OK, to speed up, increase my reservation from 3 Dualminers to total of 5. Please confirm, so I can initiate BTC transfer. Thx.
|
|
|
Sorry, I'm moving to the USA group buy, tracked shipping is too expensive from AUS. Please remove my reservation for 5 Dualminers.
|
|
|
I'm in for 3 Dualminers. Payment follows...
|
|
|
I would go for 6GB. Considering ASICs entering scrypt mining, GPUs in future will escape towards scrypt-jane coins that in time are requesting more and more VRAM...
|
|
|
ok. one GPUD, usd200 for 300K. 3MHS need 10pcs GPU.its 2000USD. and you need two set of computer:it should should be around usd600. and it needs more power.
...and I'm getting GPUs with 2 year warranty from the shop around the corner . And I am able do payment on 12 monthly rates . And even on 24 . And ROI is about 3-6 months . And before the first rate comes I already earned more than double for the monthly payment . And meaning that I will have some spare LTC/BTC to buy at least one ASIC LTC unit . Just for fun . And I will buy more when Your prices became competitive (read: halved from now). And till than I'm not worried if LTC developers decide to change the scrypt algo .
|
|
|
Reserve 5 pieces for me please. It's double the price than GPU, but it's a new toy. Priceless...
|
|
|
I would really appreciate if someone could help me with this.
I'm using only one instance of bfgminer started with: bfgminer --no-opencl-binaries and bfgminer.conf containing following after pools section: "api-mcast-port" : "4028", "api-port" : "4028", "expiry" : "120", "expiry-lp" : "3600", "gpu-dyninterval" : "7", "log" : "5", "no-pool-disable" : true, "no-show-processors" : true, "no-show-procs" : true, "no-opencl-binaries" : true, "no-unicode" : true, "queue" : "3", "scan-time" : "60", "skip-security-checks" : "0", "submit-stale" : false, "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "shares" : "0", "kernel-path" : "C:\\Program Files\\BFGMiner\\/share/bfgminer", "scan" : [ "BPM:all", "erupter:all", "antminer:all", "BPM:all", "erupter:all", "antminer:all" ], "set-device" : [ "antminer:clock=x0981", "antminer:clock=x0981" ] }
Works for combination of U1s, Bluefurries and BlockErupters.
|
|
|
AFAIK there is no need to be on separate hubs, except if power supply of the hub is not enough for all of them. Bfgminer is simplest way of using different USBs...
|
|
|
Its hard to run a site like multipool, esspecially when the hashrate almost doubled in a week, i, and i think most miners can understand the difficulties.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Now I'm confused. Suddenly hordes of "Newbies" with knowledge and hash power that outperforms couple orders of magnitude their status here making constant unnecessary pressure. I believe that if someone tries to track down this "newbies" it will go down to the source of multipool attacks. I'm not moving away of multipool. Two days mining for the pool without payment for one year period is less than 1% donation. Flound, take Your time.
|
|
|
I just got my new video card today, the Sapphire R9 270X OC 4GB and I went to my pool's getting started page to download CG Miner, but there's 12 different versions listed there and being that I've been mining with cudaminer on two Asus GTX 650Ti Boost cards, I have no clue which version I should be looking at. My OS is Win 7 64-bit. Any help pointing me in the right direction will be greatly appreciated, Thank you in advance. cgminer 3.7.2 is the latest official version supporting GPU-mining.
|
|
|
that window is unsightly and i wish you could minimize it to tray. there are methods to hide it entirely but if you do that, then you can't do things like turning it off and running it again on another pool. Anyone knows a way to minimize it to tray?
Try cryptominers in a tray: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=149442.0Highly customizable, so You have homework (xml-configuration file) to do. Works for me.
|
|
|
I added more hashing power, so wanted to increase share difficulty. Maybe it's only impression, but I'm having higher percentage of rejects when share difficulty is lower. Just to be clear, it's about SHA256 share difficulty that I can't change.
Looked at the help page, found that sha.diff. 8 for sha256 is not listed. But You can choose it from the sha.diff. drop-down list when changing.
|
|
|
Over long time periods, share difficulty does not matter, and the default of 64 will work fine for anyone.
I added more hashing power, so wanted to increase share difficulty. Maybe it's only impression, but I'm having higher percentage of rejects when share difficulty is lower. Just to be clear, it's about SHA256 share difficulty that I can't change.
|
|
|
How can I change share difficulty for worker? I was able to do that before, now it says "worker updated", shows higher difficulty, but my miner reports (after some time, after restarting...) again the old difficulty.
|
|
|
SCAM !!
What's up?
|
|
|
scrypt. I'm still on 0 because I'm spending on bitcoin miners what I earn on GPUs.
|
|
|
Payment and PM sent for 3 U1s.
|
|
|
As a GPU miner which i am not. i would seriously evaluate ROI point and resale value to get ride of GPU mining and investing same capital to BTC or something else. Waiting for next wave of hardware mining. Early adopters always gain the benefits. The people who are planning to make 8, 12, 16 GPU rigs now... dont, you are too late. Goldrush is gone.
Bad advice. GPU mining will allways be more fun and risk free than entering ASIC spiral that streams all the coins to ASIC sources. If scrypt coins developers want, they can make changes towards different algo. GPUs will adapt, what will happen to scryptASICS? They will continue diving into BTC ASIC spiral. That's why nobody is producing scrypt-only ASIC.
|
|
|
Do you know an utility that allows you to change the voltage of these cards ? Trixx does not work well with these cards.
Thank you in advance.
Have You tried checking box "Synchronize cards in Multi-GPU config" under Trixx settings? AFAIK "Disable ULPS" should be ticked as well...
|
|
|
There are several ways to tell the difference in the type of miner you are using.
And picture is like TELLING thousand words. I've seen "pictures" of SHA-scrypt combined ASICs and nothing after...
|
|
|
|