I'll still not give you 0.0000000000001 BTC as a tip  Actually you can't. Bitcoins are only divisible down to 8 decimal places. 1 satoshi = 0.00000001 BTC and this will be the minimum amount you could send him, hypothetically. Well, hypothetically, you could use an off-chain service in order to send amounts of Bitcoin that are divisible by more than 8 decimal places, so this could be possible if there was an off-chain wallet or service that supported something like this  |
|
|
|
|
Ah, one of the sites ran by good ol' moriarty.
Don't use it, don't look at it, and to be honest, beyond this point, don't even mention it. Let's not give that tool any more attention and let him possibly scam even more people out of their hard earned cash.
|
|
|
|
My solution is just to ignore all users that have joined signature campaigns. They post nonsense just to get paid, so they don't have much to add anyway.
Even as someone with a signature ad, I don't really blame you for this. Those with signature ads post a lot more rubbish and spam than those without, and signature ads have caused a lot of rather unsavoury practices to become much more widespread - botting, account selling, account hacking...etc. Personally I think that all of the signature campaign managers should be a lot stricter on what is paid. If that means you have to exclude 90% of someone's posts and piss them off - then so be it. |
|
|
|
But as QS has mentioned , I would definitely not consider his posts understood to most people. It seems his primary language isn't english.
As a native English speaker, I can understand him perfectly. It's obvious that he knows what he is doing and has no intention to stop. Read some of his posts once again, he is clearly not a native english speaker. Another point he doesn't ask the same question again and again, at least I didn't find so when going through his posts , maybe he just posts repetitive questions over a long range of posts so that they are not visible when going through his recent posts. Repetitive = spam or am I wrong? Eh, kind of. Repetitive would be the same thing over and over again. Spam encompasses both repetitiveness, uselessness, etc. His posts are definitely spam, though, basically on the level of a bot which copy and pastes phrases and matches them up, but it seems here that it's just a human typing vaguely related stuff at speed to earn money. |
|
|
|
|
My ideal outcome would be around Q3 2016 for BTC to reach 500 USD/BTC, because personally I think that's quite a sustainable rate of increase with respect to any new news about Bitcoin companies, etc that should have come out by then. Give or take a quarter, but I think we'll definitely see BTC hit 500 USD/BTC by the new year of 2017.
|
|
|
|
48 posts in 1 day, I bet that guy will not reach that number if his post's are not paid. This is what you get when one of your rules is "No minimum posts, no maximum posts, no worries! Do not spam.", He definitely missed the last 3 words
Indeed. Though I've made over 40 posts today, and I hope most people consider me to be a decently constructive poster... Hope. It's a shame that there are people like these who make everyone who posts a lot and has a signature ad seem bad. Though I normally post in bursts. |
|
|
|
Don't worry guys, he decreased the price to 0.009 BTC. I know it's really advanced to use photoshop for 20 seconds to select a filter, but it's clearly worth the money to save the time. /s |
|
|
|
of course it might be profitable in a long run everything depends on how lucky you will be you can loose all your balance in a day though you can play with it for a year if youre lucky
Might be. That's the key here. You'd have to be extremely lucky to have gambling be profitable over the long-term, as the variance will generally have evened out by then to put you in the red overall. You're much more likely to lose it all in the long-term. |
|
|
|
It's a damn shame that you are not as intelligent as your avatar. Done from my end.
* DiamondCardz sighs I'll repeat. "No fiat money has ever survived" isn't a valid claim to make. There are fiat currencies that have survived for hundreds of years, and this statement is not valid unless all of them collapse, which you can not predict with a 100% certainty will happen. |
|
|
|
I think you underestimate it by not including the factor of the unknown in the equation. every repetition of the history will always be somehow unqiue. perhaps "against all odds" type of unique.
So by that definition you must also agree that there is an approximately equal chance that you are wrong and I am correct, due to this "factor of the unknown". |
|
|
|
Wouldn't be the first time a country went bankrupt. I just don't think that the world would go to war and anarchy over something like this, it just seems so unlikely. There would be a recession, maybe a depression, but the world would recover. Do not be naive and join the bandwagon of crypto-anarchists or anarcho-capitalists.
I'm speaking of something like 2008. The world will recover but it will be a different world. In the meantime it sends bitcoin to the Canis Majoris. I think you overestimate what would happen if something like the recession of 2008 happened again, ignoring the fact everyone will be skint. Yeah, inflation gets higher, but the inflation wouldn't be high enough to warrant a ridiculously high increase in the value of BTC. Yeah, there'd still be a nice increase, but don't go over-the-top. |
|
|
|
Gotta love extrapolation. And loop-the-loops. Look, I combined both for you! It's about as good as your diagram, no?  |
|
|
|
No universe has ever survived to not be blown apart by a large mythical alien with 60 heads made of spaghetti.
That claim is equally as true as yours, because there is no way of proving it is true or not true until the universe ends.
you bring analogies to your opponent's claims, falsely thinking that they are true analogies, while they're not. if anything, they could be analogies according to your personal description of the world (which we all know is subjective). we have been collectively wrong so many times before. what gives you the justification to say that this time it is different? that this time there will be no great depression and everything will somehow find a good solution. the feds just keep on the printing presses, quantitative easing, 0% interest rates and we all live happily ever after. you are being naive. Wouldn't be the first time a country went bankrupt. I just don't think that the world would go to war and anarchy over something like this, it just seems so unlikely. There would be a recession, maybe a depression, but the world would recover. Do not be naive and join the bandwagon of crypto-anarchists or anarcho-capitalists. |
|
|
|
Yeah, we had this thing called a world recession about 7 years ago. Recessions have happened before, but we're still around and kicking. No fiat based money has ever survived. The entire world economy runs on fiat. A collapse of unprecedented proportions is inevitable, just a matter of when. In a world like we are currently in there is no real valid source to back that claim up now, due to the massive globalisation of the world. Also, that claim is esque to saying I have never died, therefore I will never die. No fiat based money has ever survived -> how do you know it won't survive until it is dead? You can never predict if fiat-based money will survive. The definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expecting different results. No universe has ever survived to not be blown apart by a large mythical alien with 60 heads made of spaghetti. That claim is equally as true as yours, because there is no way of proving it is true or not true until the universe ends. |
|
|
|
Don't worry bud, I made you a 20-second job in paint.net totally legitimate hand-sketched version of your avatar:  That'll be 0.00000001 BTC for my time That'll be 0.09 BTC please Hahaha, thanks man. It looks pretty good to be honest. For 20 seconds of work, yeah, I suppose so Though the outline could be rid of.  Like that.  Edit: Nope, still not gone. Damn!  This might be it...  Still a small outline at the bottom...  Professional GFX development only beaten by OP. I mean, we lost a bit of the edge of the card, but that's just collateral damage, amirite? I mean, we could have just rubbed out the edges...  But that would take common sense. |
|
|
|
Nice scam you got there. Don't worry bud, I made you a 20-second job in paint.net totally legitimate hand-sketched version of your avatar: That'll be 0.00000001 BTC for my time That'll be 0.09 BTC please |
|
|
|
For only 8 days the price of bitcoin has been changes too much.
Current price is $293 and i think 1btc is enough to earn at least $20 weekly.
But if you can try to invest much more and you will earn much more too.
Only if it keeps going up in price, of course, which is unlikely. Unless you know what you're doing, look at the long-term game, not the short-term profits i.e. "$20 weekly". Else you'll just end up very disappointed when the price doesn't go up by $20 weekly constantly. (it won't ) |
|
|
|
You're being mighty picky for what amounts to about $1.50 in Bitcoin, bud. I don't think we're going to see many professional GFX artists coming in here to make you a professional avatar if you're offering a whopping 0.005 BTC for them to do it.
So what do you think how much should I keep the rewards to really interest professional GFX artists. I know 0.005 is not a big chunk of reward but the work is also not that much. And I think creating a avatar will not gonna take that much time. Or I am wrong ? Up it to at least $5-10, really. $1.50 buys you like 10 minutes of work at the minimum wage for a lot of states, and the quality you will receive will generally follow that (10 minutes of work from someone who isn't that good). At least with $5 you might get 10 minutes of work from a decent GFX artist. |
|
|
|
Trading at $291 atm.  Time for the $400 thread lol Exactly $294 at Bitstamp now, I have a feeling it might shoot up a bit once it passes $300. Daily Change: $11.16 +3.95% I just wonder if it's actually sustainable. |
|
|
|
|
You're being mighty picky for what amounts to about $1.50 in Bitcoin, bud. I don't think we're going to see many professional GFX artists coming in here to make you a professional avatar if you're offering a whopping 0.005 BTC for them to do it.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
