Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 12:36:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 176 »
61  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: US Marshalls auction SilkRoad bitcoins on: June 15, 2014, 11:14:09 PM
Wish I could get in on this action. 

Alas I don't have the minimum $200,000 to place a bid.   Cry

Second Market is accepting bids for aggregation:
https://bitco.wufoo.com/forms/participate-in-us-marshals-bitcoin-auction/

I cannot see how this matches the USM requirements of knowing and approving bidders.  If they are really bidding for a group and disguise that they will be lying to the government.  If the group is large and they honestly name the members and one is not eligible would not that invalidate the whole group?   
62  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: June 15, 2014, 02:04:14 PM
Restart, we are going in a loop - no blocks.


PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank You its really bad.......................

We got a block now!  Smiley
63  Economy / Goods / Re: [wts] Bitcoin accepted here stickers for merchants on: June 14, 2014, 11:38:46 PM
do you have other currency stickers aswell or only btc?

Just BTC.  I can do others with a good enough pre-order.  What where you thinking of?
64  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Open letter from Jason King (SeansOutpost) on BITCOIN IN THE BELTWAY (DC CONF) on: June 14, 2014, 01:45:42 AM
Looking forward to it!
65  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: June 14, 2014, 01:40:50 AM
My guess is he's mining at a lot of pools at the same time and withholding blocks. When he finds a block at one pool, he would move all his hashes to that pool to increase his payout percentage. And then release his valid block after 10 minutes or less. This way, he can increase his expected payout.

It wouldn't be hard to catch this if the pool is paying attention.

This attack would not work.  Holding a valid block is dangerous as someone else can mine it first and you get less.  Pointing more power for that short period of time would make little difference. 

Block withholding is mostly done to harm a pool, give it back luck and drive users away.  It is not done for direct profit. 
66  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [FYI] A user GHASHTHROW has announced that they are selfish mining at Ghash.io on: June 14, 2014, 01:35:03 AM
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/282z7a/im_selfish_mining_at_ghashio/

In other words, they are withholding blocks on purpose.  Is this the start of something new?



Not at all.  Brucexie did it on BTCGuild and Eligius long before this.

My thinking is brucexie did it accidentally or through poor quality control.   This is someone purposefully damaging a pool or making people think he is (both can achieve the same goal) to cause miners to leave.  Brucexie is saying he did not do it, the user ghashthrow is saying he IS doing it. 
67  Bitcoin / Pools / [FYI] A user GHASHTHROW has announced that they are selfish mining at Ghash.io on: June 13, 2014, 11:05:08 PM
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/282z7a/im_selfish_mining_at_ghashio/

In other words, they are withholding blocks on purpose.  Is this the start of something new?

68  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: June 13, 2014, 05:41:26 PM
I'd like to see the BTC 200 from Eligius and 300 from Blockwitholder put in escrow and a trusted 3rd party audit carried out.

I'd rather this was done than some witch hunt / trial by media.




Agreed! I was just about to move my TH's to Eligius, but seeing this information has me a bit worried about doing so.

So you would prefer to have a pool owner that does not protect the pool?  

You trust the pool owner to control the BTC 99% of the time but do not in this case?  Either you trust the pool owner or not.  ABSOLUTELY NO need for escrow in this situation.  

It's not a case of trust, it's about doing the right thing. Behaving in an honest and open fashion.  The innocent party has nothing to fear from my suggestion. Your rapid defense of Eligius may be admirable, but in this it is misguided.

It is not a defense.  It is a point.  They normally have control over your money.  You trust them simply by joining their pool.  If you do not trust them for your mining proceeds you should not be in the pool. 
69  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Pool Competitors: Want to Stop GHash.IO from getting to 50%? on: June 13, 2014, 03:33:58 PM
How can pools be reliably inhibited from growing too large?
by using p2pool that is distributed!
That's opt-in; I want some technique for rejecting blocks from pools that are too large.

Can't work.  Pool would do something to make itself look like two or more smaller pools. 
70  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: June 13, 2014, 03:30:46 PM
I'd like to see the BTC 200 from Eligius and 300 from Blockwitholder put in escrow and a trusted 3rd party audit carried out.

I'd rather this was done than some witch hunt / trial by media.




Agreed! I was just about to move my TH's to Eligius, but seeing this information has me a bit worried about doing so.

So you would prefer to have a pool owner that does not protect the pool?  

You trust the pool owner to control the BTC 99% of the time but do not in this case?  Either you trust the pool owner or not.  ABSOLUTELY NO need for escrow in this situation.  
71  Economy / Goods / Re: [wts] Bitcoin accepted here stickers for merchants on: June 13, 2014, 05:32:33 AM
bump
72  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: MINERS UNITE! Block the FBI coins. Do not fund violent underground organizations on: June 13, 2014, 05:30:46 AM
Isnt it impossible to "block" coins. What kind of bullshit is that.

If it is possible(which would be pretty damn stupid), then do not block the fbi coins....would look pretty stupid for bitcoin overall if that ever happened.

It is possible for the coins to be blocked.  Just like it is possible for the FBI to give them to Seans Outpost.  It COULD happen.  It just won't.  
QFT and all that needs to be said, really.
Don't be so sure. Eventually it will happen. And first signs are already there. Prioritizing transactions gets done. De-prioritizing (to zero) will come.

That is not the same.  It actually takes a 51% attack to DE-prioritize to zero.  Any pool or solo miner can include the transaction.  It takes 51% of the hashing power to ACTIVELY block the transaction not just neglect to include it. 
73  Other / Politics & Society / Re: All Our Patent Are Belong To You - By Elon Musk, CEO on: June 13, 2014, 05:27:22 AM
Nice to hear they actually did it!

Now I hope we'll see an increase in electric cars being promoted/sold in the next couple of years.

Probably won't be many producers until Elon starts taking real business away from the automakers.  That will take at least five years.  The gigafactory needs to be built first.  The Model E is just a preliminary design.  Elon is truly amazing, but this is a slow process.  SpaceX will have landed a payload on Mars before you see any huge market share for electrics.   
74  Bitcoin / Meetups / Re: BITCOIN IN THE BELTWAY - Conference Schedule on: June 13, 2014, 02:10:22 AM
I will have a table and be selling merchandise and have some give-aways as well. 
75  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: It's already 48%, No one care about Ghash? on: June 13, 2014, 01:45:37 AM
Donate to P2P pool miners.  Others will see the free coins and join.  Already P2P pool has been more profitable for miners then other pools since the donation tool started:

http://blisterpool.com/p2pdonate

76  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: MINERS UNITE! Block the FBI coins. Do not fund violent underground organizations on: June 13, 2014, 01:43:55 AM
Isnt it impossible to "block" coins. What kind of bullshit is that.

If it is possible(which would be pretty damn stupid), then do not block the fbi coins....would look pretty stupid for bitcoin overall if that ever happened.

It is possible for the coins to be blocked.  Just like it is possible for the FBI to give them to Seans Outpost.  It COULD happen.  It just won't.  Those two pools will not do that as they will see the value of Bitcoin plummet and have everyone left and right asking them to block more coins.  
77  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: P2Pool donation tool now available to help decentralize the network on: June 12, 2014, 05:06:22 AM
Thanks again!  I am seeing small donations multiple times a day.

If you are not on p2p pool, you should be!
78  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [460 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: June 12, 2014, 05:04:15 AM
Thank you to all who are doing the donations to p2p miners.  While it is not lots of money, it is an incentive and all of my mining power will be on p2p pool by next week. 
79  Economy / Goods / Re: Bitcoin decals and apparel on: June 12, 2014, 02:44:28 AM
I'm looking to put some nice decals on a newer model f150. Preferably long ones like

http://cdn3-i.hitc-s.com/128/bitcoin_logo_31993.jpg

But with white letters.

Also looking for a bitcoin front licence plate.

Give me suggestions, thanks.

I have a number of designs:

http://cryptoanarchy.com/store/index.php?route=product/category&path=59

80  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mysterious Bitcoin Block 5035 & the deep story behind (Probably big fraud) on: June 10, 2014, 09:41:39 PM
As we early can see on block 5035 is the enhanched way the early adopters of Bitcoin could easly have found the block through mining, but my doubt is actually in the field of cheatable mining and easy comforting fraud of unknown values.
What most people don't see is the everlastig truth written in most blocks 5035 on especially all coins from old too new too even surround this as an specially featured fraud on non unknown values.

What I particulary take my own feelings around Bitcoin Block 5035 is the way probably told as Satoshi's wallet but truly the way it was spent to other accounts nevertheless the wallet that actually did make my wonder was this wallet which got 50BTC through mining and one mined wallet transfer: https://blockchain.info/address/12higDjoCCNXSA95xZMWUdPvXNmkAduhWv
This is the Block 5035: https://blockchain.info/block/0000000060aa4dc6fb31c82c978d8a51a1bcf2c77fe174a2e30d5d320fa7fb19
Just follow the transfers and you come too the big account.

That wallet is connected too transactions from Block 5035 and it's truly real suspicious as we count on it, being the most unknown reasons for multiple transactions going with most of the 150 BTC to another account which sends nearly 1 BTC too 1Derby* accounts and so on it goes with multiple transactions through many accounts in momentarily feature, where the transactions are dated to same suspicious time, wether this was false data that was written into Bitcoin block explorer is still unknown, but I hardly doubt it was an fraud, but just an exptetatious transfer through 100's of accounts at nearly the same timeframe. Even trying to go deeper through the huge amount of accounts you see clearly this as an suspicious transfer. As knowing each transaction should had had seconds in between each transaction. This is this cause address: https://blockchain.info/address/1FrSBjGSmtwrpmqTBZtyzsANaSPbeZjytp

Knowing that the closest link too 1Derby* accounts is actually John Thomas through an expectable 1Derby account on twitter, I find it hard to believe he have no connection through all of this, is he the early adopter of Bitcoin?, and why are all 1Derby* accounts still to this day without any transactions?, Even enough search on the internet we clearly can find out John Thomas as an Japenese speakable person, but nearly close connection too Mt.Gox as he has the connection to be an hedge trader whom invests many millions of dollars through New York hedges, we can clearly also see this with his trades on S&P500 which have great interest in the Bitcoin investments. And even Exchanges. Can some people or even investments in Bitcoin be made too cheat the market? And be knowing the most expectable situations too fall easly as to keep eventually fraud as an aspect in all of this?

Why I ask this around block 5035 is to clearly not understand the enormous signature that is nearly with all coins ever produced, what we can find out is that information on blocks 5035 is nearly full of accounts with many coins, or even without information cause of too much information (DarkCoin) and while 5035 is resistently an thing that goes around BlackCoin as clearly the wicked thing that happened, even for LTC we clearly see this as an signature placed especially within most coins ever produced. Have you nearly never wondered why most ANN on alternative cryptocurrency is with the same typical theme construction. While people most often aren't able too tell if they mined the coins from early start of most coins? While most coins have signature blocks 5035 as something we really should look into...

I actually don't hope people start to Wonder, but it's nearly the truth openwide too even demolish the existance of Bitcoin and force some programmers to actually create an coin from within people are forced too create SHA512 codes on each fraction of a coin and forcing only 1 share discoveries?

Is this a mad-lib gone Bitcoin?
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 ... 176 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!