Try sending them three more, perhaps one of them will magically jump ahead in the huge backlog of emails they probably have.

If lots of people think like that it means that a large amount of bitcoins that people really want to sell is piling up. When you give up waiting the price will crash.

Why do you pick the examples with the largest difference to prove your point? It proves that you have decided what you want to believe, and only look for evidence supporting it. What you should be doing is looking for evidence that disproves your own theory. If you did you would have used the most similar money, which are the coins. If you can honestly say that the most similar examples are too different to be confused you would have made a much more convincing argument.

It may only be because it's a really early build, but this archive does not contain the same files as the archive on dot-bit.org.

Why would they do that when they can mine bitcoins and use them to buy more namecoins for the reward than they would get by mining namecoins directly?

I can probably take the loss much easier than most people on this forum, but it's nice to know that we don't have to share the money with too many people if it turns out we'll have to go to a lawsuit to get anything back.

You should have noticed by now that anything that supports what libertarians wants to believe is automatically seen as fact on this forum. Everything else is wrong.

It's still my money, and I don't really care if the site is up or not. I just want my money, and they have all the information they need to send them to me. It's the same as for all the previous transactions. If you sit and wait silently for 100 days you're just stupid, because if it takes that long it's because they've taken the money and run away. This has already taken suspiciously much time, and I'm certainly not going to give them a 100 day head start.

We've been plenty patient. We've checked mtgox every day, and every day there is a new excuse for why they have to delay the opening just one more day.

You won't be playing this game for long if you think it's ok to lose money without a fight either.

No, I've given them one more day every day for almost a week. They've never asked for a week, they always ask for just one more day.

Why were they open a week ago if they can find so many things to fix now?

You need to learn the difference between knowledge and pulling numbers out of you @ss.

They need to learn to tell their users which information is mandatory, especially when it's pretty useless compared to the information the user has already submitted.

But then they don't. They auto reject claims with extremely good information and accept claims with mediocre information.

Unless the BTC value stays at the current level while the difficulty continues to rise, it may never be profitable to mine namecoins again. The namecoin difficulty was pushed too high in the last mining rush, and with hardly anybody mining it will take forever for it to go back down. Even if you really want namecoins you can get twice as many by mining bitcoins and trading them for namecoins.

Has anybody used this pool successfully with "Flexible mining proxy"? The proxy works fine with my 5 other pools, but this one is just completely ignored. It never logs any attempt at getting a share, even though it has the highest priority and both pool and workers are enabled. I don't get any error messages as far as I can see.

Putting that much weight on this piece of information seems stupid. If the account were hacked the hackers would know how much money is in the account.

Guess I underestimated your lack of moral standards, then.

Then you, sir, are an asshole and a leech. Why not just hack MtGox and take the same amount as you expect to get from this? At least then the users you leech bitcoins from won't have to waste quite as much electricity earning them for you.

The reason why ETFs are used is that they contain assets of a kind or mix that individual investors can't easily buy on their own. It is much easier for most people to buy a bitcoin than a share in an ETF, so there's no point in creating one.

Tradehill doesn't support European transfer methods and basically pays people to spam about them. Either is enough that I won't use them.

Then why did you?

But then how can you claim that they are not allowed to do a rollback if you don't have a contract with them?

Exactly. Should the original owner be allowed to take back the stolen money by any force necessary, or does it now belong to the people who knowingly bought stolen coins? Do they now belong to whoever can afford the biggest guns to take them back or defend them?

At least this incident has shown how a lot of the libertarians are a bunch of hippocrites when it comes to property rights and moral.