In my opinion important keep dates on road map is first fisnish dedicated forum + nav cooperating system on this forum. At the same time finish web wallet. After finish mobile wallet. After this basics finish Nav Masternodes or/and at the same time finish Decentralization anon tech. After decentralization start PR with promo video and media marketing materials. Without decentalization anon any marketing actions will be ineffective imho. Its logistic path imho.
Of course, the priority goes to projects already under construction. Let me clarify that in one of the previous posts, I do not mean to propose to build in house a complex alternative payment processor, or a full exchange or a decentralized one. The second is too complex, it can not be improvised in a short time. With regard to create a payment processor, it should also overcome the distrust of the merchant, in already crowded area. IMHO it would be much better if some of the payment processor of the larger and more reliable in cryptoworld, "adopt" the NAV. Basically Nav did not have RPC interfaces different from other wallets, so I think their task would be "relatively" easy. What I meant to suggest in other message was a "simple" and doable gateway, as Shapeshit (if it continue to not be interested), which allows to instantly convert Nav and pay in BTC, and start to really use the NAV for small payments anywhere. The approach of the aforementioned VeriBit, which I did not know, and I thank for the information, it's very interesting. From a point of view (very) theoretical, perhaps is not very different from what was done for the anonymous transaction, from a certain point of view is even simpler, just that instead of sending the transaction output to a wallet Navajo, it would be sent in a BitCoin wallet. It remains only to manage the interactions between the "changenode" and the exchange itself, and reserve management (both on exchange and wallets). This ChangeNode, or "Agent" would be a kind of node similar in structure and communications, to the existing anonymous nodes, but different in his final task. (This changenode, could be decentralized or assigned to a group of individuals, but is useless to go too far now) The ability to send payments in bitcoins, directly from NAV wallet, maybe it would not be "unique", but IMHO it would be very intriguing, and perhaps Pakage has indirectly made a lot of the work needed. Bye Bye PS: You are all witnesses, if one day someone will invent a IceCream dispenser integrated into a wallet... I want 15% of earnings.
|
|
|
5) Coins will be split to the first 20 wallets in richlist. (except the first one....it is always exchange)
Any other suggestions?
The first might not be an exchange's wallet, and instead a part of the other 20 addresses above may actually be exchange's wallet, or may belong to the wallet being held offline and then they do not do anything useful for the network. Instead you do not feel that would be more serious and fair reward with an extra, the first 20 addresses that have produced more blocks in the given period of time? They actually do something for the network, they make sure that it works. Extract information of the top 20 staker is not too hard, just count the blocks in the main-chain generated by address. (with a routine ofc) Bye Bye
|
|
|
I guess we need to think about what will make Nav a truely unique coin?
An ice-cream dispenser, built in the wallet? IMHO it would be a great success, and would also be well linked with the legacy of SummerCoin. Make NAV somehow "unique" can be useful, and it would also be easy to propagandize, but perhaps it would be even more useful to make sure that it is actually used as currency. Therefore, used by different merchants and payment processor that natively accept this currency, or services of automatic exchange to BTC\LTC for use NAV anywhere, even where it is not accepted, I mean a service of the type of ShapeShift, even if it means doing it "in house". Bye Bye PS: In house -> by the DevTeam on the official site
|
|
|
I'll add that tommorow.
Hi! I gave a quick look to the new OP, and I would have a few suggestions: 1) In the roadmap, some dates are for mid June, but some of the goals are not yet ready, perhaps it would be better to show dates more reliable. 2) At the end, a circular symbol it was created by force. IMHO, it seems a bit too dark, maybe a faint yellow or gold around the circle, perhaps with some reflection of light, it would make it a little lighter. But these are just personal taste. 3) The link to the block explorer is wrong, it looks like a typo. 4) Regarding the blockcrawler, IMHO now it seems pretty useless. The beta phase of anonymity ended long ago, and the blockcrawler now not find even the block 1. Other this also differences between the blockexplorer and blockcrawler are not explained. I propose three solutions: A) Remove the BlockCrawler from OP B) Diversify graphically and explain the differences. C) The most useful. Allocate the block crawler to another task. It can be a sort of blockexplorer reserve, as an alternative fast and rough but always constantly updated to the main chain, of course, placed on a server physically different from the BlockExp. Probably when you'll deploy the web wallet will change many things on the site, but until then I think we need a BlockExp always updated. 5) The symbol associated with the download of blockchain, the penguin, generally is historically related to Linux, it might be more suitable another symbol with greater relevance to the content. PS:I have not checked the rest. Bye Bye
|
|
|
but with multiple coins running at once the gui signals keep overwritting each other and almost none of the data shown is valid for the coin that is trying to be displayed.
I do not know if what I'm about to say has the slightest sense, have you thought of putting a (different) ID in the signal on the wallets side , and then in the GUI side, according to the ID received deliver the message at the appropriate model? (Plan B: send a different signal for each wallet) A curiosity, what is currently the memory footprint of multiwallet, greater or less than the three separate wallet? One last question, where do I find the source of the latest stable version of ECC (single) wallet? Bye Bye
|
|
|
Please let us know what You think, it's the first version and it can be changed. Or we can stay with the text based logo, which I presented above.
This new logo is low and wide. When resized, the central N could become relatively small. Instead of a circle, what do you think of a oval? It would be someway different from the others logo. Aside this, to give a little more contrast at logo, I would inverted the orientation of the circle fill gradient, at the opposite side of the internal logo. (i.e. the purple color at top right side) (just two instantaneous thoughts, I'm not sure on results) Bye Bye
|
|
|
Will it be also a circular version of the logo?
We have a set which go from green to blue and another from purple to blue. If not too a waste of time, would be possible have a complete set of letters, just for closing the main colors spectrum ? Bye Bye PS: I don't mean the entire alphabet, just the NAV letters. Quirk and Dirty just to explain better:
|
|
|
In my personal opinion the purple & blue version looks better. It's much, much more original than the standard green one and it's connecting well with the name.
Nice work. I like the concept of a transparent folded tape, and where the individual letters can be seen as parts which form the main (N) logo. The disappearance of the horizontal bar of A, it seems a bit a pity, it would have made the concept more evident. I have not understood a part of your comments: why purple is more well-connected with the name? I'd be slightly more favorable to the blue violet (and if there was even a touch of red, perhaps it would be even better). One possible change would be give the impression that the material is a stylized punched tape, I believe that in this way it could have a different tech appeal, but maybe it's a reference a bit too retro. Now I imagine which also the theme song must change, so I vote for (Deep) Purple, although I would prefer more Pink Floyd. Bye Bye
|
|
|
Any nodes I can add to speed up syncing the blockchain? I only have 1 connection right now, thanks.
18:59:34  getpeerinfo
18:59:34  ....
I think that having on the official website a list of nodes continually updated, could be a useful thing. And maybe DevTeam could also group the node according to their nation, as was done with the world map, with members registered in Slack Talk (sorry probably wrong name). Bye Bye
|
|
|
We are currently in the process of implementing a few major improvements to the blockchain protocol.
Please await more information related to this.
You would like to give us a little hint? Animal, vegetable or mineral? Bye Bye
|
|
|
How is the multipool doing? How many people use it everyday?
I have long abandoned mining and can't seem to get the info I'm asking from the infernopool page. Although there is a section of the page mentioning total payouts of each coin, they are all empty
Well... From what I see, in the http://infernopool.com/getting_started page, there is the total paid for every coin, and also a example with the wallet address of the pool maintainer, in our case sTxZhCSTy2GtfGkkgvgJ9p1CrbKEEnPvLS. So, considering: Total NAV Paid: 1514.77867705 in http://infernopool.com/miner/sTxZhCSTy2GtfGkkgvgJ9p1CrbKEEnPvLS we can see: sTxZhCSTy2GtfGkkgvgJ9p1CrbKEEnPvLS Total amount paid to this address: 996.58765596 NAV
if at this, we add also: sJj8aG322Eg8EaVV4yhoz8teKgiTjpPtua Total amount paid to this address: 516.52304825 NAV
we get a figure near the total paid. In brief, what we can conjecture is... actually no one is actively using the NAV multi pool, other than the maintainer. IMHO, this total lack of use, to want to be very diplomatic, is not the best thing that the community can give. Bye Bye
|
|
|
A lot of people are having a few coins here... so not really people with a lot of coins that can dump the price.
From what I can see in the RichList, even not considering the SuprNova's wallet, the others first ten wallets have 26+ M, something near the 44% of coin supply. Apart from that, if you really do not care if your account will give a yield of 30%, or even 1%, well, then the director of your bank must be a very happy man. Joke aside, IMHO it's a good thing the Dev said of bug and put priority on fix this, it is a step on the right way. Bye Bye
|
|
|
As a part of development. We want to conect mining profatibility (in BTC) with value of Rate coin. We still have many things to decide. (More info after POW)
So, the main feature of this coin is not yet decided, and will not implemented in wallet's code until the POW end, when the POS will be already running, but nevertheless the launch is for tomorrow. Thanks for your answer... in some way it has been enlightening. Bye Main feature of this coin is already decided. Rate coin is a fast, safe and decentralized P2P crypto currency. We want to develop true decentralized anonymity. As a part of development we will focus on market with renting hashes. We want to build stabile crypto currency with real use. This will be longterm project. Launch in 1 hour... I think that anyone could argue with each line of your reply, but these are times frantic and it would be a waste of time for everyone, and I do not want to offend or upset you. But one thing I must ask, if yours is a long-term project, why not take the time to plan every detail and explain well in a complete way your plan, before the launch, instead of postpone any new explanations and developments to endgame? Why start a project with a misstep? Bye
|
|
|
Do You would like be so kind to explain more deeply this plan, which will bind the coin value and the mining?
As a part of development. We want to conect mining profatibility (in BTC) with value of Rate coin. We still have many things to decide. (More info after POW) So, the main feature of this coin is not yet decided, and will not implemented in wallet's code until the POW end, when the POS will be already running, but nevertheless the launch is for tomorrow. Thanks for your answer... in some way it has been enlightening. Bye
|
|
|
@R-A-T-E I saw in altcoincalendar this two lines, with the main goal of RATECoin: RATEcoin is dedicated to buildi a community across the crypto landscape, connecting crypto people and coin communities through unique economy plan. We would like to conect mining profatibility with value of the coin.
Do You would like be so kind to explain more deeply this plan, which will bind the coin value and the mining? What will be the "PoS Maximum Age" ? TIA
|
|
|
Welcome! I think you'll be fine here. I saw the site http://poolpicker.eu/text.php?algo=sha-256 , and your multipool has a long row of good results, both on Sha256 and on Scrypt, my compliments. For what i can see your pool now mine only Sha-256 and Scrypt, two algos which nowadays require specialized hardware to be mined with profit. Do you have some plan for other algos, ie x??, neoscrypt, lrye2... etc, more easy to mine for "normal user" ? Remy_5 Bye Bye
|
|
|
That is all speculation. I can not tell you. But it is the truth. And to the comment above... A third party first needs to check what is done and how... That needs as much time as starting from scratch and is perhaps even more difficult. We can not say what is the status and is everything correct. (security etc..)
I do not know the AltCoinGuys, then I may have misunderstood, but if he's one of those people who prepare the clones of coins for other inept "developper", and so creates coins destined to become once more new scamcoins, if He is a programmer who does not sign the work it produces, then I am very very happy that he has no personal relationship with the project Navajocoin. The kind of people IMHO are a disaster for the whole area of altcurrency. IMHO perhaps at this point it would be better to do one thing, throw away his previous work and start from scratch, or by other public and secure projects. But we found a really good dev that seems to be very good in what he is doing and he already has experience in webwallet... Especially security aspects.
VERY VERY WELL!! Ahaa... It's a relief. Bye Bye
|
|
|
But you have seen their shipping fees? Bye Bye
|
|
|
@leetcoiner Please dump on 300 satoshi.
LOL !! You are really greedy. No need to do damage just to keep the point. From the theoretical point of view, as a demonstration of force, it would be much simpler transfer all 3+ M of NAV to another of its addresses, and then provide the TXID, without dumps on the market, and so no one loses or gains 1 single Nav. Bye Bye
|
|
|
Ok, back to the real things.
In the last release of wallet, there has been a jump of version, now is 3.0.0, and AFAIK the bigger improvement is the new irc chat.
Some one of the DevTeam, would be so kind to explain to beginner, what are the similarities or the difference, or the improvement with the already present "Talk Code" panel?
Another question about the chat, Pakage in "Talk Code" had made an elaborate security system for registering a nickname to avoid someone can steal the nickname of others person, this nickname's system will cover also the new irc chat?
Bye Bye
|
|
|
|