IDEX would be your most likely option.

Maybe you should take this as an opportunity to share a little bit about your coin? If you think it has some value, which presumably you do as otherwise why would you list it and think someone would exchange for it, then you should be able to share something about it!

Otherwise keep building your project up and list once it is a bit more developed.

For most people it would be more 'good' than 'harm'.

I learned how to gpu mine, learned a bit of coding on the side, learned about blockchain and about new projects in this space (even if most don't work out!).

So yeah, definitely a net positive.

The only people who would say it has been more harmful would be those who dumped a bunch of money in around 2017 with not much consideration of the risks. Those people would have lost money and not learned anything about crypto or blockchain.

It's just an attempt by Facebook to make more money.

Besides being a digital 'currency' in a loose sense, it will be nothing like Bitcoin.

Bitcoin is decentralized, unregulated and lasting. Facebook's coin is.... what exactly? Nothing but an over inflated and pumped up sh*tcoin.

This is a major security issue, and I'm sorry to hear you lost so much that must be devastating.

In my country you hear of phone companies saying that a phone number was never meant to be used as a security checking device, and so they are of the view that while they have (basic) security procedures in place, they are not responsible if taking your phone number results in a breach of your broader accounts attached to your phone. They will take responsibility for costs incurred relating to the phone specifically (like making a bunch of overseas calls) but not something like coins, emails or other personal information attached to your account.

I hope there is some recourse for you through the phone companies or maybe even insurance.

If you are already holding crypto, there are a few services that offer interest for locking up that crypto. For example dharma io which I mentioned before and cryptocom.

Worth checking out, easy interest and you don't have to do much.

I wouldn't recommend this but you could take the faulty fan off your gpu, and point a normal desk fan directly at the card/rig.

When you think about it, the fan is just there to get the heat off the card and a regular fan can do that. Just need to keep tabs on the temperature since it isn't as precise.

I haven't done it, but have read of someone doing this.

If crypto was regulated like stocks, he'd be going to jail for insider trading or running a pump and dump scheme.

Craig probably has a stack of Bitcoin SV, probably bought even more deep before the copyright claim, and I bet you he is dumping hard just having doubled his money from all the people that don't realise a 'claim' doesn't mean it has been found successful.

If he wants to prove he is Satoshi it so easy. Say you'll move an amount of BTC from the 'Satoshi bitcoins' wallet to another, and back again. Say you'll do it on a certain day. And then just do it. Bam you've got a case to be Satoshi.

At todays slightly rebounded prices, you can still mine profitably at around 15 cents per kwh.

Obviously the cheaper the better. But it definitely doesn't need to be quite that low to still be worthwhile. However, I wouldn't be going out buying a rig at that price.

I would never do KYC at bounty/investing stage of ICO.

Way too much risk in my opinion. Could have issues with identity theft or selling on your information. Even just from a spam perspective it isn't a good idea.

I will only do KYC for projects once they've been set up with a product for at least a year, and even then it is rare.

You could try dharma io. You lend out ETH or DAI for a set return. It is pretty high for DAI as a stablecoin, but also works for ETH.

There is an interface to lend out your crypto and the rest is done with smart contracts. Good passive income if you plan on just holding.

Yes I remember the crypto lark. He does a good job and his videos are pretty engaging.

For those interested in altcoins, you can try searching for 'boxmining' on youtube.

If your focus is on mining bitcoin - then you can't mine it directly with GPU. Or if you could, it wouldn't be profitable - it would be like mining for gold with a spoon in a city.

If you just want Bitcoin, and are happy to mine it indirectly, you could use a program like Nicehash, which mines other coins then automatically exchanges them for Bitcoin. So you are kind of indirectly 'mining' Bitcoin.

Otherwise you can use a website like whattomine and choose a coin from there. To start off with (and given you have GTXs), you could try Ethereum or Ravencoin, as both are well established projects - particularly Ethereum which is second in coinmarketcap only to Bitcoin. In either of these cases, you could always go to a coin exchange later and swap it for Bitcoin.

But if exchange volume is $100-$200 USD per day, then getting another exchange (to potentially split that total) wouldn't actually help at all. There are issues with liquidity as it is.

The issue is that there is no buy pressure, since there isn't a firm reason (in most people's) minds to buy. You've got bag holders in telegram saying they've got millions of these coins, and they're choosing not to sell in hopes the price goes up. But you can bet as soon as it does, they'll start dumping, which creates even more downwards pressure on prices and pushes it back down to its current levels.

Not sure I have a solution other than needing more incentives or use cases to encourage buying and using JSE coin.

I think the stablecoin of $1 plus rhetoric is a bit of an obvious pump attempt (even if they think they can get there in time once the project starts delivering).

If they have auditable evidence that their tokens are backed by assets or something tangible worth that amount, then great, but right now it is a bit ephemeral and not exactly clear how they'll show that it is pegged/stable to something.

Month 2
Week Number: 4
Spreadsheet Telegram number: 8
Bitcointalk Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1115736

1. 18/05: https://t.me/CryptoComOfficial/203820
2. 18/05: https://t.me/icowatchdog/72555
3. 18/05: https://t.me/jsetelegram/59397
4. 19/05: https://t.me/jsetelegram/59455
5. 19/05: https://t.me/CoinLion_Official/83679
6. 19/05: https://t.me/CryptoComOfficial/204319
7. 19/05: https://t.me/CryptoComOfficial/204322
8. 19/05: https://t.me/jsetelegram/59460
9. 19/05: https://t.me/WPPEnergy/63321
10. 19/05: https://t.me/WPPEnergy/63322
11. 20/05: https://t.me/CoinLion_Official/83734

A beginner just means you are starting out. Everyone was a beginner at some stage.

Don't stress - yeah you could make a profit but maybe don't use that as your only measure of success. Instead just read up on the forum, post on topics you find interesting, and learn a few things along the way, whether that be mining, altcoins, bitcoin or whatever

There are a few popular credit type platforms. Cryptocom is launching a crypto lending/borrowing facility.

Similarly Dharma io offers has had one going for a while (was launched earlier this year) and does this almost entirely through smart contracts.

So in short, yeah there are a couple platforms that have pulled it off. Not sure about this first 'german STO'. I'll watch it out of interest, but probably won't participate.

Not all governments and regulators are against cryptocurrency. Take places like Cyprus, Estonia or even Singapore or HK as examples. Plenty of locations out there are taking advantage of the interest in cryptocurrency and creating open but still somewhat regulated spaces for new blockchain companies, projects and start ups to incubate.

Fold proteins on a cpu? Awesome for medical research!

Also by the looks of it you can set this up as something you could do on the side for your gpu mining rig. It also doesn't look like it uses too much electricity.

If they are good posters, then they can keep posting. A ban on your sig does nothing to stop that.

You're specifically arguing that you/they will be 'unemployable' because of being caught plagarizing - so my point stands. If transparency on an earlier ban makes you unable to get into sig campaigns well that's probably a good thing. There should be disincentives.

Reading back on your posts in this thread, the entire language and expectation you have around how you should be able to make money off signatures, being a good advertiser, needing to be employable and so on is entirely indicative of the problem with spam in this forum.

If these people are good posters first, and have a sig blog as a secondary point, then they will keep posting regardless of any sig bans.