BITCOIN 21 official launch is currently postponed until further notice.
Until digital currency exchanges are regulated and protected by the financial services authorities, and peoples investments are guaranteed it would be a bad decision to continue with the launch.
LULZ @ this.  If you want regulation, use fiat currency & banks - regulation works soooo well in the banking industry.....  EPIC FAIL COIN. So, by 21st April you're confident that the whole Bitcoin/Altcoin industry will be completely regulated.....  Should have said 1st April.... |
|
|
|
It would be nice to get the testnet/pro moving again for Cryptopia.
I tried setting up nodes, both with Uno testnet wallet and the Pro client, but it didn't help.
I couldn't find any peers last time I tried. If I have time this weekend I'll try and get on Cryptopia and see if I can see their node, and throw a little hash at it to see if it unsticks. Anyone else with a node up feel free to chime in. Waste of time I'm afraid. The wallets only connect to the node (if you're lucky), not to each other - making it a centralised system & the reason why it failed - that & the fact that BW couldn't be arsed to fix it. The wallet code needs to be fixed first so that they can connect to each other if it's going to work. I couldn't connect to wallets on my own network, let alone a node on the webz somewhere. |
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
Thanks OP for this thread, very informative.
I'm currently looking for a new hosting service for a few S7's in the EU/Iceland & was wondering if anyone can post any recommendations or feedback on their experiences. Obviously costs are of major interest, but just as important to me is customer service/connectivity.
Thanks in advance.
Anyone? |
|
|
|
considering that antpool is one of the biggest mining pool's into the bitcoin ecosystem they should send a proper answer why the payouts was't sent :-/
If it's customer support you're after you'd better change pools...... |
|
|
|
How are things going with this launch... Dev any new?
 |
|
|
|
Who's the Dear Leader?
Kim Jong Un?
Kim Jong UNO Never forget. You wind up in gulag. Along with Prot Tan Ium......  |
|
|
|
I'm taking the DE node down.
It's started having problems less than 2 minutes after that post.
Sorry about that, I'll inform once things are sorted out.
Damn, that DE node was perfect for me up until the problems started.....  |
|
|
|
Interesting quote on Bitcoinclassic github page: Sure, this shouldn't be in the first hardfork. But something like this needs to happen. I thought the "enforced p2pool" concept was better. IE: no such thing as a pool that doesn't use p2pool. therefore there's no need to join a centralized pool, because p2pool is going to work better. which means pools lose power and machine owners get it back. If only........  |
|
|
|
BITCOIN 21 official launch is currently postponed until further notice.
Until digital currency exchanges are regulated and protected by the financial services authorities, and peoples investments are guaranteed it would be a bad decision to continue with the launch.
LULZ @ this. If you want regulation, use fiat currency & banks - regulation works soooo well in the banking industry..... EPIC FAIL COIN. |
|
|
|
|
Some rediculous asking prices on C-Cex, not a single trade has happened.......
|
|
|
|
Block!! 
|
|
|
|
Nice green block. Pretty empty thou...
Was found based on work only seconds after the previous block so there weren't many transactions around but the highest priority transactions pending still got included. This would have been a completely empty block if found by numerous other pools. I like That's exactly how it should work. Yeah it was only 6.225 seconds after the previous block: [2016-01-19 09:31:08.876] Block hash changed to 0000000000000000063a313addbe94086022924139e7c2be7ee1458a7b6629d2
[2016-01-19 09:31:15.101] Possible block solve diff 136869014868.750259 !
[2016-01-19 09:31:15.172] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-01-19 09:31:15.184] Block hash changed to 000000000000000008087f29ce6277f0982e33b56aaf15534793005a36674692
Living proof that it's possible to include TX's when finding blocks within seconds of each other with a properly coded pool. Miners - don't let any other pool try & tell you otherwise or fob you off with excuses. Congrats & well done Kano & ck! |
|
|
|
|
Block explorer hosting is finished - is there another?
|
|
|
|
Update: Support for Namecoin has been removed due to a merge mining bug.
What bug are you referring to? |
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
Thanks OP for this thread, very informative.
I'm currently looking for a new hosting service for a few S7's in the EU/Iceland & was wondering if anyone can post any recommendations or feedback on their experiences. Obviously costs are of major interest, but just as important to me is customer service/connectivity.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
Other than slowing down GBT latency a little if you choose 2MB should have 0 effect
What news on your domain btw? - I'm intrigued |
|
|
|
It's not ready yet...
That's what I thought, I've compiled it on a NIX VM without issue to play with though - looking forward to seeing how it performs with p2pool compared to core. |
|
|
|
Should probably ask in the emark thread in the altcoins section. ------------------------------------------------------------- Is anyone running the Bitcoinclassic wallet with p2pool here? I was checking the github repo out & after seeing the trolling being done by a certain core dev & ex-pool admin it makes me want to start using it...... |
|
|
|
Testing..... I'm getting this error with auxpow: NarrowError: -32601 getauxblock method is not available until switch-over block. @dev: At what block does auxpow switch-over start? What payout system do the listed pools use? More info please........ Once again dev, you've completely ignored my questions - why?If anyone wants 6754 PNC, drop me a line with an offer. |
|
|
|
Policy change announcement: We support the hard fork effort to increase the max block size to 2MB. Seg-wit may be deployed together in this hard fork if it can be ready in time, or it can be merged later. Non-controversial features in the hard fork wishlist, if it does not delay the hard fork process, can be deployed at the same time. The hard fork should be implemented in Core, eventually. “Bitcoin” Classic, which despite was born on the same day that XT dies, is an attempt that could make the hard fork happen sooner. We welcome Classic. We are going to cease support for FSS-RBF after upgrading to version 0.12, some time in the next few weeks. We may not implement the opt-in RBF feature. We believe that we should do everything we can do to make 0-conf transactions as secure as possible. We do not believe the concept of fee market.
Get someone who knows English well to translate this for you. Your wording implies you are going to try to force everyone to accept a hard fork - which of course you are not in charge of bitcoin so making such a statement would be foolish. If instead you mean the standard miner voting for a change using the core rules, then that of course is appropriate. Ditto - the way it's worded makes it sound like some kind of aggressive Bitcoin takeover bid......or is it? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
