Of course, the priority goes to projects already under construction.

Let me clarify that in one of the previous posts, I do not mean to
propose to build in house a complex alternative payment processor,
or a full exchange or a decentralized one.

The second is too complex, it can not be improvised in a short time.

With regard to create a payment processor, it should also overcome
the distrust of the merchant, in already crowded area.

IMHO it would be much better if some of the payment processor of the
larger and more reliable in cryptoworld,  "adopt" the NAV.

Basically Nav did not have RPC interfaces different from other wallets,
so I think their task would be "relatively" easy.

What I meant to suggest in other message was a "simple" and
doable gateway, as Shapeshit (if it continue to not be interested),
which allows to instantly convert Nav and pay in BTC, and start to
really use the NAV for small payments anywhere.

The approach of the aforementioned VeriBit, which I did not know,
and I thank  for the information, it's very interesting.

From a point of view (very) theoretical, perhaps is not very different from
what was done for the anonymous transaction, from a certain point of view
is even simpler, just that instead of sending the transaction output to a
wallet Navajo, it would be sent in a BitCoin wallet.

It remains only to manage the interactions between the "changenode" and
the exchange itself, and reserve management (both on exchange and wallets).

This ChangeNode, or "Agent" would be a kind of node similar in structure and
communications, to the existing anonymous nodes, but different in his final task.
(This changenode, could be decentralized or assigned to a group of individuals,
but is useless to go too far now)

The ability to send payments in bitcoins, directly from NAV wallet,
maybe it would not be "unique", but IMHO it would be very intriguing,
and perhaps Pakage has indirectly made a lot of the work needed.

Bye Bye

PS:
You are all witnesses, if one day someone will invent a IceCream dispenser
integrated into a wallet... I want 15% of earnings.

The first might not be an exchange's wallet, and instead a part of the
other 20 addresses above may actually be exchange's wallet, or may
belong to the wallet being held offline and then they do not do
anything useful for the network.

Instead you do not feel that would be more serious and fair reward with
an extra, the first 20 addresses that have produced more blocks in the
given period of time?
They actually do something for the network, they make sure that it works.

Extract information of the top 20 staker is not too hard, just count the
blocks in the main-chain generated by address. (with a routine ofc)

Bye Bye

An ice-cream dispenser, built in the wallet?  
IMHO it would be a great success, and would also be well linked with the
legacy of SummerCoin.

Make NAV somehow "unique" can be useful, and it would also be easy
to propagandize, but perhaps it would be even more useful to make sure
that it is actually used as currency.

Therefore, used by different merchants and payment processor that natively
accept this currency, or services of automatic exchange to BTC\LTC for use
NAV anywhere, even where it is not accepted, I mean a service of the type
of ShapeShift, even if it means doing it "in house".

Bye Bye

PS:
In house -> by the DevTeam on the official site

Hi!
I gave a quick look to the new OP, and I would have a few suggestions:
1) In the roadmap, some dates are for mid June, but some of the
goals are not yet ready, perhaps it would be better to show
dates more reliable.

2) At the end, a circular symbol it was created by force.
IMHO, it seems a bit too dark, maybe a faint yellow or gold
around the circle, perhaps with some reflection of light,
it would make it a little lighter.
But these are just personal taste.

3) The link to the block explorer is wrong, it looks like a typo.

4) Regarding the blockcrawler, IMHO now it seems pretty useless.
The beta phase of anonymity ended long ago, and the blockcrawler
now not find even the block 1.
Other this also differences between the blockexplorer and blockcrawler
are not explained.

I propose three solutions:
A) Remove the BlockCrawler from OP
B) Diversify graphically and explain the differences.
C) The most useful. Allocate the block crawler to another task.
It can be a sort of blockexplorer reserve, as an alternative fast and
rough but always constantly updated to the main chain, of course,
placed on a server physically different from the BlockExp.

Probably when you'll deploy the web wallet will change many things
on the site, but until then I think we need a BlockExp always updated.


5) The symbol associated with the download of blockchain, the penguin,
generally is historically related to Linux, it might be more suitable
another symbol with greater relevance to the content.

PS:I have not checked the rest.

Bye Bye

I do not know if what I'm about to say has the slightest sense, have you thought
of putting a (different)  ID in the signal on the wallets side , and then in the GUI side,
according to the ID received deliver the message at the appropriate model?
(Plan B: send a different signal for each wallet)

A curiosity, what is currently the memory footprint of multiwallet, greater or less than
the three separate wallet?

One last question, where do I find the source of the latest stable version of ECC (single) wallet?

Bye Bye

This new logo is low and wide.  When resized, the central N could become
relatively small.

Instead of a circle, what do you think of a oval?
It would be someway different from the others logo.

Aside this, to give a little more contrast at logo, I would inverted the
orientation of the circle fill gradient,  at the opposite side of the internal logo.
(i.e. the purple color at top right side)

(just two instantaneous thoughts, I'm not sure on results)

Bye Bye

We have a set which go from green to blue and another from purple to blue.

If not too a waste of time, would be possible have a complete set of letters,
just for closing the main colors spectrum  ?

Bye Bye

PS:
I don't mean the entire alphabet, just the NAV letters.

Quirk and Dirty just to explain better:

Nice work.

I like the concept of a transparent folded tape, and where the individual letters can
be seen as parts which form the main (N) logo.

The disappearance of the horizontal bar of A, it seems a bit a pity, it would have made
the concept more evident.

I have not understood a part of your comments: why purple is more well-connected
with the name?

I'd be slightly more favorable to the blue violet (and if there was even a touch of red,
perhaps it would be even better).

One possible change would be give the impression that the material is a stylized punched tape,
I believe that in this way it could have a different tech appeal, but maybe it's a reference
a bit too retro.   

Now I imagine which also the theme song must change, so I vote for (Deep) Purple,
although I would prefer more Pink Floyd. 

Bye Bye

I think that having on the official website a list of nodes continually updated,
could be a useful thing.

And maybe DevTeam could also group the node according to their nation, as was done
with the world map, with members registered in Slack Talk (sorry probably wrong name).

Bye Bye

You would like to give us a little hint?

Animal, vegetable or mineral?   

Bye Bye

Well...

From what I see, in the http://infernopool.com/getting_started page,
there is the total paid for every coin, and also a example with the wallet
address of the pool maintainer, in our case sTxZhCSTy2GtfGkkgvgJ9p1CrbKEEnPvLS.


So, considering:



in http://infernopool.com/miner/sTxZhCSTy2GtfGkkgvgJ9p1CrbKEEnPvLS we can see:


if at this, we add also:

we get a figure near the total paid.

In brief, what we can conjecture is... actually no one is actively using
the NAV multi pool, other than the maintainer.

IMHO, this total lack of use, to want to be very diplomatic, is not the
best thing that the community can give.

Bye Bye

From what I can see in the RichList, even not considering the SuprNova's wallet,
the others first ten wallets have 26+ M, something near the 44% of coin supply.

Apart from that, if you really do not care if your account will give a yield of 30%,
or even 1%, well, then the director of your bank must be a very happy man.

Joke aside, IMHO it's a good thing the Dev said of bug and put priority on fix this,
it is a step on the right way.

Bye Bye

I think that anyone could argue with each line of your reply, but these are times frantic
and it would be a waste of time for everyone, and I do not want to offend or upset you.

But one thing I must ask, if yours is a long-term project, why not take the time to plan
every detail and explain well in a complete way your plan, before the launch, instead of
postpone any new explanations and developments to endgame?
Why start a project with a misstep?

Bye

So, the main feature of this coin is not yet decided, and will not implemented in wallet's
code until the POW end, when the POS will be already running, but nevertheless the
launch is for tomorrow.   

Thanks for your answer... in some way it has been enlightening.

Bye

@R-A-T-E

I saw in altcoincalendar this two lines, with the main goal of RATECoin:



Do You would like be so kind to explain more deeply this plan, which will bind the
coin value and the mining?


What will be the "PoS Maximum Age" ?

TIA

Welcome! I think you'll be fine here.

I saw the site http://poolpicker.eu/text.php?algo=sha-256 , and your multipool has a long row
of good results, both on Sha256 and on Scrypt, my compliments.

For what i can see your pool now mine only Sha-256 and Scrypt, two algos which nowadays
require specialized hardware to be mined with profit.

Do you have some plan for other algos, ie x??, neoscrypt, lrye2... etc, more easy to mine
for "normal user" ?

Remy_5

Bye Bye

I do not know the AltCoinGuys, then I may have misunderstood, but if he's one of
those people who prepare the clones of coins for other inept "developper", and so
creates coins destined to become once more new scamcoins, if He is a programmer
who does not sign the work it produces, then I am very very happy that he has no
personal relationship with the project Navajocoin.

The kind of people IMHO are a disaster for the whole area of altcurrency.

IMHO perhaps at this point it would be better to do one thing, throw away his
previous work and start from scratch, or by other public and secure projects.



VERY VERY WELL!!

Ahaa... It's a relief.

Bye Bye

But you have seen their shipping fees?

Bye Bye

LOL !! You are really greedy.

No need to do damage just to keep the point.

From the theoretical point of view, as a demonstration of force, it would be much simpler
transfer all 3+ M of NAV to another of its addresses, and then provide the TXID, without
dumps on the market, and so no one loses or gains 1 single Nav.

Bye Bye

Ok, back to the real things.

In the last release of wallet, there has been a jump of version, now is 3.0.0, and AFAIK the bigger
improvement is the new irc chat.

Some one of the DevTeam, would be so kind to explain to beginner, what are the similarities or the
difference, or the improvement with the already present "Talk Code" panel?

Another question about the chat, Pakage in "Talk Code" had made an elaborate security system for
registering a nickname to avoid someone can steal the nickname of others person, this nickname's
system will cover also the new irc chat?

Bye Bye