Coming from accounts such as:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;threads;u=1084991;sa=showPosts
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;threads;u=1084964;sa=showPosts
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;threads;u=1084967;sa=showPosts
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;threads;u=1085010;sa=showPosts
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;threads;u=1085005;sa=showPosts

If you have to trust anyone with a significant amount of coins - regardless of how trustworthy he is - it's a shitcoin that relies on trust while cryptos should be trustless. It's a step back, not forward.

So any form of significant premine is a scam, be it for ICO, airdrop, bounty, etc.

Nice guide but too bad virtually no miner supports --no-getwork and --coinbase-addr.

Not even Tpruvot's fork, let alone private miners.


There's no reason to remove RPC - which still works with older wallet versions.

Airdrops coins are heavily if not fully premined coins therefore scams.

And they're unfair since the devs and others can buy dozens of accounts to redeem coins.

So 100% premined unfair system supporting sockpuppet account trading.

Fuck no. Premined nonsense - regardless of airdrop.

18 million premined with 8 coin/block PoW rewards. Literally no reason to read further and just ignore it.

Eth could go $1000 just as it could go $40 when the next bug will be exploited. So you'd really just increase your risk. Might as well invest in lesser projects with higher risks.

I'm not much of a trader but I'd stay away from going all in on Eth. I would even argue not to invest in it at all, but that would be based on personal preference and not trading experience.

Yes, but it costs the same to spam 1 MB blocks as it is to spam 8 MB blocks with 1/8th of the fees.

It won't change anything. Dust transaction will get pushed out even if we'd have 1 GB blocks.

We currently have less than a thousand unconfirmed transactions. And we had 120k weeks ago when it was spammed.

Let's say the spammers spent 0.5 BTC per day (random guess) to spam the network, they could spam 1GB blocks for the same cost if fees are proportional to block sizes.


A fee market is unavoidable and that's fine.


But even if there were no fees, you couldn't pay for your coffee with 10 minute block times in case a block is not being found for like 30-40 minutes due to variance. There are hundreds of altcoins for your coffee and dust transactions.

How about talking about solid facts instead of the marketing bullshit?

It is not faster (still 10 minute block times), and it is not technologically advanced.

If anything, it's a dumb people's fork who can't wrap their head around basic math and a disgrace to crypto in general.

Still, 100% premined coin. No self respecting crypto enthusiast will touch that crap.

You can't mine Waves as it is a 100% premined coin, which - by definition - makes it a shitcoins.


Any coin which allows for a certain party to control a large amount of coins is not following one of the basic fundamentals of crypto which makes it a useless shitcoin.

I don't know but I'm sure the losers after BCC will think of something.

You really don't read anything I wrote so far.

The argument behind any increased blocksize proposition is deeply flawed; let's say the blocksize becomes 1 gigabytes. Transaction fees would cost 1/1000 of what they are now do you can all buy your latte's with BTC without fees (except for the 10 minute blocktimes). But the problem you all seem to ignore or unable to comprehend is that spamming 1GB of transactions would cost the same fucking amount (using a very simple script) as it is today to spam the 1 MB costs. It's the exact same situation!

You have to have a transaction fee market, there's no way around that.

What are you even talking about? Increasing blocksize does not increase the cost of filling the network. You can't have both; cheap transactions and expensive cost of attacking the network!

You represent way too well the blind and retarded propaganda seen on /r/btc I've been describing here so well that I'm starting to think you're a troll account.

And I thought I was drunk.

Unless this is a known troll acount I'm not aware of, thinking that you somehow convinced some people that you're Satoshi... blows my mind and makes me laugh uncontrollably.

That already sounds like a shit way of doing things, considering BCC isn't even exist but that's all I'm going to say as I'm not familiar with them.

But surely, you should be able to withdraw your Bitcoins some way.

I'm not familiar with them but they seem to heavily supporting BCC.

Either way you should be able to withdraw your coins into a non-custodial wallet such as Electrum where you are in command of your private keys (and therefore actually owning your Bitcoins).

I'm not sure but I'd guess BitcoinABC is a custodial wallet in which case you're trusting them to handle your Bitcoins.

Whatever the case might be you should be able to withdraw your coins or get both BTC and BCC - otherwise you're being scammed.

Bitcoin Cash doesn't exists yet.

You too seem to spam mindless crap without any thought I see.

Why don't you dispute my previous comment about gigabyte blocks instead?

Since it's expected that BCC's price will only go down, likely trading all to BTC as soon as possible is the best way. Unless there will be a pump later.

But, it's all speculation.

Considering how silly the BCC project is, I don't want anything to do with it and will get rid of it as soon as I can in exchange for free BTC and the tears or anti-BTC zealots.


Read my earlier comments. Block size increase solving transaction fees is a delusion and BCC offers nothing else at all. It won't solve absolutely anything.