Keeping up with this would have been a full time job.
Cool idea though
Yes, we need a reaper to take care of the necronomicon, any one interested ? it won't be a paid job, but at least you will keep people informed of the latest coins informations. A lot of people there went trapped in a project because they ignored it was actually dead. |
|
|
|
There was no exchange in the begining, he have been added two days ago, i don't want to speculate, i better like to be based on facts. Each time i intervenated in this project it was with facts and proofs, i never complained about anyone here, i always try to answer objectively, and now, i detected this problem, and i am talking about it, i am not hiding anything.
For sure i am part of the signature campaign, but if i detect something not logical for me, i talk about it.
Could you please send me the details of the scheme you talked about ? this way i will investigate it and see if it applies.
No other exchange approved their coin. And no one ever will, hence past 10 days they busy building their own exchange, the value of bitconnect coin is worthless for the moment as there is absolutely no relevance to it, or acceptance to it outside of their website.
This strategy is totally the best one, keeping the exchange internal is the best they could do regarding the whales on other exchanges, it is not hard to get listed as long you have the required amount of BTC, the hardest part is the get a stable price, and this can only be done in an internal exchange, a lot of cryptos tried to fix their price at 1$ but had never been achievable on the long run, mainly because of pump/dump. I totally agree that they should keep it internal, and develop their own exchange including other cryptocurrencies, plus, the code is amazingly well done. I checked the whole source, as i aleready said, i don't support a project without checking it entirely. At last, a usefull investigation, thank you for the comments.
Don't believe that signature participants are idiots, if i am here it is to understand the bitcoin community, as i am a member of it. This way things are more clear, and perosnally i would never invest (myself or money) in a project i don't believe in.
Now regarding electroniccash, i think that in the end his accusation have been beneficial to the project, because it pushes us to ding deeper in the information collection, and it pushes us to learn more about the project.
Exactly, but an escrow is also a warranty of trust, it can help to bring in more investors because of the escrow's fame, but in this case, Electroniccash can't understand is that BCC have aleready hitted the minimum, and they aleready have the reputation, just have a closer look, they tried to use Bittrex but apparently they failed because of Bittrex, and it is totaly understandable as bittrex charges a lot, like 10% plus 5BTC and more on, iti s not reliable. It is less money for the project, and it wouldn't be fair for the other investors, who haven't asked for an escrow. So the escrow is not mandatory, and some of them don't hesitate to pump from the company's ressources, i better like the BCC team to use the budget for Bittrex as a buy-back in case of a dump to secure the currency price.
You have a project, you got a community, you asked them to invest, they did it, and then you thought "Hey, why don't i do the same in bitcointalk ?". Now, thinking that most of the people on your platform invested without an escrow you decide the do it again.
It is as easy as that, why should someone use an escrow when he aleready collected a lot of BTC without it ? it doesn't sounds logical to me.
Now, you can go to the signature section and check for edwardard's address, and try to follow them upward, you will find a lot of addresses with huge amounts of BTC, don't go too far away, because i suppose it is coin mixer then, or exchange because the sums are too high.
Not trying to diss you Bud. Keep up the investigative approach, but id rather take a neutral stance vs a promotional / defensive stance. Scheme? Just wait and watch, it will happen. Maybe a month maybe 3, how soon depends on how bad a job the marketting team does. You will see even more aggressive promotions, even more ads and banners like someone pointed out saying "They have a crazy good marketing budget so the coin is legit!!!! Totally a 7/5 (Cheers to those who get the reference  . There will be a pump, but it cant be validated as the platform is controlled by them (I.E Internal). And then a whole load of " I told you this coin is legit, I made $10 Million on it", followed by even more promotions. And then, and then the big squeeze. Regarding the marketing it is true that it is good, but i am not talking about that now as the exchange looks corrupted, because they don't have an external API to let bots fake volumes on the exchange, it means that the order with 0.03 btc is a fake one, and this is a true issue, mainly because the exchange stats on the 24H High is 85k Satoshi, while in the chart, it says 0.03, so where is this order ? have it been processed ? who issued it ? and it points to annother problem, where is the market history ? or the order book history ? we have no ways to check the exchange's history except our own orders. In this case, marketing can do nothing, i understand that they want to manipulate the coin's price, by pumping it, but here, it is a fake manipulation, so, the result is the loss of traders, and even the marketing won't be able to bring them back, so at the end, it will just be dumped by miners, they can't constantly buy back the miner's rewards. Exchange manipulation is a very bad point, coin manipulation is normal as it is beneficial to everyone, but here, an exchange, it is a problem of confidence, and if there is no confidence in the unique exchange, then the whole project is threatened. |
|
|
|
So, either it is a technical problem, or they faked the order.
Sorry this news dear supporters.
it is useless to prosecute electroniccash or anyone else accusing the project, the only real action to take, is deep investigating the project. And i am going to do it.
LOL. It hasnt even started yet. Read a few of my last posts you will slowly start to realise what others have been saying all along. BCC to BTC peg has been removed. So all those early adopters would get a heart ache. Majority are slow to realize, some are paid not to realize and some are just so out there. There was no exchange in the begining, he have been added two days ago, i don't want to speculate, i better like to be based on facts. Each time i intervenated in this project it was with facts and proofs, i never complained about anyone here, i always try to answer objectively, and now, i detected this problem, and i am talking about it, i am not hiding anything. For sure i am part of the signature campaign, but if i detect something not logical for me, i talk about it. Could you please send me the details of the scheme you talked about ? this way i will investigate it and see if it applies. |
|
|
|
Interesting activity last night.  I don't appreciate this comment, and you shouldn't support without argument, show the other informations, normally with this "activity" the high shall be at 0.03 while he is at 0.00085, it is not normal, there is a problem there, and i would like the dev to answer about this and give more details. Guy, We obviously posted at same time about the same topic just in different ways. I did not even know you were posting so my post had nothing to do with yours. You need to chill. I dont give a rats ass what the dev says I was just laughing at the abnormal price fluctuation on the bcc exchange. If you have a question for the dev then IM him. Sorry i didn't checked the time, anyway, this 0.03 is a big problem for them. We just had the same idea, next i will check the hour of the post, sorry. |
|
|
|
I bought a few BCC not really that big,seeing a good promise and a potential but they should also address getting listed in exchange,however small that exchange,they should also set up a buy support to strengthened the price I don't want to see this less on what I invest.
I totally agree with you, but we don't know if they reserved a buy-back amount to support the price drop. But, with what i found, especially the high price processed by the exchange, plus the fact that there is no "history" of the last trades, with a high pressure on the coin in the pools, with some pools getting about 1500BCC/day, worth 1.5BTC/day based on the first price of 0.001BTC. Plus we don't have any information regarding the volumes except the 24H volume, who is today, around 15 BTC, if you look at the price chart you will notice how the price is droping, and i calculated based on 1 with 5gh/s , including the 20gh/s showed in the wallet, it means that around 6BTC a day are generated, so 40% of the 24h Volume is a sale volume, and this is dumping the coin. At the same time the exchange is not clear enough regarding the displayed informations, and especially that 0.03 order who is not taken in count. |
|
|
|
Interesting activity last night. I don't appreciate this comment, and you shouldn't support without argument, show the other informations, normally with this "activity" the high shall be at 0.03 while he is at 0.00085, it is not normal, there is a problem there, and i would like the dev to answer about this and give more details. |
|
|
|
Good to hear that the ICO have ended. I hope that the team at Bitconnect Coin will get a response from Bittrex soon - once it is listed on Bittrex, all of us can expect a huge skyrocketing price.  . So what is the latest update here? Will we be able to see this coin getting listed on exchange site like Bittrex or Yobit? ICO is ending soon and I would like to ask if the signature campaign (a long with others promotional campaign) still continue?
if signature campaign is over Edwardad will say so I have been into this campaign signature for 3 staight weeks and Edwardad have done a great job,payment is always on time and he only pick the best poster and I think marketing still continue they are using facebook and google ads,have seen them everywhere. Same for me, Edward is a great guy and a great manager, i aleready asked him about the campaign's duration and he replied in the thread, so, for now, we must wait for the OP to decide wether it will be maintained or not. I like this campaign, and this project, so i hope they will let it run for a long time. Same here. Edward is an active and promising signature campaign manager. The managed this campaing well and I hope that BitConnect Coin continue to grows. Effectively, sorry for my long silence, Edwardar is amazing on the management of the campaign, as soon as it ends, i will trust him, and hope that you guys will do it too, as he deserves it. This is one of the best signature camapign I'm in,always paid on time th eico is over but the campaign is still on until the 29,this is a good sign that Bitconnectcoin is a huge success,some signature campaign will start after the ico but not Bitconnectcoin.
Again, i like this campaign too as i am learning a lot in your contact, even the scam accusators, and i am at your service for investigations, i like when we exchange ideas, arguments, and facts. The problem now is that Bitconnect have a big problem, when i checked the exchange page i found that some coins have been sold for 0.03btc, while the 24H High is at 0.00085000 btc, at this point it can only be : 1- Fake order to draw the prices high. or 2- A bug in the database. I always supported this campaign/coin, i always did my best to promote and prove it, but here, if this is a fake volume/order, it can only be issued by the team because there are no external APIs to let someone connect to. Here is the proof :  So, either it is a technical problem, or they faked the order. Sorry this news dear supporters. it is useless to prosecute electroniccash or anyone else accusing the project, the only real action to take, is deep investigating the project. And i am going to do it. |
|
|
|
This strategy is totally the best one, keeping the exchange internal is the best they could do regarding the whales on other exchanges, it is not hard to get listed as long you have the required amount of BTC, the hardest part is the get a stable price, and this can only be done in an internal exchange, a lot of cryptos tried to fix their price at 1$ but had never been achievable on the long run, mainly because of pump/dump.
I totally agree that they should keep it internal, and develop their own exchange including other cryptocurrencies, plus, the code is amazingly well done. I checked the whole source, as i aleready said, i don't support a project without checking it entirely.
Strategy? Bud, they got rejected by other exchanges and as a fallback they had to come up with this to continue the show... If they had mentioned this from the start, and not as a circumvention to a rejection, I would call that strategy. There is nothing you can do to prevent whales / pumps / dumps. Anyone with enough money can do it. But, no matter how good a gambler you are the bank / house always wins. Guess who's the bank? Infact Guess who the biggest whale is? And as it stands, the majority of work being done without prior notice to investors or by misleading investors / public. I.E : We are going to get listed in Bittrex / XYZ exchange. And then build your own exchange? Strategy? Its good you did your research, and if you had mentioned they will not get listed in any exchange and are going to build their own, I would give your research some importance. Logically speaking. Also:- -snip- Oh please, had you ever seen a project who triggers losses ? a project is made to earn also, it is not an open sourced project, even the miners now will get their profits out of their operations, it is important to take care of them, you can't delay them for too long. Now read well the answer of bitconnect about Bittrex listing, it is easy to get listed as i said, and an internal exchange is the best any coin could do. |
|
|
|
No other exchange approved their coin. And no one ever will, hence past 10 days they busy building their own exchange, the value of bitconnect coin is worthless for the moment as there is absolutely no relevance to it, or acceptance to it outside of their website.
This strategy is totally the best one, keeping the exchange internal is the best they could do regarding the whales on other exchanges, it is not hard to get listed as long you have the required amount of BTC, the hardest part is the get a stable price, and this can only be done in an internal exchange, a lot of cryptos tried to fix their price at 1$ but had never been achievable on the long run, mainly because of pump/dump. I totally agree that they should keep it internal, and develop their own exchange including other cryptocurrencies, plus, the code is amazingly well done. I checked the whole source, as i aleready said, i don't support a project without checking it entirely. |
|
|
|
|
At last, a usefull investigation, thank you for the comments.
Don't believe that signature participants are idiots, if i am here it is to understand the bitcoin community, as i am a member of it. This way things are more clear, and perosnally i would never invest (myself or money) in a project i don't believe in.
Now regarding electroniccash, i think that in the end his accusation have been beneficial to the project, because it pushes us to ding deeper in the information collection, and it pushes us to learn more about the project.
|
|
|
|
Just think about it.
they were doing ICO so they know for sure they need the escrow for it. who in the right mind right now would do ICO without escrow. we all know these guys aren't newbies here in bitcointalk. they do have high rank account here, in fact they can give me a red trust for asking how this ICO come to realization without escrow but then of course they won't be doing it because they'd be busted.
Escrow is not the issue if they have supported for a community for long time. The current issue is the bitcoin fund address, I also doubt 1400 btc raised is a bluff or hype, until OP shows the fund proof The proof of long time? I never seen this site in the community, I am close to bitcoin community, none of my friends have known this site. So if no proof, you are just spread fake news. Again, i investigated the domain name, and here is the result of whois.domaintools : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Domain Name: BITCONNECT.CO Domain ID: D74141685-CO Sponsoring Registrar: NAMECHEAP, INC. Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 1068 Registrar URL (registration services): http://www.namecheap.comDomain Status: clientTransferProhibited Registrant ID: TSZ0Z3T2KKHZDBEZ Registrant Name: WhoisGuard Protected Registrant Organization: WhoisGuard, Inc. Registrant Address1: P.O. Box 0823-03411 Registrant City: Panama Registrant State/Province: Panama Registrant Postal Code: 00000 Registrant Country: Panama Registrant Country Code: PA Registrant Phone Number: +507.8365503 Registrant Facsimile Number: +51.17057182 Registrant Email: b7074be43a1e4cce8fe9e9f41f95090b.protect@whoisguard.comAdministrative Contact ID: A2IER553D4IO5V2I Administrative Contact Name: WhoisGuard Protected Administrative Contact Organization: WhoisGuard, Inc. Administrative Contact Address1: P.O. Box 0823-03411 Administrative Contact City: Panama Administrative Contact State/Province: Panama Administrative Contact Postal Code: 00000 Administrative Contact Country: Panama Administrative Contact Country Code: PA Administrative Contact Phone Number: +507.8365503 Administrative Contact Facsimile Number: +51.17057182 Administrative Contact Email: b7074be43a1e4cce8fe9e9f41f95090b.protect@whoisguard.comBilling Contact ID: WL2YK22SZLHCVAAH Billing Contact Name: WhoisGuard Protected Billing Contact Organization: WhoisGuard, Inc. Billing Contact Address1: P.O. Box 0823-03411 Billing Contact City: Panama Billing Contact State/Province: Panama Billing Contact Postal Code: 00000 Billing Contact Country: Panama Billing Contact Country Code: PA Billing Contact Phone Number: +507.8365503 Billing Contact Facsimile Number: +51.17057182 Billing Contact Email: b7074be43a1e4cce8fe9e9f41f95090b.protect@whoisguard.comTechnical Contact ID: I52EBWBX1UYFCCZM Technical Contact Name: WhoisGuard Protected Technical Contact Organization: WhoisGuard, Inc. Technical Contact Address1: P.O. Box 0823-03411 Technical Contact City: Panama Technical Contact State/Province: Panama Technical Contact Postal Code: 00000 Technical Contact Country: Panama Technical Contact Country Code: PA Technical Contact Phone Number: +507.8365503 Technical Contact Facsimile Number: +51.17057182 Technical Contact Email: b7074be43a1e4cce8fe9e9f41f95090b.protect@whoisguard.comName Server: NS1.DREAMHOST.COM Name Server: NS2.DREAMHOST.COM Name Server: NS3.DREAMHOST.COM Created by Registrar: NAMECHEAP, INC. Last Updated by Registrar: NAMECHEAP, INC. Domain Registration Date: Tue Feb 09 07:08:17 GMT 2016Domain Expiration Date: Sat Feb 08 23:59:59 GMT 2020Domain Last Updated Date: Mon Aug 01 14:48:25 GMT 2016 DNSSEC: false ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- They exist since more than a year regarding domain name registration, and they will still be here untill 2020. If you reverse the ip (dedicated server) you will finde 3 websites, the last one is still under construction. The server is based in california, operating from Panama (FP). And here is ScamAdviser : Website: bitconnect.co Title: Bitcoin Community-Earn, Buy, Sell and Trade | Bitconnect Description: World bitcoin community for bitcoin and other crypto users to earn, learn, buy, sell and t Type: Community,bitcoin Domain Age: 333 Days Website Speed: Slow Website Value: $16698.78 Organisation: WhoisGuard, Inc. Owner: WhoisGuard Protected Owner Address: P.O. Box 0823-03411 Owner City: Panama Owner Postcode: 00000 Phone Number: +507.8365503 [Panama] Phone Type: VoIP telephony :Panamá Skycom Communication, S.A. / Galaxy Communication, Corp Email: [United States] Owner Country : Hidden [Unknown] Website Location : United States [United States] Probable website origin :- 88%; [Unknown] Unknown 6%; [Panama] Panama 5%; [United States] United States Notes:- [Alert Result] The owner of the website is using a service to hide their identity [Alert Result] This website is 333 Days old [Good Result] This website is deemed to be popular by Alexa with a ranking of 144262 Analysis Details:- Although this website appears to be based in United States there are other countries involved and you should review this information carefully and decide if it is as you expect.Although being a new website, does not make it un-trustworthy, as with any new business you should be extra vigilant and do your own research before placing an order or making an investment. This site is using an anonymous service - which prevents us from identifying the site owner. This can sometimes be just so that the owner does not receive spam, but be aware that many scam sites use this as a method to hide their identify. If this is an ecommerce site - we would suggest you confirm the business address with the website owners. |
|
|
|
Just think about it.
they were doing ICO so they know for sure they need the escrow for it. who in the right mind right now would do ICO without escrow. we all know these guys aren't newbies here in bitcointalk. they do have high rank account here, in fact they can give me a red trust for asking how this ICO come to realization without escrow but then of course they won't be doing it because they'd be busted.
Wallet is existing,coins is existing,roadmap is existing,pools are existing investors get what they paid for immediately so why held an escrow,escrow are for those works that are not yet created . You need an escrow if you will launch the wallet and the coins because nothing yet in existing.. Exactly, but an escrow is also a warranty of trust, it can help to bring in more investors because of the escrow's fame, but in this case, Electroniccash can't understand is that BCC have aleready hitted the minimum, and they aleready have the reputation, just have a closer look, they tried to use Bittrex but apparently they failed because of Bittrex, and it is totaly understandable as bittrex charges a lot, like 10% plus 5BTC and more on, iti s not reliable. It is less money for the project, and it wouldn't be fair for the other investors, who haven't asked for an escrow. So the escrow is not mandatory, and some of them don't hesitate to pump from the company's ressources, i better like the BCC team to use the budget for Bittrex as a buy-back in case of a dump to secure the currency price. |
|
|
|
Just think about it.
they were doing ICO so they know for sure they need the escrow for it. who in the right mind right now would do ICO without escrow. we all know these guys aren't newbies here in bitcointalk. they do have high rank account here, in fact they can give me a red trust for asking how this ICO come to realization without escrow but then of course they won't be doing it because they'd be busted.
You are locked in the escrow part, think about it. You have a project, you got a community, you asked them to invest, they did it, and then you thought "Hey, why don't i do the same in bitcointalk ?". Now, thinking that most of the people on your platform invested without an escrow you decide the do it again. It is as easy as that, why should someone use an escrow when he aleready collected a lot of BTC without it ? it doesn't sounds logical to me. Now, you can go to the signature section and check for edwardard's address, and try to follow them upward, you will find a lot of addresses with huge amounts of BTC, don't go too far away, because i suppose it is coin mixer then, or exchange because the sums are too high. |
|
|
|
-snip-
I think you are putting words to the dev's mouth,you are not even an investors here or a member of their dashboard,that's make you an ignorant on Bitconnectcoin because all you are posting are generics,
You shouldn't tell to people that they are ignorants, it is unfair, even if we don't share the same point of view, we are members of the signature campaign, we have to answer to questions and accusations of everyone here, because before participating to the campaign we check and verified the project ( i guess you did, as i did), so we must always answer in a pragmatic way. We are more in a "HelpDesk" like answer type, this is why we quote people's questions and try to answer as good as we can. But, effectively, the identity is not that important, it is more about the project itself, its business plan, the roadmap, the reliability ... you are right Robelneo, any investment can be droped, crashes happens in stock markets even when you know everyone's identity (ftse, cac40, wallstreet ... ) with justified and approved actions, but, one should make the difference between a scam, and a project with breaches. As a developer i saw that the platform is really functionnal and that a lot of work have been pulled there, so the developer team believes in the project, and they coded it well. while i believe there are two kinde of scams, the first one (1st degree) is the kinde of developer who uses templates without providing any work, who's only goal is to run with ICO funds. And the second (2nd degree), is where the dev imagine a project, an idea, they provide no business plan, they don't know how to realise the project, and they don't care about, they offer an approximative ICO, this project is at 99% sure to fail, as they will start investments straight after the ICO, even the roadmap is approximative, as they will need so much time to release the project that the coin will be completly dumped, at the end, they find them selves with a huge lack of funds, of developers, of everything, while the head is still believing in his project. That's why everyone shall first read, understand, and assimilate a project ( as i did) before engagin, investing, participating. This is why i try to answer to everyone, using my knowledge. |
|
|
|
well the total investment getting larger each day  1734253.844808 BCC (1414.24413991 BTC) Total Sold Coin
even it will not get listed in any exchange, BCC still probably not scam!! if after ICO ended they give a prove of investment to us and they agree to convert BCC into BTC for all investor Totally agree. As long as they keep working with maximum efforts, I believe this coin will soon appear on some trading platform. Investors will soon realize how good and how awesome BCC is. BCC will absolutely bring some profit to all of us U are gullible to shits. Whats good in it? No chain, no funding, no roadmap, absolutely nothing to offer. U are a carpenter with low income, and I suspect that u was paid in advance for hyping and praising trashy dust. Your laziness is chocking me. Read more before posting please, blockchain is live, project is prefunded, roadmap in the website, everything in OP post or both websites. |
|
|
|
Bitconnect must have seven lives to be able to raise over 1000BTC, but my concern is that there is no way to verify these funds on blockchain also the questions raised have not been attended to yet
If 100 people invested here,100 new bitcoin address should be shown,because each user has their own unique address to deposit,but of course we can always ask for wallet account,but deposit and withdraw are ongoing,this could be the reason why dev cannot provide the funds on blockchain.
Normally they will start not to respond on ANN threads after ICO but this bitconnect coin dev already not responding even when IcO is still on going. hows that for a proof?
If those project with escrows afford to scam people, why can't they?
I have been posting on this thread for quite some time and have seen and read dev's respond why not do a back read and check the dev's post,this is going nowhere and has become redundant,one guy asking questions about the project,dev will answer after a few days,another noob will ask the same question again,it's redundant.. i am very sorry if that hurts your butt. its just not fun to back read what was replied by the dev as i can't find him after 10 pages. so why was he hiding? there are reasons why they can't reveal themselves as a team right? and one of these reasons is that if investors knew them, they're screw. did they answer this already? can you link me to it if you knew. So following all the accusations in the page i decided to do a small investigation on BCC. I helped them to solve a small bug in a web page, after that, they offered a donation, so i followed the donation address back in blockchain.info, i went up to annother address with 300 BTC, i even confirmed that it is the same address who sends to the escrow, there are a lot of movements in the address, however, i had to fetch in order to find this address because it seems they are using coin mixers, as there are a lot of addresses to check before finding the 300 one. But i really do believe they have the 1200 btc, the ico ends in 12 hours, so we will have more informations on it later today. When they had the 1000 btc this thread was not active at all, there was only 4 pages of discussion, so i don't think that BCC was looking for bitcointalk's investors, they are just telling us what they are doing, the ICO was aleready running, and he runned for a long time, so they aleready have investors, internal investors, plus i don't think that Edwardar haven't checked if it is a scam or not, because he is playing his reputation here too as he is the campaign manager for signatures. This thread's stars are Robelneo and Electroniccash, as they draw a lot of people to the discussion. However i still believe it is not a scam, regarding all the addresses and amounts passing by, even if i don't have the proof that x or y address belongs to them. And i think that they aleready started to use the ico funds, and this is why the ico is internal. I can also tell you that the platform is worth around 100 BTC because it is as good as an exchange, so, mainly, bitcointalk is just a marketing way for them. And i strongly believe that if people are complaining about this coin is due to bittrex, when they refused to hold the ICO (if i remember). Again, Bittrex is not a trust granter, look at the flash ico, completly failed, but no one is accusing them of scam. Their ICO is still running while it was planned to be ended the 7th january 2017, you can still buy, so it looks they extended but no one announced it. So please, let's whait and see what will happen next. Remember that most of the actual ICOs are failing (flash, icobid ...), except BCC, simply because they convinced their community to invest. |
|
|
|
Payment recieved, thank you Edwardard and Bitconnectcoin. |
|
|
|
I forgot to add :
facebook : Blumed Edition
there are my company's pictures and all stuff.
and no, it is not bitcoin's price, it was a volatility index.
oh god noo. please, i didn't asked for any of those photos i swear.  in your blumed thread, if i remember someone asked for all these and yet you hesitate to send and yet now that no one is asking you send it. i can't believe how crazy you can be. I think it's not craziness at all if you looked at it closely,he is shaming and challenging you that he can afford and able to put up any project here I doubt if you can do that,I don't have a huge company to put up,he is not only capable but he has the right to set up an ico.. Thanks, i will screen these discussions and show to my son when he grows a little more, to show him how awesome are bitcointalk's users. Challenge is something good because i would never say "believe me i will release a nice beta please hang on". No i am not a memeber of BCC, i just explore bitcointalk. So now, let me answer to two questions at a time, is BCC a scam ? And, wether i am challenging electoniccash. 1- i saw in my coutry how chineese work, i had the possibility to import from chenzen, i visited chenzen hongkong beijin, they have the best electronics in chenzen but the administrations are in beijin, so i had to travel. I learned that they are very organized, and they have the blue and white collars organisation, blue collars work a lot to earn a few, white collars few to earn a lot, production units in china are like drug store in england, they are everywhere. Last year, algeria imported 43 billions dollar, 18-19 billions went to china, without considering food and diary products. Algeria spent 92 billion dollars over 12 years to chineese companies in several construction projects like algiers opera, social appartments ... they have more then 3000 years of writen history, so i found that everything i wanted to produce was aleready existing, even the copy of an iphone, their government isnt regulating them as much as us or eu governments are regulating their industries, they even let them pollute their country. Generally the offre is the demand, in my coutry we say that you can find anything in china except your parents, as long as you give the right price. I exported dates, and olive oil to china, and i never had any trouble with them, they pay on time, so asian populations are honest, china doesn't offer anything for free to the citizens, if you don't work, then you are dead, no social support, no free school or hospital, it is a population who works hard to make a life, and to get back to the cryptocurrencies, they even took controle over the bitcoin by miners. 44% of the bitcoin community loves hyips, ponzy etc, generally they are begginers, while this project is a legit investment plan in china, it is up to you. If i decided to support them it is because the ICO funds are comming essencially from their community, and not bitcointalk. And it is the chineese community who first trusted this project. Now if you check on coinmarketcap for the daily traded bitcoin volume, you will notice that the biggest volumes are comming from china, so the project is totally logical to me. 2- i am not challenging anyone here, i just want to help the community, my country is forbiding the purshase of external currencies, or even the usage, except with letter of credits during an importation operation (L/C), and during export operations, you can only withdraw using DZD. You can check this on google. Now regarding blumedex, i wasnt going to earn anything on it as i cant receive money from other countries, and the dzd cant be exchanged. We have only the right to exchange 130 eur a year, or during an import operation, these can be easily verified in google, algeria financial laws. I wanted to do an ICO in order to pay the staff and servers and services required by the project, my personnal earning is to rally the united arabic maghreb, to the altcoin community. As you know, today altcoin community is 70% of speculation and 30% of effective usage, countries want to screw cryptocoins because they can't tax or control them. But i hope that one day, countries will have their own cryptos. I do believe in this project. Regarding blumedex, the community who will invest will be the market maker, i wont need an algorithm like satoshimines, bitsler, 999dice ... because it is totally fair and can easily be verified without the hashes. |
|
|
|
I forgot to add :
facebook : Blumed Edition
there are my company's pictures and all stuff.
and no, it is not bitcoin's price, it was a volatility index.
oh god noo. please, i didn't asked for any of those photos i swear. in your blumed thread, if i remember someone asked for all these and yet you hesitate to send and yet now that no one is asking you send it. i can't believe how crazy you can be. I wanted first to form a groupe, a community, to see what can be upgraded, changed, ameliorated, everyone was saying the project was a scam (mainly because i was a jr member), i was urged to finish some parts of the project in order to release a demo, i wanted to reveal my ID in the middle of the work, as the project development was the most important thing to do. I enlisted in a sig campaign in order to understand how the community works as i felt to be missing something. I can also send you a picture of myself with my son, he was born somedays before the project release. It doesnt matter to reveal my id or not, i was going to do it, but as soon as the announcement was released, everyone told me it is a scam. Last time, people was more interested in saying the project is a scam rather then been interested by the project itself, so i decided to report the project untill i finish the development of a fully functional beta for people to learn what is binary options trading. Now that we understood each other, lets be cool. The most important thing in this project is the chineese community who are following them. If i support this project it is mainly because i want the international communities to get involved in cryptocurrencies, because i strongly believe that they are the future as there is no trust issue when you "use" cryptos. I Really hope that one day, countries will use cryptocurrencies as national currencies. This way populations will know where their taxes are going, and humanity will have more rights over the funds managed by governments. PS: It is true that there is a lot of scams in the forum, but keep in minde that even these, sometimes, brings innovation to the blockchain technology wich helps the bitcoin community to evolve. PS2: i had a newborn, i wans't really capable of handling a project, feaver, gas, feeding bottles ... all of this was in my minde. it is really hard to be the head of a crypto project and financial project, developer, husband, company manager. Even when you go to sleep in the living room, he comes with you :  Good luck to the futur dads and moms. |
|
|
|
what sort of argument you talking about? that blumed that you intend to offer an ICO for the bitcointalk users which until now you haven't show anything? you tried to hire people to write an ANN thread and whitepaper for you El while your site is running under a subdomain? you joke?
you have an argument and you won't share? lol you better just keep it because you might just scam nothing at all. Whatever happens this bitconnect coin is a scam.
You want to have details about blumed ? -snip We are just slowly developing a wallet built with node, with built-in binary platform, this is an image from my VM, i can send tons of others like that, now stop trolling, because you are really abusing now. when was this taken? is that 445-444 bitcoin price? god that was a long time ago. my analysis is that if you develop such application, you then must be a trader. and a trader can't afford to buy a domain? get the hell out of here.
what sort of argument you talking about? that blumed that you intend to offer an ICO for the bitcointalk users which until now you haven't show anything? you tried to hire people to write an ANN thread and whitepaper for you El while your site is running under a subdomain? you joke?
you have an argument and you won't share? lol you better just keep it because you might just scam nothing at all. Whatever happens this bitconnect coin is a scam.
You want to have details about blumed ? -snip We are just slowly developing a wallet built with node, with built-in binary platform, this is an image from my VM, i can send tons of others like that, now stop trolling, because you are really abusing now. Blumed is a product which developed by bcc team? Correct me if i am incorrect. No. just a scam nemgun had set up back then but was stopped because its a very suspicious project like bitcoinnect coin. I forgot to add : facebook : Blumed Edition there are my company's pictures and all stuff. and no, it is not bitcoin's price, it was a volatility index. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
