Payment will be SEER tokens, which can be traded on Bitfinex, the world's largest cryptocurrency trading platform!
Since you are paying with altcoins, you should post in altcoin section. Please move the thread to altcoin marketplace. This board is only for services which offer payment in BTC I want to apply for the SEER Community Manager, I've sent you an email. Please check, Thank you Hello brother, you are Hero member and I think you should know the rules of the forum.
|
|
|
Honestly, if OP wouldn't have been Legendary before introduction of merit this would be almost impossible today. Since January he received 7 merits and I think this amount is above the avarage merit received per user. there are many having only 0, 1 or 2. Merit is still distributed only in low numbers.
OP is neither too much active nowadays nor he is trying to hunt merits, jk. He made this awesome thread before the merit system was introduced. At present we can see some interesting threads but most of those are objective, kinda merit beggars.
|
|
|
You guys are missing the point - a spell checker won't flag a word like "effect" or "insure", when really what you mean is "affect" or "ensure".
Exactly. This is the problem of spell checker. For the guys who make some common mistakes, please notice- Knew-NewKnew is past form of know and new is something which has been done for the first time. Then-ThanThen means kind of times and than is used in comparison. Their-There
Their is possessive form of they and there refers to a place actually. Even-EventuallyEven generally refers to mention something specially. But eventually refers "in the end". Doesn't the own forum correct misspellings?
OP is not talking about mispelling at all. Those are some common mistakes actually. Doesn't the own forum correct misspellings? <...>
No, that is some feature related to your device/browser and textboxes. It seems you are little wrong. There should be a feature in SMF which does correct the spelling as the guy said.
|
|
|
However without the ability to post images, I'm a bit crippled!
You might want to consider buying a copper membership which will give you the ability to post images. Haven't xtraelv said the same? Why are you repeating? @coinerz Please lock the thread since you have got your answer. You can lock thread at the left side below of your post.
|
|
|
Strange, because I have 180+ activity anbd Im still a Member.
Hmmm, strange!! With 186 activities, you don't know about the new merit requirement. You do have activities within last days also.
|
|
|
It's a calculation on the total amount of activity, isn't it? Well, it has been decreased because a huge amount of Jr member demoted into newbies and they couldn't wear signature. Because of that, there is no meaning of continue posting as they will get no bounty. However, after the new implementation, the activity in meta, was increased decently. So, the same will happen. 10 merits requirement will reduce spamming in Altcoin discussion (No one care that, IMO) while it will increase spamming in meta significantly.
|
|
|
Is the algo different now?
I don't know what algo are you talking about. If it is for rank, I think it's still same as it was back in the day. The only requirement which had been added to the system is merit.
|
|
|
IP check.. anyone want a bet that the accounts all consistently logged in on the same IP?
Since all of those are his friends, they may visit his house someday and use the same. It can also be an excuse. Thus, you will lose the bet, lol.
|
|
|
I am, however, in favor of removing signatures from everything below Member rank, requiring 10 merits (or perhaps more) to display a signature.
Requiring 10 merits for wearing signature may reduce the shitpost/spamming from meta only if the spammers/shitposters are here for maintaining the required posts. Cause there will be a significant downfall in signature bounty hunters. If theymos implement this system, shitpost will be increased, because- The problem arised (spamming meta) because of hunting merits actually. It has been increased decently after the new requirements applied. So, requiring 10 merits will make people more hungry for hunting merit which will result more spamming. Right now, I have nothing to suggest. The only thing we can do- Recognise merit beggars and stop engaging with those. Don't merit a person in meta who is showing concern or writing post for having merit. Although it will be tough for most of the sMerit sender. I will update once I get any idea.
|
|
|
@cryptofarid10 Why are you posting irrelevant image here? Is it something to do with merit system? Please stop posting off-topic.
|
|
|
Did you checked his post history?
Jet Cash said 'Brand New' and isn't Brand New mean 0 activity? @OP There is no reason to hack a brand new profile, at least not for creating a profile in fit to talk. If someone wishes to create profile in fit to talk and he/she needs a BCT account, s/he can create one easily. That's why I think that's real account. BTW, it's my personal assumption only.
|
|
|
Why do you think that these are not bots? They have completely the same activity, the same posts. identical companies.
Alone055 has already mentioned the reason. There is less posibilty of being bots. I think those are from a bounty abuser who is ernrolling on same campaign.
|
|
|
Maybe I found a large number of bot accounts.
Not really. I have made a list with 147 accounts from a single entity and this list is yet to be completed. Link- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4720640.msg46587604#msg46587604As @Don Pedro Dinero suggested, you should post this list here- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4720640.0Please, don't forget to link the thread from which you have collected the data. ~snip~
The first list is dedicated to copy/paste and the 2nd one for reporting those bumpers/spammers so that mod can take a step. bots are usually used to post nonsensical off-topic replies in multiple threads around the forum in order to increase the activity points of an account which could later be used to participate in bounties.
Not true at all. bots were used for increasing activity back in the day when there was no merit system for upgrading. Nowadays, bot accounts are used for bumping ANN and bounty thread. I want to redirect you here with an explanation. 2. Bounty managers payment are based on participants. The more participants are there, the more payment will be given. That's why they bump the bounty thread so that they can get eyed by participants. I have solid proof of this one.
BTW, It's true that most of the accounts listed here are not bot.
|
|
|
Lots of people who have already ranked up can be shitposters and that's why the new system is. We need to stop people ranking up with shitposting. It's possible and lots of member already did. You should check this thread to know who has ranked up after merit system implementation- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4839318.0 One that i know is DdmrDdmr who already earn more than 1k merit LoyceV has also achieved 1069 merits till now.
|
|
|
It would probably be an even better option to verify that anyone someone is considering leaving negative trust that they are in fact a scammer
I don't think DT member tagged someone without any issue although there might be some exceptions. (or someone who will likely scam in the future).
A proverb going that Black will take no other hue.They shouldn’t leave a negative rating just because lauda says the are a scammer without evidence.
Most of those have enough reference link. Without reference link, tagging again will look awkward. In this case, DT can check the ref link and tag.
|
|
|
I make this account for Ban appeal. if I apply for the copper member from this account can I post in other discussion
No. It will be counted as Ban Evasion and you will be banned again. 25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.[e]
25. If you get banned (temporary or permanently) and create a new account to continue posting / sending PMs, it's considered ban evasion. The only exception is creating a thread in Meta about your ban.
|
|
|
You are listing all the people who have been tagged by Lauda while I am listing people who have been turned into neutral from red. I've sent a PM to Vod, asking to update those profiles on BPIP so I can scrape their current trust. With that, I could exclude all current red (and banned!) accounts too. It will be quite easy for you, also less time-consuming. I do have to do it manually which consumes huge time. So, can I stop working on it? As, it is easier for you. Removed from DT1 it doesn't mean all feedback has removed. All feedback will reflect on Untrusted feedback. If someone visit profiles and check untrusted feedback than obviously he will see that tag. If anybody never check all feedback before make any trade than it will not much benefits to make list. If peoples are very lazy than he deserve scam.
I doubt 10% people know that there is a trust system without DT, lol. Also, those trust isn't seen in profile by default if you don't change your setting.
|
|
|
Not exactly, there has some difference between the two lists. You are listing all the people who have been tagged by Lauda while I am listing people who have been turned into neutral from red. Also, I have listed 100 only till now.
|
|
|
|