But, do you see the technical problem here? If a user sends from his own wallet, he makes 1 to 1 transaction with full-size fee, and if we share control - we can batch even these "wallet-to-box" transactions, otherwise there is no sense in fee reduction, you already paid full-size fee. So yes, it's about sharing control, which means even if the site is down, the user can manipulate his wallet.
But I can see your point, especially when you think about funds, investments, but here is the difference. You usually make one 'pricey' transaction and that's all. And the purpose of the service to deal with issues that appears when you do regular transactions on daily basis
I agree with you. If the user already paid for the tx , there is no reduction. But how will you batch the transactions and group them if they didnt send you in the first place(and paid the full fee)? Will you be working with fiat? I agree that we can live with some vulnerabilities in a web service. After all, if a user is sending 10k usd he can pay 2usd in fees. But for small transactions (which don't need high level security) we can use a web service with some vulnerabilities
|
|
|
...
So you are basically holding the users private keys and sending bitcoin in their names back and forth. Even your second option you will send the private key to the users. This is very dangerous for 2 reasons: 1- A hacker may intercept your message to your client. (even if it is a web client, such as blockchain.info wallet) 2- You can still spend your client funds (I am not accusing you, just saying it is possible) There is a huge risk in using your service. I think you should think about creating an alternative to let the users hold their own private keys without you knowing them.
|
|
|
Em termos de AML? Acredito que não.. O cara rouba os dados do meu KYC e vai fazer o que? Vender BTC por BRL e depositar na minha conta? Ir até uma agência bancária e criar uma conta no meu nome para então usá-la? Logo ali, onde é cheio de câmeras? Acho difícil..
Cara, nessas altcoins que sao SCAMS abertos e pegam até passaporte dos outros pra dar airdrop... Eles podem até fazer um passaporte falso com seu nome e dar pra um terrorista usar. Eles podem abrir contas no seu nome e usar para lavar dinheiro, coisas assim. É improvavel? Bastante. É possível? Sim. Infelizmente nao usei esse servico quadno registrei meu dominio.
É só transferir o domínio para eles. Mas isso nao adianta absolutamente nada. O domínio já está linkado ao meu nome. Nao da pra deslinkar. Certamente existem pessoas com bancos de dados com todos os nomes registrados nesses Whois Guard e meu nome já está lá.
|
|
|
It's an interesting idea, but I'm going to need some more information on how you will implement it.
I am interested to know as well. Personally, I don't see how can this really reduce fees. Adding inputs makes the transaction more expensive, and tehre is no economy if you add lots of inputs. There might be some reduction because the person who control the transaction knows how to estimate a good fee looking at the mempool. But, is it worth giving your private keys and your privacy to someone else just because he knows how to estimate a good fee? Most of the wallets out there (and third party services) have a terrible fee estimate. All of them overestimate fees. It is easy for someone who knows that he is doing to save on fees, compared to fee estimators. But it is easier just to educate people.
|
|
|
BTC technicals are against $20,000. I don't think holding now is a good idea.
Technical analysis means nothing when you have solid fundamentals. We have halving, huge monetary expansion never seen before due to corona virus crisis, inflation, paypal accepting btc, etc. Maybe a good idea is to move the money from BTC to altcoins.
You would better move to USDT or some stable coins, because if BTC goes down it will sink all altcoins with it (or at least most of them). But, you will probably end up with less BTC than you had before. I believe we will go past ATH, to a new ATH nobody knows (25, 30, 50k? Who knows? Bitcoin is unpredictable, it always was)
|
|
|
Certainly Binance is your best option. They are an honest business I have never seen anyone complaining about locked funds or whatever due to kyc
I have already withdrawl some amounts from my binance account and I never did any KYC.
I would certainly avoid other services unless you have to use them (such as a different altcoin which is not listed in binance)
|
|
|
Esse tema é bem interessante. Não por acaso, eu descobri o bitcoin quando estava pesquisando sobre privacidade na rede. Eu fiz uns anos atrás um post sobre boas ferramentas de privacidade para usar online Let's talk about privacyFiz uma tradução, mas não a mantive tào completa. Está aqui: Proteja sua privacidade na redeRecentemente descobri o serviço Njalla, que faz registros de domínios sem nenhum pergunta sobre quem voce é. Adicionei no tópico principal. Infelizmente nao usei esse servico quadno registrei meu dominio. O whois guard nao protege sua privacidade, apenas dificulta que spammers roubem seu email.
|
|
|
Bitcoin is 88% premine to kids born today It might as well be ETH.
To kids born in 2142, it is 100% premine. It might as well be FIAT
Do you think the future of humanity is going to accept it? I don`t. Premine is a concept created basically to accuse altcoins that falsely mined most of their coins before releasing it to the public. This is a dishonest attitude, and most coins that made that were scams. There was no premine in bitcoin. Whoever want (or wanted) to mine just need to turn on a computer with a decent hash rate and contribute to the network. All coins being already mined by 2142 makes basically no difference for regular users. Who wants bitcoin in 2142 will have to pay for it, or work for it to earn. Just like any currency. The only difference is that there is no central authority, like the FED, creating new coins out of the thin air. Why not make a currency that everyone mines at the same rate upon creation of supply? 1 hour coin an hour or 1 second coin a second distributed to unique addresses. For the addresses you use a HMID, human id, fingerprint, iris, dna or heartbeat. You don`t even have to give up your name or address.
You can have fiat, where a few create the supply out of thin air You can have bitcoin, where people with fiat create the supply I`ll have a coin everyone mints fairly. I will pay people to vote I will pay people to watch account signups on a livestream to the blockchain I will have pools of network fee`s that the voters vote on where the funds are spent, a bittime society for roads and space exploration.
Your coin is backed by fiat, nothing. My coin will be backed by duration, waiting, time.
You will pay with your new created coins? I will tell you this: You cannot create money out of thin air, unless if you are a government (which you are not). so your coin will be worthless, probably.
|
|
|
bitcoinvisuals is a nice website, thanks for sharing. Sadly they do not have their own API, the data is available only in CSV. According to most charts LN keep growing. Time for me to open a channel again (specially to receive donations in my website). I will get a mobile wallet to do, probably Phoenix Wallet recommended by mk4. Two charts show something happened with total valued locked but I've not yet digged to find what happened in late of 2019. From June to December 2019 the price was in strong downtrend. I believe there is a considerable number users who just sell their btc during that time. So they get btc out of their lightning channels. You can see a clear correlation with the price in both chartst (BTC locked and USD locked)
|
|
|
Just a heads up(though not an answer to your question): privacy shouldn't be with your Bitcoin holdings alone. Your personal privacy is actually far more important. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Check this out: https://privacytools.io/P.S. Kudos to you for being privacy conscious. This is true, you need to protect your privacy everywhere, only using mixers/tumblers is not enough. And if you send your coins to a mixer and keep doing bad security privacies (such as address reuse) you may end up revealing yourself in those mixed coins very soon. Try not to reuse addresses, try to avoid using different addresses in the same transaction (use coin control feature from electrum wallet), and so on. It is worth taking a look at blockstream privacy analysis at your addresses to see what you are doing wrong https://blockstream.info/tx/30a011358e856d68ec084e620bf41c6852ddd3ffe628aad51f206269112f1f2cAnd bitcoin wiki blockchain privacy is also good article https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Privacy#Blockchain_attacks_on_privacy
|
|
|
Design updated. Added a few more currencies. Now input boxes are all darker to match the dark theme style. Hope you guys like it. Still open to suggestions. Thanks everyone for using. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F8sQzmTn.png&t=664&c=Nkc02sDx7uY31A)
|
|
|
Dei uma atualizada geral no site. Mudei o design (Aprendi a usar gradientes, enchi o site de gradientes kkk), adicionei uma sugestão de taxa (é a menor fee rate dentro do primeiro bloco do mempool +5sats). Essa taxa sugerida pode subestimar a taxa, voce pode não cair no próximo bloco (embora seja provável eu caia). De forma geral, todos os estimadores de taxas por ai sobrestimam as taxas. O meu subestima. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F8cMb9ws.png&t=664&c=8SugmdBvVL2r5Q)
|
|
|
Your .9 btc must be in a change address. Have you checked your wallet balance in ledger live app?
Dont worry, your funds are probably safe, as ledger is a very secure hardware wallet.
I believe 3PFs6vecVw2gWRK4b7Ah6XborpCnuTeL1i is your change address and your fund are ok
|
|
|
If you have smerits and not finding enough time to identify merit-able posts then you may follow suchmoon to spend your smerits on right posts.
If other merit sources do as you suggest, we will be all meriting the same users/posts... Suchmoon does an amazing job and he is the most generous merit source of this forum. But other merit sources must find good posts to merit on their own to spread the merit as most as possible.
|
|
|
Honestly.
Do not buy and hold (or stake) a coin just because you may get some other random ones if you do.
Those CAKE tokens are worthless... You will probably get better returns just holding BTC.
If you want to hold more than just BTC try to make an smart portfolio, with good altcoins (ethereum for example). Do not buy any coins to receive airdrops.
BNB might be a good option, but do not buy it because you will get some 0.0001USD of CAKE coin.
|
|
|
Eu já estou pensando em organizar uma "campanha", botar uns 1.000 brasileiros comentando no nosso PR pra ver se eles dão atenção..
Vamos chamar também uns portugas. Acho que se mantivermos discussões ativas (e de qualidade) por la, com cada hora um diferente falando, chamamos atenção sim.
|
|
|
Basically anything with "crypto" is a scam, with few exceptions (most of the real cruypto projects are listed here in this forum and have active community support).
I think the best is to always try to avoid unkown and small cryptocurrency business, until they are really established. Unfortunately, this is the reality we live in: lots of scammers.
AS for bounty hunters, go to small projects if they hire a reputable campaign manager. If they do not even have the money to hire a campaign manager, you are unlikely to get paid imo.
|
|
|
Tu é um dos poucos que ainda falam em trade. Você ainda tem feito trade com o intuito de obter lucro ou é mais por diversão mesmo? Li que 90% dos traders perdem dinheiro e muitos poucos são bem aventurados, o simples hold ainda parece ser uma boa opção. Até o @sabotag3x que uma vez sempre falava um monte de análise grafica está quietão faz meses, perdeu tudo nessa brincadeira será? ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Desculpem o off-topic.... quanto ao assunto do OP, também já gastei muito com taxas de exchanges, principalmente no mercado brasileiro que é matador nesse quesito. Acho que tem gente que consegue tirar um dinheiro com trade sim. Mas isso que voce falou é verdade: a maioria esmagadora perde dinheiro. Além disso, quando voce faz hold ninguem ganha dinheiro, somente você. Quadno vc faz trade, voce paga dezenas de taxas (taxa de compra, taxa de venda, taxa de saque, taxa de deposito, etc etc). E fica nesse loop infinito de taxas. É assim que as exchanges ganham dinheiro, incentivando voce a fazer trades. Te mandam cursos free, propagandas, historias de sucesso, etc etc E de veradde mesmo, por mais que o cara tire 10-20, até 30% por mes com trade, ele gasta muitos neuronios. Ele nunca vai conseguir deixar lá uma quantidade significativa de dinheiro em trades. Diferente de um holder. Se o cara botou 10 mil em bitcoin no comeco de 2017 e nao sacou até hoje, esse dinheiro já virou uns 200 mil. E nao foi nada pro bolso de exchanges.
|
|
|
|