Bitcoin Forum
July 05, 2024, 07:46:07 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 [246] 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 ... 339 »
4901  Economy / Reputation / Re: Entrust or distrust for this? on: February 16, 2020, 02:27:04 PM
Red tagging is for scammers only, or if you see a valid a evidence if that person is going to scam anyone.
Whilst I am not going to comment on this ordeal included in the OP (people fighting is very tiring), I ask you to stop repeating this false statement. Red trust is not only for scammers, never has been and never will be.

I don't believe that TECSHARE is likely to scam anyone, or trading with him is high-risk since we have a trade at the past. This kind of tag is not acceptable since it's more like a personal thing. Tagging people just because you didn't like him is not acceptable at all.
See the bolded part. While you may not think so, someone else may think so. We should not attack people for fundamental differences in how they perceieve trust. If you really disagree with it, talk to them. If you can't come to a common ground, exclude from your trust view if it is worth that much to you. But the stark attacking of each other needs to stop. What was the point of turning the trust system into a democracy-style system otherwise?
I have nothing against TMAN and I am not attacking him, I am just saying what's my opinion with regards to this issue. And I am just saying what's trust system should be to Theymo's point of view. I understand your point with regards to different way to perceive the trust system, and I respect that. Maybe TMAN's way is right considering that, lot of DT's are trusting his judgement.

Quote
Red trust is not only for scammers, never has been and never will be.

I agree, For scammers and for forum rule breakers  Grin (For me)
4902  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: My story with leverage on: February 16, 2020, 01:19:18 PM
Personally I am not doing Leverage trade. Because its quite complicated calculations from normal trade. You might loss your capital or you might win big just like gambling. One of my known person had tried leverage trade on Bitmex, but he had lost everything there although amount was very small. So for beginner, leverage trade isn't appropriate. For me, still now I don't have any intention to do leverage trade even on Binance. I am just away from trading for few months and holding some shitcoin (Lol). Just remember, where you have chances for big win there also risk involved for big loss, you have to be ready for loss as well.
Leverage trading is not advisable to anyone who enters to crypto, and I know many people that lose all of their money by leverage trading. It's very easy to lose there since one-second dump might get you liquidated, or just simply opening your trade more than a day will make your funds go to zero.
Personally, I tried it, and it didn't end well, I just lost my money and quit on trading for some time, I think there's a lot of people having a big profit when they are doing leverage trading, but most of the newbie is going to be liquidated there lol.

Just a tip: Stay out of leverage trading if you are just new in trading.
4903  Economy / Reputation / Re: Entrust or distrust for this? on: February 16, 2020, 12:44:24 PM
I respect TMAN and can't distrust him just because he make a one mistake using the trust system, we should consider what he do to the forum and not only see the few bad decision he make, but I will say that this is not a correct usage of the trust system.

Theymos said that:
you should not use trust ratings to attack a person's opinions

Red tagging is for scammers only, or if you see a valid a evidence if that person is going to scam anyone. Nobody should be tagged for personal opinion. If you hate that person's opinion you can ignore him or just make a neutral feedback about him,

Quote
Negative - You think that trading with this person is high-risk

I don't believe that TECSHARE is likely to scam anyone, or trading with him is high-risk since we have a trade at the past. This kind of tag is not acceptable since it's more like a personal thing. Tagging people just because you didn't like him is not acceptable at all.



Just let's wait for TMAN's answer for this, and hoping he would delete this kind of feedback.
4904  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: After losing did you feel you must return the soonest to win back your losses? on: February 15, 2020, 10:59:12 PM
Well, that was all the basic question about our feeling of gambling. Out of 20 questions, we all experienced that as a true gambler.
Indeed, a true gambler should learn what those mistakes they encounter and perhaps they should avoid not to happen again in the future.
Even if you are in losing the moment, don't forget to have control in your self and put limitations. You will be fine always if you know how self-control works. If you lose? then, move on and get back when you fully relaxed. 

Only that most gambling forms are luck-based more than strategical so you can't really control the odds of you messing up altogether. But that doesn't mean you can't control how you win or how less you lose. You got to ensure that you are putting leeways for yourself at the very least. If you feel exhausted after a loss then it pretty much means that you would need to quit for the meantime even if it's still the beginning of the match. Being tired and aggravated clouds all your decision making which could then lead to mishaps and wrong moves. Altogether this causes a bad turn and a lost if it persists. So give yourself some time to rest after gambling.

I myself ensure that I only get 3 games everyday not only to preserve my mental state but to also ensure that I don't get addicted. 1 game is  more than enough to be a deciding factor if you can continue or not but I usually have my mentals intact even after a first loss. That's why I go on. But I also ensure that the 3 games are met to ensue discipline and of course as I have mentioned to endure that I don't get addicted to gambling.
4905  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: When trading, never ignore the statoshi value of your coins on: February 15, 2020, 10:22:20 PM
Few days ago I decided to utilize some fraction of bitcoin just sitting in my trading wallet to try profiting from the market. Although I may profit when the profits was calculated in dollars but unknowingly I lost massively in Satoshi value. That means assuming I just kept hold of my coins I would had made almost the same value I made with the coins i bought. Many traders haven't realized this yet but just get carried away with the US value of their trades without realizing they lost some satosh in the process.
This is very true, many times I see people bragging about their profits and when I see their results I discover they have made more money by just holding bitcoin, and what it is the point of holding an altcoin if that altcoin is not going to outperform bitcoin? When you think about it this does not make sense which is one of the many reasons for which I am really careful when I decide to invest in altcoins and as soon as it seems I am losing some bitcoin I sell them.
That is a good investment strategy I must say. For investors who really take into account the satoshi value or bitcoin value of their coins as compared to the US dollar value this is really helpful, they can ensure that their investments don't depreciate in value as they jump from one cryptocurrency to another. As per people who base their investments through dollars though I will say that this is not that helpful for them, but the fact is that US dollars have lesser growth potential than satoshis. That's why much more people are afraid to lose bitcoin than to lose dollars in this industry. However, satoshis and bitcoins still pretty much depend on US dollars at this point so it's still unfair to just shrug them off.



 When training, what are you mostly concerned about, to gain more profit in bitcoin or gain more in usd dollar without minding if you lost some Satoshi value?.
This also comes at a risk, cause without enough assessments you might mistakenly pull out an investment that could've hit a spike, the profits are gone, and you can't get it back. So it's always vital to review your investment strategy every now and then and observe the market graph in order to create the best decision at a certain given situation.
4906  Economy / Economics / Re: Gold bubble and Economic situation more what to expect on: February 15, 2020, 09:43:28 PM
As I predicted here the Gold bubble Will pop.

People asking me is the Gold really safe heaven? 
My answer is, Gold is not safe heaven even bitcoin is not safe heaven!! 

Your best safe heaven is knowledge and information.

I'm not a gold bug which means that I disagree with people who blindly follow gold all the time, without considering any market cycles and entering the market at the least opportune time and thinking they can just 'hold it out'.

But right now, gold is undervalued in my opinion especially with all the trade tension internationally. I think that it's only a matter of time before precious metals gets its bull phase of the market cycle.

Silver did drop below $17 which surprised me a little bit. Again, I don't think that it'll regress fully back to $14-15 at the start of the year. Right now would be a good spot for long term accumulation.
True. Gold is underappreciated as of the moment and it's worrying too. For cryptocurrency  investors who have placed a considerable amount of investments here it won't affect them much because they can just pull out money from their account whenever they feel the need to. However for people who have only invested as a means of added profit and those people who haven't really invested at all, it's going to be hard for them. Gold is under the same governing system as dollars, and that pretty much means that if Gold drops, there is a high tendency that dollars will drop too. It could've been good if not only for the fact that most of who will be affected will be the common people. While the rich will still wallow in their money.

I hope gold balances itself out anytime soon. Just because we invest on something doesn't mean we should hate other assets though. After all cryptocurrencies and gold exist in a different investment environment so I don't see the point of hating gold or its followers. Gold's shiny and beautiful after all.
4907  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Gaming Industry and Cryptocurrency! on: February 15, 2020, 08:55:21 PM
I like the Lightnight game I think it would be a huge hit if they could get a greater graphics.
I also think that they should make a MOBA so other gamers could also enjoy it.
I also wish that these games would be mobile friendly.
The concept of the game is fine and I think is a really innovative way to promote bitcoin. But I am worried about its progress for a couple of reasons. One thing that I would like to point out is that since this game is a fortnite clone basically, this could cause some copyright infringement and issues from the developers of the two games. Which could then cause controversy. This could either make or break the game as it could garner users to come in and play the game, but it could also cause serious legal issues and at the end have the game be closed.

Another is the payment method. We want the game to be as accessible as possible through all means. And it being only available for purchase through bitcoin doesn't help. I know the developers want to promote bitcoin or cryptocurrencies as a mode of payment but not everyone is a bitcoin investor. This could easily be a gateway to have them invest altogether to bitcoin but setting up a bitcoin payment on a non-bitcoin user is already a big obstacle.
4908  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Leave gambling, if it destroys you. on: February 15, 2020, 08:05:54 PM
This points are golden rules for gambler. One of the major reason gamblers doesn't find it easy to quit is the intention to win back their money after losing.
We do that because we got balls to take more risk, of course no one would just easily let go when they lose, most of us wants to win back our loses because our intention is to always win if possible, but at least we will most of the time as that is doable.

This is a great secret for obsession and it always leads to more losses. The greatest solution is to counter your mindset of winning the money back and let it go then you stop immediately. This has helped alot.
You can't easily achieve that kind of matured thinking but eventually you'll learn that as you keep gambling and open yourself for improvement.
True. For me what would really make you out of gambling addiction's not these tips we provide and all but the innate growth that you are expecting from yourself. The fact that you are asking for someone's help is a plus, and a good indication that you are indeed growing. We can blabber about everything we know here but as long your mentals is still fixated on the phrase "I want to win" you won't go anywhere. You'd lose your savings and you'll ruin your life for yourself and for your family. If you don't grow out of your excuses you can't get to what you want to be. You need to help yourself that's what I meant basically.

Another thing you might want to keep in mind is the fact that you always have to assess your self before doing a task you are unfamiliar with. There's no hurt in turning back if you know the thing you'll be doing will ruin you. It's a basic human instinct to run away from danger. If you know that you will not control yourself gambling, then try to take a step back and assess yourself and see what made you want and made you not want to gamble. Then decide. It has helped me get out of my gambling addiction too. So I hope this works for you.
4909  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: What are the most popular cryptocurrencies for investors? on: February 15, 2020, 06:25:01 PM
The chart is clear that bitcoin is becoming very popular, so it is easy for new investors to determine their choice to invest now, if they look at the charts there, the most popular crypto promises better returns. The list will not change much for a number of periods because the large capitalization will allow them to last for a long time because of the popularity factor that will keep them at the top of the list.
Not quite surprising at all. We've known bitcoin making a loud sound on different places, so no wonder why there is much people are hooking with it now especially this year that an anticipated bitcoin halving will occur on May. Bitcoin dominance is up to 60% and continue to get higher every month, which says that bitcoin is generally invested. Investors these days do not look for high capitalization or any as long as it is showing a good run in the chart and possible in makinh profit. So undoubtedly bitcoin now is the most invested cryprocurrency, with its possessed popularity guess nothing in the market will go above it.

BUT if we are talking aside from bitcoin, surely it is the ethereum just noticed how transactions are made in ethereum blockchain plus the doubled user gain of some ethereum related applictions.
4910  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin to Precious Metals Companies on: February 15, 2020, 05:46:04 PM
Honestly, people do not really see bitcoin as a payment method of precious metals mostly because it is not something you can collect by hand whereas precious metals are normally seen as things you can buy directly.
You can also buy bitcoin directly with any e-wallet offering the coin or exchange but the main thing is people are more giving value to bitcoin because it is trendy and growing. On top of that is the volatility of the bitcoin that has been the very source of speculation on which its price are hardly predictable. However, metals do have physical components wherein the value or physically evaluated.


You go to a gold shop and you buy the gold using your dollars, there is none like that for bitcoin, plus international transport of precious metals are usually a dangerous and a very regulated thing so you can't work for the whole globe when you are doing something like that, otherwise people would go beyond the regulations and just use bitcoins to buy billions of dollars worth of gold to their nations, weakening the other nations gold reserves right? That is why regulations matter when it comes to these things and we can't use bitcoin however we want to purchase.
lol. Use bitcoins to buy billions of dollars worth of gold to other country and result to weakening of other nation's gold reserve? Have you thought of money printing? Today, we don't have any backed up asset on our currency such as gold or oil, What we habe now is the faith of the paper having its value that we can use to trade, why? because the government say so. And FYI, buying gold is much more hard than buying bitcoin, TBH you can just create an account with any exchange make deposit and buy bitcoin then withdraw that's all it takes to have a bitcoin.
4911  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Metamask Reaches One Million Users on: February 15, 2020, 12:46:25 PM
Did the Ethereum really hit $300 today? Coz I only see $281 on the coinmarketcap, anyway, there is no surprise at all that a high volume of people are using metamask and rides simultaneously with the Ethereum's price as Metamask allows its users to do ethereum related stuffs. I bet they reached that high usage because of the incoming bitcoin halving, why do I say so? Simply because they are converting what they have to buy bitcoin and ethereum. I often use Metamask back then purposely for selling my tokens but I've read some in Github that several people are having problems with connecting their accounts to Metamask. Last time I checked there was a loading error on some websites and exchanges whenever Metamask is activated. I'm glad they are having a good business up til now and guess there will be more people who will use Metamask for the crypto event this year.
4912  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: PEOPLE WILL NEVER STOP FALLING FOR SCAM on: February 15, 2020, 09:22:51 AM
this is not a bitcoin specific thing though. for as long as humanity existed there have been gullible people and there have been scammers who use their gullibility to make money from them. the form of it and the "medium" they use changes but the principles are the same and will remain the same.

It is a bitcoin thing tho since we are inside a forum that talks about everything that is happening is crypto-space. 'Scam' has been become the very correct term when blinded online, then we used to call it 'Fraud' before the internet is invented. Principles are technically similar, they are both blinding their victims with much opportunity however these things are not only for stealing money or any type of currency coz some are aiming for personal information and documents. What is inevitable is the gullible people or those who cannot detect the danger of scam because of the possible positive outcome.


unfortunately there isn't much others could do about it either. we can only keep informing them and fight the scammers by publicizing their scam, reporting them to authorities, closing their websites,....
I must agree we cannot do much for the others but to let them know what to avoid perhaps they are going to be scammed. The only BUT we can do is the legality like seeking for authorities help to track and locate the criminals. Well publicizing isn't that effective for me, even using a platform that has a millions of users like Facebook or Twitter coz accounts can be easily made and protect the publicize posts.
4913  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Best strategy for Dice on: February 14, 2020, 05:13:07 PM
There's no strategy for dice. Just play base on your guts, The most straightforward approach there is a martingale, but usually, it doesn't work. So I highly suggest that you should enjoy the game and bet big in random moments and just bet if you feel lucky at that moment. Dice gambling is just a pure luck game. Unlike sports betting or poker, just enjoy the game and always remember if you win in dice cash it out I always win there but ended up emptying my funds for that day, sometimes dice is tricky LOL. Just enjoy the dice  Wink
4914  Economy / Reputation / Re: Need more opinions about bestchange red trusts. on: February 14, 2020, 03:55:20 AM
The issue has been resolve and as @best_change explanation it's just frozen account and the money has been claimed by the owner. So I really believe that my fellow DT should remove or at least make their feedback a neutral one, and the flag that has been created should be deleted or at least should be oppose by other DT.
I haven't read everything, but if this is true, I'd say the negative feedback should be removed. This might also help motivate others to do the right thing in a similar situation in the future.
If it becomes clear negative feedback is there to stay even after fixing the accusations, users might be less willing to do the right thing.

I just want to quote the whole thread for any user that will visit this thread, to know that the issue has been resolve and those DT is still not deleting their tag/accusation to the exchange.

Official statement from ChangeHero regarding the case with Sergey M.

On 27/10/2019 supposedly Sergey M. (hereinafter - “the User”) has made two transactions with the web interface of the ChangeHero service (hereinafter - “the Service”).

The first transaction was made at 15:15:12 on 27/10/2019. Exchanged 50 USDT20 to XMR. Finished at 15:52:43.
The second transaction was made at 17:11:44 on 27/10/2019. Exchanged 21,010 USDT20 to XMR. The transaction was automatically put on hold due to AML-system being triggered.

Sequence of interactions with the user
 
The interaction with the User was happening as follows:
On 27/10/2019 at 20:28 the User contacted the Service’s support team through the chat asking for a refund of his assets because he refused to pass the user verification procedure known as KYC (“Know Your Customer”). At 21:04 he was provided with the support team’s email address, where further communication was occuring;
On 29/10/2019 at 15:55, after consulting with legal experts, the Service has decided to continue verification of the User until the circumstances are completely clarified;
On 01/11/2019 at 14:53 after the User’s inquiry, the Service affirmed the refund is possible only after completing the KYC procedure;
On 09/11/2019, as a reply to the previous letter, the User sent an email with his ID, proof of source of part of his funds and screenshots of his exchange account attached to it;
To confirm the User’s identity, on 21/12/2019 a Skype call was made after being repeatedly postponed, through the User’s fault as well.

During the Skype call, the User was asked a few standard questions, which, in our opinion, could serve as a proof of ownership over the funds:
Which cryptocurrency wallet was used by the User to send the funds to the Service;
Which cryptocurrency wallet was used by the User to receive the funds exchanged by the Service;
Why did the User exchanged his funds not directly on the exchange (at the time of transactions, the rates on the exchange were more favorable);
For what activities does the User utilize his exchange account, from which the funds were sent to the Service.
The User was not able to provide an answer to any of these questions and disconnected from the call, claiming he would call back in 15-20 minutes.

To get more information on the case, during a few days from 21/12/2019 until 17/01/2020 the Service sent inquiries to the exchange from which the funds were sent. The information received from the exchange representatives can be summarized as follows:
The funds were indeed sent from their exchange account;
The account shows the signs of “allegedly suspicious activity”;
There were no official inquiries from law enforcement regarding this account.

Closing the case

According to the Terms of Use, on 31/01/2020 at 13:39:43 the Service has made a refund to the outgoing Address 0x975f422840ed3729a5b95a60e454e0826b719f4a, Hash: 0x207cc2a75781aecc9b08d6f7e7bfeadce53ff85c7ee509cc79ea8da1b8477d9f. The address will be blacklisted by the Service, and the User or any further operations connected with this address will be blocked.

Despite the unjustified accusations, all the time since the start of the incident, the User’s funds were on hold on the Service’s payin address, were not sent or used in any other transactions.

Concluding the case

ChangeHero is a non-custodial exchange solution. It does not withhold its users’ assets and balances. It does not require obligatory sign-up.

The Service’s team adheres to the policy of opposing illegal activities, such as fraud, money laundering, as well as suspicious operations and transactions. The Service’s policy will not be changed despite the attempts to influence it through public activities, private e-mail and messaging, Service’s partners etc.

The Service is going to review the communication flow with its customers who refuse to undergo KYC and to resolve similar future cases within 24 hours.

The Service is going to review its Terms of Use to make the conditions of using the Service more clear and understandable to the Users.

The team is sincerely sorry that some of these unjustified accusations and reputation damage were dealt to the BestChange and Indacoin services that have no connection to the transactions in question. We express our gratitude to BestChange and Indacoin for adhering to their Terms of Use and not pressuring ChangeHero to refund the assets in question.






I am still hoping that my fellow DT will do the right thing, or at least somehow they will make a statement why they are not removing their feedback to the exchange that don't do nothing wrong. It's been a long time since the accusation has been proven that the exchange is legit and paying, I am still not sure if they are just ignoring that fact or just didn't see it or care anymore.
4915  Local / Pamilihan / Re: [Round 2 Paid Raffle] Satori Coin Bitcoin Poker Chip - 10XRP Fee(4/16) on: February 14, 2020, 02:15:13 AM
6 and a sakin
4916  Economy / Speculation / Re: Tone Vays Stands by $4K Bitcoin Price Pre-Halving Prediction on: February 11, 2020, 06:07:44 PM
3 months before the halving, so I'd say around 2 more months before his prediction to be confirmed whether it is true or not? Still, really though, who would believe the guy? That's a 60% drop for a span of only 70+ days. Unless the market suddenly went haywire and went down literally everyday by huge portions, there's close to 0 chance that BTC would drop to $4k in a few months. This isn't like the bubble of 2017, no it isn't. There's no bubble here, there's no correction to be made here, there's only BTC growing and rising.

Honestly, predictions like this just look like they are screaming, asking for attention. It's pretty difficult to ignore though, since he is quite known by some and predictions like this are well, quite entertaining to see with whatever reasoning they make to defend their stand.
4917  Economy / Economics / Re: How a Global Epidemic is helping counties see the bigger picture on: February 11, 2020, 05:50:48 PM
The bigger picture is, if they don't help, they can become the next victims. The bigger picture is, they help because they can also be affected. See, let's just say potentially, the virus is restricted to only Chinese people. Would you think that other countries would willingly help? Sure, some researchers would, since it's they're passion and all, but other countries and their government probably would not extend their hands by too much. Why? Because, they wouldn't be affected. Whether they help or not, no big effect could come from doing either, and by process of determining which is much more efficient, not helping would be one now won't it?

There's also the idea of social relations of China with other countries, with the audacity of some of their citizens to act like they own foreign countries. Like it's their own backyard or something. With that kind of attitude, most people would be unwilling to help imo.
4918  Economy / Speculation / Re: BTC price exceeds $10,000 on Feb 10th … on-chain and off-chain growth positive on: February 11, 2020, 05:24:05 PM
Seeing as how BTC has moved from time to time every increase it does, I doubt it would stay at $9.8k for long. That is, if it continues the same pace that it has had in the past month, then it shouldn't stay at the current price range for more than a week or so. Still, even if everything goes contrary to what I say, volatility is a nature of BTC so there's nothing we can do.

The price has already fallen and again below $ 10,000 for bitcoin. Therefore, there will be a lot of news about bitcoins that have reached the mark of $ 10,000, because I think that the price may slightly exceed it, then roll back. Now the main thing is to gain a foothold at the level of 9800-9900.
If it fails to get a foothold at $9.8 though, it may actually continue going down back to $8k. That's already an optimistic outlook though. Still, BTC has continuously shown such habits the last month, where it goes down a bit after pushing through and stays at the same price for a few days before going up again. Hopefully, we can expect the same for this time.
4919  Economy / Speculation / Re: what if biggest holder selling all the bitcoins? on: February 11, 2020, 05:01:03 PM
It depends. Depends on the price he sold them for, the amount he sold at a certain time frame and the like. If he sold it at below the market price, naturally, the market would follow suite and buyers would then buy his BTC up at that low of a price. It could be temporary though, since those buyers could resell them at a higher price, but this in turn changes the volume exchanged in the market though. Now, if he sold everything at a single time, at a certain price, then the market would probably adjust if the price is lower than the market one, but if its higher, nothing much would happen.

Still, it isn't any type of irregularity though. Some people sell their BTC at bulks sometimes, and this causes the market to sometimes crash, but a correction would surely occur and would make it return to the price before, or maybe a bit lower than the previous one.
4920  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Why most of ALTCOINS are dead or worthless? on: February 11, 2020, 04:25:55 PM
All the altcoin which were created only for the speculative reason, will definitely become dead or worthless over the time. I mean to say, an altcoin should be created with the purpose like some real life application. Without that, any coin will definitely cannot sustain.

Token is something different which is like acting as a stock market for a project . Similarly altcoins also can act like a stock market but the corresponding project must be having real life application so that it can grow in value. If devs are looking for making money by selling the coin then that altcoin will end up becoming worthless.
Some devs are creating altcoin just for money, and the projects are just turning into shit after the crowdfunding, they only want to get the money that investors will be investing in, that's why a lot of projects and the same time with the coin are being worthless and dead. There are still decent Devs there are actually creating a good plan and actually trying to make it work, It's just hard these days to specify which project will have a good outcome or which projects just want a quick way to get millions of dollars by scamming.
Pages: « 1 ... 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 [246] 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 ... 339 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!