Yeah it's a gamble but I'm kinda forced to bet on the opposite here. I'm so thin on RBs now that Henderson is apparently on McVay's shitlist ("breathing issue" LOL) - even had to put Goedert in flex for this week...

EDIT wow, AMZN got a bit more than halved and is only a few bucks away from the March 2020 bottom; META lost 76%, GOOG 42%

Yeah we do get some of the same players and I'm quite sure you snatched a few off the wire right before me. But no, you can't have Jacobs

I had Conner (and Edmonds) last year, kinda accidentally/unplanned, and he hauled in some serious pointage for me. Perhaps I'm being sentimental LOL but I think he's still the top RB for Cardinals. Although Eno sure had a good run (no pun intended) in his absence.

I miss you guys' thoughts!

However, I am most worried about you for week 9 because I do not have McCaffrey and if you get Goedert, I lose hehehe.

Oh good. I was worried it might have stood for socialist. 

The market is at a decision point again. The market will be waiting for the Fed meeting tomorrow. Taking trades can be very risky. So it seems best to be patient and wait. The market seems to be open to manipulation again. That's why I don't think it will be easy to open a trade when there are so many risks. First up and then down or vice versa.In fact, it is supposed to be independent. But the market moves because of these decisions.

It is rare but after the flag against the Bengals the football was placed on the one yard line, and with Chubb on their team it made sense they went for two under those circumstances.

MSSM = mainstream social media. What does the other s stand for?

Almost as bad as the MSSM.  

Due to the weird 10-team scheduling I will not have to play against bbc.reporter again (not until playoffs if I get that far) but I will have to play against you, so not sure what the trading "strategy" should be

Congrats on a well-deserved W.

@suchmoon. Do not give him Goedert hehhehehe.

I would like to trade Tyler Lockett for Dallas Goedert but can you wait after week 9? I will be lacking on starters for week 9 and I will need Lockett once before trading him with someone or in the waiver wire.

Didn't even get to the field goal range?

LOL, to be fair hes been pedestrian all year until today. I took a hard pass on all Raiders cause Carr sucks sweaty balls sacks.

Also I posted that list so that so I can go back at the end of the season and see how it turned out.

Paging DireWolfM14... you need to replace Deebo.

As previously disclosed, the Company’s operating performance and liquidity have been severely impacted by the prolonged decrease in the price of bitcoin, the increase in electricity costs, the increase in the global bitcoin network hash rate and the litigation with Celsius Networks LLC and its affiliates (“Celsius”). As a result, management has been actively taking steps to decrease monthly costs, delay construction expenses, reduce and delay capital expenditures and increase hosting revenues. In addition, the Board has decided that the Company will not make payments coming due in late October and early November 2022 with respect to several of its equipment and other financings, including its two bridge promissory notes. As a result, the creditors under these debt facilities may exercise remedies following any applicable grace periods, including electing to accelerate the principal amount of such debt, suing the Company for nonpayment or taking action with respect to collateral, where applicable. Any such creditor actions may result in events of default under the Company’s other indebtedness agreements, including its two series of convertible notes due 2025, and the potential exercise of remedies by creditors under such agreements.

Very funny ha ha. Well, I didn't have much hope for it anyway

I'm so thoroughly fucked this week that I might have to play without a WR. Two players with a "D", which I can't move to IR, so I can't shop for replacement. And three players on a bye, which I don't want to drop.

We do so much to try to protect the privacy of the lightning network but always going to be constantly fighting the tendencies for society to give away information for convenience. I can't begin to tell you how aggregating this information to a single party is an attack on Lightning and the privacy of all individuals as a whole.

Muppet, sorry for your ignorance. The question is can you learn? Note that BTC has... 12 nodes, owned by 6 groups with the majority in 2 countries and 3 nodes. You have been warned. BTC is good for trash. DYOR.

I really like that nice BitcoinSV logo in your screenshot. I pity you because your stupidity transcends you, my god it's overwhelming. You seem to be so condescending that you don't want to make the effort to understand how bitcoin technically works. However, you may soon discover that there is a difference between production nodes and peeping nodes which do nothing but read. It will depend on how many serviceable neurons you have left. If the effort seems difficult, believe me, it is not impossible. Try again, Read the technical facts.

Decentralization has different meaning in different contexts. Consider at least the following: