Wrong.
No it does not. This is not a fact, this is (paid) propaganda.




Those definitions are subjective, but definitely not under 100/1000.

No it doesn't. And don't fool yourself that this is remotely 'capitalism' either.

The sad hypocricy of these developments is that Adam Back asserted back in 2013 that he thought that Bitcoin was a "one off event" and that he didn't hold much store by altcoins.

Then he goes and starts a company to build altcoins - just not ones that the market can value independently of bitcoin.

So what will happen now is that bitcoin won't be bitcoin any longer as far as markets are concerned. It will be a heterogenous, unfungible cludge of every kind of chain you can think of, all welded together like siamese x-tuplets where liquidity or value in any sector is a lottery, not subject to the indigenous  supply and demand of that sector but at the mercy of the economic fortunes of every other.
 
"The market" will simply value it accordingly. "Sidechain warts" and all where every sh*tcoin has the same value as bitcoin because a bunch of programmers said so.

There's already a precedent for this - it's called the Euro, where if Germany sneezes, all the Mediterranean countries catch a cold.

Not what the doctor ordered

Corporate backing for bitcoin/Bitcoin developers. No one else sees a problem with this?

I agree, i also like your nice Videos  THX U and keep on it, to make them with Love  .

Come chat with the GoldCoin team and community on Skype this Sunday at 1:00 PM New York time. This will be an audio/chat session. Cameras welcome but not required. Click the link to join:

https://join.skype.com/j8PQ0ajJ07bH

In a recent reddit posts it was written:

"Greg Maxwell admits the main reason for the block size limit is to force a fee market. Not because of bandwidth, transmission rates, orphaning, but because otherwise transactions would be 'too cheap'."

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/42hl7g/greg_maxwell_admits_the_main_reason_for_the_block/

This suggest that block reward is not enough, or that miners are too greedy and they want to double dip, i.e., profit from block rewards and from transaction fees.

So how much transaction fees are "too cheap" for miners?

Then why don't you make one?

You just make false accusations and pretend that they are intelligent points - who do you think you are fooling?

It is pretty clear to me that you are simply being paid for this - so what I am going to do with you (like all the others) is just wear you down until you give up or your masters decide that your posts are not worth paying for.

So I was reading through Satoshi posts alongside the bitcoin whitepaper recently

Yeah yeah I know this is an old topic but hell... still an interesting discussion.

No new evidence but I did notice:

* Some UK spelling in the whitepaper (favourable) whilst Satoshi uses USA spelling on bitcointalk posts
* In some old bitcointalk posts he interchanges I with we in a very suspicious way that an individual would not do
* The technology behind bitcoin and the quality of the whitepaper & Satoshi's posts could defnitely not have been done by one person. Come on, I mean you've got Merkel Trees (a linux technology), Poisson distribution, networking, public/private encryption, TOR, a recipe in the whitepaper that implies the idea has been tried and tested in depth on a private network. The way the paper is written is EXTREMELY professional. I have read quite a few whitepapers and this is more professional than many I have read which have multiple authors (and this is supposedly just 1 individual). This is 100% not an individual writing this but a team of people.
* The thing just freakin works as soon as it is released with no problems. This is very suspect and unusual. Anyone who ever did programming knows that nothing works like that unless it has been EXTENSIVELY tested for months and months (if not years). That requires a lot of skill and resources, more than any individual has.
* The paper was released at the beginning of the year (suspicious.... implies it was professionally scheduled)

Lets also remember at this point that most of the protocols behind the internet were invented by the US government. It's a no brainer.

Basically this is a 100% US government project (I think US & UK, given the mix of spellings). It is 100% a team that worked on it and it was an idea that was worked on for years until it was released.

50 years in the future we will know when the files come out. Until then everything else in the media is a false flag. That's another reason why satoshi is so effective at keeping his silence and will never return. Because the project has now successfully concluded and been shut down. Also it is no coincidence the marshalls coins went to one of the most established and trusted American VCs.

PwC? I worked for them and i fucking HATE THEM!
biggest assholes on the planet. FUCK THEM

Yes, that's true.  Gavin is an idiot, and so is Brian Strongarm, along with any miner (of any nationality) who supports their idiotic contentious hard fork.

We already got rid of the potential benevolent dictatorship, with the departure of Mike Hearn. The immediate threat have been dealt with. If the development team turns into a <Communist> system, like the OP defined it, we will deal with that too.

The developers work for the community and to improve the technology based on the needs of the community. If they do not address those needs, other developers are free to bring their proposals and the community will decide, if the proposal is good enough to replace the current developers.

Vote guys  

I'm sorry for the ignorance, but does this mean a hard-fork is coming soon?