never open the RPC port on your router ! are you a fool ? :p RPC = "Remote Procedure Call" except if you want to be remotely withdrawed ;p
Of course I'm a fool! I'm trying to set up solo mining! LOL Actually, opening all the ports was a move of desperation. Nothing I've done has worked, so I tried the shotgun method. That did not work either, so it must be something else getting in the way. I've pretty much given up now, since even after trying everything suggested (and more), there's been no change. I'm still not able to get CudaMiner to even really 'attempt' to mine. You're trying to solo mine from one pc to wallet on another pc? 127.0.0.1 is not going to work in that case. Try temporary disabling firewalls and internet security software on both pcs.
|
|
|
Any expectation how long will Bittrex maintain GRC-wallets? I think problem was solved one week ago.
|
|
|
The board is an upgrade kit for the gridseed pods.
+1 Wanted
|
|
|
I know. You are doing all this just for simple "capacity miner" to give up reading all the bad words here. To sell everything for cheap. No, no,... I know that You are doing this with intention. You are PRs, don't You? All this is marketing,... bad to be honest, but with intention. So, I'm holding despite Your massive, collective bsh-ing here.
|
|
|
Someone else has problems with BitcoinUtopia and ASICs? sha256.eu.nicehash.com:3334 and sha256.usa.nicehash.com:3334 are not getting hashes from cgminer for more than 24 hours. BU wrapper is using them instead of simple nicehash.com:3334 and westhash.com:3334.
the old nicehash urls without algo prefix are deprecated. At the moment for me deprecated are working and new ones not? Talking about SHA256, don't know about other algo nicehash urls. EDIT: 3 days later - everything is normal now.
|
|
|
Someone else has problems with BitcoinUtopia and ASICs? sha256.eu.nicehash.com:3334 and sha256.usa.nicehash.com:3334 are not getting hashes from cgminer for more than 24 hours. BU wrapper is using them instead of simple nicehash.com:3334 and westhash.com:3334.
|
|
|
What happens with pool cryptominig.farm?
EDIT: I was too fast, pool frontend was stucked some time, but now looks normal.
|
|
|
You call that expensive? Check out the prices here.. 0,529€/kWh is the cheapest if you have a single meter "Fixed Price" 0,423€/kWh is the cheapest if you have a single meter "Variable Price" If you only use at night it's the last column (no one does that) that's a fixed price of 4,16€/kWh or also if you have a dual meter (night tariff and day tariff) The prices at the bottom are the average prices, variable and fixed prices. So you all should be happy with those prices... Your prices look very good. If You take into account that one EURO has 100 EUROCENTS than Your calculations in EUR will improve in Your favor . I hope that I made Your day knowing that You are paying between 0,0416 and 0,0529 EUR/kWh So fire-up Your GPUs and relax...
|
|
|
if we can get the damned adsl connection back on - and running STABLE ( a word that these comms companies seem to know nothing about ) - then i will setup a donation link specifically for the algo and miner that you have optimized as part of the testing of the donation links ( which are currently donating for sp at the moment ) ...
Next time You speak with telecom support, tell them to DECREASE the speed of the line. They will tell You that they are measuring, bla, bla,... that the link is OK for the X speed, bla, bla,... I struggled long time with unstable ADSL until one wise support lady did decreased the speed. Later, when problem arose (it was once or two times a year) I knew that someone upped the speed, so it was easy to convince support to decrease again.
|
|
|
Can't say I've tried ScalaMiner - might give it a go if I can get to the DualMiner USB again. Hadn't forgotten about this - but I can't seem to get it to launch.. might be the environment (read: user error after futzing about with dependencies as it is). I peeked through the source code, and as far as I can tell (JAVA is not my forte) it does address the device directly without subprocesses. Presumably any retail SFARDS devices will come either with custom software, or another run-two-instances front-end which just presents itself as a single UI. I couldn't start Scalaminer under Ubuntu virtual machine, but I had "success" starting it under OSX. It connects to stratum pools and not sending shares. Dualminer is connected/disconnected during "mining" and LEDs are dimmed. Maybe some settings is missing that I didn't noticed.
|
|
|
it's very concerning that withdrawals are not working from polo for a VERY LONG time now... I wonder why and is it related to the incredible price drop???
Hmmm, I'm waiting more than 24 hours for deposit also... Poloniex has problem with his BURST wallet I suppose.
|
|
|
You basically run two separate pieces of mining software - one for the BTC/SHA256d bit, one for the LTC/Scrypt bit. Most users didn't really use this, though - using them for Scrypt only.
ScalaMiner https://github.com/colinrgodsey/scalaminer declares that can mine both simultaneosly, but never tried or heard someone running it. Anyone has experience with Scalaminer and dualminer/gridseed?
|
|
|
Every time Ctrl-C submitted results in ccminer crash: Problem Event Name: APPCRASH Application Name: ccminer.exe Application Version: 0.0.0.0 Application Timestamp: 554e095c Fault Module Name: ccminer.exe Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0 Fault Module Timestamp: 554e095c Exception Code: c0000094 Exception Offset: 000d31bf OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.1 Locale ID: 1134 Notebook Geforce 840M with standard start parameters only (-o -u -p) on Nicehash algo quark. EDIT: edited algorithm
|
|
|
So basically my understanding is that you have no clue what you're talking about and you're all in for propaganda. Nobody in business considers GPL a decent software license nowadays but the most extremist open source dudes. If you want free software, free is free. Free is MIT or ZLIB.
I have a clue that we are discussing here variant of sgminer and other GPL-licensed code. Suddenly someone that "has clue" jumps with "better" acronyms. You should go try convince Jeff Garzik that he has no clue choosing GPL-license for his work. If You can do that I will promote You in MASTER OF PROPAGANDA.
|
|
|
No, 100% positive that obligation for announcing the source code comes only if one publishes derivative work. Distribution comes at ask of end user, so no obligations afterwards even if the end user was paying for it. At this case, he is distributing not only kernels, but also variant of sgminer and that's the reason of not publishing the work, but distributing. He knows he is on a safe side.
I read this a few times and I cannot make any sense of it. Maybe I used wrong term "distribute", meaning direct (peer to peer; private channel) transfer. There is no GPL rule that can prohibit something that can not be prohibited. If the end user is willed to use improved binaries without source code, there is no power prohibiting that. In fact, I believe that GPL is not meant to prohibit anything, but to make better environment and conditions for free software. You are free to use GPL licensed software for You in any way You like. You can change it before. And someone can help You changing it. Here is part of section 2 (Basic permissions) of GPL terms and conditions: "You may convey covered works to others for the sole purpose of having them make modifications exclusively for you, or provide you with facilities for running those works, provided that you comply with the terms of this License in conveying all material for which you do not control copyright. Those thus making or running the covered works for you must do so exclusively on your behalf, under your direction and control, on terms that prohibit them from making any copies of your copyrighted material outside their relationship with you." I said nothing about persons leaking after. If they want to publish GPL licensed derivative work, they have to find source code before. If "the leakage" is through private channels,... there is no (legal) power to stop that also.
|
|
|
Interesting, is GPL applicable here? SPH_LUFFA_PARALLEL hints that this kernel is derived work.
It is not, since his (maybe derivative) work is not published. He can sell, distribute, but not publish derivative works to comply to GPL... If he distributes it to someone who wants the source, then he has to give it - assuming he has used ANY GPL'd code in his kernel, the entire kernel has now been infected. No, 100% positive that obligation for announcing the source code comes only if one publishes derivative work. Distribution comes at ask of end user, so no obligations afterwards even if the end user was paying for it. At this case, he is distributing not only kernels, but also variant of sgminer and that's the reason of not publishing the work, but distributing. He knows he is on a safe side.
|
|
|
Nope, officially not my shit, or modified. Mine has 12 kernels, as-is, but SHOULD be 9 or so after cleanups.
Interesting, is GPL applicable here? SPH_LUFFA_PARALLEL hints that this kernel is derived work. It is not, since his (maybe derivative) work is not published. He can sell, distribute, but not publish derivative works to comply to GPL...
|
|
|
Agreed - downtime like this is not being recorded. I took a snapshot of all my miners with them. In addition to running slow, they are also constantly switching pools. So the ones that are working are bouncing off all three pools every 20 minutes to so. My inbox is overflowing with pool alerts. If I add the hashrate for these miners on all three pools it's 47% of expected. Started around fight time last night.
I can confirm bouncing, but my overall hash rate is much lower than 47%, here are my pools: Also monitoring system is not reliable starting from 1-st of May. It's missing zero hash-rate drops longer than 2 hours.
|
|
|
My Chengdu miner is now offline.
Mine also, but hashing at pool. Miner monitor fuzziness?
|
|
|
What happen to burstbank now? Paying every hour? Not bad for burstmillionaires, but for average Joe it makes interest lower due to transaction fees...
|
|
|
|