I offered @eric to help with communication (and free of charge).

I don't live in Beijing now so unfortunately that might not be suitable for him.

I did not ask anyone to trust me (and I don't expect that they should).

Then why don't you make one?

You just make false accusations and pretend that they are intelligent points - who do you think you are fooling?

It is pretty clear to me that you are simply being paid for this - so what I am going to do with you (like all the others) is just wear you down until you give up or your masters decide that your posts are not worth paying for.

Seriously you are either paid to troll or are just plain stupid.

Just like Gavin calling Luke-Jr "poisonous" heh?

(you hero worship of the guy is rather demeaning of yourself - he acted quite clearly as a bully then and is trying to do so now)

You do realise that Gavin created a topic referring to Luke-Jr as "poisonous" or do you not?

(and if you accept that *fact* then you must also accept that Gavin "isn't helpful" then either)

There is only one reason we have these alternative implementations - let me spell it out for you:

G
a
v
i
n

Got it?

Well - he is the one trying to destroy Bitcoin (and this is his second attempt).

Has Luke-Jr done this?

But seeing you are such a Gavin fanboy you must agree with him that Luke-Jr is "poisonous" or maybe you realise that Gavin isn't always right?

Here is what I predict will happen with Bitcoin Classic - Gavin will move on to another such take-over attempt and Garzik will do a Mike Hearn (slowly people are starting to see that Gavin is actually a "poisonous" person when it comes to open source projects - the very thing he had accused Luke-Jr of about BIP 16 vs. BIP 17).

(and I do have some inside knowledge about what is going on)

Personally I think it is a pity that Garzik has done this to himself but it seems that Gavin can be quite convincing (something that I'm sure that Mike Hearn now regrets in hindsight and if he really did sell all of his BTC he'll regret that too when this forking threat nonsense is over).

The Trade package is now at the point of final testing and so should be ready any day now.

In the meantime I discovered this: https://github.com/tromp/cuckoo

There is a whitepaper for this algorithm as well and it so far looks very promising to me - it could be the final piece in the CIYAM blockchain jigsaw that I have been looking for.

This is a nice analogy and yes the only reason we have people ranting and raving that we need to increase the block size now is politics (which have all originated from Gavin - the now "poisonous" developer trying his hardest to destroy the Bitcoin project).

That is the really nice thing about Bitcoin - being algorithmic it doesn't care that you are frustrated (and you should perhaps go out and find someone to help relieve that problem).

The pass phrase you used to encrypt the wallet can't change unless you change it explicitly - so if you are restoring a backed up wallet then it will require the password that you had last used for that wallet.

My guess is that you're actually a paid shill but have made such a failure of your "point" that you are just resorting to insults.

Before you stop using Bitcoin I would recommend you sell your account (you should get at least 0.01 BTC for it and maybe even higher if you delete your silliest posts).

(do you even know what the word "libido" means?)

I have dealt with "end users" like you before who refuse to even bother to do the most basic research about how something actually works and instead make "childish demands".

After you've gone and learned about how Bitcoin works then maybe come back and ask a question.

But to put it more simply - Bitcoin is not for you - so please stop using it.

So if you know how Bitcoin works then why are you making such stupid complaints and requesting impossible features?

While we get the devs solving your problem I hope that they can make me a time machine so I can go back and buy more Bitcoins in 2009 (which is about as possible as what you are asking for).

I use credit cards to buy things online like 99.99% of the rest of the developed world (maybe you should do that to).

I see - well how about you provide the "fix" then genius and show us all how much smarter than Satoshi you are.

(am guessing you must have bought your account to be so ignorant about Bitcoin yet supposedly a Hero Member)

You've earned a "heroic facepalm" (I'll let someone else provide the image).

Huh? It was dropped from the mempool exactly as it should (you haven't found anything to exploit at all).

There is a reason why merchants should not accept zero confirmation txs (so if you think you have just made some major discovery then I'm sorry to have to disappoint you - but you haven't).

Indeed IMO each major blockchain would use a different algorithm (whether we are just stalking a different POW or something entirely different).

To a fair extent I think that Litecoin has actually paved the way forward pretty well (as it has kept up with all the recent improvements added to Bitcoin and even has ASIC mining now so is backed by a lot of computing power).

The CIYAM UI is entirely HTML (so nothing difficult for anyone to use).