mrVegas or mrVegad (whichever it is in your attempt to hide "your" identity) as well as eid for cross-posting the discussion:
I'm utterly shocked and appalled at your apparent lack of any ethical or moral character. To post the above discussions that were made in a private environment speaks volumes about you as a person. To list the names of those that wish to remain anonymous implies you should consider a position at the NSA. I’m sure they would welcome your lack of integrity with open arms.
Frankly, I should not be surprised by your behavior above as you previously attempted to badger me incessantly on another topic to “tell me their names” within the beta chat box. Thankfully, my integrity and moral compass is above such reproach. I will unquestionably maintain the anonymity of ANYONE who wishes to remain so (including your identity) as this is only a decision each person can make on their own. This, unfortunately, is not something you can apparently comprehend.
Until such time as you yourself come “out from the shadows” of anonymity and post your true name and relevant/verifiable identification I will consider you to be nothing more than a coward.
And you consider yourself an American? You should be ashamed of yourself.
1: I made this identity long before I was on emunie forum, hit the wrong key when making my username here and didn't catch it in time. 2: It was from skype 3: Those people choose to use their own names on skype. 4: Sorry to have badgered you, I was having a really bad day but there was no excuse for my behavior. 5: No, I don't call myself American. |
|
|
|
|
Pretty much what eid said goes for me as well:
Lost faith in emuine, Lost trust in Dan so I left.
What I don't think is right is having an IPO before the exchange is done, if the exchange doesn't work then what happens to the price stability? We have always been told that the exchange will help keep the price stable and not jump around like the others. People should be made aware of this fact.
|
|
|
|
one is mine and co-located the other is provided by them  Sorry, just making sure I understand what is happening: Visin : "please don't spread lies. site is down, but not 'hacked'. we are working with the hosting provider now." hamiltino asked :"Its been many hours and the web server is still down?" Fuserleer replied: "It will continue to be until OB1 is ready, then we will bring the new servers up then. OB1 is more important." So I wasn't sure if the servers belonged to you or a hosting provider. |
|
|
|
|
The servers that went down, do you physically own them or does a hosting company own them?
|
|
|
|
|
So then they are your servers?
|
|
|
|
nooo I needed dan@emunie.com email....that email server died today along with the webserver. the client doesnt rely on those at all So its your server's and not the web hosting server's that are down? |
|
|
|
|
Who holds the fiat? Is there a fee for merchants? Are there any user fees?
|
|
|
|
No ETA yet. I have implemented part of the network protocol that processes incoming network packets and keeps track of unconfirmed transactions.
ty for the update |
|
|
|
|
What's the eta for Decrits?
|
|
|
|
That is strange. I saw him on our forums after this post was made, but nothing here. booo.
Oh I was just double checking that the guy proposing to patent this didn't know what ECIES was a week ago. There is also prior art, and what looks to be a much better idea than yours and that one here. Time for a rewrite again, lol. Also prior art on using ECDSA to encrypt. What does ECDSA security have to do with double spending? (Nothing.) This does not answer anything about the viability of the network's security model. It also throws out any notion of your eMugraph, as if it had any viability to begin with. Still working on that AI to determine how much money to create? From those links u posted it looks similar but it is not the same, also from what I can tell it looks like a lot of talk but no action. Has there been any implication on these ideas? If so please provide links. |
|
|
|
|
So then all text messages sent with eMunie is also encrypted?
|
|
|
|
Using MAC address is just ONE of the many ways to collect stats on the network. It is not being used just by itself, its a very small piece of the puzzle.
Are all of the pieces just as hilariously easy to exploit? This isn't promising at all. This will not affect the overall strength of the network, it is only used for stats and there are other more secure pieces in place to protect it. |
|
|
|
|
Using MAC address is just ONE of the many ways to collect stats on the network. It is not being used just by itself, its a very small piece of the puzzle so gaming it won't have an affect on the overall strength of the network.
|
|
|
|
What does being closed source have anything to do with updates?
Not agreeing with them at all, but closed source allows them to protect IP for as long as possible and prevent competitors from copying code. I read in the forums another reason for it being closed-source was that it would allow them to push out updates, hard forks / forks, without the need to update clients and whatnot. The coin is not using the normal QT but rather a Java application so the update system will be different I would assume. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong. The beta is in java but the final client will be in c++ |
|
|
|
Unlike you, I am not so easily impressed by infographics and false explanations. Neither will anyone else be who understands the dynamics behind a p2p distributed shared file. The time to discuss what actually will make emunie tick is now, so people can find vulnerabilities in the logic, not a year down the road when the source code is finally released. I did say probably full of shit because fuserleer has not once satisfactorily answered a technical question. I have been told to "check the forum" several times--where there is nothing more than the same lack of real info, and again by another mouth breather, but I have started two topics (unanswered) already, and will continue to post more depending on whether or not fuserleer actually wants to gain some credibility. http://forum.emunie.com/threads/how-do-hatchers-choose-transactions.194/http://forum.emunie.com/threads/so-whats-a-mediator.193/These are valid points and questions will be answered however Dan's time and energy right now is focused on getting eMunie together. His plan is to have the whitepaper finished before eMunie is released. Could eMunie be vaporware? Sure it could but so far Dan has delivered on everything he has said he was going to do. As eMunie is still going through some changes, the answers you got now might not be accurate and Dan isn't out to fool anyone. |
|
|
|
|
Let's s take as look at the current "coins" out there:
Bitcoin -
Unstable price - not good for average joe or merchants
. Special hardware to mine it so only a small percentage of people are able to take part in the creation of it.
Transaction times are way to slow - useless for pos
Other alt-coins
If it can be 51% attacked - useless
Double spend - useless
. Transactions longer then 30 sec - useless
Have any of these coins been stressed test to see how they would perform under heavyload?
eMunie is trying to solve these problems, so if u want to shit on it because for right now it's not open source then stick with you coins that have no future.
.
|
|
|
|
|
But what if i dont want to fork it? Can't i just make a change to the current code without forking it? Is there a procedure i have to follow to do this?
|
|
|
|
He never said eMunie was going to compete with banks or PayPal. He is saying those are closed source systems but you use them.
We use them because they're part of the existing financial system. I can pay my bills straight from my bank. It's easy to explain my bank account on my taxes. Everyone accepts Paypal. Bitcoin (and altcoins) aren't part of the existing financial system. (If I ever make big profits in Bitcoin, I dread figuring out how I'm supposed to list it on my taxes.) But I still bother with Bitcoin because it's a truly decentralized solution that no one is in control of. There's no chance of some company changing their terms of service and closing my account. There's no chance someone is going to suddenly change the minting rate and make mine worthless. There's no chance that my funds will be seized by mistake, or a system error on a bank's part out of my control leaves me unable to access it for a while. There isn't going to be a buggy mandatory Bitcoin update ever. If you make a new altcoin without the decentralized part, why should anyone bother? There are already many solutions like banks and Paypal that aren't decentralized and are already extremely well integrated with the existing financial frameworks. So im a developer who has a great improvement for bitcoin, i am able to take the source code add in my improvement and then release it for people to start using? |
|
|
|
|
He never said eMunie was going to compete with banks or PayPal. He is saying those are closed source systems but you use them.
Lohoris i see u dodged the ripple question?
|
|
|
|
Cough, cough... for those claiming they know what "decentralised" means, I shall point this out: The meaning of decentralization may vary in part because of the different ways it is applied... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralizationblah blah blah lies and misdirection. decentralised = no single points of failure, can be replicated indefinitely. as long as it's closed source, it has a single point of failure. so, stfu. Didn't u try to set up some sort of exchange for ripple? So u against closed source unless u can make some money with it? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
