be focusing on more of a situation where it will be doing fine in the long run, and bitcoin/ethereum/ltc/bnb these are those options for me.

As long as a casino add these four, and maybe doge as well just for fun, then I would be fine, they can stop adding more. However, I also understand them adding new ones as well, to attract more customers.