I don’t mind the fee although it’s almost 2x than last time. Apart from the fee, the cricket playing nations & popularity of cricket is also another factor toward the small amount of participants I guess. There are pools for soccer where the number of participants is quite high. If the fee was a bit lower or same as we had last time, maybe we would get some more participants. I'm too lazy to send the fee. Will do it sooner.
|
|
|
Is there any update on how many participants joined as of now? Without having at least 10 members, I don't think it’s going to be fun & competitive enough like we had last year. Nevertheless, I will be joining soon as well. Please if possible, update the current list of participants in the ANN thread.
|
|
|
What will be the definition of lost coin? Say I have 1 BTC stored in Paper wallet which I didn't touch for the last 5 years. If your theory apply to old coins too, will bitcoin be anymore same as store of value; unlikely. Apart from that, I may have lost my written private key in 2013 but I can find the key in 2021. Very possible. Later on, when you got your private key and imported it in a wallet & discover your funds are not there; wouldn't you think that someone has stolen? Therefore, it's STEALING, exactly what DannyHamilton said above.
|
|
|
Hello Hhampuz, Sorry to say that I missed this week as well and it's 4 at a row. It has been a great pleasure working with you. I'm in Roobet campaign for a long time now. I guess it's almost a year but unfortunately it's not anymore possible for me to continue with signature campaign. I have tried to be active on the forum but not anymore possible for a while. I'm very busy managing my business IRL; have expanded my business recently. Thank you for giving me chances while I missed few weeks & sorry for wasting your times last 4 weeks. Good luck to you, good luck to Roobet & all the campaign participants. Please fill the spot. I'm removing the signature and avatar now.
Best regards
|
|
|
I dont accuse 1meow of anything but he is a merrit source and he has exchanged trust (despite no transaction), bumps for sig threads (to ask for sig sponsor), and merrit extensively with that guy.
If you have enough proof like insider information, bring it here. Otherwise, you have no way to proof that they are abusing merit. In my eyes, they are meriting posts which seems good while it’s different to you. Simply posting this wouldn’t do any favor to you, not your case.
|
|
|
You are accusing bullrun2020 to abuse the merit system? I really doubt it. Although I don't know German language, I know him to be a good poster in global boards. There’s no proof of your accusation as well. Regarding the tag, I guess it’s not a good practice kf the system. But since feedback isn’t moderated, you have no way but to mutually solve the issue.
|
|
|
Do you really receive so many unsolicited PMs that something so drastic is needed?
It’s not about receiving so many PMs; check what he referred in OP. Apart from that, having such a list would be great but in such case, it would be very hard to reach an user when something is important. In SMF, the feature isn’t available by default I guess. Therefore, customization would be the only way but I guess it’s too much time consuming in exchange of the level of the benefit we will have.
|
|
|
What does the link proof and how can that post proof that you are not alt of anyone? I'm not saying you are alt of anyone; since you linked this, I got curious how this post is relevant to proof that you are not anyone's alt.
|
|
|
WBTC works like this. I have 1 BTC and if I need 1 WBTC, the issuer of WBTC takes the real 1 BTC from me and then mints 1 WBTC and issues it to me. When i no longer need the 1 WBTC, I can swap it from my real 1 BTC and the WBTC I had gets burned by the issuer's smart contract. So WBTC has no impact on Bitcoin's circulating supply except tools like coinmarketcap might misinterpert the data.
The WBTC you actually see on coinmarketcap is equivalent to locked Real Bitcoin
@renegadetrader has an excellent point.
Ok, I got your point. If that's the fact behind WBTC, then how come they have their own marketcap? It’s a total mess when you calculate it. You are not excluding the BTC from the circulation and you are also counting the WBTC. Total mess.
|
|
|
I can't see any reason why would anyone have to pay $27 fee for BTC on-chain tx. The current fee is pretty low and I can't remember if I have seen such a ridiculous fee ever. Which wallet are you using & how many inputs are there in your tx? Have you received the BTC more than a few times? If so, that can be the reason for such a ridiculous fee. Or, it's very possible that you have your BTC in an exchange?
|
|
|
According to this[1], the safest coin is DIA
It’s DAI, not DIA DAI is decentralized while the most popular one USDT is a centralized stablecoin. Nevertheless, both has drawbacks and benefits. USDT can be frozen but in term of being a stablecoin, they can maintain the closest $1. As their recent issue with SEC has been resolved, you can use USDT. Otherwise, DAI would be great.
|
|
|
Well, it seems I can't share my point of view exactly. Imagine, someone has purchased 1 wrapped bitcoin. Take all the other factor constant. Now, if he can exchange the wrapped bitcoin for the same amount of USD/BTC anytime, there's no difference between holding 1 BTC and/or holding 1 WBTC; as you can liquidate both anytime with the same amount worth of 1 BTC. Now, from where that 1 WBTC is coming? It’s acting same as the BTC. Say, in a regular market, the demand of BTC is 100 BTC. If out of that demand, 10 BTC demand is fulfilled by WBTC, isn’t the value of BTC decreasing? I don't know if WBTC issuer have BTC backed for each WBTC. If so, then it’s fine and there's nothing wrong but if it’s not then I guess it’s decreasing the value of BTC at the end of day.
|
|
|
With advance, I mean the indicators and the features it have. As I'm very beginner, I can't use them properly; hence having premium account makes no sense at this point I guess. Thanks Lakai01, it makes sense to use the gecko bot. I will try out this.
|
|
|
I was never that good at trading cryptos, nor I had tried to learn it deeply. Lately, I'm trying to learn TA to see how things go on. Is there any place to practice the TA where indicators are available for cryptocurrencies? I guess tradingview is one of them but it seems quite advance level to me.
|
|
|
There's no impact on Bitcoin's supply if they are printing these tokens from nothing, though.
If they have say 100000 WBTC in circulation. Technically, this WBTC is another form of a token and serving as BTC according to its value. Isn't it then increasing the circulation of BTC technically as more WBTC is there? I know there's no new coin will be mined but that WBTC is also the same actually. Nevertheless, if this token is backed by bitcoin, only then they are ok to use or mine.
|
|
|
What TF is WBTC? I guess it's the tokenization of Bitcoin and if I'm correct there are a few such tokens backed by/ pegged to Bitcoin. But do the issuer have such enough amount of Bitcoin as they print (mint)? Shouldn't enough BTC be staked in order to create such a token? I don't know how much token works, whether they have BTC backed or not. But the question I'm thinking about for the last few days- If there is no enough BTC backed by the issuer, isn't the supply getting increased day by day?
|
|
|
Well, stop-loss feature is certainly good for minimizing the loss and/or ensuring the profit but it has a bad side as well. Imagine your stop-loss order has been executed and right after that, there was an uptrend. You will miss the potential gain too and thus losing your BTC in case you plan to buy back which you will as you are a day trader.
|
|
|
Sometimes, some whale also creates fake buy order to give false impression of buying wall or the vice versa of sale wall. In theory, it should be an indicator where price is going to but technically that can be faked. In addition, you have to check the distance of price in which people have put buy order. For example, a coin with current price of 1000 satoshi may have a big bug order at 100 satoshi which is very unlikely to fill. Therefore, the order has put only to give fake impression.
|
|
|
|