Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 02:12:59 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 ... 128 »
881  Economy / Gambling / Re: bustabit.com -- The Social Gambling Game on: April 12, 2017, 05:18:16 PM
Omg!! R u serious? I wasn't expecting any rewards in the 1st place. You are simply awesome!! Hehe! I shall choose stone. Thank you for making my day.Wink

My username is Furlicious

Ouch. Bad news, I picked paper Sad

Proof:
sha256(paper|234alsdkjfsalty) == 9ed48f503f21c4b9e4b873e39b53ad45d8f397cbff69c97c73f9e25b89e9f64c



Oh well, at least you got 10000 bits which I have credited to your account  Grin
882  Economy / Gambling / Re: bustabit.com -- The Social Gambling Game on: April 12, 2017, 03:25:22 PM
Life is a gamble anyway. By far, Bustabit is the most legit and transparent,bitcoin based gambling site that i have come across. I myself have been playing there since months and although my ranking is at 1512 but my net profit is ( -668,238.96 bits) . No doubt i do get disappointment when my games are not to my favor but still all up to us whether u want to hit the numbers high or just be contented with a 1.04multiplier winning. Im still a big fan of Bustabit and i love and respect how the owner manages the site! Thumbs up!

<3 My favorite type of gambler, someone who has fun regardless of the outcome.


So for fun, let's play a game of rock-paper-scissors: If you win, I'll give you 0.2 BTC. If you tie, I'll give you 0.1 BTC, and if you lose you get 0.01 btc.

To prove I can't change my result, here's my sha256 hashed (and salted) pick: 9ed48f503f21c4b9e4b873e39b53ad45d8f397cbff69c97c73f9e25b89e9f64c

So now pick between rock, paper or scissors (and let me know your bustabit account name to credit you). Guess wisely  Grin


883  Economy / Gambling / Re: 🌟🔴🌟🎲🌟🔴🌟MONEYPOT.com -- Crypto Casino Suite and Web Wallet 🌟🔴🌟🎲🌟🔴🌟 on: April 10, 2017, 06:30:55 PM
was this move somewhere announced?

any other owner changes?

There's no need to announce stuff like that, removing access from people who no longer need it is considered a best practice, and has absolutely no adverse affects on anyone. Removing access doesn't imply that they did it because the person did something wrong, or anything like that.

We are able to do this, but it will take a fair amount of time to accomplish as data lives in different partitions. We only keep the last 1-200m games in our live databases.

You might want to also just filter out all bets < 100 bits or something, as they'll just add background noise and be annoying and slow to work with

Quote
We also do not have access to pre-take over data.

Nor do I, unfortunately. I did find this chart I made from a bit before the sale though: https://i.gyazo.com/041bb7932ebd9bc346ea1c88ddb6a1b9.png

(and there you'll see the strong negative correlation between investor profit and wagered like I was talking about in my previous post)
884  Economy / Gambling / Re: 🌟🔴🌟🎲🌟🔴🌟MONEYPOT.com -- Crypto Casino Suite and Web Wallet 🌟🔴🌟🎲🌟🔴🌟 on: April 10, 2017, 06:13:15 PM
Someone should calculate the probability of moneypot legitimately losing 82 btc from 1 billion bets with 92,000 btc wagered. I would be very interested to see how tiny the % is.

For anyone interested in this stuff, this is an interesting paper worth checking out: https://lab.getmonero.org/pubs/MRL_Monte_Carlo_Edition.pdf


Although, a far simpler thing I think that would make sense to look at would be the correlation between site profit and volume. It's been my observation that the two are strongly inversely correlated with each other. Generally when people are doing well, they gamble (a lot) more, driving volumes through the roof -- and tend to be happy customers that come back. And likewise when people are doing poorly, they tend to not gamble much.
885  Economy / Gambling / Re: suggest me top beting site??? on: April 10, 2017, 04:05:03 PM
These type of threads tend to just attract spam, but I'll try avoid that by recommending some other sites I've played at, had good experiences, been able to verify the games (and have no financial motive to promote):

primedice.com (only has dice, but probably the most trusted bitcoin gambling site)
betking.io  (although currently down)
bitdice.me (i think has the biggest limits at the moment, and the ability to invest)
fastbets.io  (not that popular, but looks pretty and I like how they try build new interesting stuff)
nitrogensports.eu  (sports betting, but only used them a couple of times. I'm not much of a sports better)


Disclaimer: I haven't really been lately trying new casinos, so I'm probably missing out a ton of great new casinos
886  Economy / Gambling / Re: Investing in btc casinos on: April 10, 2017, 01:25:58 AM
For people interesting in bankroll investing, another thing to look into is margin lending on some of the exchanges. I started about a week ago on bitfinnex and have so far averaged equiv to ~11% p.a.  Not entirely sure this justifies the counter party risk (after all, if they get hacked again you're pretty screwed), but it's a pretty viable thing to look into if you want to increase your diversification  
887  Economy / Gambling / Re: bustabit.com -- The Social Gambling Game on: April 04, 2017, 09:42:03 PM
Another huge bustabit winner:



That's 201 BTC, but most impressively that's a recovery from previously -82 BTC.
888  Economy / Gambling / Re: bustabit.com -- The Social Gambling Game on: April 04, 2017, 12:41:58 AM
You mean by skill player? I do not think that it has anything to do with skill here, as long as you are the highest bettor and try to last long enough then you will good bonus.

Well that's the skill part, knowing to do that. There's a bit of a metagame though, for instance if someone is aiming at 100x, i know their chance of cashing out is only ~1% so I wouldn't try cash out after them, but I'd be better off cashing out early to secure the bonuses in the games they don't cash out.

Also the bonuses are % based, so it's equally fair no matter how big of a better you are -- you don't need to be the highest bettor (although sometimes it can help beef up the bonus pool).

Quote
And btw what do you mean by calculator for this house edge? Is there any calculator there?
https://www.bustabit.com/calculator
889  Economy / Gambling / Re: bustabit.com -- The Social Gambling Game on: April 03, 2017, 09:49:47 PM
Also 1% skill ? You can't prove that ? Is it probabky fair that it is 1% . What skill exactly?  That's a way to advertise to get people to play and is the only problem I have with bustabit.

The "1% skill" part comes from ~1% of the game is bonus based. For every 100 BTC that is wagered, on average the site gives out 1% in bonuses. The bonus part is skill based in the sense you can compete with other players for it (see: bustabit.com/faq#fair)

Quote
If it was 1% skill bustabit would make no money. I think they mean 1% house edge. Who knows. Maybe there is a crash level you can pull xP

Actually the house edge is quite a bit lower than 1% (see: bustabit.com/faq#odds). The skill based part doesn't really impact the house, as it's actually a purely pvp component (players fight amongst themselves for it)
890  Economy / Gambling / Re: bustabit.com -- The Social Gambling Game on: April 01, 2017, 01:45:18 PM
I just want a bitcoin based gambling site that I am wanting to join in on and try to be as transparent as possible to the players who want to join there site.

For what it's worth, bustabit is one of the most transparent gambling businesses out there.  You can see bustabit.com/stats with it presented over time by some sites like thebitcoinstrip.com But unfortunately there's nothing like FDIC-insured bitcoin casino accounts
891  Economy / Gambling / Re: bustabit.com -- The Social Gambling Game on: March 31, 2017, 11:41:49 PM
Are you the owner of Bustabit?

Yeah


Quote
Where are they located? It says licensed on the home page but that does not mean they are located there.
Clarify this so I can have confidence when I am placing my btc into the wallet of your site.

There's no real regulatory oversight to bustabit, but if you did have a problem and wanted to take it up through legal channels, it'd be done in Costa Rica.  I'm pretty confident you won't have any problems though, the site does a huge amount of volume (average ~2000 BTC a day?) and has remarkably few complaints (probably less than a dozen cases in the entire history of bustabit that haven't been amicably resolved). Yesterday the site paid out 300 BTC (more than it took in) without holding any withdrawals for even a second.
892  Economy / Gambling / Re: bustabit.com -- The Social Gambling Game on: March 31, 2017, 01:23:52 AM
Wow, we have a new #1 by net profit:




Yup, that's right: LosDeXibalbaMC has won 286 BTC  Shocked
893  Economy / Gambling / Re: bustabit.com -- The Social Gambling Game on: March 23, 2017, 02:26:25 PM
That was a copy pasting problem and I lost the money. After copy and while I paste the last digits changed and I didn't recognized. I use Coinbase, Do you know any way for refunds?

It's almost certain you have malware on your computer (possibly a malicious browser extension?). Bitcoin addresses have a checksum so no copy-and-paste error can cause that.

I can't offer refunds (the money never even went to me), I doubt coinbase does either -- but you could check with them. I'd make sure to check your computer pretty throughly as fortunately this was just a very small amount of money, it could be a lot worse
894  Economy / Gambling / Re: Wealthydice.com | Bitcoin & Cryptojacks (CJ)|*DICE*PLINKO*|*CJ FARMING*| 1% H.E on: March 22, 2017, 08:04:07 PM
luckily I wasnt calling you a clown but it was RHavar and you didnt tell him to stop the bullcrap Smiley
do you remember when you asked me to stop mentioning the name "RHAVAR" in slack?

@JackpotRacer I've asked you before, can you stop bringing me into this. I really don't support you. I forgot the context, but it's how I felt about how he was acting at that particular time about that particular thing (and something I should have probably kept to myself). You on the other hand seem to consistently act brain-damaged in all matters. Besides wasting everyone else's time with your crap, you're also wasting your own. Do you really have nothing better to do with your life than be a blight for years?

Seriously, move on with your life. Do something productive. Take up a new hobby. Volunteer in a soup kitchen. Play with lego. Seriously.
895  Economy / Gambling / Re: bustabit.com -- The Social Gambling Game on: March 22, 2017, 07:31:31 PM

That transaction isn't sending money to a deposit address (neither 1AG1Tww6N3WS2AB2RWzDJ8EdqS4Y4QgNXw  or 1P6Di7brhBRvqywGcjQnA6hUC9ibc3UCJS is from bustabit).

If you're having issues, please use bustabit.com/support and i'll be happy to help
896  Economy / Gambling / Re: QuantumDice.com - Bitcoin Dice | 0.5% House Edge | Fastest Dice Site on: March 22, 2017, 06:57:44 PM
Last time this was posted, the site was just a front-end copy with absolutely no functional backend (that's why they removed the faucet). When ever you tried depositing it would always give the same deposit address, which was just a static address owned by the scammer.  I can't be bothered to check if they've changed anything since, but regardless stay very far away
897  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: @RogerVer lets make a deal. At least 60k, my BTU for your BTC. on: March 22, 2017, 04:20:32 AM
For the swap, you should be able to use the taint method so that the BTCs and BTUs get to their proper destinations:

Yeah, your method seems fine. Although since it's such a large amount of money, I'd also add something like a "<2years> CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY" that allows some escrow-agents to resolve the dispute if the two parties don't 2-of-2 sign before then.


You'd also probably want to do a coin-join style send to the escrow address -- just so the first sending party doesn't risk getting trolled and have their money stuck in limbo
898  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: @RogerVer lets make a deal. At least 60k, my BTU for your BTC. on: March 22, 2017, 03:53:06 AM
Do you have any problem with me posting the terms of our bet on Reddit (once dooglus has accepted and we've made sure that the terms are unambiguous), in order to generate some publicity?

No problems, posting it on reddit is fine with me. Maybe one of the prediction sites can even turn this into a bet =)
899  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: @RogerVer lets make a deal. At least 60k, my BTU for your BTC. on: March 22, 2017, 03:33:51 AM
Good point, if the fork happens just before the deadline then how about we wait up to 4 months for the minority chain to mine 2100 new blocks.  If the minority chain doesn't mine 2100 blocks by then, we'll call it dead and I win the bet.  

Regarding your term that if a fork happens, but BU reorgs so that the most-work chain no longer contains a block > 1 MB, I might be OK with that, but it's a bit unfair to me because what if we just get a random 1.1 MB block like we saw with bitcoin.com?  I could see that happening again, and I don't think that should count as a fork.  How about we define a "fork attempt" as occurring once the large block chain has at least 72 blocks built on top of it?

I am happy with Dooglus as escrow.

Excellent, sounds great to me. I'm ok with 72 blocks being considered a "fork attempt". I've PM'd a link to this conversation to Dooglus and will fund it when/if he posts an address. Want to do more than 1 BTC by any chance?
900  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: @RogerVer lets make a deal. At least 60k, my BTU for your BTC. on: March 22, 2017, 02:52:57 AM
Alright: how about a small side bet for us little fish?  I bet you 1 BTC that--should the most-work blockchain include a single block larger than 1 MB--that no minority chain will make it beyond 2100 blocks (~2 weeks and the length of a difficulty adjustment) without either a difficulty reset or a change in the proof-of-work algorithm.  If I win, the 2 BTCs in escrow will be sent to me.  If you win, the 2 BTCs on both chains will be sent to you.  If nothing happens by December 31, 2017, we both get our 1 BTC back.

The terms are rather unfair to me (e.g. if the fork happens just before the deadline, then it's impossible for the minority chain to mine 2100 blocks) but I'll overlook that. As long as I also win if BU makes a failure of its fork (i.e. after some time miners realize the BTC chain is worth more, with lower difficulty -- so they switch back). In that circumstance by the end of the year BTC will be the fork with the most proof-of-work, even though at one time it was a minority.

Anyway, I'm happy with 1 BTC and will go as high as 100 BTC.  May I suggest Dooglus as an escrow, but I'll take anyone of the standard escrows here.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 ... 128 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!