AT stands for Automat ed Transactions and not atomic transactions  Thank you Legendary & Vbcs, I was caught up in > 1000 alt coins and 1000 assets something that automated NOT automatic transactions will fix I hope ?  btw Legendary it is something restricted to BURST you have been working with or you will bless other coins with your help as well ? thank you (corrections made with both fear and respect) |
|
|
|
can not be more than 10K a day with 100T with 10 ~ 15 T oscilaltions as we have now and it aint going down, you better of buying on an exchange price should drop big time before years end, next year is an open end game
can you explain why price should drop big before years end? ty possibly due to the natural behavior of the markets during Holiday season, might be a window of opportunity however now with the automated NOT atomic transactions announcement situation might be very different I would still observe market carefully especially in the coming days |
|
|
|
Burst 1.2.0Download: https://mega.co.nz/#!75xV1abB!PG6gC6mMcSmr5ys2SrkHnIw-BDq1FodG5_bzWVlXJtssha256: 00cafd7efb560c3253f8e94ff0b16f2c488d1849166f27c06f0dee7b98f07bcb or github: https://github.com/BurstProject/burstcoinUpdate required for all users by block 49200 (12/26 or 12/27) If using an existing copy of the blockchain this will do a re-scan on first run. This update adds the Automatic Transaction (AT) system. This will allow users to write turing complete scripts which can be saved to the blockchain. Scripts will get their own account id and are able to send and receive coins, and will execute trustlessly. This release should be compliant with the ciyam AT specs found here: http://ciyam.org/at/Additional platform-specific api calls will be added later on. Current fees for ATs are: On creation 1 burst per memory page(256 bytes). When ATs execute, normal opcodes cost 0.1, and api calls cost 1. There is a maximum of 200 fee per AT execution. Thank you, your work has been awesome on this! I hope we can put together a press release on this that is awesome, love it, thank you for pushing this forward, okey dokey speak soon have fun (first and most) and have a great week ahead |
|
|
|
How much are you earning per day with 100TB on devs v2 pool ?
can not be more than 10K a day with 100T with 10 ~ 15 T oscilaltions as we have now and it aint going down, you better of buying on an exchange price should drop big time before years end, next year is an open end game No. My guess is you will earn ~10K with 35-40-45tb. To have 200tb on regular equipment, mining 24/7, must be hell. Since I started mining a year ago, no form of mining has required as much work and attention as Burst. But still it's fun with all the problems. Can't remember how many times I been thinking "I'll fix that rig tomorrow!", but still end up spending 2h in the middle of the night getting it to tun smoothly again. That makes you respect the mined coins more. I'll not sell them cheap, for sure. yeah must be 20K a day on 100 tera on approximately 3.K thousand dollars (getting goose bumps just thinking about it) as far as selling right now I don't who is selling! WD/Seagate testing lab ? maybe I forgot one more investment one has to make high speed DRAM usually > 150$ a pop if smart one gets 4 x and if really smart (smart of stupid you decide) one spreads load of drives across multiple servers so I say + extra 1,000$ for fast deadlines, multiple servers costs so I say + extra lets say 3,000$ we tabulate for a 20K to 30 T investment Today will be... and the winner iiiis: 3,5000$ + 1,0000$ + 3,0000$ = ------------ grand total 7,500$ that's seven and a half thousand dollars for 20,000 BURST a day which is at the current market prices and the winer is: 0.000527 x 20,000 whopping 10$ a day! we congratulate the winner Disclaimer: not saying it is not fun to engage in this tech it is awesome and not saying prices won't go up but I am really curious who is selling |
|
|
|
we spoke to each other , will keep tab on the above, good people, and you ? you thiiiiink (like in the Bruce Lee movie) |
|
|
|
For large scale burst miners, can you recommend pool? Like 200TB... solo was doing ok, but lets try options?
It has been unstable lately but uray's SG pool was by far the very best for larger miner; I'm waiting for the day it returns to it's full glory. For now I have almost 100tb on devs v2 pool. It pays my the best right now and very regularly. Before I was on crow's burst.ga but it really didn'tpaid off as I thought, sadly. Would be fun to see how a 200tb-miner would do on devs pool. The use of deadlines therr pays off nicely for larger miners, that I know atleast. How much are you earning per day with 100TB on devs v2 pool ? can not be more than 10K a day with 100T with 10 ~ 15 T oscilaltions as we have now and it aint going down, you better of buying on an exchange price should drop big time before years end, next year is an open end game let me see , 4 Tera even on ebay (and that is a risk) 150$ ? take 100 T / 4 T = 25 x 4 tera drives times 150$ so the individual invested 3,500$ simply wow almost 4 grand for 10K BURST a day can not be more than that maybe plus or minus 4K BURST sometimes I wonder on people's capacity to think also not to mention that every time magnetic needle touches down the surface (moving parts) for surely these ain't optical drives it shaves off lifetime of these drives in the 24 cycle after one year every day will be risk of complete disk failure |
|
|
|
I would just like to remind the devs or whoever is maintaining vertcoin.org that it still shows links to the old vertminer and there is no mention of the new algo on the mining tab of the page.
Maybe a promotional/informational campaign/stunt is in order? since I'm not sure the algo change is popular knowledge outside the vertcoin community.
just my 2 cents
0 worries , every single crypto coin is taking a hit and till the end of this year it is going to be so and even worse VERT or bla it does not matter, however I (we am sure) appreciate you taking care volume simply is not there to cover all markets which will be consolidated in years to come |
|
|
|
Vertans! happy Sunday, how is the mining situation going ?, would you mind to share what pools you are using and if with good or bad effects I am using: https://pool.verters.com site (and stratum) only went down once yesterday due to VPS problem since then recovered and going strong + operator is very attentive and friendly , fee is 2% other's experiences ? another question if someone knows and can share : how to setup backup stratum in ccminer if one stratum goes down after n retries etc or timeout , can anyone share good strategy ? thanks much in advance and one more thing, see what block finding time is in your particular pool, seeing upwards of 30 minutes per block.. sometimes extending to over one hour (but not too often) also I believe bots are at rage on bittrex looking at amounts and frequency of sell/buy orders , someone is playing games with arbitrage for sure |
|
|
|
please stick to intricacies of parametrization of cgminer and ccminer cycys for lyra2 and deep elaborations of subtleties of hashing rounds and their asic resistence I understand your sentence until before cycys... do you think I understand it ? I often ask myself this question what does it want what is it's desire (its from the movie Galaxy Quest have fun watching it I sure did)  |
|
|
|
please stick to intricacies of parametrization of cgminer and ccminer cycys for lyra2 and deep elaborations of subtleties of hashing rounds and their asic resistence |
|
|
|
https://pool.verters.com died from too much happiness think it is run by this clown operator (I am kidding really take a joke) @TheCoinFinder Ahhh - damn VPS. My dedicated server was more reliable (and also far more expensive). DB is up again now. I need to put up some heartbeat monitor for this. Apologies for any downtimes. noooo problem, otherwise yo run beautiful operation and very steady cheers, as soon as VERT goes up you might have to give few year QT's (hopefully super conservative here) bump VPS spec (or sooner as your 2% will also suffer I just love how it all works, miners need pool , pool need miners, hand washes another hand aaaaaand we ran to "bad luck" syndrome again across all pools, block finding extended to > 1 hour |
|
|
|
https://pool.verters.com died from too much happiness think it is run by this clown operator (I am kidding really take a joke) @TheCoinFinder seems back,what happened bro ? seemed like mysql fried |
|
|
|
https://pool.verters.com died from too much happiness think it is run by this clown operator (I am kidding really take a joke) @TheCoinFinder
|
|
|
|
Hey guys
We apologize for the long delay. We have been working on a new project (alongside LTB).
Update on LTB
The switch from scrypt to neoscrypt algo didn't go as planned. We ran into a myriad of issues which resulted in us having to roll back (temporarily).
LTB will however, be revived !! We are currently in discussion with a few guys that are interested in coming onboard and running LTB from our end.
LTB will still undergo a switch (instead of NeoScrypt, we are looking into X11) - Using DigiShield for protection against multi-pools and an over-inflation. In addition to the aforementioned changes, we will also put focus into the following:
√ New website
√ Mobile wallets - iOS, Android and Windows systems which are highly secure, fast and reliable
√ Block explorers | faucets | mining pools (self-hosted and 3rd party)
√ Tip Bots (IRC, twitter, reddit ETC)
√ BitMiles Branding Pack (logo | paperwallet | payment buttons)
√ Upgraded BTMi wallet (UI/UX AND FUNCTIONALITY rework)
We are hoping to have this up and running by mid January (latest). Updates will be posted here as we progress.
Again, we apologize for the inconvenience. Hold on to your LTB !!!
@QuadraQ : we have sent the PO of the pool several mails. We were told that the server owner shut us down. We contacted the server owner (several times) and we are still waiting for his response. This was a blind move. For future - We now know who to work with and who not.
Regards
good, also with neoscrypt Nvidia users would have been left impaired as no mining software exists for CUDA (as of the moment) if X11 is good for darkcoin it is good for you as well. good luck with re-launch next time and happy holidays it would be waste of planet precious resources (electricity) if you would halt blockchain , let it unwind its natural course , it is your call |
|
|
|
@TheCoinFinder others , anyone knows why on pool https://pool.verters.com block time find has extended to over one hour ? thanks update... back .. it was just this one block.. believe back on track , hopefully must have been really really bad luck Yes, it happens. Same as sometimes we get two blocks within a minute or so. yeah no problem at all, since its a new algo its just being cautious, thanks for running your pool btw "bad luck" blocks must be causing havoc in the multipools ops as they don't know if it is caused by high difficulty or bad luck it is great to see ASICs and fpga's taken out of equation. LTCGear must have some unhappy customers (LTCGear share farm explicitly targeted Scrypt-N and contracts are not short either, I am always worry about shared pools because of exactly what just happened.. with VERT shifting to lyra2) so far so good had 2 SIGINT exceptions.. btw another tip if on Unix use supervisord so the mining software restarts automatically on critical faults |
|
|
|
@TheCoinFinder others , anyone knows why on pool https://pool.verters.com block time find has extended to over one hour ? thanks update... back .. it was just this one block.. believe back on track , hopefully must have been really really bad luck |
|
|
|
What hashrate should I expect on Nvidia 780 and how much power does it consume?
don't know... I have a 780ti (OC) and it does ~1600kh/s power consumption is around70% djm34 question, at that speed, how many watts at the wall does that little beast eats? I will really love to know. I am about to build some more rigs and will love to know, so far the winner is 750ti, but a 1600Kh on a single card is tempting!  but power consumption is the most important thing the 780ti is rated 250W so 70% of that is 175W a 750ti is rated 60W at 55% that's 33W by 3 ~100W (people with watt-meter should confirm though) It means stay away from the 780ti (and I am a big fan of the 780ti...) prices might go down on GPU cards in general although people said that couple of times this year and nothing.. that is because of us miners! we are the demand and keep prices where they are |
|
|
|
What hashrate should I expect on Nvidia 780 and how much power does it consume?
don't know... I have a 780ti (OC) and it does ~1600kh/s power consumption is around70% are you serious ? that is a lot on a single card! I mean hash horse power congrats! yeah so that is ~ 519$ on egg .. let me see .. 750 ~140$ I think at 620 kh/s (no oc ) yeah so one needs 2.5 x 750 ti to have one 780 ti... so thats like 350$ .. but still.. only single PCI so you can pack more.. very nice regardless congrats again on the choice, smart let me see amp needed (Watts) on 780 ... reason I went with 750 like a year ago.. is electricity.. really adds up.. over time I ment kh/s above of course mh/s would haha be awesome.. but in my dreams also thinking to undervolt and overvolt thru BIOS.. a dont want to destabilize the system one really has to know what one is doing with Linux.. yeah so 250 W on the 780.. so in my case I would pack two of them for 3 x 750 (hash power wise) but would need to bump my power supply no big deal but maybe this post here helps someone building a rig or planning for one spec on 780 http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-780/specificationsspec on 750: http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-750/specificationswhat is really nice with 780 is for extra dollars (power supply) cooling system cost wont increase as seems temperature spec is the same for both cards that despite > 2 x as many CUDA cores! great achievement by Nvidia.. here anyways have a great time mining dont worry too much because of VERT price.. everyone is in the same boat and just be patient |
|
|
|
I'm fixing several issues in new version. It is almost ready, but one of the issues requires some time to debug.
nice to see new developer onboard ! and thank you |
|
|
|
I see what you are asking. You are right, I did misread what you posted. My apology. The block reward is currently 0.5 LTCD 0.13 LTCD per block. That is due to block reward halving. There was a correction to the block rewards that was made some time ago. That correction reduced the block reward value and shortened the length of time for block reward halving. You have not correctly understood, and mean that the award of the block fell from 200 to 16, instead of 100,50,25 etc. perfect, keep working on the technology and let the blockchain continue uninterrupted as is |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
