same here, but not when I loop it


I'm starting to think my ass is just cursed... on the bright side of things, I am a stubborn bastard and now have declared war on this.

mrR6tqtfN8oy4fXC4m5gLgQV1mtcSWUXDT
mhMPgaDJzQgkraiUTB3dZGWztoY9MwmDVU
mxfZNKGgSkh6HDNmRayTd1ea4vrvqWNXwc
mmY6EHeM1YiAFSw16ciFS3WfcgAUhWDxY6
mnfES4Eq998HWwKCKNe45K66ifUMyJvpB6
msU7nzrLmXdP3bzbTTjUapxVJA3pxPvt52
mpub8eL8S3j2zTBNfrPFQjU6meWQSP37j3
mwFLwT5ST47cK8cHkHwHrZUfuaPQruazvb
n4UQSiCZ4qPm5xRX1HHe1VXb3wEJpmu2uZ
mn7boX26VaDUzkvS6Hcqek28cceECrPjv6
mujLLuVDxrernHQsueeCBeqZCzVqShKyyJ
mxMdkSGMcTyT4fBW64ukgvW24fq95kXQ8E
n4Mb4adPq843SSLWKL8mAM7wpxQdnEAz7P
mxzadzCB2wa5g1dWEzTCnWw3oZAbG5e4jr
n3F8nctZbyoYn5cveJCFkLRGGThG237fqL
mpago1Mk8sHqqJqUvSk9SeMcuHuDRzPnSM
myPfVdcpJCP5z1RHfdPfqHRVh1T2reMMDB
mx1GGsiJpyybKzUZUoVhx9Sn13Pq6rnbQc
mftq2AvDk6woTexdP76kfmeY4RGwY3tPii
mwiEAiu3b8LMd386r65DP6fCCi3yMYRUqk
n3oxrNM8WP362QRftH9c7wrwu6RPXiHgpZ
mhcNeHLvkjbginnVkUgJfHsVRkTuCBKf8b
mgox33t2mYN7x5En7376vtjLWmMeSN1oir
mrsCKnm444yWc4sTSzWXtfzgGoRh5zhwEW
mkHLrGYhBxkRgZDz3YkyXQ8SYob3WZvGtT
mnSmHD5BqCaruq7SuYLz1QiXdmzwaEBfe3
mq9xMW8bdhjWEnjNyBGLVZZ4ERKZ3y6TfN
n2HexiFB8ABy86uuzb2YPNeR4Ndqsgf5r7
mwCt7xFGHCu1YL1hy5wEgF5U45rJYzPWz4
msfvDgubKTDnkD1WPkEe9nPvM3y3YKDejg
mqon1c1NwJHvqD9qLfCt8LbBaa4Ya84FTq
mo9pgh8oJG4rYD7X6HrJKJsnudMxZgVCY4
n3Xehg8poetkSrVoFJ4cXwa8HYC7JeR7eR
mjkuuEHUf5P5C9r8TzFy1Ltao9Pjydnqtv
n4h9REN8Aeym6J9Y5fjRXX6LVujivtFhkx
mhYXUSBLp1xrDQoejLP9JDLWAJTBUnMeJi
mnpbdLsboxwjPLd7idWspXzjkGweTcd4AM
mjrPuZNgxiEGApd14qEgz7cC1UuFNQuWoY
mwEXWAumZQEXELDyyJXXAepmev1LcjUBPk
mxEdDSmnkUuxc6AciLzneohix3kTAZcy4J
miRbJob6Yzo9pwTotv9nhHH6xtJKyC7Fyd
mq8o8havatpjAZGm64WpHsaB8TT4Pt88jy


more available upon request

no dice


you wouldn't think this would be so damn hard...

Well shit, not sure what I am doing wrong here. This is my script:




But it's still giving me duplicate tx error. Any suggestions?


Did you add the BTC PPA? I am 99.9% certain you can install libdb4.8++-dev from that


This I would have to agree with. From what I read the other days this whole issue with libdb4.8 can be solved by compiling from source with 5.1, it just changes your db structure but otherwise the source will compile from readily available dependencies instead of being a pain in the neck. Learn something new every day.

It's just less problematic for people to compile it themselves, but like catia said if there's enough demand we probably will offer Linux binaries. There doesn't seem to be any great reason for not offering Linux binaries.

Yes, but in the beginning it wont be a simple job to create pools for this coin. Like catia mentioned, we are in many ways back in the stone age because a lot of the current technology built around bitcoin-based coins will need to be altered quite a bit in order to work with Cryptonite.

I believe the current plan is that launch will be full source plus prebuilt windows binaries. Linux binaries are just for testing phase. They are kind of difficult to get compiled in such a way to work across distros. If there is a lot of demand we could do linux binaries.

Is there a Wallet, or something else

lol don't mind the n00b who can't be bothered to read the OP. . . I'm gonna go sulk in the corner now

You guys do realize, PoW coins can just transform to PoS right...So if the dev of...idk.... Litecoin wanted to change Litecoin to PoS, he could..

So while coins like NXT may have the heads start by a little bit in the PoS department, Any other coin with terrific devs can simply turn PoS and destroy NXT's position in the PoS coin market...

what does NEM stand for

When all the mining power becomes concentrated in 2-3 large mining corporations, which is inevitable given how the process unfolds, how is this different from centralized money printing by central banks? PoW will last another year or two before that happens. When only 2-3 large corporations control processing of all transactions, they will be regulated and dependant on regulators' decisions and rules, and this becomes the same as any fiat currency, except this currency is produced by solving blocks, but it will be far from the idea of decentralization that crypto currency came up with.

Ok well using sendtoaddress will randomly select some of your addresses to send coins from, so it's highly likely n4Ao was emptied, because I can see you've made a large number of transactions in the last hour.

Yes it's now showing a balance of 10000 for me. Looks like everything is working smoothly. If you run listbalances again on n4Ao you should get the same thing.