Depends, no-one can really predict that. For all we know Bitcoin could maintain a fairly low block size with large transactions becoming the norm as off-chain solutions become more used, with fees remaining slightly higher as a result, or the block size may have been increased by then with much lower fees to facilitate global commerce.

That's not quite how inflation or currency exchange rates work. I don't know where you got that figure from, but it's neither very effective nor useful in proving a point.

Why. Why did you do this crap? To boost your post count? Even in the altcoin section when people make new coins these posts are considered useless, what the hell could you possibly be reserving a slot for other than to get paid more for your signature campaign?

Sigh.

To answer the OP, sure. Possible future value shouldn't affect what I do now.

If you guys are referring to the market correction as the possible start of a recession, then you probably have another thing coming for you. A market correction was long overdue, guys, it's not going to cause a new recession this early.

Because they're scared of the price changes. Investing in a volatile asset or commodity or currency or whatever you like to call Bitcoin just isn't for everyone, some people don't have very high risk tolerance. In some cases that also causes them to make extremely irrational decisions even after they have researched and invested into assets.

Congratulations on showing that you have absolutely no economic knowledge.

Reduced supply of a good means that a good will have a higher price due to its scarcity, it makes no sense saying that the price would be lower.

Eh. It's good we reached $300 this month and it's a possibility that we could reach $350 next month, but it's definitely not guaranteed. I wonder when the increases in price will either stop, or whether we'll see a correction in the market soon enough...hopefully we don't walk into another bubble.

Hey Mitchell, would you happen to know where I could purchase a coin slab that fits the dimensions of a series 1 numbered gold round which has a capsule on? I want something to put my round and capsule in and the coin slab that came with my round never fit it.

Wow, that's actually a good $40 below spot per coin for a nice and respected coin too, the only thing that might make some people hesitant is the fact that you seem to have left it unprotected and exposed meaning the quality of the coin may have been damaged by scratches, etc. Still a good deal based on spot though, good luck selling them.

Your "not always" is in a very limited and very rare situation. I do not consider things such as playing the odds at a booker or taking advantage of multiple bonuses at different sites to make a guaranteed +EV bet on say, sports, to be "gambling" per se, and +EV games are extremely rare and limited time.

what


what


I guess...?


Your reasoning is heavily flawed in this argument. We aren't going to see $500 next month due to some random barely explained spike in Bitcoin popularity, and any proof for that must be invalid as we would already be seeing prices that high if the proof was valid.

Yeah, we've already tapped $300. I think by the end of this month we'll either have a good hold around the $300 area, or we'll have dropped to about $275 and hold there. It all depends what happens in the next day or two.

I'll do $17 as the bid on the other site you're auctioning at is still $16.

Well it is called an overview of popular Bitcoin gambling websites.

This is defined in the footer of the OP:

Note: I define a "popular" Bitcoin Gambling Website as one with a Bitcointalk thread with a size of over 25 pages (though I reserve the right to give some leniency). That doesn't actually necessarily mean it's popular, but it sorts out the ribble rabble and stops people screaming to add x y and z unknown sites. I also... [...]

Like his negative trust says, Mitchell was considering changing it to a neutral feedback. I don't think offering what essentially amounts to a bribe was the best of ideas in this case.

Just take a signature campaign which will take people with negative trust. Simple.

Going to start bringing this back up-to-date now, so keep an eye out for updates to this. First I need to check if all of the ratings are still accurate, then make adjustments.

Brush size 3, coarseness 118, Effects -> Artistic -> Oil Painting. Via paint.net (something between regular MS paint and more advanced alternatives like photoshop)



Just an example. A more advanced free alternative to Photoshop is GIMP, which is basically as advanced as photoshop just with a tad bit less features, and definitely has a large amount of filters and effects. My point is, even free alternatives as simple as paint.net can do this stuff.

Granted this isn't the same style, but paint.net is quite ground down and only has 3 effects in the "Artistic" category. I'm sure GIMP can make something almost in the exact same style.

That's really not clear, y'know, though that could just be an issue of a slight, slight language barrier.

But again, anyone can do this with even free photo editing software using just one filter

Stopped taking the post seriously here. Come on guys. I like some optimism myself but don't get so excited that you start making ludicrous predictions. These predicts of "mass adoption" and Bitcoin "going to the moon" have already happened a million times, we don't need to start bringing in predictions like "mass euphoria" as well.

Sustainable growth. That's what we need. Just like in a real economy.

Well the thing here is that Anibal Cavaco Silva was an elected president, and there will also be new elections for a president in 2016. It seems now though that they're going to try to get rid of the new government via a vote of no confidence, though I wonder if his constitutional powers will extend here as well and he will be able to prevent this.