The trust system is very good at luring scumbag scammers like you, cumulative liars who play the victim on top of it all. If you say that the trust system is broken for a long time, why do you leave feedback? Probably because of how stupid you are.

Good luck recovering the (supposed) money you have not been paid.

No. There is no discrimination in this forum at all. And precisely here there is a respect for freedom of expression that there is not (anymore) in other parts of the internet, especially in social media.

I myself have argued a lot with advocates of pro-communist or radical leftist policies. With moderate leftists too, but with them I usually reach common ground. I was amused by one thing he replies to you:


LOL. I could have told you the same thing. Which is not to say that I discriminate against you.

I'll fix it for you:



The fact that you are a liar as can be seen in the negative feedback left by DT members does not help your case at all.

Much less you making up lies like this:





As much of a liar as you are, the most normal thing is that you have invented the case and manipulated the alleged evidence to give the appearance of veracity to your case.

I've been re-reading all the posts regarding this matter and I think Lightlord or someone from the site should say something. If cjmoles is right, just solve the issue. If he isn't telling the truth, they have to give their version.

If you are going to accuse me of lying at least read what I say first. I said that most of this style end up being false, not that you have made other false accusations.


I agree.


His profile makes me distrust him at first glance, but you are right in what you say and that is why I said:

I'll fix it for you:



Lightlord always pays. Sometimes it takes a while, but it pays. However accusations like yours regarding this and other casinos we see them every now and then and in most cases they turn out to be false accusations. And your profile doesn't look very reliable, on the other hand Lightlord would not risk his reputation for such a payment.

Good luck with your thread. If I see that you are right in what you say, I'll say so.

Actually the post is a continuation of the other one, in which I think you also commented, and how communism ends up being a disaster, although it is very nice in theory, what I wanted to reflect are the consequences of applying it as it is. In the fall of the USSR there was also a hyperinflationary collapse, which is not to say that hyperinflationary scenarios are exclusive to communism. I think fillippone specifies it well:


I guess you know well what you are talking about, as I remember that Italy before joining the Euro was also famous for inflation.


I mentioned that because in the previous thread it was said that the USA does not intervene in Cuba because there are only poor people there and they have nothing to take out, unlike Iraq where there was oil. If that is the reason, it is not understood why it does not invade Venezuela.


I didn't know that. But is it the hardest to extract because of the way it is managed in Venezuela or is there something in the reserves that makes it especially difficult to extract the oil?

I just wanted to make a nuance. It is not bitcoin that is bullish or no longer bullish. It is us as investors that are bullish or bearish. These are terms that apply to our psychology, our mood.

Going to the point, I agree with most opinions that we are in a bullish scenario. I don't expect to have much trouble getting to $50K, and I still think we pass $100K this year (hopefully we'll get to much more).

You are ridiculous:




And you're ridiculous too. If you talk saying you're going to be accurate, at least make sure what you write is well written. Pathetic.

I would qualify and say that it is not the debt that is a financial asset but the ability to get into debt. The more debt you have, the more difficult it is for a financial institution to give you a loan, and if it does, it will be with worse conditions, such as a higher interest rate. That is why it is always better, if you get into debt, to have a healthy debt-to-equity ratio. If you maintain it, banks will still offer you good conditions if you need to take on more debt.


It would depend. If it's one month, I wouldn't even bother to lend you the money. If it is a year, I would lend it to you because I am sure that inflation will be well over 1%.


It is a personal thing. Personal finance is, just that, personal. If your friend isn't comfortable with debt, it's better to go light on debt. Although it seems financially smarter to go into debt, and in fact, that's what the vast majority of billionaires do.

Your friend may not understand this: Zuckerberg's 1% Mortgage: Why Does a Billionaire Need a Loan?

Or this: Elon Musk, short on cash, keeps borrowing more and more money even as Tesla stock surges

Although getting into debt like this is not for everyone. You have to be financially smart and be careful. The average Joe can go on a liquidity binge if he does experiments like these that can backfire.

I think you are right but I would like to specify. Senator Warner (Democrat) and senator Portman (Republican) are those who have proposed the last minute amendment which seems to be more detrimental to our interests. The other three, who are also from both parties, the amendment that seems most favorable.

So it does not seem to be a party issue. You know I don't agree with you on many things and I like to check what you say, but if I understand you are right I say so.

Your scientific research has also resulted in your ridiculously failed predictions.

You can shove them up your ass.

Only 17 merits left for it. It could happen soon. What I wonder is if Sir Theymos hasn't noticed, or if he doesn't care, or if he is preparing something to release it at the last moment.

The difference is that they were published as news, and not as ads. When you publish a paid article, you should put "sponsored by" or "paid promotion" or things like that that make it clear that this is not objective journalism but that you are advertising for the institution who pays you.


And how about recognizing the difference between publishing an advertisement making it clear that it is an advertisement and that you are being paid to publish it and being paid to publish something you publish as news? That looks quite like being bought to me.

To me what strikes me about this is that if you listen to Ran Paul, you can agree with him or not, but he is a doctor and he gives detailed arguments to expose his ideas, without putting aliens or microchips in what he says. To support censorship of this senator is to fall into a radicalism more typical of the USSR than of an advanced democracy.

What I don't quite understand is that the price does not go along with this news. Either the market has not heard the news or it thinks that this last amendment is not going to be approved or something.

I understand you mean communism, rather than socialism. Another thing is that after the end of the cold war, due to the realization that communism is a disaster, some communists preferred to call themselves socialists to disguise. For example, nowadays in Venezuela the United Socialist Party of Venezuela of Maduro is the party that rules, and they call themselves that even though they are communists.

But there has been moderate socialism that has worked very well, in Europe social democracies have lived many decades of prosperity and well-being.

Well, I completely disagree with the previous answers.

Bitcoin is not only a simple safe haven, it is the best safe haven in the world.

It is the best way to store your wealth. It is the most difficult to confiscate and the easiest to transport. That is why it is the best safe haven.

You can take $1B around the world very easily, or you can send it to the other side of the globe in no time for a ridiculous amount of money.

Try to take $1B of real estate or gold, or fiat currency around the world. Or try sending it and compare. 

As a continuation of the previous thread: Enjoy comunism: Venezuela raises monthly minimum wage to $2.40 today we can continue to see that because communists consider wealth as a cake, rather than as something dynamic that you can create, what they end up doing is distributing misery with simplistic measures:


source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/venezuela-to-launch-cbdc-in-october-and-cut-six-zeros-from-its-currency

The bad part of the situation in Venezuela does not seem to have a solution in the short term. It does not appear that Biden is willing to invade the country. Not for a humanitarian issue and not for oil. And the little opposition left in the country is too weakened by hunger to mount a revolution. .

If you stopped to read links, instead of dismissing them because Tucker doesn't agree with your political ideology, you would see that there are more links than Tucker. For example: The spectator.

Exclusive: New York Times quashed COVID origins inquiry: "https://spectatorworld.com/topic/new-york-times-quashed-covid-origins-inquiry/"



That's a garbage argument you made up. At no time have I ever said that.


Again. Since you don't feel like attending to information that doesn't agree with your political ideology, you don't read and make up crap fallacies like that. The links I posted talk about 5 newspapers and Twitter.