Shouldn't we find a global layer of mineral deposits correspondent to flooding?  Yes. And we do. On every continent are found layers of sedimentary rocks over vast areas. Many of these sediment layers can be traced all the way across continents, and even between continents. Furthermore, when geologists look closely at these rocks, they find evidence that the sediments were deposited rapidly. You realize you're quoting science for the justification of your answer? Science that you previously have been railing against as unreliable and incapable of giving us objective truth? You can't have it both ways. I have no problem with science! In fact, observable science confirms that there was intelligent design in every living thing to the smallest of atoms. What I have a problem with is what is masquerading as science today, theories of how the earth supposedly came to be and now being taught as fact. That is a huge problem.  YOU HAVE NO UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE! How can a person who is as ignorant as you are on a subject, claim to understand it enough to form an opinion. What are your thoughts about the born interpretation of quantum mechanics? Do you think k-space is a suitable model for quantum energy states in Silicon semiconductors, considering the asymmetrical band formations? Or really simple, since you claim formation of planetary bodies is made up nonsense... Prove that kepler's laws are a consequence of conservation of angular momentum or how to resolve the asymptotic nature of the inverse square law using the dirac delta. You surely are able to equally discuss all topics you are uninformed about. You see, you are so ignorant, you don't even know how ignorant you are. You, quite literally, have no idea how deep the rabbit hole goes. I have never claimed to know it all. I am fully aware that there are plenty of people with higher IQ's and a greater understanding of science, quantum mechanics, physics and so on. But thankfully God has promised that he would use the foolish things to confound the "wise." The intelligence of man is not enough to pay the price needed to enter heaven. I trust God more than man. You can trust in "science" and man's intelligence and your own intelligence. You certainly have that choice. But all I am saying is that there will be consequences for that choice. I have had many debates with people over these things. It seems like there is a common thinking that if someone doesn't believe in heaven or hell then they won't be accountable for the choices they make. They think that if they don't believe in it, then it doesn't exist. But if heaven and hell exists then does our belief or disbelief change that fact? Here is an example. Let's say that there were people on a very tall and high plateau and all around the plateau was a giant cliff. If anyone walked off the cliff they would certainly die. Most people were wearing blindfolds but some of us chose to take off the blindfold and we saw the cliff so we started to warn those around us that that they really needed to take off their blindfolds and look and see it for themselves! We begged them to take the cliff seriously but they were certain that there was no cliff there and that we were just imagining it. In fact, they said that we were the crazy ones for even saying that there was one there at all. So one by one the people would walk towards the edge and fall to their death. Would just believing it is not there cause them not to walk over the edge? So in other words fuck science, I'd rather just believe in this old book book lalala I can't hear you over my being saved. The bolded text is a huge misunderstanding, atheists don't think they can do whatever they want just because there is no afterlife. On the contrary, we think this is the only chance we have so why would we want to screw it up? I certainly don't want to spend the one life I have rotting away in a cell. If a book is all that's keeping you from tossing out your morals then please keep believing, I'd rather not have a mass shooting because you think there are no consequences. Last, your metaphore is completely inaccurate, as no religion/mythology has more proof than another. Of the thousands of beliefs through out human history why should we believe any of them, much less a specific one? Observing the world around us has proven that we evolved, there is plenty of evidence if you want to actually read up on it instead of claiming there is none. The only science I do not agree with is the science that is not based on observation. I don't understand why this is even an issue. Just because I don't agree with the evolutionary teaching should not imply that I don't value science. The fact that you believe this life is all there is a very sad and depressing thought. This life is pretty messed up in case you haven't noticed. I had a pastor that once said that this is the closest to hell we as Christians will ever be. But then I realized that this is the closest thing to heaven many people who do not accept Jesus will ever experience.  Yes there are many religions and many of them have a common moral thread. However, Jesus said, "I am the way the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." I would think that the religions that say that any path is valid, following Christianity would be a wise choice then (kills two birds with one stone). For most religions however, they all have the idea that we can earn our way to heaven or nirvana. Christianity is the only religion that is not about what we do in our own strength but entirely about what God has done and our response to that. It takes humility to accept that we are not smart enough or good enough to earn our own way though. People generally would rather find a way to do things themselves instead of admit that they are powerless to do something. Also, a thought that should cause some thought, is that Christianity is the ONLY religion that has an "anti-religion" formed against it in the form of Satanism. For some reason this resonated with my husband and he really thought that was interesting and proof that Christianity is the most valid of them all. In a way, it is Satan showing "his hand" so to speak. He does that sometimes. Please talk to a psychiatrist, you seem to have very severe depression if you hate living on this planet. Not even being Sarcastic. Back to the topic, the science of evolution is based on observation. We have made organisms evolve in a lab right before our eyes. Dog breeding works the same except with humans deciding which traits to keep instead of nature. We can observe our common ancestors by looking at the body compared to other primates. While the fossil record is not complete, what we have so far points to evolution. I don't believe in spiderman because there are fans of his enemies, that is pretty much the logic you're going on for saying satanism proves it. Same with saying gods word proves it, says so right there in the comic that he is real! |
|
|
|
Shouldn't we find a global layer of mineral deposits correspondent to flooding? Yes. And we do. On every continent are found layers of sedimentary rocks over vast areas. Many of these sediment layers can be traced all the way across continents, and even between continents. Furthermore, when geologists look closely at these rocks, they find evidence that the sediments were deposited rapidly. You realize you're quoting science for the justification of your answer? Science that you previously have been railing against as unreliable and incapable of giving us objective truth? You can't have it both ways. I have no problem with science! In fact, observable science confirms that there was intelligent design in every living thing to the smallest of atoms. What I have a problem with is what is masquerading as science today, theories of how the earth supposedly came to be and now being taught as fact. That is a huge problem. YOU HAVE NO UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE! How can a person who is as ignorant as you are on a subject, claim to understand it enough to form an opinion. What are your thoughts about the born interpretation of quantum mechanics? Do you think k-space is a suitable model for quantum energy states in Silicon semiconductors, considering the asymmetrical band formations? Or really simple, since you claim formation of planetary bodies is made up nonsense... Prove that kepler's laws are a consequence of conservation of angular momentum or how to resolve the asymptotic nature of the inverse square law using the dirac delta. You surely are able to equally discuss all topics you are uninformed about. You see, you are so ignorant, you don't even know how ignorant you are. You, quite literally, have no idea how deep the rabbit hole goes. I have never claimed to know it all. I am fully aware that there are plenty of people with higher IQ's and a greater understanding of science, quantum mechanics, physics and so on. But thankfully God has promised that he would use the foolish things to confound the "wise." The intelligence of man is not enough to pay the price needed to enter heaven. I trust God more than man. You can trust in "science" and man's intelligence and your own intelligence. You certainly have that choice. But all I am saying is that there will be consequences for that choice. I have had many debates with people over these things. It seems like there is a common thinking that if someone doesn't believe in heaven or hell then they won't be accountable for the choices they make. They think that if they don't believe in it, then it doesn't exist. But if heaven and hell exists then does our belief or disbelief change that fact? Here is an example. Let's say that there were people on a very tall and high plateau and all around the plateau was a giant cliff. If anyone walked off the cliff they would certainly die. Most people were wearing blindfolds but some of us chose to take off the blindfold and we saw the cliff so we started to warn those around us that that they really needed to take off their blindfolds and look and see it for themselves! We begged them to take the cliff seriously but they were certain that there was no cliff there and that we were just imagining it. In fact, they said that we were the crazy ones for even saying that there was one there at all. So one by one the people would walk towards the edge and fall to their death. Would just believing it is not there cause them not to walk over the edge? So in other words fuck science, I'd rather just believe in this old book book lalala I can't hear you over my being saved. The bolded text is a huge misunderstanding, atheists don't think they can do whatever they want just because there is no afterlife. On the contrary, we think this is the only chance we have so why would we want to screw it up? I certainly don't want to spend the one life I have rotting away in a cell. If a book is all that's keeping you from tossing out your morals then please keep believing, I'd rather not have a mass shooting because you think there are no consequences. Last, your metaphore is completely inaccurate, as no religion/mythology has more proof than another. Of the thousands of beliefs through out human history why should we believe any of them, much less a specific one? Observing the world around us has proven that we evolved, there is plenty of evidence if you want to actually read up on it instead of claiming there is none. |
|
|
|
I think you should be able to take whatever kind of drugs you like, but I've noticed that a lot of the 'legal highs' that are made to emulate illegal drugs have insane side effects. Spice is supposed to be like weed, but I've never heard of anybody losing their sanity from smoking a blunt. Legalize it all  |
|
|
|
|
Every one of your vouch posts is from a newbie account and you expect people to trust you with Paypal? lol...
|
|
|
|
Someone need's to tell them bible bashers how many tree's died to show us the bible is an inanimate object, and cannot be 'alive', that's like saying god existed before everything else, including non-existance.. Ps, dont mention or ask where the water came from, the water god moved OVER the face of, before the earth was formed  How the fuck god moved over the FACE of the water which had ZERO ground to keep it in place.. yet this water was clearly contained enough to reflect that which moved over it's (deep) face.. And just as I was about to make coffee, god say's.. remind them I am the light.. created in the third day Before then it was dark. Decky, you have a lot of things backward, but you are giving me the opportunity to say something about the atheists that I have always wanted to say. An atheist is a person who can look up at the sky, anytime, and see that it is blue. But the moment that some scientist proves, mathematically or scientifically, that the sky is red, or it is green, or it is yellow, or that it doesn't have any color at all, then that is the thing the atheist will spout from now on... even though he can look up at any time and see it is blue. That would never happen short of all of humanity being in a mass hallucination, as science is nothing but observations of the world around us. Meanwhile, a religious person says the sky is pink because their holy book said so That would be one thing if every observer of a scientists writings expressed only what the scientist said. Or if the many non-scientists understood what the scientist meant. But this doesn't happen the majority of the time. Because of this, the atheists are more to be pitied than all other propagandized people. Your desire to be ignorant is entertaining really. You've come up with so many fallacies and nonsense arguments for a god, but are unable to cite a single good source that shows evidence of one, then you say that atheists should be pitied because we blindly take what we hear, even though the scientific evidence has been reviewed by other scientists time and time again. Coming from somebody that thought the Higgs Boson proved god just because of it's nickname, you really don't have room to talk there Keep trying. Or maybe start trying? Sooner or later, if you try hard enough, you will see through the haze of faith in your religion, so that you can finally see the truth. I could sit here all day and dismantle your terrible arguments for a god, but you'll just keep coming up with new ones. You proved with the Higgs Boson you literally do 0 research before spewing out false info. It's really kinda funny that you belittle the person that has proved every thing you've said to me in this thread wrong. Believe what you want, but there is no evidence. Oh, and atheism isn't a religion Again, the strong evidence is found in (among other things) these: 1. There is simply no evidence of anything other than entropy, so how did all this start? 2. We see no evidence of complex machinery without a machine maker, so where did the complex universe machine come from? 3. There is no such thing as pure random, so there is no way that the complex universe could have happened by accident. 4. The fact of consciousness and conscience within people defies all scientific tracking except a very external one. So, when are you going to recognize the evidence and stop parroting the no-evidence idea? Or are you some kind of a political science propagandist? 1: big crunch seems to be the leading theory right now. Lack of knowledge doesn't prove a god 2: fine-tuned universe fallacy 3: makes no sense 4: God of the gaps, and we do understand consciousness on a basic level. Soon we will understand it more C'mon, give me a challenge  See? That's precisely the point. Anybody can simply say that they don't accept what was said somewhere else. If you study the 4 points I made above, you would see God. I understand how that might scare the heck out of you. But heck is just another word for hell, and you would feel a whole lot better with a whole lot less of hell in you. Thank you for threatening to burn me in a eternal fire instead of countering my points |
|
|
|
Someone need's to tell them bible bashers how many tree's died to show us the bible is an inanimate object, and cannot be 'alive', that's like saying god existed before everything else, including non-existance.. Ps, dont mention or ask where the water came from, the water god moved OVER the face of, before the earth was formed How the fuck god moved over the FACE of the water which had ZERO ground to keep it in place.. yet this water was clearly contained enough to reflect that which moved over it's (deep) face.. And just as I was about to make coffee, god say's.. remind them I am the light.. created in the third day Before then it was dark. Decky, you have a lot of things backward, but you are giving me the opportunity to say something about the atheists that I have always wanted to say. An atheist is a person who can look up at the sky, anytime, and see that it is blue. But the moment that some scientist proves, mathematically or scientifically, that the sky is red, or it is green, or it is yellow, or that it doesn't have any color at all, then that is the thing the atheist will spout from now on... even though he can look up at any time and see it is blue. That would never happen short of all of humanity being in a mass hallucination, as science is nothing but observations of the world around us. Meanwhile, a religious person says the sky is pink because their holy book said so That would be one thing if every observer of a scientists writings expressed only what the scientist said. Or if the many non-scientists understood what the scientist meant. But this doesn't happen the majority of the time. Because of this, the atheists are more to be pitied than all other propagandized people. Your desire to be ignorant is entertaining really. You've come up with so many fallacies and nonsense arguments for a god, but are unable to cite a single good source that shows evidence of one, then you say that atheists should be pitied because we blindly take what we hear, even though the scientific evidence has been reviewed by other scientists time and time again. Coming from somebody that thought the Higgs Boson proved god just because of it's nickname, you really don't have room to talk there Keep trying. Or maybe start trying? Sooner or later, if you try hard enough, you will see through the haze of faith in your religion, so that you can finally see the truth. I could sit here all day and dismantle your terrible arguments for a god, but you'll just keep coming up with new ones. You proved with the Higgs Boson you literally do 0 research before spewing out false info. It's really kinda funny that you belittle the person that has proved every thing you've said to me in this thread wrong. Believe what you want, but there is no evidence. Oh, and atheism isn't a religion Again, the strong evidence is found in (among other things) these: 1. There is simply no evidence of anything other than entropy, so how did all this start? 2. We see no evidence of complex machinery without a machine maker, so where did the complex universe machine come from? 3. There is no such thing as pure random, so there is no way that the complex universe could have happened by accident. 4. The fact of consciousness and conscience within people defies all scientific tracking except a very external one. So, when are you going to recognize the evidence and stop parroting the no-evidence idea? Or are you some kind of a political science propagandist? 1: big crunch seems to be the leading theory right now. Lack of knowledge doesn't prove a god 2: fine-tuned universe fallacy 3: makes no sense 4: How exactly does being conscious prove there is a god? We understand how it works on a basic level and are learning more about it every day C'mon, give me a challenge |
|
|
|
Someone need's to tell them bible bashers how many tree's died to show us the bible is an inanimate object, and cannot be 'alive', that's like saying god existed before everything else, including non-existance.. Ps, dont mention or ask where the water came from, the water god moved OVER the face of, before the earth was formed How the fuck god moved over the FACE of the water which had ZERO ground to keep it in place.. yet this water was clearly contained enough to reflect that which moved over it's (deep) face.. And just as I was about to make coffee, god say's.. remind them I am the light.. created in the third day Before then it was dark. Decky, you have a lot of things backward, but you are giving me the opportunity to say something about the atheists that I have always wanted to say. An atheist is a person who can look up at the sky, anytime, and see that it is blue. But the moment that some scientist proves, mathematically or scientifically, that the sky is red, or it is green, or it is yellow, or that it doesn't have any color at all, then that is the thing the atheist will spout from now on... even though he can look up at any time and see it is blue. That would never happen short of all of humanity being in a mass hallucination, as science is nothing but observations of the world around us. Meanwhile, a religious person says the sky is pink because their holy book said so That would be one thing if every observer of a scientists writings expressed only what the scientist said. Or if the many non-scientists understood what the scientist meant. But this doesn't happen the majority of the time. Because of this, the atheists are more to be pitied than all other propagandized people. Your desire to be ignorant is entertaining really. You've come up with so many fallacies and nonsense arguments for a god, but are unable to cite a single good source that shows evidence of one, then you say that atheists should be pitied because we blindly take what we hear, even though the scientific evidence has been reviewed by other scientists time and time again. Coming from somebody that thought the Higgs Boson proved god just because of it's nickname, you really don't have room to talk there Keep trying. Or maybe start trying? Sooner or later, if you try hard enough, you will see through the haze of faith in your religion, so that you can finally see the truth. I could sit here all day and dismantle your terrible arguments for a god, but you'll just keep coming up with new ones. You proved with the Higgs Boson you literally do 0 research before spewing out false info. It's really kinda funny that you belittle the person that has proved every thing you've said to me in this thread wrong. Believe what you want, but there is no evidence. Oh, and atheism isn't a religion |
|
|
|
Someone need's to tell them bible bashers how many tree's died to show us the bible is an inanimate object, and cannot be 'alive', that's like saying god existed before everything else, including non-existance.. Ps, dont mention or ask where the water came from, the water god moved OVER the face of, before the earth was formed How the fuck god moved over the FACE of the water which had ZERO ground to keep it in place.. yet this water was clearly contained enough to reflect that which moved over it's (deep) face.. And just as I was about to make coffee, god say's.. remind them I am the light.. created in the third day Before then it was dark. Decky, you have a lot of things backward, but you are giving me the opportunity to say something about the atheists that I have always wanted to say. An atheist is a person who can look up at the sky, anytime, and see that it is blue. But the moment that some scientist proves, mathematically or scientifically, that the sky is red, or it is green, or it is yellow, or that it doesn't have any color at all, then that is the thing the atheist will spout from now on... even though he can look up at any time and see it is blue. That would never happen short of all of humanity being in a mass hallucination, as science is nothing but observations of the world around us. Meanwhile, a religious person says the sky is pink because their holy book said so That would be one thing if every observer of a scientists writings expressed only what the scientist said. Or if the many non-scientists understood what the scientist meant. But this doesn't happen the majority of the time. Because of this, the atheists are more to be pitied than all other propagandized people. Your desire to be ignorant is entertaining really. You've come up with so many fallacies and nonsense arguments for a god, but are unable to cite a single good source that shows evidence of one, then you say that atheists should be pitied because we blindly take what we hear, even though the scientific evidence has been reviewed by other scientists time and time again. Coming from somebody that thought the Higgs Boson proved god just because of it's nickname, you really don't have room to talk there |
|
|
|
Someone need's to tell them bible bashers how many tree's died to show us the bible is an inanimate object, and cannot be 'alive', that's like saying god existed before everything else, including non-existance.. Ps, dont mention or ask where the water came from, the water god moved OVER the face of, before the earth was formed How the fuck god moved over the FACE of the water which had ZERO ground to keep it in place.. yet this water was clearly contained enough to reflect that which moved over it's (deep) face.. And just as I was about to make coffee, god say's.. remind them I am the light.. created in the third day Before then it was dark. Decky, you have a lot of things backward, but you are giving me the opportunity to say something about the atheists that I have always wanted to say. An atheist is a person who can look up at the sky, anytime, and see that it is blue. But the moment that some scientist proves, mathematically or scientifically, that the sky is red, or it is green, or it is yellow, or that it doesn't have any color at all, then that is the thing the atheist will spout from now on... even though he can look up at any time and see it is blue. That would never happen short of all of humanity being in a mass hallucination, as science is nothing but observations of the world around us. Meanwhile, a religious person says the sky is pink because their holy book said so |
|
|
|
|
Would something like this be legal? You're essentially creating a mob of people to harass and slow down somebody's website
|
|
|
|
Huh? The scientific proof of God is in the fact that we found the Higgs Boson. Now that we have found this elusive, little particle, just ask Steven Hawking what he calls it. The God particle. It'll be an interesting day if they ever find two of them at the same time. There probably is only ONE in the whole universe. The name 'The God Particle' has absolutely nothing to do with proving/disproving a god. The name was given based on this book. Many physicists also think that there may be more than one type of Higgs Boson: http://dujs.dartmouth.edu/physical_sciences/physicists-indicate-existence-of-multiple-higgs-bosons |
|
|
|
So soccer moms getting mad over a violent game... what else is new  |
|
|
|
How about celebration when BTC his 4200 instead....
We'll do it again then |
|
|
|
Feckin hell, go away for a while, come back and look at the depths of depravity this thread has sunk to!
There was a time when this inevitable conversation came up between myself, and son and daughter, and my lad asks, why is rape so bad? I answer in the best pc way I can think of, trying not to offend my daughter.. um.. The thing with sex bud, is that the womans body is designed to receive pleasure from the act of having sex, and this is why rape is so bad. And those who rape should be shot. My girl jumps in, and what if the girl gets pregnant? I say, well, touch wood it dont happen to you, but if it did, I'd like to think ma wee girl would get rid of it, since getting pregnant is nothing more than an act of pure love, and I'd hate to think you would want a rapists kid, for then you'd be admitting, you 'loved', and will continue to do so. It's a sad husband that sticks with a wife who keeps a rapists kid. You may like the idea that it's not the kid's fault. I agree. By even thinking it's acceptable to give birth to a rapists kid.. ouch.. glad am no a woman in this department, but then you know I'd get rid of it..
The problem with this kinda crap, is that, thanks to the gays, having a rapists kid is becoming more and more acceptable as woman dumps family, so that there are 10 women for every man (Albert Pike - Morals and Dogma) and becomes so desperate for sex, anything becomes acceptable, including paying men under the guise of 'friend's - with benefit's lol..
Thing is, what does this have to do with god?
Edit: Watch the japanese movie 'star of david'
Now tell me you'd have a rapist's kid? Sad!!
Whaaaa? What in the living fuck does people being attracted to the same sex have to do with women having rapists' kids?! If a child needs a home they might take one in, that doesn't mean they're contributing to it, just helping out a child that needs a home. Condoms break too, is it gay people's fault that they aren't aborting? There is no (and will be no) shortage of straight guys for women to fuck, and vice versa I have to admit, it's one thing trying to sell the idea of god and the straight path etc, it's another to know these things are so fuckin wrong, hence the decimation you witness before you, of all life on this planet. When sex cases become more wanted and defended than good old family values, we're all fucked.. yeah, it's harder to get the camel through the eye of a needle than walk the straight path.. I've personally got nowt against gays, was even at the first gay wedding in scotland, when my kids gran (not my mum) got, lol, married.. wtf? Even her laddie said it, it's so wrong, but what can we do? And jump on the dude who started the rape stuff, I only answered my opinion of the time based on what I read, I'm sure god in his wisdom knows where I come from, but where do you fit in here? Edit: It's been since gays were made 'acceptable' that the tide turned, and I'll write something I know of on facebook, though I'm not a member there, my cousin is model material, and in the eye's of others, sexy as fuck, the kinda chick you want in a nightclub knowing as long as she's there, the club will be packed, when her and her pals leave, the club empties to whatever after party she went to, now imagine this kinda chick turnin up at ministry of sound only to be told she's not allowed in because shes not gay, and it was'nt even a gay night..
I would back the church up anyday if they remembered the 13th century and killed all the dirty fuckers..
And no I'm not homophobic.. these cunts are nowt but sex cases period. I mean, c'mon, there was a time when men feared jail in case they got raped, now, they prob look forward to going for the free ride..Again, whaaaa? Last time I checked they don't turn people away at the door gay or straight, gay nights are just more focused on them where it can be out in the open. How would they even check for that at the door, a gaydar? There is nothing objectively wrong with being gay, who somebody chooses to love is their choice and they should have the same rights as straight people. You can't go around killing people because they like to live differently than you. I sincerely hope your children do not grow up to hate the same as you You can't turn a gay guy straight, and you can't turn a straight guy gay. As to where I fit in, I think that the unfortunate woman that was raped should be the only one making the calls on what to do with a child. |
|
|
|
Feckin hell, go away for a while, come back and look at the depths of depravity this thread has sunk to!
There was a time when this inevitable conversation came up between myself, and son and daughter, and my lad asks, why is rape so bad? I answer in the best pc way I can think of, trying not to offend my daughter.. um.. The thing with sex bud, is that the womans body is designed to receive pleasure from the act of having sex, and this is why rape is so bad. And those who rape should be shot. My girl jumps in, and what if the girl gets pregnant? I say, well, touch wood it dont happen to you, but if it did, I'd like to think ma wee girl would get rid of it, since getting pregnant is nothing more than an act of pure love, and I'd hate to think you would want a rapists kid, for then you'd be admitting, you 'loved', and will continue to do so. It's a sad husband that sticks with a wife who keeps a rapists kid. You may like the idea that it's not the kid's fault. I agree. By even thinking it's acceptable to give birth to a rapists kid.. ouch.. glad am no a woman in this department, but then you know I'd get rid of it..
The problem with this kinda crap, is that, thanks to the gays, having a rapists kid is becoming more and more acceptable as woman dumps family, so that there are 10 women for every man (Albert Pike - Morals and Dogma) and becomes so desperate for sex, anything becomes acceptable, including paying men under the guise of 'friend's - with benefit's lol..
Thing is, what does this have to do with god?
Edit: Watch the japanese movie 'star of david'
Now tell me you'd have a rapist's kid? Sad!!
Whaaaa? What in the living fuck does people being attracted to the same sex have to do with women having rapists' kids?! If a child needs a home they might take one in, that doesn't mean they're contributing to it, just helping out a child that needs a home. Condoms break too, is it gay people's fault that they aren't aborting? There is no (and will be no) shortage of straight guys for women to fuck, and vice versa |
|
|
|
"It's for the children!" is what they say whenever they want to invade your rights  |
|
|
|
Religion is all about geography so stop arguing. You just can't win against hc christians, they just won't listen to the arguments or even consider them and from what I'm seeing here, bible means shit, because everyone can understand it as they want to, like a blank paper, draw what you want. Also... All Hail Odin, King of Asgard!
Atheists are so willful that they can talk themselves out of the evidence that virtually proves God: 1. the machine quality of the universe; machines need makers; 2. the fact of no pure random; everything operates by cause and effect, action and reaction; Who or What is the Great First Cause that actually used pure random to set up the machine of the universe; 3. NOBODY has a valid understanding of consciousness or conscience, because they are of such a complicated, complex realm entirely. Now, if the so called atheist woke up to the above, he/she would be able to partake of the search for which god is the real God.
Just 'cause you (and everyone else) are so ignorant that we can't track a molecule of air on its course around the world. But if someone finally figured out a way to do this, they probably couldn't figure out a way to track millions of them at the same time. They all operate by cause and effect.
What? I didn't deny that cause and effect exists, I simply pointed out that the universe being able to support life does not mean there is a creator, as if it wasn't we wouldn't be here to discuss it. Can't even conceive of something "outside" of the universe, can you? Nobody can. But we can conceive of the idea enough to realize that there just might be, and that if there is, it would be extremely different than both, anything in the universe, and even different than the IDEA OF DIFFERENT itself.
All you're saying is that because we don't know the first cause, it must be a god. It's a huge leap to go from we don't know to it's god, and you have no evidence to support that leap. A lack of knowledge does not prove something supernatural. Such is your wilfulness to remain ignorant.
Nice job attacking me instead of countering the argument. A long time ago we had no idea the earth revolved around the sun, now we know exactly how it works. Soon we will understand the human mind too. Believe what you want, but there is no evidence for it |
|
|
|
Religion is all about geography so stop arguing. You just can't win against hc christians, they just won't listen to the arguments or even consider them and from what I'm seeing here, bible means shit, because everyone can understand it as they want to, like a blank paper, draw what you want. Also... All Hail Odin, King of Asgard!
Atheists are so willful that they can talk themselves out of the evidence that virtually proves God: 1. the machine quality of the universe; machines need makers; 2. the fact of no pure random; everything operates by cause and effect, action and reaction; Who or What is the Great first Cause; 3. NOBODY has a valid understanding of consciousness or conscience, because they are of such a complicated, complex realm entirely. Now, if the so called atheist woke up to the above, he/she would be able to partake of the search for which god is the real God. 1: Fine-tuned universe fallacy 2: So everything has to have been caused by something, but fuck all the rules god didn't so he has to be real. Real sound logic 3: Yeah, that doesn't prove god, just that we don't know something |
|
|
|
.56 x 4
Missed it |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
