Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 08:10:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 »
781  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: MASTER'S SCAMMER LIST on: March 06, 2013, 01:18:24 PM
Everyone who does stuff like this turns out to be a troll and/or abuse the power the community places in them. Micon is just one example, there are many others.

How do we know we can trust you to be responsible with a list like this?

It might be to late for this one. He said he wanted to make a list of confirmed scammers and the power to make judgment calls has gone to his head and he keeps trying to inject himself deep into discussions. I flipped sublime off ignore to see what kind of drama he was going to stir with this and I'm probably going to hit the button again.

With the total lack of power invested in me I dub this: "The Ignored Scammers and Drama List Similar to Tomatocage's List"

A list of scammer tagged people would be useful. This started with a similar list, added a more pretentious title, and now he's yet another unelected representative of the community.
782  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Liquid stores of wealth ideal for Bitcoin traders? on: March 06, 2013, 12:57:23 PM
Gold? Maybe, but it's going through a bubble cycle right now too.  Plus transaction fees... cost prohibitive.  Then moving back into BC will be a hassle too.
Digital gold, like goldmoney?  Maybe.  But I can't do a straight goldmoney to BC buy later on.
Silver?  Same issues as gold.

Platinum might be an option, scarcity and the number of fairly unique industrial uses really help to set function price floor. That along with gold and silver are things you can take to a local coin dealer or pawnshop to get cash as long as you take acquire bullion. A healthy mix of metals can help lessen price shocks. As long as there's a dealer near you it is hard to beat the liquidity.

Digital Gold and anything like Liberty Reserve I'd avoid as long term stores of anything. They might be useful to put something in to pull off a transaction, but the risk of them becoming useless is necessarily high.

Can tell I haven't slept in a while; I saw "liquid stores of wealth" and thought you'd be extolling the virtues of stockpiling vodka.

Cashing out some bitcoins to build up the liquor stock wouldn't be a bad idea right now.
783  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BitBillions New on: March 06, 2013, 12:42:56 PM
Well the revenue share will be monthly

But with the risk of the business not making it that far, do you have an answer to the much better returns I could be making with College Basketball?
At this stage, short term it may be better, but my answer would be this is a chance to take part in something that will give long term returns, without having to study the form. I wont say without risk because any startup is a risk. If successful those with the first 5000 positions will benefit greatly. So will many others but not by as much. 

Update: Missouri destroyed their spread in that last bet I mentioned. And my initial basketball betting has achieved a return of 3.5 times its initial ticket in a bit more than a day.

Once upon a time there was a low knowledge bitcoin investment vehicle. Many people were attracted to it because it offered incredible returns in spite of presenting little knowledge about what it actually did to generate returns. It paid regularly as promised until it didn't. Some people made money, but the the vast majority lost massively.

With the complete lack of information, which includes anything about the startup operator or their reputation, what is there? There's the generic assertion this might reward initial investors handsomely. There is also a name for the operation with one letter changed from the name of an online lottery website. Also there's this:

Revenue will be generated through advertising, premium communication services, payment processing, currency exchanges, sales of books, sales of music, sales of movies, and many other income producing mediums.

...with out business plan for any single one of these activities. At least Jay Van Andel and Richard DeVos had previously run businesses before they founded Amway, and they did start off having a product to sell.

If you happen to actually not be the operator of this site, I worry for you for matters beyond this investment you are making. You seem to have appallingly poor judgement. At least this guy could blame the alcohol when the thrill of the chase overpowered his judgment. Have you considered incorporating a helmet into your daily wear? You write well enough that stupidity alone can't be the problem here. Your complete lack of any preservation instinct and determination to continue sauntering this path while scorning all advisement to the contrary suggest some things (once again assuming you don't operate this). The first is that you might want to consider surrendering the management of your finances to a court appointed guardian. Also with this disabling lack of judgment you should have a professional come to your residence and "you proof" it for your safety. Consulting a doctor to look for a medical reason why you might happen to be so deficient in judgment shouldn't be out of the question, things might be so bad around the clock skilled nursing care might vastly improve your quality of life.

Go. Get the help you need. You don't have to live like this anymore. Unless you happen to operate BitBillions and then you can fuck off
784  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Coinbase: a description on: March 05, 2013, 08:55:16 AM
I'm going to buy a bag of weed for you but I need the money up front. You'll see me again in 3, 4 or 5 days. Maybe a little longer.

When I get back to you, I don't have the weed but I do have your money. I used your pledge, and the pledges of others, so that I could buy a pound of weed and distribute it amongst my friends. If we keep doing this deal, sometimes you might get some weed.

Your story needs more Wall Street in it.

Change it from weed to powder?
785  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BitBillions New on: March 05, 2013, 08:54:23 AM
Well the revenue share will be monthly

But with the risk of the business not making it that far, do you have an answer to the much better returns I could be making with College Basketball?
786  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: PrimeAsic - 80 Ghash/sec Asic Miner on: March 05, 2013, 08:42:56 AM
yet, if this is a scam, why would they propose 'picking it up locally'?



Hope no one beats BitBet's security scheme this way... My penny bets on the World Baseball Classic would disappear, and I guess the bigger ones would to. Be a hell of a way to lose at gambling.
787  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: PrimeAsic - 80 Ghash/sec Asic Miner on: March 05, 2013, 08:21:14 AM
Well, I am here now - in front of the building. So far nothing. The number is still unresponsive.

maybe he's just late... don't loose faith!

if there will be any local pickup asics, kilometer long line would form Smiley

Yeah, grab me a couple...and a coke. ASICs make me thirsty.



and a portion of goulash for me, thanks! Smiley

I might have to pick up some Egri Bikaver later if the ASIC gets demonstrated today.
788  Other / Off-topic / Re: Completely random hypothetical question on: March 05, 2013, 08:06:06 AM
Lets assume a very reputable member on the forums is asking to be payed first before he ships a product.
Or if he is asking for a loan and is given a big loan of BTC.
He agrees to pay you back, with interest.

Now assuming, what would happen if he died the following night?
Since he is dead he would never be able to pay your loan back,
and you and all the other members would never know?

Assuming your family doesn't know about bitcoins, and only you do.

He would have all the qualities of being a scammer? No communications,
No information, no pay-date, or any post that shows willingness to pay it.
Wouldn't it fit all the qualities of a scammer?

Would this account be flagged as a scammer after a month or two?
And then be left like that in the dust forever?

What exactly would happen?

After all people do win the lottery, and dying on a given day is more likely to happen
then you ever hitting the lottery jackpot in your given lifetime. So its not impossible.

I'm not sure. How long does AmazingRando stay quiet while not paying?
789  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BitBillions New on: March 05, 2013, 07:48:32 AM
Since returns on your endorsed vehicle are BTC denominated in dollars for non-refering investors there is a chance that if BTC keeps going up a regular investment might never be made whole even if the enterprise takes in many dollars and might be a conventional success.

Not sure what you mean by this. returns are given in BTC yes but as you know BTC can be given in part. All over here you hear about 0.001BTC etc. The only part that is currently set at a certain amount is the donation to be a founder member. That is currently set at 1 BTC or equivalent through GFM. Maybe if BTC goes up significantly they will lower the amount, of that I am not sure. Anything can happen. As for regular investment, I really not sure what you mean, what regular investment are you talking about?

By regular I mean one where I'm not counting on referrals to get paid.
790  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What are Devcoins? on: March 05, 2013, 07:43:28 AM
Other than that it's mainly intended to be an alternative funding program rather than a cryptocurrency (due to centralized control of distribution). It's running reasonably consistent to their stated goals (funding open source development) I guess, because I don't see too many complaints to its distribution model.

That's how I wrap my head around it. A portion of each block goes to miners so it isn't completely worth excluding from merged mining, but the vast majority are awarded through bounties. They are rather transparent about how things work, and I've managed to get paid.

The odd part compared to other cryptos that work off of a foundation is that rather than awarding a percent of the block or a fixed amount they pay off of a share of what each 4000 block round generates. Your address goes on a list one time for each share you have on a list. When a round starts each address gets paid as a block is solved round robin style until the round ends.

So the coins go to developers, musicians etc. Where do they go from there? Who would then take them as payment?
I don't think it matters for people to take them as payment. Developers/open source people receive their devcoin grant and trade it for BTC or dollars on an exchange. People wishing to support the grants can buy devcoins on the exchange as a way of keeping the value high enough for the grantees to get a good rate. So one could look at buying devcoins on the exchange as a way of supporting deveopment in the fields that devcoin gives grants to.

Pretty much. Vircurex is the easiest place to cash them in, but there is at least one Open Transactions Server exchanges Devcoins that offers a better rate. There are some nice Arbitrage opportunities for people who can get Open Transactions to work. I think at least a couple people involved are pretty excited about ripple because it might create some interesting new uses for them.

Ah ok! That makes sense. So you're saying it's a broad brush strokes way of promoting whatever projects the centralised committee/foundation is promoting at that point in time.

Intentionally that's quite a nice idea. I'm wondering what processes could be used to encourage the funding away from opinion/reactionary based methods of selection and toward scientific and evidence based selection… always a problem with committee driven policy.


The big bounties I know of right now involve developing content for the Devcoin wiki. There's probably others. I'm not really sure about the selection process.
791  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BitBillions New on: March 05, 2013, 06:50:04 AM
Why do you think it would be a poor investment? If you were to get 1 ref you have up to round 23% return. 10 refs you have doubled your original investment. If you are in the first 5000 positions (which currently it is) and they get 1 million revenue the 10% pool by itself would give back $20 worth of BTC per position. If that went up to 10M you are earning $200 per month with just that one pool. You would still earn from the other 5 pools as well.  Sure it depends on the revenue but for a one time cost (for first 10,000 positions), I would say that is a pretty good bet to make.

This of course assumes that the monetary buy in cost would be the biggest concern I'd have. It's that if this enterprise collapses and I'd referred enough people to see a return on my investment before then all of these people referred by me would not be happy.  I'd probably find myself a target for the vengeful mob which would form, and scorned bitcoiners get awfully nasty. Dealing with the fallout wouldn't be worth it.

That is the reason I joined this and not one of the hundreds or more of the other programs being thrown about. I have the same values, it's just that I have a different belief in what the outcome here will be.

I got a very nice return when Kansas easily beat the spread tonight. Almost doubled my money hours after buying in. Just because I want to make up for anything I might miss out on by not investing in this opportunity I'll throw all of the Kansas winnings plus some juice so I'm sending a round number on Missouri -10 to beat Arkansas. This is much riskier than the Kansas bet, but a win would multiply the initial ticket's value by 3.5 times. Notice I said ticket and not investment, because the thrill of the win or the zen of the loss is worth the price.

Since returns on your endorsed vehicle are BTC denominated in dollars for non-refering investors there is a chance that if BTC keeps going up a regular investment might never be made whole even if the enterprise takes in many dollars and might be a conventional success.
792  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: PrimeAsic - 80 Ghash/sec Asic Miner on: March 05, 2013, 06:08:50 AM

There's one really confident yes and a bunch of hesitant or very poor no bettors.

You have to admit coming from nowhere they have a hell of a publicity strategy. Given that they haven't taken any money yet, I'd probably call this a troll rather than a scam if this is just vaporware. Whipping all of these people into a frenzy like this, it would be one hell of a troll.

793  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BitBillions New on: March 04, 2013, 08:31:15 PM
Why do you think it would be a poor investment? If you were to get 1 ref you have up to round 23% return. 10 refs you have doubled your original investment. If you are in the first 5000 positions (which currently it is) and they get 1 million revenue the 10% pool by itself would give back $20 worth of BTC per position. If that went up to 10M you are earning $200 per month with just that one pool. You would still earn from the other 5 pools as well.  Sure it depends on the revenue but for a one time cost (for first 10,000 positions), I would say that is a pretty good bet to make.

This of course assumes that the monetary buy in cost would be the biggest concern I'd have. It's that if this enterprise collapses and I'd referred enough people to see a return on my investment before then all of these people referred by me would not be happy.  I'd probably find myself a target for the vengeful mob which would form, and scorned bitcoiners get awfully nasty. Dealing with the fallout wouldn't be worth it.

I'll take my chances on Kansas beating a 23.5 point spread over Texas Tech tonight.
794  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Android APG wont let me sign messages, on: March 04, 2013, 06:48:30 PM
Well k9 is working now, but cant figure out how to get APG to Sign a message....

It's been a while since I looked at it, but the last development activity I saw on APG was back in 2010...
795  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: private key rebuilding from scratch on: March 04, 2013, 06:45:52 PM
Electrum uses a deterministic algorithm for address generation (I'm not sure if MultiBit does).  Bitcoin-Qt and Blockchain.info do not.  They use random keys.

This means that if you have the seed for an Electrum wallet you can rebuild the entire wallet from the one seed.

However, if you have a private key from blockchain.info/wallet or Bitcoin-Qt, you can ONLY rebuild the one specific address that is generated from that key (and any unspent outputs for that address).  If you are using blockchain.info/wallet of BitCoin-Qt, then you need to make regular backups of the entire wallet (or at least of ALL the private keys in the wallet).  With blockchain.info, you need to create a new backup at least anytime you create a new address.  With blockchain.info, a new address (hidden from your view) is created every time you create a transaction to send bitcoins as well as every time you request a new address in the "receive coins" tab.  You need to create a new backup at least before 100 addresses are used.

Multibit doesn't yet have deterministic wallets, but it tends to be good about returning change to the sending address.
796  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: BitBillions New on: March 04, 2013, 06:39:57 PM
Would you like to bet that this is a ponzi / pyramid / scam, pirateat40 style?

Actually I just noticed your signature block. Unbelievable, you will waste money on gambling yet you wont even take a chance on something that is likely to be far more legit than the gambling sites you support.

You want to bet, try betting 1 BTC in this site and if the site is proven to be a scam by August, which is 1 month after it is supposed to launch, hell I'll give you a bitcoin back. I'm betting by then there is a lot more support for it as it will have proven to be more by then.

Gambling generally provides a certain kind of entertainment value at the very least. Being able to take a gambling loss on the chin while being sporting about it is generally an admirable trait. On the other hand with investments part of the aim is being able to expect some sort of return.

This venture seems like a poor investment even before the scam concerns enter. It even seems like a poor gamble on par with the Houston Astros to take the World Series this year. With the scam concerns it seems to be on par with betting less than 1 on Satoshidice except with substantially lower expected returns than from the dice game.
797  Other / MultiBit / Re: MultiBit on: March 02, 2013, 02:44:00 AM
I can sugest something? support for other coins as well, i men, wallets for namecoin, litecoin... all in a single client, that whould be great.

You could get one of those coin's developers to fork it...
798  Economy / Gambling / Re: Bit365.eu - Reduced Juice BTC Sports Betting - No Registration - Fast Payouts on: March 01, 2013, 11:33:20 PM
Apparently there are no extra innings in Spring training, so was Cards-Astros today a push?
799  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2013-02-28 Slashdot: Bitcoin hits new all-time high of 32 on: March 01, 2013, 11:50:24 AM
Let's not be critical of Slashdot, they made Bitcoin "famous" to begin with. Smiley
That's why there will probably be more anti-B astroturf than anywhere else. I don't know why you guys even bother wasting time interacting with trolls and astroturfers in such places, unless it's just fun for you.  Smiley

/. is only the worst place on the internet if you forget every other place...

Thank chance I had mod points to burn on that post.
800  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is Bitcoin the "one world currency" the elites want us to adopt? on: March 01, 2013, 10:31:26 AM
Maybe elites want you to adopt bitcoin.

The important question is which elites? The ones you feared or new benevolent ones?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!