Hey guys id like to say thank you for taking this testing that youre doing well beyond what you need to. While im sure the testing is a positive thing for the whole bitcoin community, im also sure all it has done for me so far is fuck me over. Due to this test ive been unable to withdraw my coins from an online casino(transactions for deposits havent confirmed), so instead of taking a win i degened all my chips off continuing to play
http://www.helpguide.org/articles/addiction/gambling-addiction-and-problem-gambling.htmGood luck |
|
|
|
Of course, there is a danger if you are a staunch atheist, or a believer of some other religion... a danger if you read the Bible. It is through the words of the Bible that God works on the spirits of people. You just might wind up being converted if you read.  |
|
|
|
I don't know how anyone can read the bible and call it boring. Not the first time, no. The problem with Christians is that one read is never enough, and they can never stop yapping about the (2,000 year old) "good news" from their "good book". And it's a bit more than just "one book"...there are 66 books in the bible. 66 "books", each being the length of short stories written for 8th graders... I think I've just discovered the root of the problem, Christians don't know what books are! You could say God is trying to know Himself and self-actualize via a superpositional, singular act of creation; that reality is essentially a theory of itself; that we are stratified, isomorphic images of God who attempt to know ourselves and self-actualize via our perceptions of objective reality and the theories we derive therefrom. You could also say that all the matter in the universe is secretly made of of mashed potatoes from an extra-universal potato God, but there isn't much evidence to support either claim, so sane people don't go around saying such things. |
|
|
|
The video demonstrates that the originator of your gender theories tested them on a boy who had his penis accidentally burnt off during circumcision. He decided it was a good idea to raise him as a girl, and the result was he blew his brains out, and his twin brother ODed on antidepressants. This is direct evidence
You're watching a video about it after the event occurred, it is indirect anecdotal third-hand evidence. You are proving that your science is religion, because you believe it, after it has been shown to be erroneous. Perhaps I'm only proving the point that God didn't provide me with the grace to further tolerate your ignorance. |
|
|
|
So? Do you even lift? If so explain why.
No. I don't need to lift as I'm a direct descendant of the ancient Hercules bloodline. |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin user not affected
|
|
|
|
|
I forgot to mention, another reason I hate religion is because it's so fucking boring. One book? You GOTTA be kidding me, even the LIBRARY is infinitely more exciting than a church.
Think about how retarded it is that in 2015, when nine year olds have pocket-computers linking them to the entire compendium of human knowledge, we still have entire buildings dedicated to the study of one book.
#Libraries_Not_Churchs
|
|
|
|
It'd be rad if Greece returned to the ancient city-states, with Neo-Spartans sporting mech suits in the post-capitalism post-WW3 apocalypse.  " FOR SPARTA!" |
|
|
|
However, that isn't the only thing spoken/written about the electric cosmos idea. There are some very compelling points to it. https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/special-pleadingYou have now been placed on ignore, because I have come to feel that you are beyond my help. I'm truly sorry. Please realize that the purpose of my posts is not merely for your benefit, but also for the benefit of the many silent viewers who will read these words. |
|
|
|
There has to be more ignorant, selfish assholes per capita in the USA than any other country in the world. Without any doubt, yes. This is the result of unnatural privilege. The baby boomer Americans were the most spoiled generation of people in the history of this planet. Unfortunately for millennials and Gen Xers like me, the honeymoon phase between Capitalism and America is long over by now. 2008 was a filing for divorce. |
|
|
|
Perhaps you are right when speaking about science I am right about everything. I realize that there are lots of things against what is found at http://electric-cosmos.org/. However, there is enough in favor of electric cosmos things, that the nuclear star idea should be in the realm of theory if it isn't. . The "Electric Universe" (EU) is an umbrella term that covers various pseudo-scientific cosmological ideas built around the claim that the formation and existence of various features of the universe can be better explained by electromagnetism than by gravity. The exact claims are diverse and vary from crank to crank author to author. A common motif is the insistence that all science should be done in a laboratory — an attempt to throw away gravity from the very beginning, because one can't put a solar system or a galaxy in a laboratory. Most Electric Universe proponents claim some kind of relation to the "plasma cosmology" of the Nobel Prize laureate Hannes Alfvén. Too bad his model was rendered obsolete by the missing observations of the radio emission predicted by his cosmology.[2] EU advocates can be roughly split into two groups: garden-variety physics cranks who are convinced that they have a legitimate revolutionary scientific theory, and various woo-peddlers who use EU claims to prop their main ideas (because mainstream physics would blow them apart). One subset of the latter comprises some of the more loony global warming deniers (such as Vault-Co), who try to use it to "prove" that climate change is being caused by some process outside human control. Claims-Stars do not shine because of internal nuclear fusion caused by gravitational collapse. Rather, they are anodes for galactic discharge currents. -Impact craters on Venus, Mars and the Moon are not caused by impacts, but by electrical discharges.[3] The same applies to the Valles Marineris (a massive canyon on Mars) and the Grand Canyon on Earth.[4] -The Sun is negatively charged, and the solar wind is positively charged -- the two systems forming a giant capacitor (this is James McCanney's particular erroneous belief.) 1 http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1540489/pg1#254332602 http://www.theplasmaverse.com/pdfs/the-electic-sky-book-by-donaldescott-review-discussion-against.pdf3 http://dealingwithcreationisminastronomy.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
Science simply isn't (for the most part) out there trying to prove the existence of angels. Science isn't out there trying to prove anything, that's the difference between faith and science. Science is out there trying to disprove everything that can be disproven. It's called skepticism. You should try it some time. things like Big Bang, Evolution, Black Holes, the idea that stars are nuclear when electric arc law fits star activity better Stars are nuclear fusion. That is accepted as scientific fact not because a bunch of scientists choose to believe it, but because it cannot be disproven, like evolution and the laws of thermodynamics. |
|
|
|
The word "gender" in the minds of EVERYONE who is not some kind of dictionary-nerd, linguist, has its whole meaning wrapped up in "sex." Say the word, "Gender," to the average person on the street and he thinks "sex." And if you ask Americans whether angels really exist, 3 out of 4 of them will tell you they do. I suppose you think this is how science is done?  So sorry, science is not a popularity contest. |
|
|
|
Some neurolinguistics experts classify religion as a language virus, which short-circuits critical thinking pathways in the brain. Exhibit A: If science only involved the scientific method and the things that are absolutely proven as fact, then the bolded statement, above, might approach truth. But since science includes many theories that are almost comical in their absurdity, and since science often maintains itself on pure probability (quantum mechanics and quantum math) rather than anything factual, science, itself, is fraught with faith throughout. The problem with the faith of science is, science won't even recognize that it is God that it is basing its faith on. Because of this, it is science that is acting on blind faith more than any formal religion could ever think to.  |
|
|
|
Considering you refuse to reply to my very on topic statements, and instead just choose to go after easy targets to try to make it look like you have a clue, I am not sure how I can debate myself.  Stop acting like a butthurt child, I'm not your mother. When you write something worth responding to, I'll respond. This shitposting doesn't cut it: |
|
|
|
Well, because they are apostates from the faith, renounced the faith because they were otherwise persuaded not to believe in anything, and annoy everyone who opposes them, and those who have their faith or religion annoys them. 1. Not all atheists were ever faithful to begin with, ergo only some atheists are apostates from "the" faith. This may come as a shock to you, but there are atheist/agnostic parents raising children. 2. There are many different faiths (cults of makebelieve), not just yours. Science rejects all faith equally and without discrimination. Science demands evidence - observation and measurement. |
|
|
|
|
@TECSHARE
I'm happy you're bumping my thread, even if it's with your random off-topic nonsense. You're linking me to other people debating, why not just have the debate here?
|
|
|
|
|
Every end is also a beginning.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
