I don't see much point in getting onto more exchanges until the VPN functionality is in beta, at least. TradeOgre and, yes, even shitty old Stocks.Exchange are sufficient for now.

Lol, your very first post here is to ask the same question that's been asked a thousand times before? You're off to a great start, kid.

luckpool sucks; zhash.pro sucks less; suprnova sucks the least.

As you might infer, none of these are a ringing endorsement.

I rather suspect you are going to have to provide more details if you want help. At the very least, what brands are the cards, what overclocks/power limits are applied and how are they applied (e.g. - AfterBurner)?

If your English is not good and you can't (be bothered to) read the discussion - at least the last couple of pages - then you will have to be satisfied with @skablast's succinct, yet correct, answer: no, these are not a good investment. They never were, really.

Yeah, don't post shit like this:






Etc. and so on...

While you make an interesting point - many miners will stop mining if a more profitable coin comes along - it kind of fails the reality check as of now. Ethereum & Monero don't have PoS or masternodes and yet the hashrate on their networks is very robust (even after XMR hard forked to block ASICs).

Granted, ETH is still threatening to transition to PoS, and maybe allotting some of the block reward to stakers will eventually prove to be necessary, but as of now it doesn't seem to be the case.

No. You are basically calling me a liar, newbie, and I don't respond to internet bullies or trolls. Believe me or not, I don't give a rat's ass. If you apologize, learn some manners and ask nicely I'll go to the trouble of getting you a screenshot, but as of now you can kiss my ever loving ass.

Yes, the daemon is synced and the wallet is receiving payments from mining on a regular basis.

Both the cli and gui v201 wallets are working fine for me, so must be a problem on your end.

Indeed it is. I just switched over to 2.0.1 (because 2.0.0 stopped syncing) and even though it was only 1 day behind it took almost an hour to sync. It finally did, though, and my coins are present.

In other news, I've got a stack of coins piling up on the main pool; something might be wrong with payouts there.

Did you add the exclusive nodes to the command line for the daemon? See @YaStaer's previous post:

That partially explains things. What isn't explained is how I would know this given that I just downloaded the new wallet package from your link about 1.5 hours ago?

EDIT - Clearly I should have read what you typed more carefully, but I think it was eminently reasonable to assume that I had the current wallet package when I had downloaded it *after* the hard fork had already happened. You have a habit of being overly terse, CaptDero, and sometimes using a few more words preemptively can spare a lot of wasted words/time later on. Like merely saying something along the lines of, "there have been 2 more updates since the hard fork was announced," would have prompted me to d/l the wallet package again, rather than assume I had the current version (which also led me to think you were being extremely obtuse when you kept asking what for all the world looked like Really Stupid Questions).

I literally just did that in anticipation of your request hence the edit to my previous post. But just to forestall any further argument I did it yet again using the version command in the daemon and it says 1.0.4-alpha.12+30042018.

I hate to be overly redundant here, but it seems necessary to point out for the 3rd time that I followed your directions precisely and the daemon is stuck, anyway. Oh, and yes, I am running it as an administrator. One other datum that may or may not be relevant: I did not delete the existing blockchain files, but you didn't say we needed to.

Yeah, I did that, which is why I quoted your previous post.

EDIT - I just closed and reopened the daemon to confirm this behavior persists and that I am running the correct version; yes to both.

Is the daemon supposed to stall at 68600 while the network block height is at 68637 and climbing?

EDIT - looks like the network block height is stalled at 68637

EDIT 2 - nope, network block height just incremented to 68638.

The link was given in the post right before yours... 

While I agree that @TMAN should judge you on the merits of your idea, I also think your post history is fair game because it provides important clues as to whether you are capable of making reasoned arguments, are just trolling for the lulz, or are churning out shitposts to meet your bounty quotas.

Unfortunately, a post history full of bounty campaign updates, off-topic subjects (e.g. - abortion?! WTF, this is a cryptocurrency forum!) as well as total shitposts like this -


- does you no favors should you post about a more serious topic, like a major change to how the forum operates.

Hmm, it is still offline now, some 4+ hours later. I didn't move any DERO there; just 2, "wildly speculative," coins, let's call them, that can't be traded anywhere else.

UPDATE - it seems to be up again... at least for now. (~1 hour later)

I have made many deposits, withdrawals and trades on stocks.exchange, and while I have not lost any coins, let's just say this exchange is rarely trouble-free. I also really despise how it repeatedly does the Cloudflare DDoS check, even after you've already logged in (I mean, who in their right mind is going to properly log in and then do a DDoS attack???).

I just signed up on TradeOgre a few days ago mainly to see if any pump-n-dump manipulation occurs, but so far I like the UI a lot more than stocks.exchange and I have deposited two different coins there without incident and with very prompt crediting. Also, no Cloudflare BS. I'll update this thread when I actually do a trade.

I haven't tried SouthXchange and haven't heard much about it so can't give an opinion on that one.